Log in

Artificial intelligence-assisted water quality index determination for healthcare

  • Published:
Artificial Intelligence Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Groundwater resource analysis is an important technological means of avoiding disease and controlling water pollution. In this field of study, water quality assessments are conducted using sequential parametric values collected in real time. For evaluation reasons, several state-of-the-art water quality evolution mechanism typically employs a single time-invariant model to determine the quality of Water. As a result, it is challenging to illustrate the importance of randomness and contingency in the process of water quality assessment, leading to variations and errors in the procedure of quality assessment. In consideration of these limitations, this study proposes a Digital Twin inspired Hybrid System (DTHS) for water quality assessment in real time. In addition, the degree of water quality is offered as an indication for quantitatively assessing the health risk status. Observational data from a monitoring station in Chaheru, a locality in the Phagwara district of the Indian state of Punjab, are used to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework in terms of water quality determination, computational cost, and stability. The framework has achieved higher prediction accuracy (94.14%), sensitivity (93.74%), specificity (91.47%), and f-measure (92.37%), indicating its ability to accurately determine water quality. Additionally, the framework offers reduced computational delay and improved reliability and stability, making it a trustworthy solution for timely predictions with respect to water quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Bindal S, Singh CK (2019) Predicting groundwater arsenic contamination: regions at risk in highest populated state of India. Water Res 159:65–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho K, Van Merriënboer B, Gulcehre C, Bahdanau D, Bougares F, Schwenk H, Bengio Y (2014) Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. ar**v preprint ar**v:1406.1078

  • Chen Z, Jiang P, Liu J, Zheng S, Shan Z, Li Z, Hmelnov AE (2022) An adaptive data cleaning framework: a case study of the water quality monitoring system in China. Hydrol Sci J 67(7):1114–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit SS, Smol JP (1994) Diatoms as indicators in the environmental monitoring and assessment program-surface waters (EMAP-SW). Environ Monit Assess 31:275–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du X, Shao F, Wu S, Zhang H, Xu S (2017) Water quality assessment with hierarchical cluster analysis based on Mahalanobis distance. Environ Monit Assess 189:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gani MA, Sajib AM, Siddik MA, Moniruzzaman M (2023) Assessing the impact of land use and land cover on river water quality using water quality index and remote sensing techniques. Environ Monit Assess 195(4):449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep learning. MIT press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Haque H, Labeeb K, Riha RB, Khan MNR (2021, March) IoT based water quality monitoring system by using Zigbee protocol. In 2021 International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI) (pp. 619-622). IEEE

  • Hawari HFB, Mokhtar MNSB, Sarang S (2022, November) Development of Real-Time Internet of Things (IoT) Based Water Quality Monitoring System. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence for Smart Community: AISC 2020, 17-18 December, Universiti Teknologi Petronas, Malaysia (pp. 443–454). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore

  • Imen S, Chang NB, Yang YJ, Golchubian A (2016) Develo** a model-based drinking water decision support system featuring remote sensing and fast learning techniques. IEEE Syst J 12(2):1358–1368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IS10500 BIS (2012) Indian standard drinking water-specification (second revision). Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi

  • Jiang Q, Feng C, Ding J, Bartley E, Lin Y, Fei J, Christakos G (2020) The decade long achievements of China’s marine ecological civilization construction (2006–2016). J Environ Manag 272:111077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khattak JA, Farooqi A, Hussain I, Kumar A, Singh CK, Mailloux BJ, van Geen A (2022) Groundwater fluoride across the Punjab plains of Pakistan and India: distribution and underlying mechanisms. Sci Total Environ 806:151353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen P, Whalley C, Zal FNN, Christiansen T (2018) European waters assessment of status and pressures 2018. EEA Report, (7/2018)

  • Kumar A, Singh CK (2020) Arsenic enrichment in groundwater and associated health risk in Bari doab region of Indus basin, Punjab India. Environ Pollut 256:113324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M, Singh T, Maurya MK, Shivhare A, Raut A, Singh PK (2023) Quality assessment and monitoring of river water using IoT infrastructure. IEEE Internet Things J. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3238123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Liu G, Yang Z (2019) Improved gray water footprint calculation method based on a mass-balance model and on fuzzy synthetic evaluation. J Clean Prod 219:377–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libelium (2020) Wireless sensor networks with waspmote and meshlium. [Online]. Available: http://www.libelium.com/libeliumworld/smart-water/

