SpringerLink
Log in

Fabrication and evaluation of nanocomposite membranes of polyethersulfone/α-alumina for hydrogen separation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Polymer Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, polyethersulfone (PES)-based nanocomposite membranes with the incorporation of inorganic filler of α-alumina were prepared via thermal phase inversion method. The fabricated flat sheet-mixed matrix membranes were characterized using X-ray diffraction, thermal gravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, scanning electron microscopy, and atomic force microscope analysis, and the permeation tests were performed for hydrogen, nitrogen and carbon dioxide. Also prepared α-alumina particles were identified by X-ray diffraction and the surface area, total pore volume and average pore diameter of particles were measured with a high-speed gas-sorption analyzer. The distribution and dispersion of α-alumina particles suspended in the polymer matrix were uniform and the surface roughness of the nanocomposite membranes was obviously lower than that of the pure membranes. The thermal analysis indicated that the glass transition temperature of the mixed matrix membranes was around 221.23 °C and the initial degradation temperature was up to 433 °C in air. The nanocomposite membranes increased the permeability of hydrogen, nitrogen and carbon dioxide gases and the hydrogen over nitrogen selectivity, simultaneously and shifted above the Robeson’s upper bound line-2008. The results showed that the nanocomposite membrane containing 8 wt % of α-alumina led to a considerable and simultaneous increase in the permeability of hydrogen (up to 8 times at pressure of 4 bar) and the selectivity of hydrogen over nitrogen (up to 2.4 times at pressure of 4 bar) in comparison to the neat polyethersulfone membranes. The pressure dependence of the gas permeability of the membranes was also investigated and based on selectivity versus permeability charts, the appropriate morphology of the nanocomposite membrane was suggested. Overall, the capability of α-alumina as an inorganic filler for hydrogen separation application has been shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yu J, Li L, Liu N, Lee R (2013) An approach to prepare defect-free PES/MFI-type zeolite mixed matrix membranes for CO2/N2 separation. J Mater Sci 48:3782–3788

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liang CY, Uchytil P, Petrychkovych R, Lai YC, Friess K, Sipek M, Reddya MM, Suen SY (2012) A comparison on gas separation between PES (polyethersulfone)/MMT (Na-montmorillonite) and PES/TiO2 mixed matrix membranes. Sep Purif Technol 92:57–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yeo ZY, Chew TL, Zhu PW, Mohamed AR, Chai SP (2012) Conventional processes and membrane technology for carbon dioxide removal from natural gas: a review. J Nat Gas Chem 21:282–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Madaeni SS, Farhadian A, Vatanpour V (2012) Effects of phase inversion and composition of casting solution on morphology and gas permeance of polyethersulfone/polyimide blend membranes. Adv Polym Tech 31:298–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ge L, Zhu Z, Rudolph V (2011) Enhanced gas permeability by fabricating functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes and polyethersulfone nanocomposite membrane. Sep Purif Technol 78:76–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chung TS, Jiang LY, Li Y, Kulprathipanja S (2007) Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) comprising organic polymers with dispersed inorganic fillers for gas separation. Prog Polym Sci 32:483–507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Khanbabaei G, Vasheghani-Farahani E, Rahmatpour A (2012) Pure and mixed gas CH4 and n-C4H10 permeation in PDMS-fumed silica nanocomposite membranes. Chem Eng J 191:369–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Clarizia G, Algieri C, Drioli E (2004) Filler-polymer combination: a route to modify gas transport properties of a polymeric membrane. Polymer 45:5671–5681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Robeson LM (2008) The upper bound revisited. J Membr Sci 320:390–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Aroon MA, Ismail AF, Matsuura T, Montazer-Rahmati MM (2010) Performance studies of mixed matrix membranes for gas separation: a review. Sep Purif Technol 75:229–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cakal U, Yilmaz L, Kalipcilar H (2012) Effect of feed gas composition on the separation of CO2/CH4 mixtures by PES-SAPO 34-HMA mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 417–418:45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lin R, Ge L, Hou L, Strounina E, Rudolph V, Zhu Z (2014) Mixed matrix membranes with strengthened MOFs/polymer interfacial interaction and improved membrane performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:5609–5618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu J, Wu S, Zou M, Zheng X, Cai Z (2012) Surface modification of silica and its compounding with polydimethylsiloxane matrix: interaction of modified silica filler with PDMS. Iran Polym J 21:583–589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Saeed Kh, Khan I (2014) Preparation and properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes/poly (butylene terephthalate) nanocomposites. Iran Polym J 23:53–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma XH, Xu ZL, Wu F, Xu HT (2012) PFSA-TiO2 (or Al2O3)-PVA/PVA/PAN difunctional hollow fiber composite membranes prepared by dip-coating method. Iran Polym J 21:31–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Li Y, Chung TS, Cao C, Kulprathipanja S (2005) The effects of polymer chain rigidification, zeolite pore size and pore blockage on polyethersulfone (PES)-zeolite A mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 260:45–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Li Y, Chung TS, Kulprathipanja S (2007) Novel Ag+-zeolite/polymer mixed matrix membranes with a high CO2/CH4 selectivity. AIChE J 53:610–616

