Abstract
This paper presents an output feedback based Variable Structure Controller (VSC) is described for a series vectorial compensator (SVeC) in order to enhance the dynamic stability of electric power system. The input to the VSC is speed deviation and it is employed to design the switching surface of the proposed VSC. SVeC is a new series Flexible AC Transmission System (FACTS) device and this can regulate the line reactance by vary the duty ratio of PWM switches. The main aim is to check the effectiveness of the SVeC with VSC to enhance the stability in unique system. For this cause, proposed a novel SVeC current injection model incorporated in the test system. The mathematical model of VSC sliding controller gain proposed. The test system is derived using Heffron–Phillips model. The dynamic stability of the system with this proposed Variable Structure SVeC is analysed through eigenvalues and nonlinear time domain simulations for a unique system at nominal load. The performance of the proposed system is compared with SVeC with Feedback control, with PSS control and without control. From the results, it is concluded that the dynamic stability of the system is enhanced with proposed Variable Structure Feedback based SVeC controller compared with other methods.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40435-023-01183-9/MediaObjects/40435_2023_1183_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40435-023-01183-9/MediaObjects/40435_2023_1183_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40435-023-01183-9/MediaObjects/40435_2023_1183_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40435-023-01183-9/MediaObjects/40435_2023_1183_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40435-023-01183-9/MediaObjects/40435_2023_1183_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40435-023-01183-9/MediaObjects/40435_2023_1183_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40435-023-01183-9/MediaObjects/40435_2023_1183_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40435-023-01183-9/MediaObjects/40435_2023_1183_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40435-023-01183-9/MediaObjects/40435_2023_1183_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40435-023-01183-9/MediaObjects/40435_2023_1183_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40435-023-01183-9/MediaObjects/40435_2023_1183_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40435-023-01183-9/MediaObjects/40435_2023_1183_Fig12_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40435-023-01183-9/MediaObjects/40435_2023_1183_Fig13_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Code availability
No datasets were generated or analyzed during this current study.
Abbreviations
- \(A\) :
-
State matrix
- \(B\) :
-
Control matrix
- \(C\) :
-
Output matrix
- \(D\) :
-
Dam** constant (pu)
- \(D_{{\text{S}}}\) :
-
Duty cycle
- \({\text{E}}\) :
-
Generator induced emf (p.u)
- \(E_{\text{d}}^{^{\prime}}\) :
-
D-axis component of voltage behind transient reactance (p.u)
- \(E_{\text{fd}}\) :
-
Field circuit voltage (p.u)
- \(E_{\text{q}}^{^{\prime}}\) :
-
Q-axis component of voltage behind transient reactance (p.u)
- \({{f}}\) :
-
Frequency in Hz
- g :
-
Stator algebraic and network equations
- \({{h}}\) :
-
Switching hyperplane
- \({{H}}\) :
-
Machine inertia constant (s)
- \(I_{\text{d}}\) and \(I_{\text{q}}\) :
-
Direct and quadrature axis current (p.u)
- \({{I}}_{12}\) :
-
Current flowing in the line 1 and 2
- \({{K}}_{{\text{A}}}\) :
-
Automatic voltage regulator gain
- \({{K}}_{{\text{e}}}\) :
-
Equivalent control phase matrix
- \({{K}}_{{\text{r}}}\) :
-
Reaching phase control matrix
- \({{K}}_{{{\text{SMC}}}}\) :
-
Sliding mode control gain matrix
- \({{M}}\) :
-
Transformation matrix
- \(n\) :
-
Turns ratio
- \({{P}}_{{\text{e}}}\) :
-
Electrical power
- \({{P}}\) :
-
Positive definite symmetric matrix
- \(Q\) :
-
Positive semi definite matrix
- \(R\) :
-
Positive definite matrix
- \({{R}}_{{\text{S}}}\) :
-
Stator resistance (p.u)
- \(R_{{\text{e}}}\) :
-
External equivalent resistance (SMIB system) (p.u)
- \(R_{12}\) :
-
Resistance of transmission line between node 1 and 2 (p.u)
- \(S\) :
-
Sliding surface
- \(T_{{\text{A}}}\) :
-
Regulator time constant (s)
- \(T_{{{\text{do}}}}^{\prime }\) :
-
D-axis open circuit time constant (s)
- \(T_{{\text{e}}}\) :
-
Exciter time constant (s)
- \(T_{{\text{M}}}\) :
-
Mechanical torque (p.u)
- \(U\) :
-
Control (or) input vector
- \(V_{{\text{d}}}\) :
-
Direct axis voltage (p.u)
- \(V_{{{\text{inf}}}}\) :
-
Infinite bus voltage (p.u)
- \(V_{{\text{q}}}\) :
-
