Log in

What is the most effective analytical method for quantification and identification of microplastics in contaminated soils?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Environmental Geochemistry and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing concern over microplastics (MPs) contamination in agricultural soils due to excessive plastic use is a worldwide concern. The objective of this study was to determine which analytical technique is most effective for the analysis of MPs in agricultural soils. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), multispectral analysis, and X-ray diffraction were used to analyze sections of clay soil containing varying percentages of virgin white MPs from 0 to 100%. X-ray analysis only detected MPs at high concentrations (20%). However, NIR at 2.300 nm and multispectral analysis at 395 nm demonstrated greater accuracy and sensitivity in distinguishing between all MPs levels. SEM revealed that MPs have an amorphous structure that is distinct from crystalline soil, potentially influencing their interactions with other soil constituents. These findings highlight the value of NIR and multispectral analysis in accurately identifying and measuring MPs in soil. Efficient management plans rely on increased awareness of MPs' environmental impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, 2024/08299-0) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).

Funding

The authors have not disclosed any funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MGDSB, BGN, ADCL, AGG, RCDS, DCFDSS, and KFM conceived and designed the experiments. MGDSB, BGN, ADCL, AGG, RCDS, DCFDSS, and KFM performed the experiments. AB, FG, and EF planned and conducted the simulations. MGDSB, BGN, ADCL, AGG, RCDS, DCFDSS, and KFM contributed to sample preparation. MGDSB, BGN, RCDS, and KFM contributed to the interpretation of results. MGDSB took the lead in manuscript writing. All authors provided critical feedback and assisted in sha** the research, analysis, and manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maura Gabriela da Silva Brochado.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Silva Brochado, M.G., de Noronha, B.G., da Costa Lima, A. et al. What is the most effective analytical method for quantification and identification of microplastics in contaminated soils?. Environ Geochem Health 46, 260 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-024-02082-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-024-02082-4

Keywords

Navigation