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Karatay E, Kalıpçılar H, Yılmaz L (2010) Preparation and performance assessment of binary and ternary PES-SAPO 34-HMA based gas separation membranes. J Membr Sci 364:75–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tutuk DK, Ahmad FI, Ahmad M (2010) Application of activated carbon mixed matrix membrane for oxygen purification. Int J Sci Eng 1:21–24

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ismail AF, Rahim NH, Mustafa A, Matsuura T, Ng BC, Abdullah S, Hashemifard SA (2011) Gas separation performance of polyethersulfone/multi-walled carbon nanotubes mixed matrix membranes. Sep Purif Technol 80:20–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sadeghi M, Khanbabaei G, Saeedi Dehaghani AH, Sadeghi M, Aravand MA, Akbarzade M, Khatti S (2008) Gas permeation properties of ethylene vinyl acetate–silica nanocomposite membranes. J Membr Sci 322:423–428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li JF, Xu ZL, Yang H, Yu LY, Liu M (2009) Effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on the surface morphology and performance of microporous PES membrane. Appl Surf Sci 255:4725–4732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu T, **e T, Yang G (2009) Preparation and characterization of poly(ε-caprolactone)/Na+-MMT nanocomposites. Appl Clay Sci 45:105–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chowdhury G, Kruczek B, Matsuura T (2001) Polyphenylene oxide and modified polyphenylene oxide membranes: gas, vapour and liquid separation. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Khulbe KC, Matsuura T, Lamarche G, Lamarche AM (2000) X-Ray diffraction analysis of dense PPO membranes. J Membr Sci 170:81–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sing KSW, Everett DH, Haul RAW, Moscou L, Pierotti RA, Rouquerol J, Siemieniewska T (1985) Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl Chem 57:603–619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cong H, Radosz M, Towler BF, Shen Y (2007) Polymer-inorganic nanocomposite membranes for gas separation. Sep Purif Technol 55:281–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ismail AF, Rahim RA, Rahman WAWA (2008) Characterization of polyethersulfone/Matrimid®5218 miscible blend mixed matrix membranes for O2/N2 gas separation. Sep Purif Technol 63:200–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Luo M, Wen Q, Liu J, Liu H, Jia Z (2011) Fabrication of SPES/nano-TiO2 composite ultrafiltration membrane and its anti-fouling mechanism. Chin J Chem Eng 19:45–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang MJ (1998) Effect of polymer-filler and filler–filler interactions on dynamic properties of filled vulcanizates. Rubber Chem Technol 71:520–589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahn J, Chung WJ, Pinnau I, Guiver MD (2008) Polysulfone/silica nanoparticle mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation. J Membr Sci 314:123–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Li Y, Guan HM, Chung TS, Kulprathipanja S (2006) Effects of novel silane modification of zeolite surface on polymer chain rigidification and partial pore blockage in polyethersulfone (PES)–zeolite A mixed matrix membranes. J Membr Sci 275:17–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Li Y, Chung TS (2010) Molecular-level mixed matrix membranes comprising Pebax® and POSS for hydrogen purification via preferential CO2 removal. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:10560–10568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Rubal M, Wilkins CW Jr, Cassidy PE, Lansford C, Yamada Y (2008) Fluorinated polyimide nanocomposites for CO2/CH4 separation. Polym Adv Technol 19:1033–1039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ismail AF, Kusworo TD, Mustafa A (2008) Enhanced gas permeation performance of polyethersulfone mixed matrix hollow fiber membranes using novel Dynasylan Ameo silane agent. J Membr Sci 319:306–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Khulbe KC, Kruczek B, Chowdhury G, Gagné S, Matsuura T, Verma SP (1996) Characterization of membranes prepared from PPO by Raman scattering and atomic force microscopy. J Membr Sci 111:57–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. David OC, Gorri D, Urtiaga A, Ortiz I (2011) Mixed gas separation study for the hydrogen recovery from H2/CO/N2/CO2 post combustion mixtures using a Matrimid membrane. J Membr Sci 378:359–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Li Y, Chung TS, Huang Z, Kulprathipanja S (2006) Dual-layer polyethersulfone (PES)/BTDA-TDI/MDI co-polyimide (P84) hollow fiber membranes with a submicron PES-zeolite beta mixed matrix dense-selective layer for gas separation. J Membr Sci 277:28–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ramanathan T, Fisher FT, Ruoff RS, Brinson LC (2005) Amino-functionalized carbon nanotubes for binding to polymers and biological systems. Chem Mater 17:1290–1295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Merkel TC, Freeman BD, Spontak RJ, He Z, Pinnau I, Meakin P, Hill AJ (2002) Ultrapermeable, reverse-selective nanocomposite membranes. Science 296:519–522

