Abstract
Purpose of review
Global disparities in HIV infection, particularly among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM), indicate the importance of exploring the multi-level processes that shape HIV’s spread. We used Complex Systems Theory and the PRISMA guidelines to conduct a systematic review of 63 global reviews to understand how HIV is socially patterned among GBMSM. The purpose was to conduct a thematic analysis of the reviews to (1) synthesize the multi-level risk factors of HIV risk, (2) categorize risk across the socioecological model, and (3) develop a conceptual model that visualizes the interrelated factors that shape GBMSMS’s HIV “risk.”
Recent Findings
We included 49 studies of high and moderate quality studies. Results indicated that GBMSM’s HIV risk stems from the individual, interpersonal, and structural levels of the socioecological model. We identified a few themes that shape GBMSM’s risk of HIV infection related to biomedical prevention methods; sexual and sex-seeking behaviors; behavioral prevention methods; individual-level characteristics and syndemic infections; lived experiences and interpersonal relationships; country-level income; country-level HIV prevalence; and structural stigma. The multi-level factors, in tandem, serve to perpetuate GBMSM’s risk of HIV infection globally.
Summary
The amalgamation of our thematic analyses from our systematic reviews of reviews suggests that the risk of HIV infection operates in an emergent, dynamic, and complex nature across multiple levels of the socioecological model. Applying complex systems theory indicates how multilevel factors create a dynamic and reinforcing system of HIV risk among GBMSM.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) around the world experience inequitable disparities in their risk for acquiring HIV. In Europe, 50% of new HIV cases in its western region are among GBMSM [1]. In the Eastern European region, GBMSM HIV transmissions increased eight-fold from 2008–2017 [1, 2]. In 2019, in the United States, 69% of new HIV cases were among GBMSM [3] but Black GBMSM in the US account for 37% of new HIV diagnoses among GBMSM [4]. In South America, GBMSM are one of three key population groups, including transgender women and female sex workers, that account for nearly half of HIV infections [5]. In Africa, a meta-analysis indicates that 61% of GBMSM ever tested for HIV, 46% tested within the last 12 months, and only 15% of African GBMSM were engaged in care [6]. In Asia, HIV prevalence among GBMSM increased from 2007 to 2015 and ranged from 11–32% depending on the country [7]. An exploration of the factors that shape GBMSM inequities is paramount.
The literature on health behaviors and HIV among GBMSM show that current per-act probabilities of acquiring HIV, without incorporating any preventive efforts, show the highest risk stems from receptive anal intercourse at 138 infections per 10,000 exposures and, third highest from insertive anal intercourse at 11 infections per 10,000 exposures [8••]. There is upwards of a 90% reduction in HIV risk if condoms are used consistently and correctly [9]. These probabilities can be altered by pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), which indicates nearly 100% protection if the regimens are adhered to appropriately [10••, 11••]. Additionally, Undetectable = Untransmittable indicates that persons living with HIV whose viral load is suppressed through adherence to treatment regimens do not transmit HIV to sexual partners [12••]. The science of HIV risk showcases numerous interrelated factors that can shape risk.
Theoretical models aim to incorporate structural and social determinants of health, which is vital for HIV science. The Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework emphasizes the social, cultural, political, and economic structures that shape stigma itself, and not merely the stigma enacted interpersonally [13]. While the framework is useful theoretically, the framework does not offer specificity in elucidating the various relationships between the social, cultural, and political levels. Rhodes et al.’s “[HIV] risk environment” shifts the focus toward the social and structural processes rather than on endogenous factors of the individual. However, the “risk environment” framework was initially conceptualized in spaces of rapid social, political, and economic transition and again didn’t elucidate the specificity of relationships [14]. The socioecological model, often presented as concentric circles, is a model that recognizes relationships between individual, interpersonal, community, organizational, and societal level factors that can all influence health, but the relationships usually are not specific [15]. Numerous studies have examined factors such as stigma, access and quality of services, and policies that can influence HIV risk. Given that multifaceted factors shape HIV risk, studying their relationships, including reinforcing and structural processes, and how the totality of factors shape HIV risk is critical. Theoretically, we can End the HIV Epidemic, yet the science of HIV is not serving all communities equitably.
