Abstract
Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria are microbes that promote plant growth and alleviate plant stress such as salinity, flooding, heavy metals, drought, cold, soil compaction, mechanical impedance, and nutrient deficiency. This chapter reviews mechanisms that alleviate plant stress using microorganisms. Mechanisms include the production of phytohormones such as auxin, of volatiles such as hydrogen cyanide and ammonia, of osmolytes such as proline and sugars, of exopolysaccharides, and the activation of antioxidant defence systems in plants. Under stress, the ethylene concentration increases in plants, leading to senescence and plant death. Here, plant growth promoting rhizobacteria favors the activity of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase, which indirectly reduce ethylene concentration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akbarimoghaddam H, Galavi M, Ghanbari A, Panjehkeh N (2011) Salinity effects on seed germination and seedling growth of bread wheat cultivars. Trakia J Sci 9(1):43–50
Ali S, Kim W-C (2018) Plant growth promotion under water: decrease of waterlogging-induced ACC and ethylene levels by ACC deaminase-producing bacteria. Front Microbiol 9:1096. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01096
Ali SZ, Sandhya V, Venkateswar Rao L (2014) Isolation and characterization of drought-tolerant ACC deaminase and exopolysaccharide-producing fluorescent Pseudomonas sp. Ann Microbiol 64:493–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-013-0680-3
Ali S, Khan MA, Kim WC (2018) Pseudomonas veronii KJ mitigates flood stress-associated damage in Sesamum indicum L. Appl Biol Chem 61:575–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-018-0392-2
Arora N, Tewari S, Singh R (2013) Multifaceted plant-associated microbes and their mechanisms diminish the concept of direct and indirect PGPRs. In: Arora NK (ed) Plant microbe symbiosis: fundamentals and advances. Springer, New Delhi, pp 411–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1287-4_16
Attila Tátrai Z, Sanoubar R, Pluhár Z et al (2016) Morphological and physiological plant responses to drought stress in Thymus citriodorus. Int J Agron 2016:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4165750
Bahroun A, Jousset A, Mhamdi R, Mrabet M, Mhadhbi H (2018) Anti-fungal activity of bacterial endophytes associated with legumes against Fusarium solani: assessment of fungi soil suppressiveness and plant protection induction. Appl Soil Ecol 124:131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.10.025
Barnawal D, Bharti N, Pandey SS, Pandey A, Chanotiya CS, Kalra A (2017) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance wheat salt and drought stress tolerance by altering endogenous phytohormone levels and TaCTR1/TaDREB2 expression. Physiol Plant 161(4):502–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12614. Epub 2017 Oct 10. PMID: 28786221
Bashan Y, Holguin G (1998) Proposal for the division of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria into two classifications: biocontrol-PGPB (plant growth-promoting bacteria) and PGPB. Soil Biol Biochem 30:1225–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00187-9
Beneduzi A, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LM (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genet Mol Biol 35(4 suppl):1044–1051
Bray EA, Baileyserres J, Weretilnyk E (2000) Responses to abiotic stresses. In: Gruissem W, Jones R (eds) American Society of Plant Physiologists. Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, pp 1158–1203
Caravaca F, Alguacil MM, Hernández JA, Roldán A (2005) Involvement of antioxidant enzyme and nitrate reductase activities during water stress and recovery of mycorrhizal Myrtus communis and Phillyrea angustifolia plants. Plant Sci 169:191–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.03.013
Cassán F, Maiale S, Masciarelli O et al (2009) Cadaverine production by Azospirillum brasilense and its possible role in plant growth promotion and osmotic stress mitigation. Eur J Soil Biol 45:12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.08.003
Chakraborty U, Chakraborty B, Dey P, Chakraborty A (2015) Role of microorganisms in alleviation of abiotic stresses for sustainable agriculture. In: Chakraborty U, Chakraborty B (eds) Abiotic stresses in crop plants. CAB International, pp 232–253
Chaves M, Maroco J, Pereira J (2003) Understanding plant responses to drought – from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol 30:239–264. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP02076
