This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Baum, W. M. (2002). From molecular to molar: A paradigm shift in behavior analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 95–116.
Baum, W.M. (2003). The molar view of behavior and its usefulness in behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst Today, 4, 78–81.
Baum, W. M. (2004). Molar and molecular views of choice. Behavioural Processes, 66, 349–359.
Baum, W. M. (2010). Dynamics of choice: A tutorial. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 94, 161–174.
Catania, A. C. (2011). On Baum’s public claim that he has no significant private events. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 227–236.
Hineline, P. N. (2011). Private versus inner in multiscaled interpretation. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 221–226.
Marr, M. J. (2011). Has radical behaviorism lost its right to privacy? The Behavior Analyst, 34, 213–219.
Palmer, D. C. (2011). Consideration of private events is required in a comprehensive science of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 201–207.
Rachlin, H. (2011). Baum’s private thoughts. The Behavior Analyst, 34, 209–212.
Skinner, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.
Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177.
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baum, W.M. No need for private events in a science of behavior: Response to commentaries. BEHAV ANALYST 34, 237–244 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392255
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392255