The environment of deep in-situ occurrence is complex, and secondary dynamic disasters occur frequently. Exploring the dynamic constitutive models of coal at different depths is the foundation for deep resource development, which can help promote the safe and efficient mining of coal resources at different depths and reveal the mechanism of sudden dynamic disasters. Dynamic mechanical testing of coal at different depths of the **dingshan mine (China) was carried out using a split Hopkinson pressure bar system with confining pressure. On the basis of statistical damage theory, dynamic constitutive models of coal at different depths were explored, and the theoretical models were compared and verified using the experimental results. An expression relating to the infinitesimal element strength of coal and loading rate was derived, and the parameters σ1dp, Ed, and ε1dp were determined. Inversion verification of the model showed that the experimental results agree well with the theoretical results prior to the peak stress. These research results are expected to be applied to the exploitation of deep resources, laying a foundation for the law of deep earth science and the construction of deep engineering.
Article Highlights
An expression for coal infinitesimal element strength that considers the rate effect is determined.
A dynamic damage constitutive model of coal that considers occurrence depth is proposed.
The influence of model parameters of coal at different depths on the dynamic constitutive model is discussed.
With the continuous development of coal resources in China, shallow resources are becoming scarcer and resources with a buried depth of 1000 m are now under consideration. With the increase of mining depth, deep coal masses are subject to a complex stress environment that includes high ground stress, high earth temperature, high karst water pressure, and mining disturbance (Gao et al. 2002). In order to avoid the distortion of the experimental results, the method recommended by ISRM is adopted, and C1100 copper alloy disc (diameter: 12.75 mm; thickness: 0.7 mm) was added as a shaper material to improve the square loading wave relative to the bevel loading wave (Culshaw 2015). Comparison of the loading wave before and after sha** is shown in Fig. 3. An improved SHPB test system with confining pressure was used in these experiments, as shown in Fig. 4 (Wu et al. Full size image
Based on the geological conditions on site, the average density of the overlying rock is determined to be 2500 kg/m3 (Li et al. 2023), and different depths are established to apply equivalent stress loads. To determine the dynamic strength of coal at different depths, the improved SHPB system was first used to load prepared coal samples to initial hydrostatic pressures of 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 MPa to simulate original ground stress environments of the coal at depths of 0, 200, 400, 600, and 800 m, respectively. Dynamic mechanical testing of the coal at different impact rates under stress conditions at different depths was then carried out. Mechanical parameters, such as peak stress, peak strain, and dynamic strength of the coal under different loading rates, were analyzed according to the test results, and dynamic damage constitutive models of the coal at different depths were constructed and verified.
2.2 Determination of coal infinitesimal element strength considering rate effect
Coal has numerous original defects, such as micro fissures and joint structures. These original defects gradually propagate and coalesce under the action of external loads, until macroscopic fracture occurs. Damage mechanics is most commonly used to study damage evolution of rock materials. Determination of the infinitesimal element strength of coal is key to establishing the damage constitutive model. The damage constitutive model based on random distribution of infinitesimal element strength and the dynamic damage constitutive model based on the element model were analyzed, combined with comprehensive consideration of the properties of deep surrounding rock, dynamic deformation characteristics of the coal, and the stress environment at different depths, to determine the infinitesimal element strength of the coal considering the rate effect. Using the proposed dynamic strength criterion of coal considering the rate effect (Li et al. 2023), a method to measure the dynamic infinitesimal element strength of coal was established, as shown in Eq. 1:
where Fd is the dynamic infinitesimal element strength of coal, \(\dot{\sigma }\) is the loading rate, \(\dot{\sigma }_{0}\) is the reference loading rate, 1 GPa/s.
c is the cohesive forces, \(c = 0.4245\left( {\frac{{\dot{\sigma }}}{{\dot{\sigma }_{0} }}} \right)^{0.5451}\) (Li 2019),
φ is the angle of internal friction, \(\varphi = 0.4299\left( {\frac{{\dot{\sigma }}}{{\dot{\sigma }_{0} }}} \right)^{0.5360}\) (Li 2019),
\(\sigma^{\prime}_{{1{\text{d}}}}\), \(\sigma^{\prime}_{{3{\text{d}}}}\) is the dynamic effective stress of coal.