Complex Systems Theory is arguably a valuable application to study HIV risk. Emergence is a key concept, which refers to the formation of the collective properties (HIV risk) arising from the systems' numerous interactions. Complex systems, as applied to HIV, recognizes that the interacting, interrelated, and dynamic processes are what create one’s HIV risk [16]. Complex systems are adaptive and dynamic in nature and have reinforcing processes that interact with one another and create dependencies and feedback loops to different parts of the system, which all, in tandem, serve to create and elevate GBMSM’S HIV risk. The emergent collective properties (HIV risk) cannot be understood by looking at system parts in isolation. Aristotle stated, “the totality is not, as it were, a mere heap, but the whole is something besides the parts…” [17]. The whole is the focus of complex systems, including how the whole gets created and emerges into existence. Complex Systems Theory has been used to visualize and specify the system of factors that shape health outcomes such as obesity, which portrays a high level of complexity of different interrelated factors across levels of the socioecological model [18]. Complex systems have not yet been applied to the body of HIV literature to identify and visualize the multi-level processes that (re)produce and socially pattern GBMSM’s HIV “risk” as a product of the system [18].
While GBMSM experience numerous risk factors for HIV that have been well studied in the literature, no single study can examine all the risk factors simultaneously. However, studying the entirety of the HIV literature will allow us to identify and visualize the multi-level factors that (re)produce HIV risk. Therefore, we used the Complex Systems Theory approach to conduct a systematic review of the HIV literature to (1) synthesize the multi-level risk factors of HIV risk, (2) thematically categorize risk across the socioecological model, and (3) develop a conceptual model that visualizes the interrelated factors that shape GBMSMS’s HIV “risk.”
Materials and Methods
We conducted a systematic review of systematic reviews that aligned with the PRISMA criteria [19]. We worked with a librarian and research analyst to conduct the review. We used the following search terms HIV/AIDS, human immunodeficiency virus, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; gay, bisexual, men who have sex with men, male-to-male sexual intercourse; systematic review, sco** review, meta-analysis. The full MESH search is provided in a supplementary file. We searched in CINAHL (n = 226), Global Health (n = 267), Psycinfo (n = 128), PubMed (n = 473), Scopus (n = 678), and Web of Science (n = 330) databases. We used the Covidence evidence synthesis software, which has systematized the systematic review process [20]. We identified 2,102 studies and removed 1,249 duplicates, leaving 853 systematic reviews and meta-analyses for screening (Table 1).
To be included, publications were required to satisfy the following criteria: (1) had HIV infection or seropositivity as the primary outcome; (2) studied factors associated with HIV infection, whether quantitatively or qualitatively; (3) had GBMSM as a focus population; (4) were peer-reviewed systematic review or meta-analytic papers; and (6) written in English or Spanish. There was no limit on the timeframe or geographical area of the studies. Given the study is a meta-synthesis, we focused on systematic reviews & meta-analyses. Additionally, we used reviews because they interrogate discrepant information that arises in our scientific literature, ensuring high-quality data for visualization of HIV risk as a complex system. Exclusion criteria included: not having HIV infection or serostatus as the main outcome, not global in nature, no incorporation of GBMSM in study samples, non-review articles, and no examination of factors associated with HIV infection or positive serostatus. Two independent reviewers conducted the title and abstract screening (KS and SO). First, we examined titles and abstracts independently and in duplicate for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Any study that did not meet inclusion criteria after the title and abstract review was excluded (n = 633), leaving 220 studies for full-text review. Most studies excluded in this initial screening were either because the outcome of the studies was not HIV infection or positive serostatus or because the studies did not include GBMSM in the sample. During the full-text review, 157 papers were excluded, mainly because they did not explicitly examine factors associated with HIV infection or positive serostatus. This resulted in 63 systematic review studies for data extraction, which totaled 2,448 individual articles. Figure 1 captures the flow of title and abstract screening (reasons for exclusion are not provided at this stage in line with evidence synthesis methods) and full-text review (reasons for exclusion must be provided at this stage) from Covidence.
Analysis and conceptualizing HIV risk
Two reviewers (KS and KG) conducted data extraction and qualitative thematic analysis of the research literature. During the full paper review, we separately extracted the following information: (1) authors; (2) year of publication; (3) geographic area of study; (4) populations under study & their frequency, and (5) identified risk factors associated with the HIV infection outcome within each review. We extracted the information and organized them into tables. We conducted quality assessments of each review using the AMSTAR-2 guidelines for systematic reviews [21]. Supplementary tables one and two present each systematic review’s strengths, weaknesses, quality assessment, and the data and results extracted from each systematic review. If multiple populations were present, we only used extracted findings specific to GBMSM. After the primary results were extracted, KS and KG categorized them into higher-order themes and respective subthemes under each level of the socioecological model (Table 2) using Bronfenbrenner’s social-ecological model. For example, condom use, the number of sexual partners, and sexual position were coded as sexual and sex-seeking behaviors (theme) under the individual level of the socioecological model. We only extracted, synthesized, and visualized data from articles with moderate or high-quality assessments (n = 49).
