Log in

GIS-based map** of geotechnical and geophysical properties of Lahore soils

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To accurately determine subsurface soil type and condition for engineering projects, structural safety, and foundation design under static and seismic loading conditions, it is necessary to have a comprehensive workflow that maps and explores the interrelationships between geotechnical and geophysical properties of soil. Although multiple interpolation techniques and mathematical correlations are available for this purpose, there is no globally accepted workflow yet. This study proposes a GIS-based workflow for selecting an interpolation technique and establishing interrelationships among SPT N values, bearing capacity, shear wave velocity (Vs), and groundwater using data from sixty-five boreholes in Lahore city. By evaluating Kriging and Inverse distance weighting (IDW) interpolation techniques using GIS software, the study finds that IDW is more effective than Kriging, with lower mean root mean square error (RMSE) for all studied geotechnical properties. The correlation coefficient of 0.77 between measured and interpolated SPT N values, Vs, and bearing capacity increases confidence in the estimated properties at unsampled locations. Additionally, cross-plots between geotechnical properties demonstrate that they are interdependent and vary with soil type and groundwater depth, which can be helpful for soil characterization, shallow foundation design, and seismic microzonation in the study area. The geotechnical maps and cross-plots produced by this study for Lahore soils are new and consistent with soil types, demonstrating the suitability of the proposed workflow for global use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

A few datasets may be shared on request.

References

  • Adhikary PP, Dash CJ (2017) Comparison of deterministic and stochastic methods to predict spatial variation of groundwater depth. Appl Water Sci 7:339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Iqbal Q, Khan FA (2013) Profiling and zoning of geotechnical sub-soil data using geographic information system. Science International 25(3):15–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, M., Rafiq, M., Akram, W., Tasneem, M. A., Ahmad, N., Iqbal, N., & Sajjad, M. I. (2002). Assessment of aquifer system in the city of Lahore, Pakistan using isotopic techniques (No. IAEA-TECDOC--1298).

  • Ali HM, Shakir RR (2022) Geotechnical map of Thi Qar governorate using geographical information systems (GIS). Materials Today: Proceedings 60:1286–1296

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali AM, Yadav RN (2016) Influence of groundwater on geotechnical properties of soils: a review. Geomechanics and Engineering 10(5):551–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Arslan H (2014) Estimation of spatial distrubition of groundwater level and risky areas of seawater intrusion on the coastal region in Çarşamba Plain, Turkey, using different interpolation methods. Environ Monit Assess 186:5123–5134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM Committee D-18 on Soil and Rock. (2017). Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) 1. ASTM international.

  • Athanasopoulos, G. A. (1970). Empirical correlations Vso-NSPT for soils of Greece: A comparative study of reliability. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment15.

  • Awan, T. A., Arshid, M. U., Riaz, M. S., Houda, M., Abdallah, M., Shahkar, M., ... & Azab, M. (2022). Sub-surface geotechnical data visualization of inaccessible sites using GIS. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information11(7), 368.

  • Bowles, J. E. (1997). Foundation analysis and design, McGraw-Hill International Editions, Civil Engineering Series, Fifth Editions, United States of America.

  • Cui Y, Gao Q, Zhang Y, Su X (2019) Investigation of soil variability and its effect on geogrid-reinforced soil retaining wall. J Mater Civ Eng 31(2):04018344

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, B. M., & Sivakugan, N. (2018). Principles of foundation engineering. Cengage learning.

  • Das BM, Sobhan K (2014) Principles of geotechnical engineering, SI. Cengage Learning, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Desa, U. N. (2018). World urbanization prospects 2018. United nations department for economic and social affairs.

  • Dikmen Ü (2009) Statistical correlations of shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for soils. J Geophys Eng 6(1):61–72. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/6/1/007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan JM, Wright SG (2011) Earthquake geotechnical engineering design. CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, J. P. (2015). Groundwater and Geotechnical Engineering. The National Academies Press.

  • Hanumantharao C, Ramana G (2008) Dynamic soil properties for microzonation of Delhi. India Journal of Earth System Science 117(2):719–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasancebi N, Ulusay R (2007) Empirical correlations between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for ground shaking assessments. Bull Eng Geol Env 66(2):203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan W, Alshameri B, Nawaz MN, Ijaz Z, Qasim M (2022) Geospatial and statistical interpolation of geotechnical data for modeling zonation maps of Islamabad. Pakistan Environmental Earth Sciences 81(24):547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, K., Inazaki, T., Kitao, K., & Kita, T. (2013, September). Statistical estimation of geotechnical soil parameters in terms of cross-plots of S-wave velocity and resistivity in Japanese levees. In 2013 SEG Annual Meeting. OnePetro.

  • Ijaz Z, Zhao C, Ijaz N, Rehman Z, u., & Ijaz, A. (2021) Spatial map** of geotechnical soil properties at multiple depths in Sialkot region. Pakistan Environmental Earth Sciences 80(24):787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai, T. (1977). P and S wave velocities of the ground in Japan. Proc. 9th ICSMFE, Tokyo, 19772, 257–260.