Quadrature axis voltage (p.u)
- \(V_{{{\text{ref}}}}\) :
-
Reference input voltage of regulator
- \(V_{{{\text{SVeC}}}}\) :
-
SVeC bus voltage (p.u)
- \(V_{\text{T}}\) :
-
Machine terminal voltage (p.u)
- \(X\) :
-
State vector
- \(X_{{\text{C}}}\) :
-
Capacitive reactance (p.u)
- \(X_{{\text{d}}}\) :
-
Direct axis component of synchronous reactance (p.u)
- \( X_{{\text{d}}}^{\prime } \) :
-
Direct axis transient reactance (p.u)
- \(X_{{\text{e}}}\) :
-
External equivalent reactance (SMIB system) (p.u)
- \(X_{\text{q}}\) :
-
Q-axis component of synchronous reactance (p.u)
- \(X_{{{\text{SVeC}}}}\) :
-
Equivalent reactance of series vectorial compensator
- \(X_{12}\) :
-
Reactance of transmission line between node 1 and 2 (p.u)
- \(Y\) :
-
Output vector
- \(\delta\) :
-
Rotor angle (rad)
- \(\omega\) :
-
Rotor speed (rad/s)
- \(\theta\) :
-
Bus voltage angle (rad)
- \(\zeta\) :
-
Dam** ratio
- \(\omega_{{\text{S}}}\) :
-
Synchronous speed (rad./s)
- \({\lambda }\) :
-
Eigen value
- \({\tilde{{A}}}\), \({\tilde{{B}}}\), \({\tilde{{C}}}\) :
-
Transformation matrices of A, B, C
- \({\tilde{{A}}}_{11}\), \({\tilde{{A}}}_{12}\), \({\tilde{{A}}}_{21}\),\( {\tilde{{A}}}_{22}\) :
-
System matrices in regular patrician form
References
Anderson PM, Fouad AA (2003) Power system control and stability. Wiley, India
Kundur P, Balu NJ, Lauby MG (1994) Power system stability and control. McGraw-hill, New York
Safari A, Shayeghi H, Shayanfar HA (2016) Coordinated control of pulse width modulation-based AC link series compensator and power system stabilizers. Electr Power Energy Syst 83:117–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.03.042
Hingorani NH, Gyugyi L (2000) Understanding FACTS: concepts and technology of flexible AC transmission system. Wiley-IEEE press, India
Lopes LAC, Joos G (2001) Pulse width modulated capacitor for series compensation. IEEE Trans Power Electron 16:167–174. https://doi.org/10.1109/63.911140
Venkataramanan G, Johnson BK (2002) Pulse width modulated series compensator. IEEE Proc Gen Trans Dist 149:71–75. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-gtd:20020004
Mancilla-David F, Venkataramanan G (2005) A pulse width modulated AC link unified power flow controller. In: IEEE power engineering society general meeting, San Francisco, vol 2, pp 1314-1321.https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2005.1489283
Lopes LAC, Joos G, Ooi BT (1997) (1997) A PWM quadrature—booster phase shifter for AC power transmission. IEEE Trans Power Electron 12(138–144):138–144. https://doi.org/10.1109/63.554179
Mancilla-David F, Bhattacharya S, Venkataraman G (2008) A comparative evaluation of series power-flow controllers using DC and AC-link converters. IEEE Trans Power Del 23:985–996. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2008.917702
Simon O, Mahlein J, Muenzer MN, Bruckmann M (2002) Modern solutions for industrial matrix-converter applications. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 49:401–406. https://doi.org/10.1109/41.993273
Gonalez JM, Canizares CA, Ramirez JM (2010) Stability modelling and comparative study of series vectorial compensators. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 25:1093–1103. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRD.2009.2034905
Safari A, Shayanfar HA, Kazemi A, Shayeghi H (2014) Dynamic modelling of PWM-based AC link series compensator. : Arab J Sci Eng 39:1971–1981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-013-0740-9
Safari A, Shayanfar HA, Kazemi A, Shayeghi H (2016) Coordinated control of pulse width modulation based AC link series compensator and power system stabilizers. Electr Power Energy Syst 83:117–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.03.042
Safari A, Shayanfar HA, Kazemi A (2003) Robust PWMSC dam** controller tuning of the Augmented Lagrangian PSO algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28:4665–4673. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2271814
Wang L, Truong DN (2012) Application of a SVeCand a SSSC on dam** improvement of a SG-based power system with a PMSG-based offshore wind farm. In: Proceedings of IEEE PES general meeting, San Diego, CA, USA
Wang L et al (2012) Comparative stability enhancement of PMSG- based Offshore win farm fed to an SG-based power system using an SSSC and an SVeC. IEEE Trans Power Syst 28:1336–1344. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2012.2211110
Ghosh A, Ledwich G, Malik OP, Hope GS (1984) Power system stabilizer based on adaptive control techniques. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 103:1983–1989. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1984.318503
