Log in

Certification pass rate of 100% for fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skills after proficiency-based training

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) program has been extensively validated for use as a high-stakes examination for certification purposes, but optimal methods for its use in skills training have not been described. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of implementing a proficiency-based FLS skills training curriculum and to evaluate its effectiveness in preparing trainees for certification.

Methods

For this study, 21 novice medical students at two institutions viewed video tutorials, then performed one repetition of the five FLS tasks as a pretest. The pretests were scored using standard testing metrics. The trainees next practiced the tasks over a 2-month period until they achieved proficiency for all the tasks. A modified on-the-fly scoring system based on expert-derived performance was used. The trainees were posttested using the high-stakes examination format.

Results

No trainee passed the certification examination at pretesting. The trainees achieved proficiency for 96% of the five tasks during training, which required 9.7 ± 2.4 h (range, 6–14 h) and 119 ± 31 repetitions (range, 66–161 repetitions). The trainees rated the proficiency levels as “moderately difficult” (3.0 ± 0.7 on a 5-point scale) and “highly appropriate” (4.7 ± 0.1 on a 5-point scale). At posttesting, 100% of the trainees passed the certification examination and demonstrated significant improvement compared with pretesting for normalized score (468 ± 24 vs 126 ± 75; p < 0.001), self-rated laparoscopic comfort (89.4% vs 4.8%; p < 0.001), and skill level (3.6 ± 0.9 vs 1.2 ± 0.5; p < 0.001, 5-point scale).

Conclusions

This proficiency-based curriculum is feasible for training novices and uniformly allows sufficient skill acquisition for FLS certification. Endorsed by the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), this curriculum is available for use as an optimal method for FLS skills training. More widespread adoption of this curriculum is encouraged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program (2007) Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Accessed on April 16, 2007 at http://www.flsprogram.org

  2. Peters JH, Fried GM, Swanstrom LL, Soper NJ, Sillin LF, Schirmer B, Hoffman K, SAGES FLS Committee (2004) Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surgery 135:21–27

  3. Derossis AM, Bothwell J, Sigman HH, Fried GM (1998) The effect of practice on performance in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 12:1117–1120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fried GM, Derossis AM, Bothwell J, Sigman HH (1999) Comparison of laparoscopic performance in vivo with performance measured in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc 13:1077–1081

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Feldman LS, Sherman V, Fried GM (2004) Using simulators to assess laparoscopic competence: ready for widespread use? Surgery 135:28–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Feldman LS, Hagarty SE, Ghitulescu G, Stanbridge D, Fried GM (2004) Relationship between objective assessment of technical skills and subjective in-training evaluations in surgical residents. J Am Coll Surg 198:105–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC et al (2004) Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 240:518–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vassiliou M, Ghitulescu G, Feldman L et al (2006) The MISTELS program to measure technical skill in laparoscopic surgery: evidence for reliability. Surg Endosc 20:744–747

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fraser SA, Klassen DR, Feldman LS, Ghitulescu GA, Stanbridge D, Fried GM (2003) Evaluating laparoscopic skills: setting the pass/fail score for the MISTELS system. Surg Endosc 17:964–967

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Scott DJ (2006) Patient safety, competency, and the future of surgical simulation. Simul Healthcare 1:164–170

    Google Scholar 

  11. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA et al (2002) Virtual reality training improves OR performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg 236:458–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Brunner WC, Korndorffer JR, Sierra R, Dunne JB, Yau CL, Corsetti RL, Slakey DP, Townsend MC, Scott DJ (2005) Determining standards for laparoscopic competency using virtual reality. Am Surg 71:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  13. Korndorffer JK, Scott DJ, Sierra R, Brunner WC, Dunne JB, Slakey DP, Townsend MC, Hewitt RL (2005) Develo** and testing competency levels for laparoscopic skills training. Arch Surg 140:80–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Korndorffer JK, Hayes DJ, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Touchard TL, Markert RJ, Scott DJ (2005) Development and transferability of a cost-effective laparoscopic camera navigation simulator. Surg Endosc 19:161–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Sierra R, Stefanidis D, Touchard CL, Scott DJ (2005) Simulator training for laparoscopic suturing using performance goals translates to the OR. J Am Coll Surg 201:23–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stefanidis D, Korndorffer JR Jr, Sierra R, Touchard C, Dunne JB, Scott DJ (2005) Skill retention following proficiency-based laparoscopic simulator training. Surgery 138:165–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, Higgins G, Fried MP, Moses G, Smith CD, Satava RM (2005) Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg 241:364–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stefanidis D, Sierra R, Markley S, Korndorffer JR Jr, Scott DJ (2006) Proficiency maintenance: impact of ongoing simulator training on laparoscopic skill retention. J Am Coll Surg 202:599–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Moorthy K et al (2006) A competency-based virtual reality training curriculum for the acquisition of laparoscopic psychomotor skill. Am J Surg 191:128–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stefanidis D, Sierra R, Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Markley S, Touchard C, Scott DJ (2006) Intensive CME course training on simulators results in proficiency for laparoscopic suturing. Am J Surg 191:23–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Scott DJ, Goova MT, Tesfay ST (2007) A cost-effective proficiency-based knot-tying and suturing curriculum for residency programs. J Surg Res 141:7–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ritter EM, Scott DS (2007) Design of a proficiency-based skills training curriculum for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 14:107–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ericsson KA (2004) Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 79:S70–S81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moulton CA, Dubrowski A, MacRae H, Graham B, Grober E, Reznick R (2006) Teaching surgical skills: what kind of practice makes perfect? A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Surg 244:400–409

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Arthur W Jr, Bennet WJ, Stanush PL (1998) Factors that influence skill decay and retention: a quantitative review and analysis. Hum Perform 11:57–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. DaRosa DA, Bell RH, Dunnington GL (2003) Residency program models, implications, and evaluation: results of a think tank consortium on resident work hours. Surgery 133:13–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Callery MP (2003) Expansion beyond compression. Surg Endosc 17:677–678

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Valentine RJ, Rege RV (2004) Integrating technical competency into the surgical curriculum: doing more with less. Surg Clin North Am 84:1647–1667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dunnington G (2006) Sim City: The APDS/ACS Surgical Skills Curriculum Committee. http://www.apds.org/Tucson%202006%20APDS%20PP.htm

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the donated materials provided by the US Surgical Corporation, the guidance of the SAGES FLS Committee, and the invaluable assistance of Ms. Lisa Jukelevics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel J. Scott.

Additional information

Presented at the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, 21 April 2007.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scott, D.J., Ritter, E.M., Tesfay, S.T. et al. Certification pass rate of 100% for fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skills after proficiency-based training. Surg Endosc 22, 1887–1893 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9745-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9745-y

Keywords

Navigation