KS used the systems map** software, Kumu.io, to create a conceptual model [22]. The output is a conceptual model that visually represents the HIV risk environment for GBMSM, which comprises the risk factors and their potential interrelationships identified through the systematic review of systematic reviews. The risk factors identified in the review were thematically analyzed to identify the relationships between the various risk factors and HIV infection. For each risk factor (e.g., sexual behaviors), we identified relationships from the literature that conceptualized specific HIV risk pathways (e.g., no condom use < – > increased HIV risk). We used text to represent the relationships between the risk factors (e.g., decreased condom use < – > increased HIV risk). Lines portray which extracted factors are directionally associated with each other. If the studies were quantitative associational/cross-sectional, we used nondirectional arrows. We utilized unidirectional arrows when the quantitative research examined a potential causal pathway (e.g., cohort studies, intervention studies). Quantitative studies that addressed confounding were of particular interest if observational. For qualitative studies, we used major thematic outputs (i.e., family/main theme), especially for studies that had methods to achieve data saturation. In the conceptual model, we aimed to ensure the directionality of arrows was theoretically relevant and aligned with the study design (e.g., limited PrEP policies and financing would influence access and use of PrEP, rather than vice versa). The conceptual model is a visual representation of the thematic analyses that portray the complex and diverse nature that systematically pattern HIV risk among GBMSM’s. The complex systems model is a dynamic system model and thus is not meant to serve as a static visualization despite its representation within the text. If studies found negative relationships, theoretically, in a complex system, that pathway would “turn off.” The dynamic model, which respects the principles of complex systems, is available in an online supplementary file.
Results
We included 49 systematic reviews and meta-analyses of high and moderate quality, which included a total of 1,721 studies. Among the included reviews, 35 were global (two or more continents), five only in the United States, six only in China, one in Brazil, one in Africa, and one in Europe. Thirty-two reviews explicitly focused on GBMSM, seven extended the study population beyond GBMSM to include high-risk populations such as injection drug users, sex workers, transgender people, incarcerated people, and LGBT populations more broadly. The remaining ten reviews were broader but included GBMSM in the inclusion criteria for the review. The risk of bias assessments indicated that 35 reviews were of high quality and 14 were of moderate quality. Four reviews were low quality, and nine were critically low quality (of which their data are not presented here).
The overwhelming majority (68%) of the systematic review literature on HIV infection and positive serostatus examined individual-level factors associated with infection. Eight reviews examined interpersonal-related factors, and six examined structural-level factors. Thematic analyses of the results implicated three levels of the socioecological model in the system of HIV risk: individual-, interpersonal-, and structural-level. Within the individual level, we identified (1A) biomedical prevention methods that shape HIV infection; (1B) sexual and sex-seeking behaviors influence HIV infection; (1C) behavioral prevention methods shape HIV infection; and (1D) individual-level characteristics and infections influence HIV infection as central themes. Within the interpersonal level, we identified that (2A) lived experiences and interpersonal relationships influence HIV infection. At the structural level, we found three themes: (3A) country-level income influences HIV infection; (3B) country-level HIV prevalence shapes HIV infection; and (3C) structural stigma shapes HIV infection.
Identified themes
Individual-level of the socioecological model
Theme 1A: Biomedical prevention methods shape HIV infection
There were four reviews, one in Europe and three globally that provided high-quality information that the use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) reduces HIV infection, emphasizing that greater adherence leads to more protection [22,23,24, 25••]. Wang et al. reviewed 74 studies reporting that post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) reduces HIV risk, reporting 2.6% seroconversions were observed among 19,456 GBMSM [26••]. However, there was a lack of data from low- and middle-income countries. Two high-quality reviews, one in Europe and the other focused on the United States, Australia, and Europe, indicated that the use of, and in particular, early-initiation of ARV treatment significantly reduces the HIV infection of sexual partners [25••, 26••]. A moderate-quality global review by Jiang et al. indicated that ARV reduces HIV infection risk [27••]. Overall, the review of systematic reviews demonstrates high-quality evidence that biomedical preventative behaviors have a dramatic impact on reducing HIV infection.
