Log in

Improving machining accuracy of electrochemical machining blade by optimization of cathode feeding directions

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electrochemical machining (ECM) is well-established in certain areas, such as the aerospace, defence, and medical industries for machining complex parts. ECM is an effective way to produce compression blades. However, with advances in the development of aero engines, the accuracy of blades becomes higher and their shapes have also become more complex. Thus, considerable attention has been devoted to improving the machining accuracy of blades by ECM. In blades machined by ECM, the angle between the cathode feeding directions and the normal of the anode profile greatly affects the accuracy of the ECM process, and it is determined by the angle combination of the anode installation and the cathodes feeding direction. It is very important to determine the best angle combinations that could minimise the angle between the cathode feeding directions and the normal of the anode profile. The present paper focuses on the optimization method of the angle combinations of the cathode feeding directions and anode installation. A theoretical model describing the optimization method of the cathode feeding directions and position of the anode was developed, and the experimental investigations were conducted in order to evaluate the rationality of the optimization method. The results show that with the optimized combination of the cathode feeding directions and position of the anode, the maximum angle between the cathodes feeding directions and the normal of the anode profile is minimised and the inter-electrode gap between the cathode and anode is more uniform. Thus, the machining accuracy could be clearly improved and the maximum errors of the convex part and concave part were only 0.054 and 0.047 mm, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rajurkar KP, Zhu D, MeGeough JA, Kozak J, Silva AD (1999) New development in ECM. CIRP Ann 48(1):567–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang JY, Xu JW (2008) Theory and application of ECM. National Defence Industry Press, Bei**g

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson JF (1971) Practice and theory of electrochemical machining. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. McGeough JA (1974) Principles of electrochemical machining. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu D, Rajurkar KP (1999) Modeling and verification of interelectrode gap in electrochemical machining with passivating electrolyte. ASME 10:589–596

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Silva AKM, Altena HSJ, McGeough JA (2003) Influence of electrolyte concentration on copying accuracy of precision-ECM. CIRP Ann 52(1):165–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li Y, Zheng YF, Yang G (2003) Localized electrochemical micromachining with gap control. Sensor Actuat A 108:144–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu D, Xu HY (2002) Improvement of electrochemical machining accuracy by using dual pole tool. J Mater Process Technol 129:15–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rajurkar KP, Zhu D (1999) Improvement of electrochemical accuracy by using orbital electrode movement. CIRP Ann 48(1):139–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Skoczypiec S (2011) Research on ultrasonically assisted electrochemical machining process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52:565–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu YH, Liu K, Zhao DB (2011) Experimental investigation on monitoring interelectrode gap of ECM with six-axis force sensor. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55:565–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fan ZW, Hourng LW, Lin MY (2012) The influence of electrochemical micro-drilling by short pulsed voltage. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61:957–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pattavanitch P, Hinduja S, Atkinson J (2010) Modelling of the electrochemical machining process by the boundary element method. CIRP Ann 59(1):243–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brusilovski Z (2008) Adjustment and readjustment of electrochemical machines and control of the process parameters in machining shaped surface. J Mater Process Technol 196:311–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Curtis DT, Soo SL, Aspinwall DK (2009) Electrochemical superabrasive machining of a nickel-based aeroengine alloy using mounted grinding points. CIRP Ann 58(1):173–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee ES, Won JK, Shin TH (2012) Investigation of machining characteristics for electrochemical micro-deburring of the AZ31 lightweight magnesium alloy. Int J Precis Eng Man 13(3):339–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tang L, Yang S (2013) Experimental investigation on the electrochemical machining of 00Cr12Ni9Mo4Cu2 material and multi-objective parameters optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-012-4703-1

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dhobe SD, Doloi B, Bhattacharyya B (2011) Surface characteristics of ECMed titanium work samples for biomedical applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55:177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Senthilkumar C, Ganesan G, Karthikeyan R (2009) Study of electrochemical machining characteristics of Al/SiCp composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:256–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim BH, Na CW, Lee YS (2005) Micro electrochemical machining of 3D micro structure using dilute sulfuric acid. CIRP Ann 54(1):191–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sharma S, Jain VK, Shekhar R (2002) Electrochemical drilling of inconel superalloy with acidified sodium chloride electrolyte. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19:492–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chang CS, Hourng LW, Chung CT (1999) Tool design in electrochemical machining considering the effect of thermal-fluid properties. J Appl Electrochem 29:321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chang CS, Hourng LW (2001) Two-dimensional two-phase numerical model for tool design in electrochemical machining. J Appl Electrochem 31:145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kozak J, Dabrowski L, Lubkowski K (2000) CAE-ECM system for electrochemical technology of parts and tools. J Mater Process Technol 107:293–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kozak J (1998) Mathematical models for computer simulation of electrochemical machining processes. J Mater Process Technol 76:170–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang MH, Peng W, Yao CY, Zhang QF (2010) Electrochemical machining of the spiral internal turbulator. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49:969–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. De Silva AKM, Pajak PT, Harrison DK (2004) Modeling and experimental investigation of laser assisted jet electrochemical machining. CIRP Ann 53(1):179–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bogoveev NA, Firsov AG, Filatov EI (2001) Computer support for “all-round” ECM processing of blades. J Mater Process Technol 109(3):324–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Paczkowski T, Sawicki J (2008) Electrochemical machining of curvilinear surfaces. Mach Sci Technol 12(1):33–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fujisawa T, Inaba K, Yamamoto M (2008) Multiphysics simulation of electrochemical machining process for three-dimensional compressor blade. J Fluid Eng 130(8):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tsuboi R, Yamamoto M (2010) Modeling and applications of electrochemical machining process. IMECE2009 4:377–384

    Google Scholar 

  32. Xu ZY, Zhu D, Shi XC (2008) Optimization and experimental investigation on electrolyte flow mode in ECM of turbine blades. J Southeast University 38(3):434–438

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zhu D, Zhu D, Xu ZY (2012) Optimal design of the sheet cathode using W-shaped electrolyte flow mode in ECM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62:147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. S. Qu.

Appendix

Appendix

V 0

Workpiece feeding velocity

V 1

Velocity of cathode electrode used to make convex parts

V 2

Velocity of cathode electrode used to make concave parts

α1

Feeding angle between convex-part cathode and the workpiece

α2

Feeding angle between concave-part cathode and the workpiece

\( V_1^{\prime } \)

Relative velocity of convex-part cathode to the workpiece

\( V_2^{\prime } \)

Relative velocity of concave-part cathode to the workpiece

θ

Angle between the feeding direction and the normal of profile

β

Blade installation angle

Δ

Inter-electrode gap

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qu, N.S., Xu, Z.Y. Improving machining accuracy of electrochemical machining blade by optimization of cathode feeding directions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68, 1565–1572 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4943-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4943-8

Keywords

Navigation