Cheffi M, Chenari Bouket A, Alenezi FN, Luptakova L, Belka M, Vallat A et al (2019) Olea europaea L. root endophyte Bacillus velezensis OEE1 counteracts oomycete and fungal harmful pathogens and harbours a large repertoire of secreted and volatile metabolites and beneficial functional genes. Microorganisms 7(9):314. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7090314
Chen L, Dodd I, Theobald J et al (2013) The rhizobacterium Variovorax paradoxus 5C-2, containing ACC deaminase, promotes growth and development of Arabidopsis thaliana via an ethylene-dependent pathway. J Exp Bot 64(6):1565–1573. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert031
Chibuike GU, Obiora S (2014) Heavy metal polluted soils: effect on plants and bioremediation methods. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2014:1–12
Chin-A-Woeng TFC, Bloemberg GV, Lugtenberg BJJ (2009) Phenazines and their role in biocontrol by Pseudomonas bacteria. New Phytol 157:503–523. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00686.x
Choudhary DK, Prakash A, Johri BN (2008) Induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants: mechanism of action. Indian J Microbiol 47(4):289–297
Cohen AC, Bottini R, Pontin M et al (2015) Azospirillum brasilense ameliorates the response of Arabidopsis thaliana to drought mainly via enhancement of ABA levels. Physiol Plant 153:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12221
de Souza R, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LMP (2015) Plant growth-promoting bacteria as inoculants in agricultural soils. Gen Mol Biol 38(4):401–419. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-475738420150053
Dimkpa C, Weinand T, Asch F (2009) Plant-rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions. Plant Cell Environ 32:1682–1694
Egamberdiyeva D, Gafurova L, Islam KR (2007) Salinity effects on irrigated soil chemical and biological properties in the Syr Darya basin of Uzbekistan. In: Lal R, Sulaimanov M, Stewart B, Hansen D, Doraiswamy P (eds) Climate change and terrestrial C sequestration in central Asia. Taylor-Francis, New York, pp 147–162
Fahad S, Hussain S, Bano A et al (2015) Potential role of phytohormones and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in abiotic stresses: consequences for changing environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:4907–4921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3754-2
Gamalero E, Glick BR (2015) Bacterial modulation of plant ethylene levels. Plant Physiol 169:13–22
Gamalero E, Berta G, Massa N, Glick BR, Lingua G (2010) Interactions between Pseudomonas putida UW4 and Gigaspora rosea BEG9 and their consequences for the growth of cucumber under salt-stress conditions. J Appl Microbiol 108(1):236–245
Ghavami N, Alikhani H, Pourbabaee A, Besharati H (2017) Effects of two new siderophore producing rhizobacteria on growth and iron content of maize and canola plants. J Plant Nutr 40:736–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2016.1262409
Glick BR (1995) The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria. Can J Microbiol 41:109–117. https://doi.org/10.1139/m95-015
Glick BR (2014) Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiol Res 169:30–39
Glick BR, Cheng Z, Czarny J, Duan J (2007) Promotion of plant growth by ACC deaminase-producing soil bacteria. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:329–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-007-9162-4
Gonnelli C, Galardi F, Gabbrielli R (2002) Nickel and Copper tolerance and toxicity in three Tuscan populations of Silene paradoxa. Physiol Plantarum 113:507–514. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1130409.x
Gontia I, Sasidharan S, Tiwari S (2014) Recent developments in use of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase for conferring tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress. Biotechnol Lett 36:889–898
Good AG, Beatty PH (2011) Fertilizing nature: a tragedy of excess in the commons. PLoS Biol 9:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001124
Gray EJ, Smith D (2005) Intracellular and extracellular PGPR: commonalities and distinctions in the plant-bacterium signalling processes. Soil Biol Biochem 37:395–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.08.030
Grichko VP, Glick B (2001) Amelioration of flooding stress by ACC deaminase-containing plant growth-promoting bacteria. Plant Physiol Biochem 39:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0981-9428(00)01212-2
Guo Q, Li Y, Lou Y, Shi M, Jiang Y, Zhou J et al (2019) Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Ba13 induces plant systemic resistance and improves rhizosphere microecology against tomato yellow leaf curl virus disease. Appl Soil Ecol 137:154–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.01.015
