Log in

Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing (ATLAS) is feasible and addresses the transferability gap

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Global Surgical Education - Journal of the Association for Surgical Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the feasibility and transferability of skills acquired using the Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing (ATLAS) curriculum for novice trainees.

Methods

First-year medical students (n = 20) pre-tested on Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS), ATLAS, and a Porcine Laparoscopic Nissen (PLN) model and were subsequently randomized into training and control groups. The training group trained to proficiency on FLS followed by post-test 1 (FLS/ATLAS/PLN), followed by proficiency-based ATLAS training and post-test 2 (FLS/ATLAS/PLN). The control group received no training and post-tested concurrently. Data are reported as median [interquartile range].

Results

There were nine dropouts; data were analyzed for training (n = 6) and control (n = 5) participants who completed the study. There were no significant differences between groups at baseline for overall pre-test and each subcomponent (p > 0.05). FLS training took 9.6 [7.6–11.6] hours, and ATLAS training 15.9 [13.9–25.8] hours. FLS training resulted in significant performance improvements in the overall and FLS scores versus controls. After ATLAS training, there was significant improvement in performance for the overall, FLS, ATLAS, and PLN scores versus controls. Workload was significantly higher for ATLAS compared to FLS training; however, ratings for curriculum appropriateness were similar.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that proficiency-based ATLAS training was feasible with all training group participants achieving proficiency after a reasonable amount of time. Importantly, ATLAS training was associated with significant performance improvement following FLS training as measured by a live porcine model. These findings support further investigations and more widespread ATLAS adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Mattar SG, Alseidi AA, Jones DB, Jeyarajah DR, Swanstrom LL, Aye RW, Wexner SD, Martinez JM, Ross SB, Awad MM, Franklin ME, Arregui ME, Schirmer BD, Minter RM. General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann Surg. 2013;258(3):440–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a191ca.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Crochet P, Agostini A, Knight S, Resseguier N, Berdah S, Aggarwal R. The performance gap for residents in transfer of intracorporeal suturing skills from box trainer to operating room. J Surg Educ. 2017;74(6):1019–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.05.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Stefanidis D, Touchard CL, Scott DJ. Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the operating room. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201(1):23–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stefanidis D, Scerbo MW, Korndorffer JR Jr, Scott DJ. Redefining simulator proficiency using automaticity theory. Am J Surg. 2007;193(4):502–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.11.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Martin JR, Anton N, Timsina L, Whiteside J, Myers E, Stefanidis D. Performance variability during training on simulators is associated with skill transfer. Surgery. 2019;165(6):1065–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2019.01.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR Jr, Markley S, Sierra R, Heniford BT, Scott DJ. Closing the gap in operative performance between novices and experts: does harder mean better for laparoscopic simulator training? J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(2):307–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.080.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nepomnayshy D, Alseidi AA, Fitzgibbons SC, Stefanidis D. Identifying the need for and content of an advanced laparoscopic skills curriculum: results of a national survey. Am J Surg. 2016;211(2):421–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.10.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Enani G, Watanabe Y, McKendy KM, Bilgic E, Feldman LS, Fried GM, Vassiliou MC. What are the training gaps for acquiring laparoscopic suturing skills? J Surg Educ. 2017;74(4):656–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.12.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagaraj MB, Nepomnayshy D, Stefanidis D, Alseidi A, Gee D, Ghaderi I, Shim JK, Scott DJ. Advanced Techniques in Laparoscopic Suturing (ATLAS): Optimization for National Curriculum Launch. American College of Surgeons- Accredited Education Institutes, March 2022, Virtual ePoster.

