Log in

Propensity and Probability in Depositional Facies Analysis and Modeling

  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Probabilistic models of geologic phenomena have often been criticized for lack of realism because they do not resemble the “picture” of geology in geoscientists’ minds. A geologic process is a single case, while conventional probabilistic methods assume a certain frequency of events. This is called “the problem of application” of the probability theory to physical sciences by Reichenbach. Propensity concept was proposed by Popper in the late 1950s, as an alternative interpretation of probability, to solve this problem with an emphasis of single cases in quantum physics. Similarly, a reservoir or a geologic process is a single case as there are no two identical reservoirs or processes in nature. The peculiarity of a geologic process as a single case often causes controversies regarding how the probability theory should be applied to geosciences. In this paper, Popper’s propensity concept is introduced to describe geologic depositional environments and facies sequences. As a matter of fact, a geologic process is simultaneously indeterministic and causal. Such a phenomenon has been shown to be well described by the propensity concept in other scientific domains and social applications. Representation of a depositional-facies conceptual or sedimentological model or facies sequences using propensity allows quantitative integration of descriptive geology with facies frequency data at wells. Such integration can produce facies probabilities that convey the descriptive geology. Subsequently, these facies probabilities can be used to constrain stochastic modeling and make a geologic model more realistic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belnap N (2007) Propensities and probabilities. Stud Hist Philos Mod Phys 38:593–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beucher H, Renard D, Doligez B, Pontiggia M, Bellentani G (2008) The effect of methodology on volumetric uncertainty estimation in static reservoir models. AAPG Bull 92(10):1359–1371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch R (2006) Charles Sanders Peirce. In: Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/peirce/#dia

  • Butler JB (1736) The analogy of religion, natural and revealed, to the constitution and course of nature. Lippincott

  • Caers J, Zhang T (2004) Multiple-point geostatistics: A quantitative vehicle for integrating geologic analogs into multiple reservoir models. AAPG Mem 80:383–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiles J-P, Delfiner P (1999) Geostatistics: modeling spatial uncertainty. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N (1991) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1901) The structure and distribution of coral reefs, 3rd edn. Appleton, New York (1st edn, 1842)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1992) Geostatistical software library and user’s guide. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyen PM, Psaila DE, Strandenes S (1994) Bayesian sequential indicator simulation of channel sands from 3-D seismic data in the Oseberg field, Norwegian North Sea. In: SPE 28382, SPE ATCE, New Orleans

  • Efron B (2004) Bayesians, frequentists, and scientists. In: 164th ASA Presidential Address, Toronto, Aug. 10, 2004

  • Eiter T, Gottlob G (1995) The complexity of logic-based abduction. J ACM 42(1):3–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Encyclopedia of philosophy, 2nd edn, vol 4 (2006a) Macmillan Reference USA, Woodbridge

  • Encyclopedia of philosophy, 2nd edn, vol 5 (2006b) Macmillan Reference USA, Woodbridge

  • Falivene OP, Arbues A, Gardiner G, Pickup J, Munoz A, Cabrera L (2006) Best practice stochastic facies modeling from a channel-fill turbidite sandstone analog. AAPG Bull 90(7):1003–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer JH (1977) Reichenbach, reference classes, and single case ‘probability’. Synthese 34(2):185–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies D (2000) Philosophical theories of probability. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajek A (2007) Interpretations of probability. In: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/probability-interpret/

  • Handford CR, Loucks RG (1993) Carbonate depositional sequences and system tracts—responses of carbonate platforms to relative sea-level changes. In: Carbonate sequence stratigraphy. AAPG memoir, vol 57, pp 3–41

  • Hennig C (2007) Falsification of propensity models by statistical tests and the goodness-of-fit paradox. Philos Math (III) 15:166–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones TA, Ma YZ (2001) Geologic characteristics of hole-effect variograms calculated from lithology-indicator variables. Math Geol 33(5):615–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journel A (1983) Nonparametric estimation of spatial distribution. Math Geol 15(3):445–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journel AG, Huijbregts CJ (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyburg HE (2001) Probability as a guide in life. The Monist 84(2). Reprinted in Kyburg HE and Thalos M (eds) Probability is the very guide of life, pp 135–150. Open Court, Chicago