On the basis of Lemitre’s strain equivalence hypothesis, we assumed that damaged coal does not have bearing capacity; the entire load is borne by undamaged coal. Therefore, the constitutive relation of the damaged material only needs to replace stress in the constitutive relation of the original material by the effective stress, then:
where \(\sigma_{id}\) is the dynamic macroscopic nominal stress of coal, \(\sigma_{2d} = \sigma_{3d} = \sigma_{3}\), and \(D_{d}\) is the dynamic damage variable of coal.
Assuming the stress–strain relationship of coal prior to damage obeys a linear elastic relationship, then:
where \(\varepsilon_{1d}\) is the axial strain, \(E_{d}\) is the dynamic elastic modulus of coal, and \(\mu\) is Poisson’s ratio of the coal.
The above relations can be substituted into Eq. (1) to determine a strong expression for the infinitesimal element of coal considering the rate effect:
Mechanical parameters are obtained from dynamic tests that consider the occurrence depth of the coal, and thus this method to determine the dynamic infinitesimal element strength of coal is universal. Equation (4) applies to the determination of infinitesimal element strength in dynamic mechanical testing of coal at different depths.
3 Construction and verification of dynamic damage constitutive models of coal at different depths
3.1 Construction and parameter determination
According to the above determination of infinitesimal element strength, the dynamic damage constitutive model of coal at different occurrence depths was established by statistical theory. We assumed that coal comprises numerous infinitesimal elements under dynamic load, and the strength Fd of each infinitesimal element obeys a Weibull distribution. The probability density function is then:
where Fd is the dynamic infinitesimal element strength, and m and F0 are Weibull distribution parameters, which reflect mechanical properties of the coal.
The coal damage variables and statistical damage model are then determined:
where \(\sigma_{1dp}\) and \(\varepsilon_{1dp}\) are the respective stress and strain values corresponding to the peak in the stress–strain curve.
The experimentally measured curves are those of deviatoric stress and deviatoric strain, and thus they must be converted before they can be substituted into the calculation equation. \(\sigma_{1dp}\) is the sum of the dynamic strength \(\sigma_{cd}\) of coal; hydrostatic pressure \(\sigma_{1s}\) is given by Eq. 9:
$$\sigma_{1dp} = \sigma_{cd} + \sigma_{1s}$$
(9)
Assuming that the corresponding peak point strain measured in dynamic testing of coal under hydrostatic pressure is \(\varepsilon^{\prime}_{1dp}\), \(\varepsilon_{1dp}\) is the sum of the peak strain \(\varepsilon^{\prime}_{1dp}\), and \(\varepsilon_{c}\) is the initial strain measured in the test, then:
where \(\varepsilon_{c}\) is the initial strain of coal under the action of the hydrostatic pressure \(\sigma_{1s} = \sigma_{2s} = \sigma_{3s}\). This analysis assumes that the coal will not be damaged under the application of triaxial equi-compression hydrostatic pressure.
When no load is applied, the initial strain of coal under hydrostatic pressure is:
As shown in Fig. 5, with the increase of occurrence depth, the dynamic peak stress of coal shows an overall increasing trend, with an increase of 13.15%, 34.08%, and 66.62% in the average peak stress, respectively. However, the peak strain shows an overall decreasing trend, with a decrease of 11.73%, 19.30%, and 13.67% in the average peak strain, respectively. Due to the differences in mechanical characteristic parameters of coal with different depths. The parameters \(\sigma_{1dp}\) and \(\varepsilon_{1dp}\) and the formulas to calculate parameters m and F0 in the model are related to the occurrence depth. Therefore, relationships for \(\sigma_{1dp}\) and \(\varepsilon_{1dp}\) at different depths were established to obtain methods to determine parameters m and F0 that can be used to construct a unified damage statistical constitutive model of coal that reflects different occurrence depths.