Shayeghi H, Shayanfar HA, Jalli (2009) Load frequency control strategies: a state of the art survey for the researcher. Energy Convers Manag 50:344–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2008.09.014
Ibraheem PK, Kothari DP (2005) Recent philosphies of automatic generation control startegies in power system. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20:346–357. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2004.840438
Kothari ML, Nanda J, Bhattacharya K (1993) Design of variable structure power system stabilisers with desired eigenvalues in the sliding mode. In: IEE proceedings generation, transmission and distribution, vol 140, pp 263-267. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-c.1993.0039
Hsu YY, Chan Y (1983) Stabilization of power systems using a variable structure stabilizer. Electr Power Syst Res 6:129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7796(83)90014-7
Chan WC, Hsu YY (1983) An optimal variable structure stabilizer for power system stabilization. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 102:1738–1746. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAS.1983.317916
Utkin VI, Yang KD (1978) Methods for constructing discontinuity planes in multidimensional variable structure systems. Autom Remote Control 39:1466–1470. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(78)90071-7
Luor T-S, Hsu Y-Y (1998) Design of an output feedback varaible structure thyristor-controlled series compensator for improving power system stability. Electr Power Syst Res 47:71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7796(98)00049-2
Balochian S (2015) On the stabilization of linear time invariant fractional order commensurate switched systems. Asian J Control 17:133–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.858
Tabasi M, Balochain S (2021) Synchronization of fractional order chaotic system of Sprott circuit using fractional active fault tolerant controller. Int J Dyn Control 9:1695–1702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-021-00762-y
Shahri M, Balochain S, Balochian H, Zhang Y (2014) Design of fractional-order PID controllers for time delay using differential evolution algorithm. Indian J Sci Technol 7:1307–1315. https://doi.org/10.17485/IJST/2014/V7I9/43866
Mondal D, Chakrabarti A, Sengupta A (2014) Power system small signal stability and control. Academic Press, Elsevier
Sauer PW, Pai MA (1998) Power system dynamics and stability. Prentice-Hall Publisher, New Jersey
Himaja K, Surendra TS, Tara Kalyani S (2021) Dynamic stability analysis of a SMIB system with PSS and LQR optimal control. In: Proceedings of ICIPTM, Noida, India. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIPTM52218.2021.9388318
Liao K, He Z, Xu Y, Chen G, Dong ZY, Wong KP (2017) A sliding mode based dam** control of DFIG for interarea power oscillations. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 8:258–267. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2016.2597306
Sonfack LL, Kenne G, Fombu AM (2018) A new static synchronous series compensator control strategy based on SMIB system RBF neuro-sliding mode technique for power flow control and DC voltage regulation. Electr Power Compon Syst 46:456–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325008.2018.1445795
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Appendices
Appendices
SVeC data
1.1 Computation of initial conditions in SMIB system
THETA1 = (pi*THETA)/180 = 0. 3370 (Voltage angle in radian).
THETA2 = (pi*0)/180 = 0 (Voltage angle in radian)
-
Step 1: \(\begin{aligned} E & = \left( {V_{1} + \left( {R_{\text{S}} + i*X_{\text{q}} } \right)*I_{\text{G}} } \right) = 1.2758 + i1.0637 \\ & = 1.6611\angle {0}{\text{.6950}} \\ \end{aligned}\)
$$ \delta = {0}{{.6950*180/3}}{.14} = {39}{{.8401}}\; \left( {{\text{Voltage}}\;{\text{angle}}\;{\text{in}}\;{\text{degrees}}} \right) $$ -
Step 2: \(I_{\text{dq}} = I_{\text{G}} *e^{{ - i\left( {\delta + \pi /2} \right)}} \;(\delta - {\text{angle in radian}}).\)
\(\begin{aligned} I_{\text{d}} & = \text{real}\left( {I_{\text{dq}} } \right)\;{\text{and}}\;I_{\text{q}} = \text{imag}\left( {I_{\text{dq}} } \right) \\ V_{\text{dq}} & = V_{1} e^{{ - i\left( {\delta + 3.14/2} \right)}} \;(\delta - {\text{angle in radian}}) \\ \end{aligned}\)
\(V_{\text{d}} = \text{real}\left( {V_{\text{dq}} } \right)\;{\text{and}}\;V_{\text{q}} = \text{imag}\left( {V_{\text{dq}} } \right)\)
-
Step 3: \(E_{{d}}^{^{\prime}} = V_{\text{d}} + R_{\text{S}} I_{\text{q}} - X_{\text{q}} I_{\text{q}}\).
