Bone defect, a multifaceted pathology prevalent in medical science, can emanate from a multitude of sources such as trauma, inflammation of bone tissue, tumor excision, or congenital malformations [1, 2]. This condition profoundly affects patients’ quality of life, necessitating comprehensive treatment approaches. Presently, bone grafting, which can be either autogenous or allogeneic (originating from a different individual), stands as the conventional method for addressing bone anomalies [3]. However, both techniques present unique challenges. Allograft transplantation may encounter rejection and obstacles in revascularization, while autogenous bone transplantation may give rise to pain at the donor site and complexities in achieving congruence with the recipient bone structure [4].

Calcium phosphate (CP), as the primary inorganic constituent, along with collagen and water as the principal organic components, constitutes the structural matrix of bone tissue [5]. CP and collagen scaffolds, being the two most prominent components, have been shown exceptional biocompatibility, osteoconductivity, and osteoinductivity for bone critical-size defect repair [6, 7]. Critical-size defect (CSD) is the smallest in diameter bone defect that does not heal spontaneously [8]. The research conducted by Kim et al. substantiates that hydroxyapatite demonstrates notable osteocompatibility, effectively facilitating new bone ingrowth [9]. Furthermore, the application of medical-grade polycaprolactone/tricalcium phosphate (mPCL-TCP) combined with collagen scaffold and rhBMP-2 has been observed to enhance bone quality significantly in the treatment of critical bone defects [10]. Additionally, the study by Chatzipetros E et al. reveals that the incorporation of nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan scaffolds plays a pivotal role in new bone formation in rat calvarial CSD, as evidenced by histomorphometric analysis and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements [8, 11].

Nevertheless, when bone defects reach critical-size, patients may be confronted with extended recovery durations, subsequently amplifying the risk of treatment-associated complications such as infection and bone malformation [12, 13]. Future inquiries must concentrate on expediting bone regeneration, curtailing the temporal scope of treatment, and obviating the emergence of complications.

Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) offers an expansive repository of therapeutic modalities, amenable to enhancement through integration with contemporary medical doctrines [14]. Such fusion may foster the inception of novel solutions and strategies for recalcitrant clinical conundrums. Additionally, this amalgamation aids in deciphering the underlying mechanisms by which TCM manifests its therapeutic impact, thereby consolidating a scientific framework for its clinical translation [15,5c). Collagen fiber content and neonatal bone tissue decreased, and mature bone tissue increased as time progressed. Consequently, the Masson staining underscored the propitious role of TFRD in augmenting early bone regeneration, and concurrently highlighted that the TFRD + Scaffold conglomerate boasted more advanced bone tissues within the bone defect location.

Immunohistochemical evaluation

The immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis probed the expression of OCN and BMP-2 antibodies at the cranial defect perimeters. OCN-expressing osteoblasts and BMP-2, which is discernible in pluripotent mesenchymal cells, osteoblasts, bone matrices, and associated tissues, both were marked by a brown or yellowish-brown cytoplasmic coloration (Fig. 6A and B). Our results clearly showed that both OCN and BMP-2 have high expression in the TFRD treated groups compared to the control group at the two-week juncture. Furthermore, The TFRD + Scaffold group demonstrated significant elevations in BMP-2 and OCN levels in comparison with the Scaffold alone group from two weeks to eight weeks (Fig. 6C and D). These observations lend credence to the proposition that TFRD catalyzes the release of osteogenesis-associated proteins, partially through the potentiation of the BMP-smad signaling conduit in osteoblasts, thereby fortifying osteogenesis. This further insinuates potential osteogenic synergism attributable to TFRD.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Representative images of IHC staining A IHC staining of OCN at the cranial defect perimeters. B IHC staining of BMP-2 at the cranial defect perimeters. Images were captured at 10× microscopy, with a scale bar shown at 100 μm. C Bar charts show OCN positive area (%) calculated by densitometry of IHC images. D Bar charts show BMP-2 positive area (%) calculated by densitometry of IHC images. TFRD versus control group and TFRD + Scaffold versus Scaffold, (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001)