Log in

Surface characteristics of ECMed titanium work samples for biomedical applications

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electrochemical machining (ECM) process has great potential on account of the versatility of its applications. ECM is being widely used in the manufacturing industry because hard metals can be machined regardless of the mechanical property of a work piece. Titanium is broadly used in a number of fields such as aerospace, power generation, automotive, chemical including petrochemical, and sporting goods. Apart from these applications, it has tremendous prospective in dental, medical industries, and biomedical engineering. The biological performance of titanium implant depends on their surface topography and form accuracy that includes various surface parameters. ECM is one of the alternative machining processes that can be applied to the machining of titanium implant for biomedical applications. The aim of this paper is to present experimental result of surface characteristics obtained on titanium samples, utilizing developed cross-flow electrolyte supply system in electrochemical machining. It is observed that electrolyte flow velocity and voltage between electrodes are some of the influencing parameters, which affect the surface characteristics. Titanium oxide layer has been generated on the machined surface, which facilitates the improvement of the corrosion and chemical resistance of titanium implant. Effects of electrolyte flow velocity and voltage during electrochemical machining process for generation of various surface characteristics have been successfully studied through experimentation. In the present work, the obtained surface roughness values on the titanium sample machined by ECM were in the range of 2.4 to 2.93 μm, which is within acceptable value for the implants. Effects of electrolyte flow velocity and voltage on the material removal rate and machining accuracy in the form of overcut are also presented in the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McGeough JA (1974) Principles of electrochemical machining. Chapman Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rajurkar KP, Zhu D, McGeough JA, Kozak JA (1999) New developments in electro-chemical machining. Ann CIRP 48(2):567–579

    Google Scholar 

  3. Osman HM, Abdel-Rahman M (1993) Integrity of surfaces produced by electrochemical machining. J Mater Process Technol 37:667–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhattacharyya B, Sorkhel SK (1999) Investigation for controlled electrochemical machining through response surface methodology-based approach. J Mater Process Technol 86:200–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. da Silva Neto JC, da Silva EM, da Silva MB (2006) Intervening variables in electrochemical machining. J Mater Process Technol 179:92–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sekar T, Marappan R (2008) Experimental investigations into the influencing parameters of electrochemical machining of AISI 202. J Adv Manuf Syst 7(2):337–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ezugwu EO, Wang ZM (1997) Titanium alloys and their machinability—a review. J Mater Process Technoogy 68:262–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bannard J (1975) The use of electrochemical machining in biomedical engineering. J Appl Electrochem 5:89–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Balazic M, Kopac J, Jackson MJ, Ahmed W (2007) Review: titanium and titanium alloy applications in Medicine. Int J Nano Biomater 1(1):3–29

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rønold HJ, Ellingsen JE (2002) Effect of micro-roughness produced by TiO2 blasting—tensile testing of bone attachment by using coin-shaped implants. Biomaterials 23:4211–4219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosnber O, Gawlik J, Mamalis AG, Vozny V, Sokhan C, Kim DJ (2006) Trends and development in the manufacturing of hip joints: an overview. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:537–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffiths B (2001) Manufacturing surface technology. Penton, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gadelmalwala ES, Koura MM (2002) Roughness parameters. J Mater Process Technol 123:133–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dhobe SD, Doloi B, Bhattacharyya B (2009) Surface characteristics of ECMed titanium for biomedical application. Sixth International Conference on Precision, Meso, Micro and Nano Engineering, Coimbatore, India pp F1–F5

  15. Ronold HJ, Lyngstadaasb SP, Ellingsena JE (2003) Analysing the optimal value for titanium implant roughness in bone attachment using a tensile test. Biomaterials 24:4559–4564

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Bhattacharyya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dhobe, S.D., Doloi, B. & Bhattacharyya, B. Surface characteristics of ECMed titanium work samples for biomedical applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55, 177–188 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-3040-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-3040-5

Keywords

Navigation