  • Jafari MK, Shafiee A, Razmkhah A (2002) Dynamic properties of fine grained soils in south of Tehran. Journal of Seismology Earthquake Engineering 4(1):25–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadwai, S., & Siraj, A. (1964). The Geology of Bari Doab, West Pakistan. WAPDA Water Soil Investigation Division. Bulletin (8).

  • Kalinski, M. E. (2011). Soil mechanics: lab manual (No. Ed. 2). John Wiley & Sons.

  • Kang T, Suh MS (2021) Retrieval of High-Resolution Grid Type Visibility Data in South Korea Using Inverse Distance Weighting and Kriging. Korean Journal of Remote Sensing 37(1):97–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaniraj SR, Thandaveswara BS (2015) Correlation of shear wave velocity with SPT N-value and soil properties. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering 8(2):273–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalid MH, Alshameri B, Abid U (2021) Application of Kriging for development of SPT N value contour maps and USCS-based soil type qualitative contour maps for Islamabad. Pakistan Environmental Earth Sciences 80(11):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan HU, Rashid I, Israr J, Zhang G (2022) Geotechnical characterization and statistical evaluation of alluvial soils of Lahore. Arab J Geosci 15(9):845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusuma GP, Kurniawan W (2020) Effect of groundwater on the shear strength of soft clay. J Phys: Conf Ser 1547(1):012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1547/1/012025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Q (2009a) Soil particle composition and geotechnical properties of permafrost in Beiluhe basin, Tibetan Plateau. Cold Reg Sci Technol 57(2–3):79–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma YZ (2009b) Propensity and probability in depositional facies analysis and modeling. Math Geosci 41:737–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, A. (2015). Geotechnical statistical evaluation of Lahore site data and deep excavation design.

  • Massonnat, G. J. (1999, October). Breaking of a paradigm: geology can provide 3D complex probability fields for stochastic facies modelling. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. OnePetro.

  • Mhaske, S. Y., & Choudhury, D. (2011). GIS-GPS based map of soil index properties for Mumbai. In Geo-frontiers 2011: Advances in geotechnical engineering (pp. 2366–2375).

  • Ohba, S., & Toriumi, I. (1970, December). Dynamic response characteristics of Osaka Plain. In Proceedings of the annual meeting AIJ (in Japanese) (Vol. 12).

  • Ohta Y, Goto N (1978) Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of characteristic soil indexes. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 6(2):167–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafi, A., Dauji, S., & Bhargava, K. (2020). Estimation of SPT from coarse grid data by spatial interpolation technique. In Geotechnical Characterization and Modelling: Proceedings of IGC 2018 (pp. 1079–1091). Springer Singapore.

  • University of Engineering and Technology (UET) (1998–2008). Geotechnical Investigation Reports of Various Sites Located in Lahore. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology (UET) Lahore.

  • National Engineering Services Pakistan (NESPAK) (1986–2008). Geotechnical Investigation Reports of Various Sites Located in Lahore. National Engineering Services Pakistan (Pvt.) Ltd. (NESPAK) Lahore.

  • Seed, H. B., & Idriss, I. M. (1981, October). Evaluation of liquefaction potential sand deposits based on observation of performance in previous earthquakes. In ASCE national convention (MO) (pp. 481–544).

  • Shafique U, Khan M, Mustafa A, Arif S (2012) Engineering geological characterization of Lahore soil, based on geotechnical testing and mineralogical composition using X-ray diffraction. Pak J Sci 64(3):191

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma B, Rahman SK (2016) Use of GIS based maps for preliminary assessment of subsoil of Guwahati city. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection 4(05):106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Noor S, Chitra R, Gupta M (2018) Applications of GIS in Geotechnical Engineering: Some Case Studies. Int J Sci Eng Sci 2:34–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Soga K, O’Brien GY (2005) The effects of groundwater level fluctuations on the behavior of soils: a review. Geotechnique 55(6):455–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Kang S, Li F, Zhang L (2009) Comparison of interpolation methods for depth to groundwater and its temporal and spatial variations in the Minqin oasis of northwest China. Environ Model Softw 24(10):1163–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi, K., Peck, R. B., & Mesri, G. (1996). Soil mechanics in engineering practice. John wiley & sons.

  • Uma Maheswari R, Boominathan A, Dodagoudar GR (2010) Use of surface waves in statistical correlations of shear wave velocity and penetration resistance of Chennai soils. Geotech Geol Eng 28:119–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varouchakis ΕA, Hristopulos DT (2013) Comparison of stochastic and deterministic methods for map** groundwater level spatial variability in sparsely monitored basins. Environ Monit Assess 185:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Srinivasan R (2009) GIS-based spatial precipitation estimation: a comparison of geostatistical approaches. J Am Water Resour Assoc 45(4):894–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Muhammad Daniyal and Ghulam M. Sohail. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Muhammad Daniyal. H. M. A. Rashid commented on original and revised versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Daniyal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix-A

Fig. 16
figure 16

Soil types at 5 m to 10 m depth intervals

See Fig. 16.

Appendix-B

See Fig. 17.

Fig. 17
figure 17

SPT N-values maps at 5 m to 10 m depth intervals

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Daniyal, M., Sohail, G.M. & Rashid, H.M.A. GIS-based map** of geotechnical and geophysical properties of Lahore soils. Environ Earth Sci 82, 540 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11201-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-11201-w

Keywords

Navigation