Log in

Digital Twin Data-Driven Multi-Disciplinary and Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Automatic Design of Negative Stiffness Honeycomb

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The honeycomb structures perform well in shock and vibration isolation with a light weight and small material. They cannot reuse due to plastic buckling after a deformation. To overcome this disadvantage, many researchers have actively studied the development of a reusable honeycomb structure using the elastic buckling mechanism. They proposed a new shape for honeycombs: one that can absorb and dissipate energy through a negative stiffness (NS) effect caused by the elastic buckling phenomenon. However, existing studies have focused on the concept design of the NS curved beam, and the research on how to design products in detail is insufficient. Therefore, this study proposes a digital twin data-driven design framework for the detailed design of the semi-symmetric NS curved beam. For this, multi-disciplinary and multi-objective optimization of the virtual NS beam model is performed by maximizing the energy absorption in the elastic buckling discipline through geometric design variables and analytical parameters, and enhancing its similarity to accurate theoretical models in the digital twin discipline through coupling variables. For the optimization, the specific energy absorption (SEA) and error rate are modeled as regression models, and convergence is modeled as a classification model using an artificial intelligence (AI) model. The optimum results improved the energy absorption and reduced the relative error rates while ensuring convergence of the virtual model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Correa, D. M., Klatt, T., Cortes, S., Haberman, M., Kovar, D., & Seepersad, C. (2015). Negative stiffness honeycombs for recoverable shock isolation. Rapid Prototy** Journal, 21(2), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-12-2014-0182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Correa, D. M., Seepersad, C. C., & Haberman, M. R. (2015). Mechanical design of negative stiffness honeycomb materials. Integrating Materials and Manufacturing Innovation, 4(1), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40192-015-0038-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Qiu, J., Lang, J. H., & Slocum, A. H. (2004). A curved-beam bistable mechanism. Journal of microelectromechanical systems, 13(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1109/JMEMS.2004.825308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ngo, T.-H., Chi, I.-T., Chau, M.-Q., & Wang, D.-A. (2022). An energy harvester based on a bistable origami mechanism. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 23, 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Klatt, T., Haberman, M., & Conner Seepersad, C. (2013). Selective laser sintering of negative stiffness mesostructures for recoverable, nearly-ideal shock isolation. In 2013 international solid freeform fabrication symposium. University of Texas at Austin.

  6. Shan, S., Kang, S. H., Raney, J. R., Wang, P., Fang, L., Candido, F., & Bertoldi, K. (2015). Multistable architected materials for trap** elastic strain energy. Advanced Materials, 27(29), 4296–4301. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201501708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Correa, D. M., Klatt, T., Cortes, S., Haberman, M., Kovar, D., & Seepersad, C. (2014). Negative stiffness honeycombs for recoverable shock isolation. In Proceedings of the solid freeform fabrication symposium. The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, US.

  8. Chen, S., Tan, X., Hu, J., Zhu, S., Wang, B., Wang, L., **, Y., & Wu, L. (2021). A novel gradient negative stiffness honeycomb for recoverable energy absorption. Composites Part B: Engineering, 215, 108745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tan, X., Wang, B., Wang, L., Zhu, S., Chen, S., Yao, K., & Xu, P. (2022). Effect of beam configuration on its multistable and negative stiffness properties. Composite Structures, 286, 115308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, Q., Zhang, X., & Zhu, B. (2018). Design of buckling-induced mechanical metamaterials for energy absorption using topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 58(4), 1395–1410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-1970-y

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhakatayev, A., Kappassov, Z., & Varol, H. A. (2020). Analytical modeling and design of negative stiffness honeycombs. Smart Materials and Structures, 29(4), 045024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/ab773a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, F., Jiang, X., Wang, X., & Wang, L. (2020). Machine learning-based design and optimization of curved beams for multistable structures and metamaterials. Extreme Mechanics Letters, 41, 101002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Giri, T. R., & Mailen, R. (2021). Controlled snap** sequence and energy absorption in multistable mechanical metamaterial cylinders. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 204, 106541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Izard, A. G., Alfonso, R. F., McKnight, G., & Valdevit, L. (2017). Optimal design of a cellular material encompassing negative stiffness elements for unique combinations of stiffness and elastic hysteresis. Materials & Design, 135, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, S., Wang, B., Zhu, S., Tan, X., Hu, J., Lian, X., & Wu, L. (2020). A novel composite negative stiffness structure for recoverable trap** energy. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 129, 105697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tao, F., Sui, F., Liu, A., Qi, Q., Zhang, M., Song, B., & Nee, A. Y. (2019). Digital twin-driven product design framework. International Journal of Production Research, 57(12), 3935–3953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones, D., Snider, C., Nassehi, A., Yon, J., & Hicks, B. (2020). Characterising the digital twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 29, 36–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, M., Fang, S., Dong, H., & Xu, C. (2021). Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 58, 346–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Glaessgen, E., & Stargel, D. (2012). The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and US Air Force vehicles. In 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures conference 14th AIAA.

