Abstract
Groundwater-level and rainfall measurements from 37 borewells in the Visakhapatnam district, Andhra Pradesh, India, from 2002 to 2021 were analyzed using Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) to comprehend the predictability of groundwater levels. We found chaotic dynamics in the groundwater and rainfall data, but a dominant trend component was seen in the groundwater-level data from phase plots. Dynamics suggest the presence of self-organized criticality/chaos in the groundwater dynamics over decadal time scales. We used BNN prediction models, (i) nonlinear autoregressive (NAR), (ii) nonlinear input–output (NIO) and (iii) nonlinear autoregressive exogenic Input (NARX), to predict the groundwater levels with rainfall and temperature as exogenic inputs. We noticed ~ 94 to 95% prediction accuracy with the NAR model with optimal inputs and ~ 1% improvement with added exogenic input. Interestingly, the study indicates that (i) the dynamics of the groundwater differ significantly from rainfall and temperature in the region, (ii) the nonlinear autoregressive model based on the self-organized dynamics of groundwater-level changes is robust in providing prediction accuracy up to ~ 95%, and (iii) the dynamics of remaining ~ 5% groundwater-level changes may be due to the presence of randomly varying extreme weather events and man-made/anthropogenic changes.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11600-023-01189-z/MediaObjects/11600_2023_1189_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11600-023-01189-z/MediaObjects/11600_2023_1189_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11600-023-01189-z/MediaObjects/11600_2023_1189_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11600-023-01189-z/MediaObjects/11600_2023_1189_Fig4a_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11600-023-01189-z/MediaObjects/11600_2023_1189_Fig4b_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11600-023-01189-z/MediaObjects/11600_2023_1189_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11600-023-01189-z/MediaObjects/11600_2023_1189_Fig6a_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11600-023-01189-z/MediaObjects/11600_2023_1189_Fig6b_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11600-023-01189-z/MediaObjects/11600_2023_1189_Fig7_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
Data used in the study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Code availability (software application or custom code)
No specific code was developed for this work. We have cited the literature on the algorithm and codes.
Change history
18 November 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01218-x
References
Abatzoglou JT, Dobrowski SZ, Parks SA, Hegewisch KC (2018) TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015. Scientific Data 5(1):1–12
Afrifa S, Zhang T, Appiahene P, Varadarajan V (2022) Mathematical and machine learning models for groundwater level changes: a systematic review and bibliographic analysis. Future Internet 14(9):259. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14090259
Alley WM, Reilly TE, Franke OL (1999) Sustainability of ground-water resources (Vol. 1186). US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey.
Barton S (1994) Chaos, self-organization, and psychology. Am Psychol 49(1):5
Barzegar R, Fijani E, Moghaddam AA, Tziritis E (2017) Forecasting of groundwater level fluctuations using ensemble hybrid multi-wavelet neural network-based models. Sci Total Environ 599:20–31
Bidwell VJ (2005) Realistic forecasting of groundwater level, based on the eigenstructure of aquifer dynamics. Math Comput Simul 69(1–2):12–20
Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Bonacci O (2004) Hazards caused by natural and anthropogenic changes of catchment area in karst. Nat Hazard 4(5/6):655–661
Broomhead DS, King GP (1986) Extracting qualitative dynamics from experimental data. Physica D 20(2–3):217–236
Brunner P, Simmons CT (2012) HydroGeoSphere: a fully integrated, physically based hydrological model. Ground Water 50(2):170–176
Burke LI (1991) Introduction to artificial neural systems for pattern recognition. Comput Oper Res 18(2):211–220
Chen C, He W, Zhou H, Xue Y, Zhu M (2020) A comparative study among machine learning and numerical models for simulating groundwater dynamics in the Heihe River Basin, northwestern China. Sci Rep 10(1):1–13
Chitsazan M, Rahmani G, Neyamadpour A (2013) Groundwater level simulation using artificial neural network: a case study from Aghili plain, urban area of Gotvand, south-west Iran. Geopersia 3(1):35–46
Coppola E Jr, Szidarovszky F, Poulton M, Charles E (2003) Artificial neural network approach for predicting transient water levels in a multilayered groundwater system under variable state, pum**, and climate conditions. J Hydrol Eng 8(6):348–360
Daliakopoulos IN, Coulibaly P, Tsanis IK (2005) Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol 309(1–4):229–240
Danda TJ, Kusangaya S, Mushore TD, Mujere N (2023) Assessing the role of evapotranspiration in reducing surface temperatures in Harare using the SEBAL algorithm. Urban Clim 49:101442
Dash NB, Panda SN, Remesan R, Sahoo N (2010) Hybrid neural modeling for groundwater level prediction. Neural Comput Appl 19(8):1251–1263
Dogan A, Demirpence H, Cobaner M (2008) Prediction of groundwater levels from lake levels and climate data using ANN approach. Water Sa 34(2).