-
Step 4: \(E_{\text{q}}^{^{\prime}} = V_{\text{q}} + R_{\text{S}} I_{\text{q}} + X_{\text{d}}^{^{\prime}} I_{\text{d}}\).
-
Step 5: \(E_{\text{fd}} = E_{\text{q}}^{^{\prime}} + \left( {X_{\text{d}} - X_{\text{d}}^{^{\prime}} } \right)I_{\text{d}}\).
-
Step 6: \(V_{\text{ref}} = V_{\text{i}} + \left( {{\raise0.7ex\hbox{${E_{\text{fd}} }$} \!\mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{E_{\text{fd}} } {K_{A} }}}\right.\kern-0pt} \!\lower0.7ex\hbox{${K_{A} }$}}} \right)\) and \(T_{\text{M}} = E_{\text{q}}^{^{\prime}} I_{\text{q}} + \left( {X_{\text{q}} - X_{\text{d}}^{^{\prime}} } \right)I_{\text{d}} I_{\text{q}}\).
1.2 Calculation of K-constants in SMIB system
In SMIB system, considering 0.02 external resistance i.e. \(R_{\text{e}} = 0.02\) [28] and calculate the K-constants using [28]
(\(\delta\)-angle in radian)
(\(\delta\)-angle in radian)
1.3 Calculation of ‘A’ and ‘b’ matrices in state space model for SMIB system
The state-space model of the system is represented as [28]
where
1.4 Computation of initial conditions in SMIB system with SVeC
The calculation of effective reactance of the SMIB system with SVeC is \(X_{\text{SVeC}} = 0.7044\) p.u (Consider the Duty Ratio from zero to 1)
1.5 Calculation of K-constants and A and B matrices in state-space form for SMIB system with SVeC Δe = 5.0216
The equations for calculation of initial conditions with SVeC are similar to septs from 1 to 6, presented in Section “Calculation of K-constants in SMIB system”, and all are in p.u
Calculation of K-constants and A and B matrices in state-space form for SMIB system with SVeC
The equations for calculation of K-constants are presented in Section “Calculation of ‘A’ and ‘b’ matrices in state space model for SMIB system”.
The installation of SVeC in SMIB system results in addition of state variables corresponding to the SVeC controller \(\Delta X_{\text{SVeC}} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}l} {\Delta D_{\text{S}} } & {\Delta X_{\text{SVeC}} } \\ \end{array} } \right]^{T}\) in equations presented in Section “Computation of initial conditions in SMIB system with SVeC” to the ‘A’ matrix [11, 12]. The modified state variables with SVeC controller as
where
In \(\Delta x\), the state variables, \(\Delta D_{\text{S}}\) and \(\Delta X_{\text{SVeC}}\) are the state variables of SVeC and the other variables are discussed in Sect. 2.1. The eigenvalues of the system matrix will be increased to two. The total eigenvalues of the system matrix with the installation of SVeC in SMIB system is six.
The equations corresponding to the SVeC controller are added in the HP model of SMIB system [15, 16]. Here
\(K_{2} = \frac{{\partial P_{\text{e}} }}{{\partial E_{\text{q}}^{^{\prime}} }},\;K_{1} = \frac{{\partial P_{\text{e}} }}{\partial \delta }\;{\text{and}}\;K_{{D_{\text{S}} }} = \frac{{\partial P_{\text{e}} }}{{\partial D_{\text{S}} }}.\)
Assuming stator resistance \(R_{\text{S}} = 0\), the electrical power \(\left( {P_{\text{e}} } \right)\) is.
\(P_{\text{e}} = \frac{{E_{\text{q}}^{^{\prime}} V_{\infty } \sin \delta }}{{X_{\text{T}} }},\),where \(X_{\text{T}} = X_{\text{d}}^{^{\prime}} + X_{\text{eff}}\) and \(X_{\text{eff}} = X_{\text{e}} - X_{\text{SVeC}} \left( {D_{\text{S}} } \right)\) where \(D_{\text{S}}\) is the duty ratio of the switches.
The system matrix Asys for the corresponding model can be obtained as
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Himaja, K. Design of an output feedback variable structure series vectorial compensator to enhance dynamic stability. Int. J. Dynam. Control 12, 737–752 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-023-01183-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-023-01183-9