According to the dynamic Mohr–Coulomb criterion for coal at different depth stress conditions obtained from the above test results:
where H is the coal depth (m) and H0 is the characteristic depth (800 m).
The theoretical solution of the dynamic compressive strength at a typical loading rate at different depths can be obtained from Eq. (16), as shown in Table 1. Errors between the dynamic strength values calculated according to the dynamic Mohr–Coulomb criterion and the experimental strength values are less than 8.8770%, and the test results are well reflected by the model.
Dynamic stress–strain curves of the coal at different depths are shown in Fig. 5. These show that the dynamic elastic modulus of coal does not change with loading rate for the same depth, while the dynamic elastic modulus of coal rock increases significantly with the increase of depth, and the maximum increase of the mean dynamic elastic modulus is 90.32%. The dynamic elastic modulus values of coal at different depths are shown in Table 2, and the relationship between occurrence depth and the mean value of dynamic elastic modulus is shown in Fig. 6.
The relationship between dynamic elastic modulus and depth can be established from Fig. 6 as follows:
The linear correlation coefficient of the fitting equation R is 0.9877. The errors between the dynamic elastic moduli determined from the fitting equation and the test results were 4.52%, 2.87%, 4.49%, and 2.71%, respectively, for the four depths considered. The errors between the two are very small, and thus the fitting curve accurately reflects the test results.
Equation (10) shows that \(\varepsilon_{1dp}\) is the sum of strains \(\varepsilon^{\prime}_{1dp}\) at the peak point measured in a test and the initial strain \(\varepsilon_{c}\) of the sample under hydrostatic pressure. According to Eq. (11), the initial strains of coal were 0.0471, 0.0627, 0.0805, and 0.0954 when the depths were 200 m, 400 m, 600 m, and 800 m, respectively.
Simultaneous solution of Eqs. (10) and (11) can be obtained:
The peak strain relationship corresponding to different depths and loading rates of coal is shown in Fig. 7 according to the data presented in Table 2. The peak strain and loading rate present linear correlations for different coal depths. The fitting equations and correlation coefficients are shown in Table 3.
Further fitting of the strain results corresponding to the peak stress at different depths can be obtained:
The occurrence depth of deep surrounding rock significantly affects its mechanical properties and damage characteristics. On the basis of the established dynamic damage constitutive model of coal and considering the influence of stress environment at different depths, the constitutive model reflecting the damage characteristics of coal at different depths is as follows:
The model comprehensively considers the occurrence depth of this coal, can simulate the entire process of dynamic deformation and failure of coal at different depths, and reflects the nonlinear relationship between dynamic stress and dynamic strain in dynamic deformation of coal. Therefore, the established damage constitutive model can effectively describe the dynamic deformation mechanical mechanism of coal at different depths.
3.2 Model verification
The established constitutive models were verified based on established dynamic damage constitutive models of coal at different depths combined with test data. According to dynamic stress–strain curves of coal at different depths under different loading rates, parameters corresponding to loading rates at different depths were obtained using Eqs. (16), (17), and (20), as shown in Table 4. Substituting the test parameters in Table 4 into Eq. (24), the theoretical value of the dynamic stress–strain curve of coal at different depths under different loading rates is compared with the test curve, as shown in Fig. 8.
Given the lack of key parameters collected after the peak during the trial, the theoretical and experimental curves obtained by the established coal constitutive model at different depths are in good agreement below the peak stress, which indicates that the established model has good applicability to the dynamic mechanical properties of coal at different depths in this stress range, and verifies the validity of the proposed coal dynamic constitutive model for different depths.
3.3 Influence of model parameters of coal at different depths
Poisson’s ratio is difficult to measure in dynamic mechanical tests, and thus the static Poisson’s ratio was adopted in this model. Mechanical parameters obtained by static uniaxial compression testing of three homogeneous samples are shown in Table 5.