Döll P, Fiedler K, Zhang J (2009) Global-scale analysis of river flow alterations due to water withdrawals and reservoirs. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13(12):2413–2432
Gleeson T, Wada Y, Bierkens MF, Van Beek LP (2012) Water balance of global aquifers revealed by groundwater footprint. Nature 488(7410):197–200
Haddeland I, Skaugen T, Lettenmaier DP (2006) Anthropogenic impacts on continental surface water fluxes. Geophys Res Lett 33(8).
Hoque MA, Hoque MM, Ahmed KM (2007) Declining groundwater level and aquifer dewatering in Dhaka metropolitan area, Bangladesh: causes and quantification. Hydrogeol J 15:1523–1534
Jalalkamali A, Sedghi H, Manshouri M (2011) Monthly groundwater level prediction using ANN and neuro-fuzzy models: a case study on Kerman plain. Iran J Hydroinform 13(4):867–876
Jha MK, Sahoo S (2015) Efficacy of neural network and genetic algorithm techniques in simulating spatio-temporal fluctuations of groundwater. Hydrol Process 29(5):671–691
Khan MS, Coulibaly P (2006) Bayesian neural network for rainfall‐runoff modeling. Water Resources Res 42(7).
Kim GB, Hwang CI, Choi MR (2021) PCA-based multivariate LSTM model for predicting natural groundwater level variations in a time-series record affected by anthropogenic factors. Environ Earth Sci 80(18):1–21
Konikow LF, Kendy E (2005) Groundwater depletion: a global problem. Hydrogeol J 13:317–320
Lee S, Lee KK, Yoon H (2019) Using artificial neural network models for groundwater level forecasting and assessment of the relative impacts of influencing factors. Hydrogeol J 27(2):567–579
Lin T, Horne BG, Tino P, Giles CL (1996) Learning long-term dependencies in NARX recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 7(6):1329–1338
Liu D, Mishra AK, Yu Z, Lü H, Li Y (2021) Support vector machine and data assimilation framework for Groundwater Level Forecasting using GRACE satellite data. J Hydrol 603:126929
Maier HR, Dandy GC (1996) The use of artificial neural networks for the prediction of water quality parameters. Water Resour Res 32(4):1013–1022
Maier HR, Dandy GC (2000) Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: a review of modelling issues and applications. Environ Model Softw 15(1):101–124
Maiti S, Tiwari RK (2014) A comparative study of artificial neural networks, Bayesian neural networks and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system in groundwater level prediction. Environ Earth Sci 71:3147–3160
Mathews GV, Rajesh R, Begum SK (2022) A short note on the natural and anthropogenic variations in the water storage changes at Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Acta Geophys, pp 1–8.
Miro ME, Groves D, Tincher B, Syme J, Tanverakul S, Catt D (2021) Adaptive water management in the face of uncertainty: Integrating machine learning, groundwater modeling and robust decision making. Clim Risk Manag 34:100383
Mohanty S, Jha MK, Kumar A, Sudheer KP (2010) Artificial neural network modeling for groundwater level forecasting in a river island of eastern India. Water Resour Manage 24:1845–1865
Moosavi V, Vafakhah M, Shirmohammadi B, Behnia N (2013) A wavelet-ANFIS hybrid model for groundwater level forecasting for different prediction periods. Water Resour Manage 27(5):1301–1321
Morrison F (1991) The art of modeling dynamic systems. Wiley, New York
Nayak PC, Rao YS, Sudheer KP (2006) Groundwater level forecasting in a shallow aquifer using artificial neural network approach. Water Resour Manage 20:77–90
Nourani V, Alami MT, Vousoughi FD (2015) Wavelet-entropy data pre-processing approach for ANN-based groundwater level modeling. J Hydrol 524:255–269
Nourani V, Mogaddam AA, Nadiri AO (2008) An ANN-based model for spatiotemporal groundwater level forecasting. Hydrol Process Int J 22(26):5054–5066
Nyanteh YD, Srivastava SK, Edrington CS, Cartes DA (2013) Application of artificial intelligence to stator winding fault diagnosis in permanent magnet synchronous machines. Electric Power Syst Res 103:201–213
Packard NH, Crutchfield JP, Farmer JD, Shaw RS (1980) Geometry from a time series. Phys Rev Lett 45(9):712
Panda DK, Mishra A, Jena SK, James BK, Kumar A (2007) The influence of drought and anthropogenic effects on groundwater levels in Orissa. India J Hydrol 343(3–4):140–153
Potapov P, Turubanova S, Hansen MC, Tyukavina A, Zalles V, Khan A, Song P-X, Pickens A, Shen Q, Cortez J (2022) Global maps of cropland extent and change show accelerated cropland expansion in the twenty-first century. Nature Food 3(1):19–28.