Gupta A, Gopal M (2008) Siderophore production by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Indian J Agric Res 42:153–156
Gupta G, Parihar SS, Ahirwar NK, Snehi SK, Singh V (2015) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): current and future prospects for development of sustainable agriculture. J Microb Biochem Technol 7:096–102. https://doi.org/10.4172/1948-5948.1000188
Hartmann A, Rothballer M, Schmid M (2008) Lorenz Hiltner, a pioneer in rhizosphere microbial ecology and soil bacteriology research. Plant Soil 312:7–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9514-z
Hatfield JL, Prueger JH (2015) Temperature extremes: effect on plant growth and development. Weather Clim Extrem 10:4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001
Heidari M, Golpayegani A (2012) Effects of water stress and inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on antioxidant status and photosynthetic pigments in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 11:57–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2011.09.001
Helliwell JR, Sturrock CJ, Mairhofer S et al (2017) The emergent rhizosphere: imaging the development of the porous architecture at the root-soil interface. Sci Rep 7:14875. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14904-w
Iakimova E, Woltering E, Kapchina-Toteva V et al (2008) Cadmium toxicity in cultured tomato cells – role of ethylene, proteases and oxidative stress in cell death signaling. Cell Biol Int 32:1521–1529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellbi.2008.08.021
Jain S, Vaishnav A, Kasotia A, Kumari S, Choudhary DK (2014) Plant growth-promoting bacteria elicited induced systemic resistance and tolerance in plants. In: Ahmad P, Rasool S (eds) Emerging technologies and management of crop stress tolerance. Academic, San Diego, pp 109–132
Kamei A, Dolai AK, Kamei A (2014) Role of hydrogen cyanide secondary metabolite of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biopesticides of weeds. Global J Sci Front Res 14(6):109–112
Kang S-M, Radhakrishnan R, Khan AL et al (2014) Gibberellin secreting rhizobacterium, Pseudomonas putida H-2-3 modulates the hormonal and stress physiology of soybean to improve the plant growth under saline and drought conditions. Plant Physiol Biochem 84:115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.09.001
Kloepper JW, Schroth MN (1978) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on radishes. In: Station de Pathologie Vegetal et Phytobacteriologie (ed) Proceedings of the 4th international conference on plant pathogenic bacteria, vol 2. Angers, France, pp 879–882
Kumari B, Mallick M, Hora A (2016) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): their potential for development of sustainable agriculture. In: Trivedi PC (ed) Bio-exploitation for sustainable agriculture. Avinskar Publishing House, Jaipur, pp 1–19
Labuschagne N, Pretorius T, Hassen A (2010) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biocontrol agents against soil-borne plant diseases. In: Maheshwari D (ed) Plant growth and health promoting bacteria. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13612-2_918
Lawlor D (2011) Abiotic stress adaptation in plants. Physiological, molecular and genomic foundation. Ann Bot 107:7–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr053
Liu X-M, Zhang H (2015) The effects of bacterial volatile emissions on plant abiotic stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci 6:774. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00774
Lobell DB, Gourdji SM (2012) The influence of climate change on global crop productivity. Plant Physiol 160:1686–1697. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.208298
Luan H, Shen H, Pan Y et al (2018) Elucidating the hypoxic stress response in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) during waterlogging: a proteomics approach. Sci Rep 8:9655. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27726-1
Lugtenberg B, Kamilova F (2009) Plant-growth-promoting Rhizobacteria. Ann Rev Microbiol 63:541–556. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918
Misra S, Dixit VK, Mishra SK et al (2019) Demonstrating the potential of abiotic stress-tolerant Jeotgalicoccus huakuii NBRI 13E for plant growth promotion and salt stress amelioration. Ann Microbiol 69:419–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-018-1428-x
Mondal HK, Mehta S, Kaur H, Gera R (2017) Characterization of abiotic stress tolerant rhizobia as PGPR of Mothbean, Clusterbean and Mungbean grown in hyper-arid zone of Rajasthan. Int J Bio-resource Stress Manag 8(2):309–315. https://doi.org/10.23910/IJBSM/2017.8.2.1793