Theme 1B: Sexual and sex-seeking behaviors influences HIV infection
Sixteen reviews discussed how sexual and sex-seeking behaviors shape HIV infection. One high-quality global review indicated that transactional sex increases the risk of HIV infection (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1–1.6) among GBMSM [28••]. One high-quality review in China indicated that GBMSM who had sex in bathhouses, compared to other subgroups, had the highest prevalence of HIV (OR = 13.4, 95% CI 10.3–17.1, n = 22) [28••]. One high-quality review in China found that GBMSM who had sex with women, as compared to men only, had an elevated prevalence of HIV (6.6% vs. 5.4% 95% CI 1.01–1.6) [29]. A review by Li 2019 found that self-reported rectal douching was associated with elevated odds of living with HIV (OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.32 to 3.39) [30••]. Several high-quality reviews and metanalyses validated the well-documented association between condomless sex and increased HIV infection [26••, 30••, 31, 31, 33••]. Four reviews six (three high and one moderate) analyzed how behavioral health factors, specifically substance use, influence HIV risk [28••, 34••, 35, 36••]. Reviews investigated a variety of drugs. Three reviews found a strong association between substance use and elevated HIV infection [34••, 35, 36••], while one in China did not find a statistically significant association [28••].
Theme 1C: Behavioral prevention methods can shape HIV infection
Eleven reviews examined how individual-level behaviors shape HIV infection. Four reviews (three high quality and one moderate) indicated that serosorting is less effective at HIV prevention, as compared to condoms. Still, serosorting is consistently associated with a lower risk of HIV when compared to condomless anal intercourse with no serosorting [25••, 32, 37, 38]. Eight reviews (seven high quality and one moderate quality) identified that insertive sexual positions are more protective against HIV than receptive only or receptive and insertive sexual roles [25••, 26••, 39,40,41,42,43,44]. Lastly, eight reviews (one moderate and seven high quality) consistently showed that condom use during anal intercourse prevents HIV transmission [25••, 26••, 28••, 30••, 31, 33••, 37, 45].
Theme 1D: Individual-level characteristics and infections influence HIV infection
Fourteen systematic reviews explored associations between HIV infection and individual-level characteristics such as socioeconomic status, education level, age, circumcision status, and syndemic infections. One moderate quality review of 47 studies from 17 countries across Latin America and the Caribbean revealed that low socioeconomic status was associated with elevated HIV prevalence [30••]. Two high-quality reviews indicated lower education levels were associated with higher HIV prevalence [28••, 33••]. Associations between age and HIV infection were mixed. Two high-quality reviews indicated that younger age was associated with more significant HIV infection [32, 34••]. In contrast, one moderate quality review showed older aged MSM had higher rates of HIV [30••]. The association between circumcision status and HIV risk has been studied extensively with mixed results. Six systematic reviews examined circumcisions and HIV, of which four reviews of three high quality and one moderate quality found no significant relationship with reduced HIV infection [25••, 40,41,42]. Two other high-quality reviews found some protection against HIV with male circumcision but mostly in low-middle-income countries and among insertive partners [44, 45]. The two reviews suggest that mixed results may be due to variations in study design, geography, or the country’s economic status. For example, 29 of 33 studies in Zhang et al.’s 2019 review found no significant association between circumcision and HIV infection. However, subgroup analysis revealed a protective association was found among cross-sectional studies (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87–0.98) compared to the cohort studies, which found nonsignificant associations (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.86–1.19) [45]. Global data from 62 observational studies involving a total of 119, 248 MSM revealed that circumcision was protective against HIV infection among MSM in LMICs (0·58, 0·41–0·83; k = 23; I2 = 77%) but not among MSM in high-income countries (0·99, 0·90–1·09; k = 20; I2 = 40%) [44]. Lastly, HIV infection was associated with other sexually transmitted infections. Seven reviews, all high quality, indicated that the presence of other STIs, covering syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, HPV, HBV, and HSV-2, was associated with higher rates of HIV infection [31, 33••, 45, 46••]. The thematic analysis of the individual-level factors reifies the complex nature of HIV risk. The body of research on individual-level factors portrays the complexity of factors that all can serve to increase risk of HIV infection.
Interpersonal-level of the socioecological model
Theme 2A: Lived experiences and interpersonal relationships influence HIV infection
Eight systematic reviews examined how an individual’s lived experience and interpersonal relationships might shape their risk of HIV. A 2018 moderate-quality review among incarcerated GBMSM from 24 middle- and high-income countries revealed that incarcerated GBMSM are at five times higher risk of HIV infection than incarcerated men who do not have sex with men [47]. However, the risk among incarcerated GBMSM varied by geography such that HIV prevalence among incarcerated GBMSM is 10 times higher in Latin America and 20 times higher in Western Europe [47]. Another high-quality review indicated that the continuity of HIV services, such as testing and testing pre-and-post release could reduce HIV cases among Black GBMSM who experience incarceration and reenter their communities post-release [48].