Pradeep Kumar GN, Sujatha P, Srinivas P (2010) Groundwater level forecasting using feed forward neural network trained with different algorithms. ISH J Hydraul Eng 16(1):20–35
Rahman AS, Hosono T, Quilty JM, Das J, Basak A (2020) Multiscale groundwater level forecasting: coupling new machine learning approaches with wavelet transforms. Adv Water Resour 141:103595
Rodell M, Velicogna I, Famiglietti JS (2009) Satellite-based estimates of groundwater depletion in India. Nature 460(7258):999–1002
Salem GSA, Kazama S, Shahid S, Dey NC (2017) Impact of temperature changes on groundwater levels and irrigation costs in a groundwater-dependent agricultural region in Northwest Bangladesh. Hydrol Res Lett 11(1):85–91
Sun K, Hu L, Guo J, Yang Z, Zhai Y, Zhang S (2021) Enhancing the understanding of hydrological responses induced by ecological water replenishment using improved machine learning models: a case study in Yongding River. Sci Total Environ 768:145489
Takens F (1981) Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. Dyn Syst Turbulence. 1980:366–381
Tao H, Hameed MM, Marhoon HA, Zounemat-Kermani M, Salim H, Sungwon K, Oleiwi Sulaiman S, Tan ML, Sa’adi Z, Mehr AD, Allawi MF, Abba SI, Zain JM, Falah MW, Jamei M, Bokde ND, Bayatvarkeshi M, Al-Mukhtar M, Bhagat SK, Tiyasha T, Khedher KM, Al-Ansari N, Shahid S, Yaseen ZM (2022) Groundwater level prediction using machine learning models: a comprehensive review. Neurocomputing 489:271–308
Taormina R, Chau KW, Sethi R (2012) Artificial neural network simulation of hourly groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer system of the Venice lagoon. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25(8):1670–1676
Tiwari RK (2005) Geospectroscopy. Capital Publishing Company, Brooksville
Tiwari RK, Rekapalli R (2021) Advances in geo-time series modelling. J Geol Soc India 97:1313–1322
Trefry MG, Muffels C (2007) FEFLOW: a finite-element ground water flow and transport modeling tool. Groundwater 45(5):525–528
Wada Y, Van Beek LP, Van Kempen CM, Reckman JW, Vasak S, Bierkens MF (2010) Global depletion of groundwater resources. Geophys Res Lett 37(20).
Wang S, Shao J, Song X, Zhang Y, Huo Z, Zhou X (2008) Application of MODFLOW and geographic information system to groundwater flow simulation in North China Plain, China. Environ Geol 55:1449–1462
Wöhling T, Wilson S, Wadsworth V, Davidson P (2020) Detecting the cause of change using uncertain data: Natural and anthropogenic factors contributing to declining groundwater levels and flows of the Wairau Plain aquifer, New Zealand. J Hydrol Regional Stud 31:100715
Wunsch A, Liesch T, Broda S (2021) Groundwater level forecasting with artificial neural networks: a comparison of long short-term memory (LSTM), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and non-linear autoregressive networks with exogenous input (NARX). Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 25(3):1671–1687
Yoon H, Jun SC, Hyun Y, Bae GO, Lee KK (2011) A comparative study of artificial neural networks and support vector machines for predicting groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer. J Hydrol 396(1–2):128–138
Yoon H, Hyun Y, Ha K, Lee KK, Kim GB (2016) A method to improve the stability and accuracy of ANN-and SVM-based time series models for long-term groundwater level predictions. Comput Geosci 90:144–155
Acknowledgements
We thank the Director of CSIR-NGRI for permitting us to publish this work (Ref. No. NGRI/Lib/2023/Pub-074). We are also thankful to the anonymous reviewers and editor for the encouragement and constructive support during the review process.
Funding
No funding was availed for this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The first author planned the experiment and wrote the first draft of the manuscript and finalized the final manuscript. The second author downloaded the online data and processed the data under the guidance of first author and was involved in the preparation of the manuscript draft and finalization. Third and fourth authors were involved in the manuscript draft preparation and finalization.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest/competing interest.
Ethics approval
It is declared that we have followed the ethics and integrity in carrying out this work. We approve here to be bound by the COPE guidelines.
Consent to participate (include appropriate statements)
We declare our consent to participate in the review process and abide by the guidelines of COPE.
Consent for publication
We declare our consent for publication within the guidelines of COPE.
Additional information
Edited by Dr. Hossein Hamidifar (ASSOCIATE EDITOR).
Author Statement: This work has been done as a part of the PhD of the corresponding author G. Vinod Mathews. Groundwater level and Rainfall data (2002–2021) of the study area (Visakhapatnam) is collected from A.P. Groundwater Department. Temperature data is obtained from Terra Climate’s high-resolution online repository (Abatzoglou et al. 2018) for the period April 2002 to December 2021 https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.191. The Land Use Land Cover (LULC) time series data has been downloaded and extracted from Google Earth Engine Global Land Cover and Land Use Change, 2000–2020|GLAD (umd.edu).
The original online version of this article was revised: Figure 1 was not correct.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Rajesh, R., Mathews, G.V., Rao, N.P. et al. Groundwater-level prediction in Visakhapatnam district, Andhra Pradesh, India, using Bayesian Neural Networks. Acta Geophys. 72, 2759–2772 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01189-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-023-01189-z