The influence of Poisson’s ratio on the dynamic stress–strain curve of coal is discussed based on the above experiments, and taking the dynamic stress–strain curve of coal at a depth of 400 m and loading rate of 517 GPa/s as an example. The values of model parameters m and F0, corresponding to Poisson’s ratio between 0.20 and 0.45, are shown in Table 6. The constitutive model parameter m gradually decreases with increase of Poisson’s ratio, and F0 is positively correlated with Poisson’s ratio, but the overall change is small. As shown in Table 6, compared with the static Poisson’s ratio of 0.32, m increased by 0.39%, and F0 decreased by 0.79% when Poisson’s ratio was 0.20; when Poisson’s ratio was 0.45, m decreased by 0.47%, and F0 increased by 0.95%. The range of parameters m and F0 varied by less than 1%, and the error is considered acceptable.
Matlab programming was employed to introduce different Poisson’s ratios into the proposed constitutive model and the dynamic stress–strain curves of coal corresponding to different Poisson’s ratios, as shown in Fig. 9. Poisson’s ratio has little effect on the dynamic stress–strain curves of coal, which is in good agreement with the experimental dynamic stress–strain curves, indicating that values of Poisson’s ratio obtained by static tests can be used to calculate the proposed constitutive model.
4 Conclusion
Considering coal in **dingshan mine at a depth of 1000 m as the research object, dynamic mechanical tests of the coal at different depths were carried out using an improved SHPB experimental system. Relevant mechanical calculation formulas were derived based on the proposed dynamic strength criteria of coal at different depths, and the infinitesimal element strength of coal was determined. Deviation between the calculation using the static Poisson’s ratio and the test results was compared and a dynamic constitutive model of coal at different depths was constructed. The theoretical model was verified by dynamic stress–strain curves of coal under different depth stress conditions.
1.
With the increase of occurrence depth, the dynamic peak stress of coal increases overall, with the maximum increase of 66.62%, while the peak strain decreases, with the minimum decrease of 19.30%.
2.
When the depth of occurrence is the same, the dynamic elastic modulus of coal is less affected by the loading rate. As the depth of occurrence increases, the dynamic elastic modulus of coal shows a significant increase trend.
3.
An expression for coal infinitesimal element strength that considers the rate effect was determined. The proposed method for measuring the dynamic infinitesimal element strength of coal is universal according to the meanings of the expression parameters.
4.
A dynamic damage constitutive model of coal that considers occurrence depth and the parameters for different occurrence depths were determined. The model was verified, which showed that it has universality for coal at different depths prior to peak stress.
5.
The static Poisson’s ratio can be used as the determination parameter of the coal dynamic constitutive model, and the influence error is less than 1%.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
References
Cao WG, Lin XT, Zhang C, Yang S (2017) A statistical damage simulation method of dynamic deformation process for rocks based on nonlinear dynamic strength criterion. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 36(04):794–802. https://doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2016.0755
Culshaw MG (2015) The ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 2007–2014: Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Bull Eng Geol Environ 74(4):1499–1500. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-007713-0
Frew DJ, Forrestal MJ, Chen W (2002) Pulse sha** techniques for testing brittle materials with a split Hopkinson pressure bar. Exp Mech 42(01):93–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02428192
Gao MZ, Zhang JG, Li SW, Wang M, Wang YW, Cui PF (2020) Calculating changes in fractal dimension of surface cracks to quantify how the dynamic loading rate affects rock failure in deep mining. J Cent South Univ 27(10):3013–3024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-020-4525-5
Gao MZ, **e J, Gao YN, Wang WY, Li C, Yang BG, Liu JJ, **e HP (2021) Mechanical behavior of coal under different mining rates: a case study from laboratory experiments to field testing. Int J Min Sci Technol 31(5):825–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2021.06.007
Kong XG, Li SG, Wang EY, Ji PF, Wang X, Shuang HQ, Zhou YX (2021) Dynamics behaviour of gas-bearing coal subjected to SHPB tests. Compos Struct 256:113088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113088
Li SW (2019) Mechanical properties and damage constitutive model of coal under impact load. Sichuan University
Li XB, Zuo YJ, Ma CD (2006a) Constitutive model of rock under coupled static-dynamic loading with intermediate strain rate. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 25(05):865–874. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2006.05.001