Nadeem SM, Ahmad M, Zahir ZA et al (2014) The role of mycorrhizae and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in improving crop productivity under stressful environments. Biotechnol Adv 32:429–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.12.005
Nascimento F, BrÃgido C, Glick BJ, Rossi M (2016) The role of rhizobial ACC deaminase in the nodulation process of leguminous plants. Int J Agron 2016:9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1369472
Negrão S, Schmöckel SM, Tester M (2017) Evaluating physiological responses of plants to salinity stress. Ann Bot 119(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw191
Ojuederie OB, Babalola OO (2017) Microbial and plant-assisted bioremediation of heavy metal polluted environments: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14(12):1504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121504
Ondrasek G, Rengel Z, Romic D, Poljak M, Romic M (2009) Accumulation of non/essential elements in radish plants grown in salt-affected and cadmium contaminated environment. Cereal Res Comm 37:9–12
Pandey P, Irulappan V, Bagavathiannan MV, Senthil-Kumar M (2017) Impact of combined abiotic and biotic stresses on plant growth and avenues for crop improvement by exploiting physio-morphological traits. Front Plant Sci 8:537. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00537
Parida AK, Das AB (2005) Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 60:324–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.06.010
Parmar P, Kumari N, Sharma V (2013) Structural and functional alterations in photosynthetic apparatus of plants under cadmium stress. Bot Stud 54:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1999-3110-54-45
Paul D, Lade H (2014) Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria to improve crop growth in saline soils: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 34:737–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0233-6
Paul MJ, Primavesi LF, Jhurreea D, Zhang Y (2008) Trehalose metabolism and signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:417–441. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092945
Raghuwanshi R, Prasad JK (2018) Perspectives of rhizobacteria with ACC deaminase activity in plant growth under abiotic stress. In: Giri B, Prasad R, Varma A (eds) Root biology. Springer, Cham, pp 303–321
Rahman K, Zhang D (2018) Effects of fertilizer broadcasting on the excessive use of inorganic fertilizers and environmental sustainability. Sustainability 10:759. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030759
Rahneshan Z, Nasibi F, Moghadam AA (2018) Effects of salinity stress on some growth, physiological, biochemical parameters and nutrients in two pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) rootstocks. J Plant Interact 13:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2018.1424355
Rajkumar M, Freitas H (2008) Effects of inoculation of plant-growth promoting bacteria on Ni uptake by Indian mustard. Bioresour Technol 99:3491–3498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.046
Ramamoorthy V, Viswanathan R, Raguchander T, Prakasama V, Samiyappan R (2001) Induction of systemic resistance by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in crop plants against pests and diseases. Crop Prot 20:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00056-9
Rasool S, Rehman MU, MahgoubAzooz M et al (2013) Arsenic toxicity and tolerance mechanisms in plants: an overview. In: Hakeem KR, Ahmad P, Ozturk M (eds) Crop improvement: new approaches and modern techniques. Springer, Boston, pp 363–378
RodrÃguez-Serrano M, Romero-Puertas MC, Pazmiño DM et al (2009) Cellular response of pea plants to Cadmium toxicity: cross talk between reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide, and calcium. Plant Physiol 150:229 LP-243. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.131524
Rout GR, Das P (2009) Effect of metal toxicity on plant growth and metabolism: I. Zinc. In: Lichtfouse E, Navarrete M, Debaeke P et al (eds) Sustainable agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 873–884
Saharan B, Nehra V (2011) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: a critical review. Life Sci Med Res 21:1–30
Salazar-Parra C, Hernández C, Pino M-T (2015) Plant water stress: associations between ethylene and abscisic acid response. Chil J Agric Res 75:71–79. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392015000300008
Saleem AR, Brunetti C, Khalid A et al (2018) Drought response of Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC. inoculated with ACC deaminase and IAA producing rhizobacteria. PLoS One 13:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191218