  20. Hattori, G., & Serpa, A. L. (2015). Contact stiffness estimation in ANSYS using simplified models and artificial neural networks. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 97, 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Charlton, S., Sikka, P., & Zhang, H. (1995). Extracting contact parameters from tactile data using artificial neural networks. In 1995 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics. Intelligent systems for the 21st CENTURY (Vol. 5, pp. 3954–3959). IEEE.

  22. Behrens, A., & Schafstall, H. (1998). 2D and 3D simulation of complex multistage forging processes by use of adaptive friction coefficient. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 80, 298–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Farah, S., Anderson, D. G., & Langer, R. (2016). Physical and mechanical properties of PLA, and their functions in widespread applications—A comprehensive review. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 107, 367–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vanegas-Useche, L., Abdel Wahab, M., & Parker, G. (2018). Determination of the normal contact stiffness and integration time step for the finite element modeling of bristle-surface interaction. CMC-Computers Materials & Continua, 56(1), 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bathe, K. J. (2006). Finite element procedures. Prentice-Hall Inc.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Hou, R. (2018). Optimal latin hypercube designs for computer experiments based on multiple objectives. University of South Florida.

  27. Li, H., Yang, L., & Liu, M. Q. (2022). Construction of space-filling orthogonal Latin hypercube designs. Statistics & Probability Letters, 180, 109245.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 785–794).

  29. Chen, T., He, T., Benesty, M., Khotilovich, V., Tang, Y., Cho, H., & Chen, K. (2015). Xgboost: extreme gradient boosting. R package version 0.4–2, 1(4), 1–4. https://rdocumentation.org/packages/xgboost/versions/0.4-2.

  30. Fazita, M. N., Khalil, H. A., Izzati, A. N. A., & Rizal, S. (2019). Effects of strain rate on failure mechanisms and energy absorption in polymer composites. In Failure analysis in biocomposites, fibre-reinforced composites and hybrid composites (pp. 51–78). Woodhead Publishing.

  31. Ashok, D., Raju Bahubalendruni, M. V. A., & Balamurali, G. (2022). A novel nature inspired 3D open lattice structure for specific energy absorption. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 236, 2434–2440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ashok, D., Raju Bahubalendruni, M. V. A., Mertens, A. J., & Balamurali, G. (2022). Numerical and experimental investigations of novel nature inspired open lattice cellular structures for enhanced stiffness and specific energy absorption. Materials Today Communications, 31, 103286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hart, S. (1989). Shapley value. In Game theory (pp. 210–216). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

  34. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/8a20a8621978632d76c43dfd28b67767-Abstract.html.

  35. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., & Haftka, R. T. (1997). Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: Survey of recent developments. Structural optimization, 14(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01197554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zang, T., & Green, L. (1999). Multidisciplinary design optimization techniques-Implications and opportunities for fluid dynamics research. In 30th fluid dynamics conference (p. 3798).

  37. Morales, N., & Manocha, D. (2016). Efficient wave-based acoustic material design optimization. Computer-Aided Design, 78, 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Marinić-Kragić, I., Vučina, D., & Ćurković, M. (2016). Efficient shape parameterization method for multidisciplinary global optimization and application to integrated ship hull shape optimization workflow. Computer-Aided Design, 80, 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Back, T. (1996). Evolutionary algorithms in theory and practice: Evolution strategies, evolutionary programming, genetic algorithms. Oxford University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Van der Maaten, L., & Hinton, G. (2008). Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of machine learning research, 9(11), 2579–2605. http://jmlr.org/papers/v9/vandermaaten08a.html.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2021R1A2C1013557 and 2020R1A5A8018822).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JC: Conceptualization, investigation, formal analysis, writing – original draft. HK: investigation, formal analysis. TN: investigation, formal analysis. YJK: conceptualization, methodology, validation, visualization, project administration, writing – original draft. YN: conceptualization, funding acquisition, project administration, supervision, writing – review & editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Young-** Kang or Yoojeong Noh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

The convergence classification model in Sect. 4.3 is determined very sensitively by the design variables and analysis parameters. In particular, In particular, in FE models with strong nonlinearity in analysis, convergence/nonconvergence varies sensitively depending on the combination of analysis parameters. Figure 21 is a scatterplot showing three reduced features and convergence/non-convergence labels using t-distributed static neighbor embedding (t-SNE) and principal component analysis (PCA), which are representative methods of dimension reduction and data visualization [40]. Here, 0 represents non-convergence, and 1 represents convergence. The results of t-SNE, a nonlinear dimensionality reduction method, show that nonlinearity is very serious for the reduced three features, and that most of the regions have a mixture of convergent/non-convergent classes. Looking at PCA, a linear dimension reduction method, convergence/non-convergence data are mixed with each other with a large variation. This result clearly shows that it is very difficult to distinguish convergence/nonconvergence according to changes in design variables and analysis parameters in NSH curved beams, and means that even a slight change in input values can change the classification results.

Fig. 21
figure 21

Difficulty of classification of convergene/non-convergence

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, J., Kim, H., Noh, T. et al. Digital Twin Data-Driven Multi-Disciplinary and Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Automatic Design of Negative Stiffness Honeycomb. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 24, 1453–1472 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-023-00816-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-023-00816-5

Keywords

Navigation