Three systematic reviews (two moderate and one high quality) examined the relationship between HIV infection and experiences of abuse (childhood and intimate partner violence), all indicating that GBMSM who experienced abuse had elevated HIV infections [30••, 48, 49]. A moderate 2012 systematic review of 12 papers revealed higher HIV infection among men with a history of childhood sexual abuse as compared with men with no history [OR = 1.54; 95% CI (1.22–1.95)] [50••]. Two reviews (Coelho and Buller) found positive associations between violent relationships and elevated HIV infection [30••, 48]. Buller et al.’s global review of data from 8,835 MSM found that exposure to intimate partner violence was associated with a 1.5 times greater chance of a positive HIV status [AOR = 1.5, 95% CI (1.3, 1.7)] [49].
One moderate-quality review examined how GBMSM’s experiences of interpersonal homophobia and homophobic abuse shaped HIV diagnoses. The 2021 rapid review and meta-analysis of 121 cross-sectional studies found an elevated risk of diagnosed HIV among GBMSM in the US who experienced homophobia (OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.10–1.64, I2 = 86.3%) [50••]. Stratified analysis showed different levels of HIV infection by race and ethnic group, with Latinos experiencing the greatest.
Lastly, a review examined motivational interviewing as an intervention to support the prevention of HIV among MSM. However, the results concluded that evidence of motivational interviewing’s effectiveness was lacking [51]. The various interpersonal-level factors that shape HIV infection serve to further complicate conceptualizations of HIV “risk.”
Structural-level of the socioecological model
Theme 3A: Country-level income influences HIV infection
Two review papers (moderate and high quality) discussed how country-level socioeconomic factors influence HIV prevalence. The moderate quality review by Baral et al. indicated a lower odds ratio for HIV infection among GBMSM in low-income countries (OR = 7.8, 95% CI 7.2, 8.4), as compared to GBMSM in middle-income countries (OR = 23.5, 95% CI 22.8, 24.0) [52••]. A review by Blondeel et al. indicated that MSM in low-middle income countries had a 19.3 increased chance of HIV infection, as compared to the general population [61i].
Theme 3B: Country-level prevalence influences HIV infection
In the same two reviews, GBMSM in very low prevalence countries had the highest OR of HIV infection [OR = 58.4, 95% CI (56.3, 60.6)], as compared to low prevalence [OR = 14.4, 95% CI (13.8, 14.9)], and high prevalence countries [OR = 9.6, 95% CI (8.9, 10.2)] [52••]. Another review showed geographic variation in HIV burden, with the highest prevalence of HIV among GBMSM found in Caribbean countries and sub-Saharan Africa, and lowest in countries within the Middle East and North Africa [52••].
Theme 3C: Structural stigma shapes HIV infection
Two high-quality reviews examined the role of structural stigma, including how homophobic and criminalizing policies elevate HIV infection [53••, 54••]. Oldenbrug et al.’s review indicated an 11% lower HIV prevalence in countries with protective laws for MSM, compared to countries lacking legal protections [53••]. Countries with protective language for men who sell sex had a 7% lower prevalence of HIV, as compared to those without such protections [54••]. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 75 papers found that GBMSM were more likely to be aware of their HIV status in countries with less repressive legislation (22% vs. 6.7%) and less severe penalties for same-sex relations [55]. These findings indicate that structural factors could influence HIV infection and complicate our understanding of HIV risk further.
Dynamic and emergent nature of HIV risk
In totality, the amalgamation of our thematic analyses and findings from our systematic reviews of reviews suggests that the risk of HIV infection operates in an emergent, dynamic, and complex nature across multiple levels of the socioecological model that interact with one another to elevate GBMSMS’s risk of HIV further. Structural factors such as stigmatizing policies, macroeconomic factors, and population-level epidemiology can shape environments in ways that produce HIV infection—moreover, interpersonal factors such as experiences of abuse and homophobia further shape HIV infection among GBMSM. Lastly, numerous individual-level factors such as sexual behaviors, use of biomedical prevention methods, and sexual relationships, amongst others, further perpetuate the risk of HIV infection among GBMSM. This systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses and the developed visualization indicated that HIV risk among GBMSM worldwide is socially patterned by numerous interrelated factors, such that the ecosystem itself is the driver of the disproportionate risk of HIV that burdens GBMSM (Fig. 2).