  • Lipton P (2004) Inference to the best explanation, 2nd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma YZ (2009) Simpson’s paradox in natural resource evaluation. Math Geosci 41(2):193–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma YZ, Seto A, Gomez E (2008) Frequentist meets spatialist: A marriage made in reservoir characterization and modeling. SPE 115836, SPE ATCE, Denver, CO

  • Ma YZ, Seto A, Gomez E (2009) Depositional facies analysis and modeling of Judy Creek reef complex of the Late Devonian Swan Hills, Alberta, Canada, AAPG Bull, vol 93, no 9, 22 p

  • Massonnat GJ (1999) Breaking of a paradigm: geology can provide 3D complex probability fields for stochastic facies modeling. SPE paper 56652, ATCE, Houston, Texas

  • Matheron G (1962) Traité de géostatistique appliquée. Technip, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron G (1963) Principles of geostatistics. Econ Geol 58:1246–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matheron G (1965) Les variables régionalisées et leur estimation: une application de la théorie des fonctions aléatoires aux sciences de la nature. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheron G (1989) Estimating and choosing: An essay on probability in practice. Springer, Berlin, 141 p. First edition in French (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo DG (1996) Error and the growth of experimental knowledge. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo DG, Cox DR (2006) Frequentist statistics as a theory of inductive inference. In: 2nd Lehmann symposium—optimality. IMS lecture notes—monographs series

  • Milne P (1985) A note on Popper, propensities and the two slit experiments. Br J Philos Sci 36:66–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchum RM, Vail PR, Thompson S III (1977) Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level: Part 2 The depositional sequence as a basic unit for stratigraphic analysis. AAPG Mem 26:53–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore CH (2001) Carbonate reservoirs: porosity evolution and diagenesis in a sequence stratigraphic framework. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordh G, Zanuttini B (2008) What makes propositional abduction tractable? Artif Intel 172(10):1245–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper K (1957) The propensity interpretation of the calculus of probability, and the quantum theory. In: Korner X (ed) Observation and interpretation. Butterworth, Stoneham, pp 65–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K (1959) The propensity interpretation of probability. Br J Philos Sci 10:25–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper K (1959b) The logic of scientific discovery. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K (1979) Objective knowledge, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (1995) A world of propensities. Thoemmes, Bristol. Reprinted

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (2002) Conjectures and refutations, 7th edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyrcz MJ, Deutsch CV (2003) Declustering and debiasing. Report, Center for Computational Geostatistics. http://www.gaa.org.au/pdf/DeclusterDebias-CCG.pdf

  • Ravenne C, Eschard R, Galli A, Mathieu Y, Montadert L, Rudklewicx J-L (1989) Heterogeneities and geometry of sedimentary bodies in a fluvio-deltaic reservoir: SPE Form Eval 239–246

  • Reichenbach H (1949) The theory of probability, an inquiry into the logical and mathematical foundations of the calculus of probability, 2nd edn. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N (1962) The stochastic revolution and nature of scientific explanation. Synthese 14:200–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivoirard J (1984) Comportements des poids du krigeage. Doctoral Thesis, Centre de Geostatistique, Fontainebleau

  • Salmon WC (1989) Four decades of scientific explanation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlager W (1992) Sedimentology and sequence stratigraphy of reefs and carbonate platforms. AAPG Continuing Education Course Notes Series, vol 34, Tulsa

  • Suarez M (2004) Quantum selections, propensities and the problem of measurements. Br J Philos Sci 55:219–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard P, Shelley C (1997) Abductive reasoning: logic, visual thinking, and coherence. In: Chiara D et al (eds) Logic and scientific methods. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 413–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Vail PR, Mitchum RM (1977) Seismic stratigraphy and global changes of sea level: Part 1. Overview. AAPG Mem 26:117–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wagoner JC, Mitchum RM, Campion KM, Rahmanian VD (1990) Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs, cores, and outcrops. In: AAPG Methods in Exploration Series, vol 7, Tulsa, Oklahoma

  • Venn J (1876) The logic of chance, 2nd edn. MacMillan & Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Mises R (1957) Probability, statistics and truth. MacMillan & Co., New York. Revised English edition

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams M (1999) Single case probabilities and the social world: the application of Popper’s propensity interpretation. J Theory Soc Behav 29(2):187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JL (1975) Carbonate facies in geologic history. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Zee Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, Y.Z. Propensity and Probability in Depositional Facies Analysis and Modeling. Math Geosci 41, 737–760 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-009-9239-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-009-9239-z

Keywords

Navigation