  10. Watanabe Y, McKendy KM, Bilgic E, Enani G, Madani A, Munshi A, Feldman LS, Fried GM, Vassiliou MC. New models for advanced laparoscopic suturing: taking it to the next level. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(2):581–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4242-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nepomnayshy D, Whitledge J, Birkett R, Delmonico T, Ruthazer R, Sillin L, Seymour NE. Evaluation of advanced laparoscopic skills tasks for validity evidence. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(2):349–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3674-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bilgic E, Watanabe Y, Nepomnayshy D, Gardner A, Fitzgibbons S, Ghaderi I, Alseidi A, Stefanidis D, Paige J, Seymour N, McKendy KM, Birkett R, Whitledge J, Kane E, Anton NE, Vassiliou MC. Simulation committee of the association for surgical education. Multicenter proficiency benchmarks for advanced laparoscopic suturing tasks. Am J Surg. 2017;213(2):217–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.07.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McKendy KM, Watanabe Y, Bilgic E, Enani G, Munshi A, Lee L, Feldman LS, Fried GM, Vassiliou MC. Establishing meaningful benchmarks: the development of a formative feedback tool for advanced laparoscopic suturing. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(12):5057–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5569-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nepomnayshy D, Whitledge J, Fitzgibbons S, Nijjar B, Gardner A, Alseidi A, Birkett R, Deal S, Duvra RR, Anton N, Stefanidis D. Advanced laparoscopic skills: understanding the relationship between simulation-based practice and clinical performance. Am J Surg. 2019;218(3):527–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.01.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gabrysz-Forget F, Bonds M, Lovett M, Alseidi A, Ghaderi I, Nepomnayshy D. Practicing on the advanced training in laparoscopic suturing curriculum (ATLAS): is mastery learning in residency feasible to achieve expert-level performance in laparoscopic suturing? J Surg Educ. 2020;77(5):1138–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.02.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Athanasiadis DI, Anton NE, Karim A, Colgate CL, Stefanidis D. Does the advanced training in laparoscopic suturing enhance laparoscopic suturing skill beyond fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery? Surgery. 2021;170(4):1125–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.06.041.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dreyfus SE. The five-stage model of adult skill acquisition. Bull Sci Technol Soc. 2016;24(3):177–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467604264992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ritter EM, Scott DJ. Design of a proficiency-based skills training curriculum for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov. 2007;14(2):107–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350607302329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Scott DJ, Ritter EM, Tesfay ST, Pimentel EA, Nagji A, Fried GM. Certification pass rate of 100% for fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skills after proficiency-based training. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(8):1887–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9745-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scott DJ. Proficiency-based training for surgical skills. Semin Colon Rectal Surg. 2008;19(2):72–80. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.scrs.2008.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004;79(10 Suppl):S70-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sandra HG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv Psychol. 1988;52:139–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR Jr, Sierra R, Touchard C, Dunne JB, Scott DJ. Skill retention following proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training. Surgery. 2005;138(2):165–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR Jr, Black FW, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Touchard CL, Rice DA, Markert RJ, Kastl PR, Scott DJ. Psychomotor testing predicts rate of skill acquisition for proficiency-based laparoscopic skills training. Surgery. 2006;140(2):252–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2006.04.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nagaraj MB, AbdelFattah KR, Scott DJ, Farr DE. Creating a proficiency-based remote laparoscopic skills curriculum for the COVID-19 era. J Surg Educ. 2022;79(1):229–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.06.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge support provided by the UT Southwestern Simulation Center. We would also like to thank the medical students who volunteered their time to participate in this study.

Funding

No funding received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madhuri B. Nagaraj.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no financial conflicts of interest to disclose.

Appendices

Appendix A

See (Table 4)

Table 4 ATLAS curriculum errors and value

Appendix B

See (Table 5)

Table 5 Trained arm testing results for individual subjects

Appendix C

See (Table 6)

Table 6 Control arm testing results for individual subjects

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagaraj, M.B., Langston, K. & Scott, D.J. Advanced Training in Laparoscopic Suturing (ATLAS) is feasible and addresses the transferability gap. Global Surg Educ 2, 15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44186-022-00072-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44186-022-00072-7

Keywords

Navigation