  • Maishanu HM, Mainasara MM, Magami IM (2018) Assessment of productivity status using carlson’s TSI and fish diversity of goronyo dam, sokoto state Nigeria. Traektoriâ Nauki= Path Sci 4(1):2001–2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min Q, Lu Y, Liu Z, Su C, Wang B (2019) Machine learning based digital twin framework for production optimization in petrochemical industry. Int J Inf Manag 49:502–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortágua A, Vasselon V, Oliveira R, Elias C, Chardon C, Bouchez A, Almeida SF (2019) Applicability of DNA metabarcoding approach in the bioassessment of Portuguese rivers using diatoms. Ecol indic 106:105470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir N, Kansal A, Alshaltone O, Barneih F, Sameer M, Shanableh A, Al-Shamma’a A (2022) Water quality classification using machine learning algorithms. J Water Process Eng 48:102920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nihalani S, Meeruty A (2020) Water quality index evaluation for major rivers in Gujarat. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:63523–63531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oukil A, Soltani AA, Boutaghane H, Abdalla O, Bermad A, Hasbaia M, Boulassel MR (2021) A surrogate water quality index to assess groundwater using a unified DEA-OWA framework. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(40):56658–56685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasika S, Gandla ST (2020) Smart water quality monitoring system with cost-effective using IoT. Heliyon 6(7):e04096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Planning Commission (2008) Eleventh five year plan 2007-2012. Government of India, 1

  • Podgorski J, Wu R, Chakravorty B, Polya DA (2020) Groundwater arsenic distribution in India by machine learning geospatial modeling. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(19):7119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podgorski JE, Labhasetwar P, Saha D, Berg M (2018) Prediction modeling and map** of groundwater fluoride contamination throughout India. Environ Sci Technol 52(17):9889–9898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltani AA, Oukil A, Boutaghane H, Bermad A, Boulassel MR (2021) A new methodology for assessing water quality, based on data envelopment analysis: application to Algerian dams. Ecol Indic 121:106952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utete B, Tsamba J (2017) Trophic state categorisation and assessment of water quality in Manjirenji Dam, Zimbabwe, a shallow reservoir with designated multi-purpose water uses. Water Sa 43(2):192–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Geen A, Farooqi A, Kumar A, Khattak JA, Mushtaq N, Hussain I, Singh CK (2019) Field testing of over 30,000 wells for arsenic across 400 villages of the Punjab plains of Pakistan and India: implications for prioritizing mitigation. Sci Total Environ 654:1358–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T, Xu S, Liu J (2017) Dynamic assessment of comprehensive water quality considering the release of sediment pollution. Water 9(4):275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Zhou Y, Zhao Z, Wang L, Xu J, Yu J (2019) A novel water quality mechanism modeling and eutrophication risk assessment method of lakes and reservoirs. Nonlinear Dyn 96:1037–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **e D, Li X, Zhou T, Feng Y (2023) Estimating the contribution of environmental variables to water quality in the postrestoration littoral zones of Taihu Lake using the APCS-MLR model. Sci Total Environ 857:159678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H, Gao Q, Yuan B (2022) Analysis and identification of pollution sources of comprehensive river water quality: evidence from two river basins in China. Ecol Indic 135:108561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, Wang T, Hu S (2015) Dynamic assessment of water quality based on a variable fuzzy pattern recognition model. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12(2):2230–2248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan B, Yu F, **ao X, Wang X (2019) Groundwater quality evaluation using a classification model: a case study of Jilin City, China. Nat Hazards 99:735–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousefi H, Jamal Omidi M, Moridi A, Sarang A (2021) Groundwater monitoring network design using optimized DRASTIC method and capture zone analysis. Int J Environ Res 15(5):807–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Zhang C, Jiang J, Yang H, Shang H (2021) Reinforcement learning approach for resource allocation in humanitarian logistics. Expert Syst Appl 173:114663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng H, Dhiman G, Sharma A, Sharma A, Tselykh A (2023) An IoT and blockchain-based approach for the smart water management system in agriculture. Expert Syst 40(4):e12892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang HX, Sauer GM, Generaux J, VanGorp C (2007, October) Application of multivariate trophic state index tool for lake nutrient TMDL development in iowa. In WEFTEC 2007 (pp. 7206-7218). Water Environment Federation

  • Zio E (2016) Some challenges and opportunities in reliability engineering. IEEE Trans Reliab 65(4):1769–1782

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ankush Manocha.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manocha, A., Sood, S.K. & Bhatia, M. Artificial intelligence-assisted water quality index determination for healthcare. Artif Intell Rev 56 (Suppl 2), 2893–2915 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10594-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10594-1

Keywords

Navigation