Sandhya V, Skz A, Grover M et al (2010) Effect of plant growth promoting Pseudomonas spp. on compatible solutes, antioxidant status and plant growth of maize under drought stress. Plant Growth Regul 62:21–30
Sasidharan R, Hartman S, Liu Z et al (2018) Signal dynamics and interactions during flooding stress. Plant Physiol 176:1106–1117. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01232
Seregin I, Kozhevnikova A (2006) Physiological role of nickel and its toxic effects on higher plants. Russ J Plant Physiol 53:257–277. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443706020178
Sethy SK, Ghosh S (2013) Effect of heavy metals on germination of seeds. J Nat Sci Biol Med 4(2):272–275
Sharma A, Johri BN (2003) Growth promoting influence of siderophore-producing Pseudomonas strains GRP3A and PRS9 in maize (Zea mays L.) under iron limiting conditions. Microbiol Res 158:243–248. https://doi.org/10.1078/0944-5013-00197
Sharma P, Khanna V, Kumari P (2013) Efficacy of aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid ameliorating water stress in chickpea under axenic conditions. Afr J Microbiol Res 7:5749–5757
Sheoran IS, Singal HR, Singh R (1990) Effect of cadmium and nickel on photosynthesis and the enzymes of the photosynthetic carbon reduction cycle in pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan). Photosynth Res 23:345–351
Shrivastava P, Kumar R (2015) Soil salinity: a serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J Biol Sci 22:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.12.001
Singh SP, Gaur R (2017) Endophytic Streptomyces spp. underscore induction of defense regulatory genes and confers resistance against Sclerotium rolfsii in chickpea. Biol Control 104:44–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.10.011
Singh RP, Jha PN (2017) The PGPR Stenotrophomonas maltophilia SBP-9 augments resistance against biotic and abiotic stress in wheat plants. Front Microbiol 8:Article 1945. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01945
Tariq M, Noman M, Ahmed T et al (2017) Antagonistic features displayed by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a review. J Plant Sci Phytopathol 1:38–43. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001004
Timmusk S, Behers L, Muthoni J et al (2017) Perspectives and challenges of microbial application for crop improvement. Front Plant Sci 8:49. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00049
Upreti KK, Sharma M (2016) Role of plant growth regulators in abiotic stress tolerance. In: NKS R, Shivashankara KS, Laxman RH (eds) Abiotic stress physiology of horticultural crops. Springer, New Delhi, pp 19–46
Vassilev A, Lidon F, Scotti P et al (2004) Cadmium-induced changes in chloroplast lipids and photosystem activities in barley plants. Biol Plant 48:153–156. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOP.0000024295.27419.89
Verma P, Yadav AN, Shukla L, Saxena AK, Suman A (2015) Alleviation of cold stress in wheat seedlings by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens IARI-HHS2-30, an endophytic psychrotolerant K-solubilizing bacterium from NW Indian Himalayas. Natl J Life Sci 12(2):105–110
Verma V, Ravindran P, Kumar PP (2016) Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses. BMC Plant Biol 16:86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0771-y
Vurukonda SSKP, Vardharajula S, Shrivastava M, SkZ A (2016) Enhancement of drought stress tolerance in crops by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol Res 184:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2015.12.003
Wilhite DA (2000) Drought as a natural hazard. In: Wilhite DA (ed) Drought: a global assessment. Routledge, London, pp 3–18
Zhang X, Long Y, Huang J, ** with Al toxicity in plants. Int J Mol Sci 20:1551. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20071551
Acknowledgements
The authors thank DST-SERB for providing financial support with research grant ECR/2017/000080 to carry out the work described in this review. The authors are also thankful to the Amity University Uttar Pradesh for providing infrastructural support. There is no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gupta, S., Pandey, S. (2023). Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria to Mitigate Biotic and Abiotic Stress in Plants. In: Singh, N., Chattopadhyay, A., Lichtfouse, E. (eds) Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 60. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 60. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24181-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24181-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24180-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24181-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)