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Moore TT, Koros WJ (2005) Non-ideal effects in organic-inorganic materials for gas separation membranes. J Mol Struct 739:87–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Merkel TC, Bondar VI, Nagai K, Freeman BD, Pinnau I (2000) Gas sorption, diffusion and permeation in poly(dimethylsiloxane). J Polym Sci B Polym Phys 38:415–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Yampolskii Y, Pinnau I, Freeman BD (2006) Materials science of membranes for gas and vapor separation. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Matteucci S, Yampolskii Y, Freeman BD, Pinnau I (2006) Transport of gases and vapors in glassy and rubbery polymers. Materials science of membranes for gas and vapor separation. Wiley, New York, pp 1–47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Ge L, Zhou W, Rudolph V, Zhu Z (2013) Mixed matrix membranes incorporated with size-reduced Cu-BTC for improved gas separation. J Mater Chem A 1:6350–6358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Appreciation is expressed to Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI) of IRAN for the financial support with the grant number of 83481047. The authors would like to thank Mrs. R. Akbari Anari for her technical helps.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammadreza Farrokhnia & Aliakbar Safekordi

  2. Catalysis and Nanotechnology Research Division, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry, Tehran, Iran

    Mehdi Rashidzadeh

  3. Polymer Science and Technology Research Division, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry, Tehran, Iran

    Ghader Khanbabaei

Authors
  1. Mohammadreza Farrokhnia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mehdi Rashidzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aliakbar Safekordi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ghader Khanbabaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Rashidzadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farrokhnia, M., Rashidzadeh, M., Safekordi, A. et al. Fabrication and evaluation of nanocomposite membranes of polyethersulfone/α-alumina for hydrogen separation. Iran Polym J 24, 171–183 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-015-0308-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13726-015-0308-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation