Abstract
The primary goals of behavior analysis are the prediction and influence of behavior. These goals are largely achieved through the identification of functional relations between behaviors and the stimulating environment. Behavior–behavior relations are insufficient to meet these goals. Although this environment–behavior approach has been highly successful when applied to public behaviors, extensions to private events have been limited. This article discusses technical and conceptual challenges to the study of private events. We introduce a neurobiological-behavioral approach which seeks to understand private behavior as environmentally controlled in part by private neurobiological stimuli. These stimuli may enter into functional relations with both public and private behaviors. The analysis builds upon several current approaches to private events, delineates private behaviors and private stimulation, and emphasizes the reciprocal interaction between the two. By doing so, this approach can improve treatment and assessment of behavior and advance understanding of concepts such as motivating operations. We then describe the array of stimulus functions that neurobiological stimuli may acquire, including eliciting, discriminative, motivating, reinforcing, and punishing effects, and describe how the overall approach expands the concept of contextual influence. Finally, we describe how advances in behavioral neuroscience that enable the measurement and analysis of private behaviors and stimuli are allowing these once private events to affect the public world. Applications in the area of human–computer interfaces are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data sharing does not apply to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
References
Anderson, C. M., Hawkins, R. P., & Scotti, J. R. (1997). Private events in behavior analysis: Conceptual basis and clinical relevance. Behavior Therapy, 28, 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(97)80040-8
Anderson, C. M., Hawkins, R. P., Freeman, K. A., & Scotti, J. R. (2000). Private events: Do they belong in a science of human behavior? The Behavior Analyst, 23(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391995
Axe, J. B., Phelan, S. H., & Irwin, C. L. (2018). Empirical evaluations of Skinner's analysis of problem solving. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 35(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-018-0103-4
Baum, W. M. (2011). No need for private events in a science of behavior: Response to commentaries. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392255
Boring, E. G., Bridgman, P. W., Feigl, H., Pratt, C. C., & Skinner, B. F. (1945). Rejoinders and second thoughts. Psychological Review, 52(5), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063275
Campfield, L. A., Smith, F. J., Rosenbaum, M., & Hirsch, J. (1996). Human eating: Evidence for a physiological basis using a modified paradigm. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 20(1), 133–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7634(95)00043-E
Carlson, J. M. (2021). A systematic review of event-related potentials as outcome measures of attention bias modification. Psychophysiology, 58(6), e13801. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13801
Ciampolini, M., & Bianchi, R. (2006). Training to estimate blood glucose and to form associations with initial hunger. Nutrition & Metabolism, 3, 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-7075-3-42
Czeisler, C. A. (2013). Perspective: Casting light on sleep deficiency. Nature, 497(7450), S13. https://doi.org/10.1038/497S13a
Delprato, D. J., & Midgley, B. D. (1992). Some fundamentals of B. F. Skinner's behaviorism. American Psychologist, 47, 1507–1520. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.11.1507
Donahoe, J. W. (2017). Behavior analysis and neuroscience: Complementary disciplines. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 107(3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.251
Donahoe, J. W., & Palmer, D. C. (2004). Learning and complex behavior. Allyn & Bacon.
Driscoll, D. J., Miller, J. L., & Cassidy, S. B. (2023). GeneReviews: Prader-Willi Syndrome https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1330/.
Dymond, S., Bennett, M., Boyle, S., Roche, B., & Schlund, M. (2017). Related to anxiety: Arbitrarily applicable relational responding and experimental psychopathology research on fear and avoidance. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41(1), 189–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0133-6
Elbert, T., Rockstroh, B., Lutzenberger, W., & Birbaumer, N. (1980). Biofeedback of slow cortical potentials. I. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 48(3), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(80)90265-5
Fenno, L., Yizhar, O., & Deisseroth, K. (2011). The development and application of optogenetics. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113817
Fox, A. E. (2018). The future is upon us. Behavior Analysis: Research & Practice, 18(2), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000106
Friman, P. C., Hayes, S. C., & Wilson, K. G. (1998). Why behavior analysts should study emotion: The example of anxiety. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(1), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1998.31-137
Gupta, R. S., Kujawa, A., & Vago, D. R. (2019). The neural chronometry of threat-related attentional bias: Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for early and late stages of selective attentional processing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 146, 20–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2019.08.006
Harthoorn, L. F. (2008). Salivary α-amylase: A measure associated with satiety and subsequent food intake in humans. International Dairy Journal, 18, 879–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2007.11.006
Hartmann, K., Thomson, E. E., Zea, I., Yun, R., Mullen, P., Canarick, J., Huh, A., & Nicolelis, M. A. (2016). Embedding a panoramic representation of infrared light in the adult rat somatosensory cortex through a sensory neuroprosthesis. Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 36(8), 2406–2424. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3285-15.2016
Hayes, S. C. (2016). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy, 47(6), 869–885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2016.11.006
Hayes, S. C., & Brownstein, A. J. (1986). Mentalism, behavior-behavior relations, and a behavior-analytic view on the purposes of science. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391944
Hayes, S. C., Hayes, L. J., & Reese, H. W. (1988). Finding the philosophical core: A review of Stephen C. Pepper’s world hypothesis: A study in evidence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1988.50-97
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Contextual behavioral science: Creating a science more adequate to the challenge of the human condition. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 1(1–2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2012.09.004
Head, L. S., & Gross, A. M. (2009). Systematic desensitization. In W. T. O’Donohue & J. E. Fisher (Eds.), General principles and empirically supported techniques of cognitive behavior therapy (pp. 640–647). John Wiley & Sons.
Heward, W. L., Critchfield, T. S., Reed, D. D., Detrich, R., & Kimball, J. W. (2022). ABA from a to Z: Behavior science applied to 350 domains of socially significant behavior. Perspectives on Behavioral Science, 45, 327–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-022-00336-z
Hochberg, L. R., Bacher, D., Jarosiewicz, B., Masse, N. Y., Simeral, J. D., Vogel, J., Haddadin, S., Liu, J., Cash, S. S., van der Smagt, P., & Donoghue, J. P. (2012). Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature, 485(7398), 372–375.
Johnston, J. M., & Pennypacker, H. S. (1980). Subject matter of the science of behavior. In J. Johnston (Ed.), Strategies and tactics of human behavioral research (p. 48). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kangas, B. D., & Maguire, D. R. (2016). Drug discrimination and the analysis of private events. Behavior Analysis: Research & Practice, 16, 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000032
Kantor, J. R., & Smith, N. W. (1975). The reaction system. In J. R. Kantor & N. W. Smith (Eds.), The science of psychology: An interbehavioral survey (pp. 47–55). Principia.
Keller, N. E., Hennings, A. C., & Dunsmoor, J. E. (2020). Behavioral and neural processes in counterconditioning: Past and future directions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 125, 103532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.103532
Kelly, A. D., & Kelly, M. E. (2021). Acceptance and commitment training in applied behavior analysis: Where have you been all my life? Behavior Analysis Practice, 15, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00587-3
Lea, A. J., Tung, J., Archie, E. A., & Alberts, & Alberts, S. C. (2017). Developmental plasticity: Bridging research in evolution and human health. Evolution, Medicine, & Public Health, 2017, 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eox019
Mak, J. N., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2009). Clinical applications of brain-computer interfaces: Current state and future prospects. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 2, 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2009.2035356
Mandavia, A., Masuda, A., Moore, M., Mendoza, H., Donati, M. R., & Cohen, L. L. (2015). The application of a cognitive defusion technique to negative body image thoughts: A preliminary analogue investigation. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4(2), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2015.02.003
Marr, M. J. (2009). The natural selection: Behavior analysis as a natural science. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 10, 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2009.11434313
Moore, J. (2008). Conceptual foundations of radical behaviorism. Sloan.
Moore, K., Bullard, A., Sweetman, G., & Ahearn, W. H. (2022). Assessing and treating anxiety in individuals with autism. Behavior Modification, 46(6), 1279–1313. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455211051678
Moreno-Padilla, M., Maldonado-Montero, E. F., Enguix-Armada, A., & Reyes del Paso, G. A. (2020). Salivary alpha-amylase mediates the increase in hunger levels in adolescents with excess weight after viewing food images. Childhood Obesity, 16, 53–58. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1089/chi.2019.0133
Morris, E. K. (1993). Behavior analysis and mechanism: One is not the other. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392606
Moxley, R. A. (1992). From mechanistic to functional behaviorism. American Psychologist, 47(11), 1300–1311. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.11.1300
Ortu, D. (2012). Neuroscientific measures of covert behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 35(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392267
Ortu, D., & Vaidya, M. (2016). The challenges of integrating behavioral and neural data: Bridging and breaking boundaries across levels of analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 40(1), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-016-0074-5
Palmer, D. C. (2009). The role of private events in the interpretation of complex behavior. Behavior and Philosophy, 37, 3–19 http://www.jstor.org/stable/41472419
Palmer, D. (2011). Consideration of private events is required in a comprehensive science of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392250
Pandarinath, C., & Ali, Y. H. (2019). Brain implants that let you speak your mind. Nature, 568, 466–467. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01181-y
Schlinger, H. D. (2008). Conditioning the behavior of the listener. International Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy, 8, 309–322.
