![Loading...](https://link.springer.com/static/c4a417b97a76cc2980e3c25e2271af3129e08bbe/images/pdf-preview/spacer.gif)
-
Article
Open AccessA Comparison of Health Professionals’ and Patients’ Views of the Importance of Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery
A comprehensive evaluation of bariatric surgery is required to inform decision-making. This will include measures of benefit and risk. It is possible that stakeholders involved with surgery value these outcome...
-
Article
Open AccessCore outcomes for randomized trials and core information for clinical decision-making: implications for outcome selection
-
Article
Open AccessIdentification of items for a standardised resource-use measure: review of current instruments
-
Article
Open AccessWhat is the effect of patient-reported outcome (PRO) item order on prioritisation of PROs in the development of a core outcome set?
-
Article
Open AccessThe importance of stakeholder selection in core outcome set development: how surveying different health professionals may influence outcome selection
-
Article
Open AccessThree nested RCTs of dual or single stakeholder feedback within Delphi surveys during core outcome and information set development
-
Article
Open AccessChoosing outcomes for a core outcome set: does provision of feedback between delphi survey rounds help prioritise items?
-
Article
Open AccessCore outcome set development: the effect of Delphi panel composition and feedback on prioritisation of outcomes
-
Article
Open AccessThe effect of local anaesthetic wound infiltration on chronic pain after lower limb joint replacement: A protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial
For the majority of patients with osteoarthritis (OA), joint replacement is a successful intervention for relieving chronic joint pain. However, between 10-30% of patients continue to experience chronic pain a...