Introduction

Wheat provides daily sustenance for a large portion of world’s population. It is produced in a wide range of climates and different regions with frequent and various stresses. Drought is one of the major abiotic stresses and the primary cause of yield reduction in crops. It has been estimated to cause an average yield loss of more than 50% for major crops1,2. Therefore, establishing an adaptive crop production system in drought soils has been widely focused on.

Hormone regulators was largely explored to breed adaptive varieties, which could enhance the tolerance of crops faced with the soil drought. Previous studies showed that ABA is a plant stress hormone which accumulated under drought stress3 and mediated many responses of other abiotic stress4. ABA pre-treatment further increased the endogenous ABA level in maize seedling by gas chromatography5. Moreover, after pre-soaking seeds with ABA, the activities of antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxidedismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and glutathione reductase (GR) were significantly enhanced in maize seedlings6. Similarly, it was found that the relative water content (RWC) of plants treated with ABA was higher than that of control plants under drought stress. In addition, application of exogenous ABA under water stress accelerated the accumulation of osmolytes, and improved the water status of grains which resulted in higher grain weight in susceptible wheat cultivars7. Current research findings indicate that plant hormones regulate many aspects of plant growth, development and the responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. These hormones do not act alone, but interrelated by synergistic or antagonistic cross-talk, so that they can modulate each other’s biosynthesis or responses8.

However, the notable shortcomings of ABA are mainly rapidly metabolism and light-induced isomerization9, render ABA inactive both in vivo and in vitro. Thus, structural modification of natural ABA is an inevitable choice. Pyrabactin specifically binded to PYR/PYL family proteins, and then inhibited seed germination by reducing the activity of type 2C phosphatases10. This compound shares the same receptor with ABA, indicating that it is an structural and functional analogue of ABA, but it has been reported in the literature that Pyrabactin did not induce plant stress-resistance10,11. Therefore, the transformation of the skeletal structure of Pyrabactin and the design and synthesis of plant growth regulators with ABA-like functions are of great significance in solving the problems of expensive and easily deactivated ABA. Coronatine, produced by Pseudomonas coronafacience var. atropurpúrea, is a toxin which induces chlorosis on the leaves of Italian ryegrass12. It can increase defense-related protease inhibitors and secondary metabolites, such as volatiles, nicotine, and alkaloid. Also, it plays an important role in resistance to abiotic stress, such as salinity stress13,

Figure 6
figure 6

Effect of B2 on the chlorophyll fluorescence in leaves of winter wheat seedlings. (a) ND212. (b) LX99. Values are mean ± SD of three replicates and asterisks denote Student’s test significance compared with the wild type (Tukey, *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01).

ABA and B2 pretreatment had no significant effect on photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular CO2 concentration, and transpiration rate of wheat seedlings under normal conditions (Table 1). While under drought stress conditions, these indicators decreased significantly. However, contrary to the inhibitory effect of ABA on photosynthetic, the downward trend of photosynthetic indicators could be effectively alleviated by B2. The photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular CO2 concentration and transpiration rate of ND212 increased by 13.5%, 15.9%, 23.4%, and 32.6% respectively. Similarly, this indicators of LX99 increased by 15.4%, 23.7%, 21.6%, and 28.4% respectively.

Table 1 Effect of B2 on photosynthesis rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and stomatal conductance (Sc) in winter wheat leaves.

B2 treatment improved the expression level of TaSnRK2.4, TaERF3, TaSRHP, and TaMYB3R1 which response to drought and ABA

After ABA or 0.01 μmol·L−1 B2 pretreatment, the expression level of these four genes was significantly increased under drought stress. However, the time for each gene up to the highest expression level is different. The expression level of TaSnRK2.4 (Fig. 7a,b) and TaERF3 (Fig. 7c,d) under drought stress showed an increasing trend first and then decreasing with time. Compared with control, ABA and B2 increased the expression level of TaSnRK2.4 and TaERF3 in wheat leaves under drought stress. Specifically, B2 increased the expression level of TaSnRK2.4 in ND212 (Fig. 7a) and LX99 (Fig. 7b) by 126% and 73.6% respectively at 6 hours. Similarly, B2 increased the expression level of TaERF3 in ND212 (Fig. 7c) and LX99 (Fig. 7d) by 143.2% and 155.2% respectively at the same time. In contrast, the expression level of TaSRHP showed opposite trend of those genes. B2 increased the expression of TaSRHP in ND212 (Fig. 7e) and LX99 (Fig. 7f) by 91.8% and 72.8% at 48 h. B2 improved the expression level of TaMYB3R1, and it reached the highest value in ND212 (Fig. 7g) at 24 hours, which was 100.8% higher than that of control. For water-sensitive wheat variety LX99 (Fig. 7h), B2 increased the expression of TaMYB3R1 by 78.8% at the 12 h.

Figure 7
figure 7

Expression patterns and relative expression level of TaSnRK2.4, TaERF3, TaSRHP and TaMYB3R1 in wheat seedlings at 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h under drought stress conditions.