Li XB, Zuo YJ, Wang WH, Zhou ZL (2006b) Constitutive model of rock under static-dynamic coupling loading and experimental investigation. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc of China 16(3):714–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(06)60127-1
Li SW, Gao MZ, Wu BB, Xu Y, Li YX, Zeng G (2023) Dynamic compressive failure of coal at different burial depths. Geomech Geophys Geo-energy Geo-resour 9(1):53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-023-00589-1
Wang ZL, Li YC, Wang JG (2007) A damage-softening statistical constitutive model considering rock residual strength. Comput Geosci 33(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2006.02.011
Wang DK, Liu SM, Wei JP, Wang HL, Peng M (2016) Analysis and strength statistical damage constitutive model of coal under impacting failure. J China Coal Soc 41(12):3024–3031. https://doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2016.0540
Wu BB, Yao W, **a KW (2016) An experimental study of dynamic tensile failure of rocks subjected to hydrostatic confinement. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(10):3855–3864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-0946-8
**e HP, Gao MZ, Zhang R, Peng GY, Wang WY, Li AQ (2019) Study on the mechanical properties and mechanical response of coal mining at 1000 m or deeper. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(5):1475–1490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-018-1509-y
Xu Y, Yao W, **a KW, Ghaffari H (2019) Experimental study of the dynamic shear response of rocks using a modified punch shear method. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52(8):2523–2534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-1744-x
Zhai Y, Zhao JH, Li XC, Ren JC (2011) Study of damage viscoelasto-plastic dynamic constitutive model of rock materials. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 30(S2):3820–3824
Zhai Y, Meng FD, Li YB, Li Y, Zhao RF, Zhang YS (2022) Research on dynamic compression failure characteristics and damage constitutive model of sandstone after freeze–thaw cycles. Eng Fail Anal 140:106577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106577
Zheng Y, Shi HR, Liu XH, Zhang WJ (2021) Failure characteristics and constitutive model of coal rock at different strain rates. Explo Shock Waves 41(05):45–57. https://doi.org/10.11883/bzycj-2020-0072
The authors express their sincere gratitude to all the anonymous reviewers for their comments devoted to improving the quality of the paper. This paper was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52225403, 52074112), the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFF0615404), the National Natural Science Foundation Cultivation Project (Grant No. 2022pygpzk08), State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Healthy Operation and Maintenance of Deep Underground Engineering and Hubei Superior and Distinctive Discipline Group of “New Energy Vehicle and Smart Transportation”.
Funding
The authors express their sincere gratitude to all the anonymous reviewers for their comments devoted to improving the quality of the paper. This paper was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 52225403, 52074112), the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFF0615404), the National Natural Science Foundation Cultivation Project (Grant No. 2022pygpzk08), State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Healthy Operation and Maintenance of Deep Underground Engineering and Hubei Superior and Distinctive Discipline Group of “New Energy Vehicle and Smart Transportation”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Healthy Operation and Maintenance of Deep Underground Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China
Haichun Hao & Mingzhong Gao
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Deep Earth Sciences and Geothermal Energy Exploitation and Utilization, Institute of Deep Earth Sciences and Green Energy, College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China
Haichun Hao & Mingzhong Gao
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hubei University of Arts and Science, **angyang, 441053, Hubei, China
Shengwei Li, Yexue Li & Gang Zeng
State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resources and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610065, China
Haichun Hao, Mingzhong Gao and Shengwei Li contributed to the experiments and writing of the manuscript. Yexue Li and Gang Zeng modified the writing of the manuscript.
All authors approved the final manuscript and the submission to this journal.
Conflict of interest
The authors wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Hao, H., Gao, M., Li, S. et al. Study on the dynamic constitutive model of coal at different depths in **dingshan mining area.
Geomech. Geophys. Geo-energ. Geo-resour.10, 105 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-024-00822-5