Schlinger, H. D. (2009). Auditory imagining. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 10(1), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2009.11434310
Schlinger, H. D. (2011). Introduction: Private events in a natural science of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 34(2), 181–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392248
Schlinger, H. D. (2015). Behavior analysis and behavioral neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 210. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00210
Schnaitter, R. (1975). Between organism and environment. A review of B. F. Skinner's about behaviorism. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 23, 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1975.23-297
Schultz, W. (2007). Behavioral dopamine signals. Trends in Neurosciences, 30(5), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2007.03.007
Schwartz, W. J., & Klerman, E. B. (2019). Circadian neurobiology and the physiologic regulation of sleep and wakefulness. Neurologic Clinics, 37(3), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2019.03.001
Shih, J. J., Krusienski, D. J., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2012). Brain-computer interfaces in medicine. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 87, 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.12.008
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts. https://doi.org/10.1037/11256-000
Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1969). Behaviorism at fifty. In Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis (pp. 221–268). Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. Random House.
Skinner, B. F. (1984). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 7, 547–581. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062535
Skinner, B. F. (1988). Comments and consequences. In A. C. Catania & S. Harnad (Eds.), The selection of behavior: The operant behaviorism of B. F. Skinner (pp. 382–461). Cambridge University Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1989). Recent issues in the analysis of behavior. Prentice Hall.
Skinner, B. F. (1999). What is psychotic behavior? In Cumulative record: Definitive edition. Copley Publishing Group.
Sommer, W., & Schweinberger, S. (1992). Operant conditioning of P300. Biological Psychology, 33(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(92)90004-e
Soto, P. L. (2020). Single-case experimental designs for behavioral neuroscience. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 114, 447–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.633
Stevenson, R. J., Bartlett, J., Wright, M., Hughes, A., Hill, B. J., Saluja, S., & Francis, H. M. (2023). The development of interoceptive hunger signals. Developmental Psychobiology, 65(2), e22374. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.22374
Stoops, W. W. (2022). A brief introduction to human behavioral pharmacology: Methods, design considerations and ethics. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 45(2), 361–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-022-00330-5
Tarragon, E., Stein, J., & Meyer, J. (2018). Basal levels of salivary alpha-amylase are associated with preference for foods high in sugar and anthropometric markers of cardiovascular risk. Behavioral Sciences, 8(10), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs8100094
Thompson, T. (2007). Relations among functional systems in behavior analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87(3), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2007.21-06
van der Zouwen, C. I., Boutin, J., Fougère, M., Flaive, A., Vivancos, M., Santuz, A., Akay, T., Sarret, P., & Ryczko, D. (2021). Freely behaving mice can brake and turn during optogenetic stimulation of the mesencephalic locomotor region. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 15, 639900. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2021.639900
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074428
Witten, I. B., Steinberg, E. E., Lee, S. Y., Davidson, T. J., Zalocusky, K. A., Brodsky, M., Yizhar, O., Cho, S. L., Gong, S., Ramakrishnan, C., Stuber, G. D., Tye, K. M., Janak, P. H., & Deisseroth, K. (2011). Recombinase-driver rat lines: Tools, techniques, and optogenetic application to dopamine-mediated reinforcement. Neuron, 72, 721–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.028
Yizhar, O., Fenno, L. E., Davidson, T. J., Mogri, M., & Deisseroth, K. (2011). Optogenetics in neural systems. Neuron, 71, 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.004
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Meindl, J.N., Ivy, J.W. A Neurobiological-Behavioral Approach to Predicting and Influencing Private Events. Perspect Behav Sci 46, 409–429 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-023-00390-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-023-00390-1