Log in

Abstract

After thermoforming, plastic parts are stacked for ship**, and these parts tend to stick together. Called nesting, sheet stock is often first coated with a silicone compound before thermoforming to prevent this. The coating usually consists of a small amount of lubricant dispersed in a majority of carrier fluid, and this fluid must then dry before reaching the sheet winder or else the coating blotches. This coupling of coating and drying to determine when to expect blotching is examined. Roll coating involves a dimensionless group called the elasticity number that governs the thickness of the coating to be dried. The drying section involves the evaporation of the coating carrier fluid, and then diffusion into the dry surrounding atmosphere. When analyzing the drying, a new dimensionless group that governs blotching is discovered, called blotchability. The result of this analysis allows practitioners to determine which operating conditions cause blotching, and how to eliminate it. Roll coating uses a deflecting rubber roll to apply vanishingly thin coatings (≤1 μm), an interesting elastohydrodynamic problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Additional correlations for coating thickness can be found in literature.4,5 Cohu and Magnin4 report film thicknesses about 40% lower than those predicted by Coyle.1

  2. Coating theory requires Young’s modulus; however, practitioners use a durometer to measure the rubber cover hardness. Deducing Young’s modulus from the measured hardness with a durometer following Gent6 is recommended. Mix and Giacomin7 have also developed a conversion from durometer hardness to Young’s modulus.

References

  1. Coyle, DJ, “Forward Roll Coating with Deformable Rolls: A Simple One-Dimensional Elastohydrodynamic Model.” Chem. Eng. Sci., 43 2673–2684 (1988)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Coyle, DJ, Macosko, CW, Scriven, LE, “Film-Splitting Flows in Forward Roll Coating.” J. Fluid Mech., 171 183–207 (1986)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Middleman, S, Fundamentals of Polymer Processing, Chapter 8. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohu, O, Magnin, A, “Forward Roll Coating of Newtonian Fluids with Deformable Rolls: An Experimental Investigation.” Chem. Eng. Sci., 52 1339–1347 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, JW, Maloney, JD, “Flow of Fluids between Rotating Rollers.” Tappi J., 49 63 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gent, AN, “On the Relation Between Indentation Hardness and Young’s Modulus.” Trans. Inst. Rubber Ind., 34 46–57 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mix, AW, Giacomin, AJ, “Dimensionless Durometry.” Rheology Research Center Report, 182, 2008.

  8. Carvalho, MS, “Effect of Thickness and Viscoelastic Properties of Roll Cover on Deformable Roll Coating Flows.” Chem. Eng. Sci., 58 4323–4333 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bird, RB, Stewart, WE, Lightfoot, EN, Transport Phenomena, pp. 613–616. Wiley, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Plastic Ingenuity, Inc., of Cross Plains, Wisconsin, and the Bemis Company, Inc., of Neenah, Wisconsin, for their financial support, through their memberships in the Industrial Consortium of the Polymer Engineering Center at the University of Wisconsin. We are also indebted to the Placon Corporation for its sustaining sponsorship of the Rheology Research Center at the University of Wisconsin. We are further grateful to Professor R. Byron Bird of the University of Wisconsin for his careful corrections.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. W. Mix or A. J. Giacomin.

Appendix: carrier fluid volatility

Appendix: carrier fluid volatility

When a volatile coating dries, it liberates carrier fluid mass, in the form of a gas at the drying surface. This gas moves away from its liberating coating surface, and thus slightly accelerates drying. The drying analysis presented here

$$ \theta_{\text{f}} = {\frac{{\left( {\phi - 1} \right)^{2} }}{4}} $$
(27)

conservatively neglects this, which yields9

$$ \theta_{\text{f}} = {\frac{{x_{\text{s}} \left( {\phi - 1} \right)^{2} }}{4\varphi \sqrt \pi }} $$
(33)

where φ is given implicitly by

$$ x_{\text{s}} = {\frac{{\sqrt \pi \varphi {\frac{{1 + {\text{erf}}\varphi }}{{{ \exp }\left( { - \varphi^{2} } \right)}}}}}{{1 + \sqrt \pi \varphi {\frac{{1 + {\text{erf}}\varphi }}{{{ \exp }\left( { - \varphi^{2} } \right)}}}}}} $$
(34)

and where

$$ x_{\text{s}} \equiv {\frac{1}{{{\frac{{M_{\text{w}} }}{{M_{\text{A}} }}}\left( {{\frac{1}{{w_{\text{s}} }}} - 1} \right) + 1}}} $$
(35)

the molecular weights M w and M A are defined in Table 1. When water is the carrier fluid, θ f from (27) hardly exceeds θ f from (33) because x s ≅ 0 and then (33) reduces to (25). For more volatile carrier fluids, equation (25) can significantly overpredict θ f.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mix, A.W., Chen, Z.B., Johnson, L.M. et al. Blotching in roll coating. J Coat Technol Res 8, 67–74 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-010-9282-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-010-9282-1

Keywords

Navigation