Discussion
The results of our systematic review portray that, globally, HIV infections among GBMSM arise from a complex interplay of structural, interpersonal, and individual-level factors. The visualization positions that structural, interpersonal, and individual-level forces operate in concert to structure GBMSM’s risk of HIV infection. The totality of these relationships influences the emergence of HIV infection in ways that disproportionately burden GBMSM throughout the globe. The analyses and conceptual model suggest that focusing on the system that shapes HIV infection is needed to address the interactional and collective nature of HIV risk that GBMSM experience.
The growing application of complex systems models improves our understanding of how several intersecting processes shape population-level HIV infection and prevalence. A recent agent-based model (ABM) of a complex system explored U.S. racial inequities in PrEP use and showed that PrEP uptake will reduce overall HIV infections, it will do nothing to address the HIV disparities currently existing [56]. In the model, when Black and White agents use PrEP at equal rates, the HIV disparity ratio between the two groups continues to increase because the underlying disparity was never addressed [56]. Goedel’s findings support the need to simultaneously address the diversity of risk factors such as accessibility, acceptability, and quality of healthcare service, which align with the results of our study, portraying the system that shapes HIV infection. This aligns with a meta-analysis of 194 studies in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom, which showed that Black GBMSM were more likely to engage in individual-level prevention behaviors (e.g., fewer sexual partners, more condom use, less likely to use substances), as compared to White GBMSM, yet had greater odds of testing positive for HIV and six-fold greater odds of having undiagnosed HIV [57]. However, as our systematic review indicates, the scientific literature still predominately focuses on individual-level risk factors for HIV, as evidenced by the 68% of articles from 2000–2021 that focused on individual-level factors. Our findings add further credence to how HIV infection arises from a complex system of factors, not simply individual-level behaviors, and indicate that enhanced conceptualizations of HIV “risk” are needed.
This is the first study to identify and visualize the interacting processes that socially pattern the emergence of HIV risk and infection among GBMSM. Global responses, such as the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), must adequately address the system of factors together, instead of in isolation, to achieve zero new HIV infections. Scholarship implores us to think of interventions not merely as a “package” of activities but rather, alternatively, to focus on the dynamic processes of the environment and context where interventions are introduced [58]. The focus on the dynamic processes is significant for HIV, which, as our results show, arises from multi-faceted routes across the socioecological model. Studies have also shown how country-level policies shape the ecosystem of HIV risk in ways that elevate GBMSM’s risk of HIV [59]. Research also identifies how combining multiple HIV intervention strategies may be necessary given the complexity in which HIV risk is socially patterned [60]. Further research needs to examine how risk factors are situated within the social and structural contexts to fully grapple with the multiple levels of influence that can weaken or support the capacity of GBMSM to reduce their risk of HIV infection.
Limitations in our synthesis include aspects of the approach used and generalizability. While we used a systematic review of review studies, the system of processes outlined in Fig. 2 is only partial. This is especially true as our primary outcome was HIV infection, and we didn’t include studies that might have explored risk factors for the risk factors themselves. The dynamic processes will change over time as scientific research and interventions occur. Many of the pathways developed were identified as associations, given the cross-sectional nature of much of our HIV research literature. To enhance the rigor, we removed the 22% of reviews that were low or critically low quality. Lastly, given that our data focused on reviews or meta-analyses rather than individual studies, we may be missing risk domains if no review study exists for that domain. However, focusing on reviews and meta-analyses allowed for a meta-review of our scientific literature on HIV risk to begin to grapple with the complexity of “HIV risk.”
Future research should further explore the system of HIV risk by examining what may shape the HIV risk factors (risks of risks). Automating systematic review processes using natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning could enhance the synthesis of the research literature. NLP is a collection of algorithms that can be used to identify, extract, parse, and analyze textual data, such as written text in journal articles, which is growing with tools such as GPT, ElicitAI, amongst others [61]. The application of Complex Systems Theory and our conceptual model can be leveraged to better hypothesize and study the mechanisms that shape population-level HIV inequities among priority populations across different environments, geographies, and interventions.
Conclusion
The thematic analysis and visualization indicate that HIV infection among GBMSM, globally, is socially patterned by a diversity of numerous interacting risk factors. Applying complex systems theory indicates how multilevel factors create a dynamic and reinforcing system of HIV risk among GBMSM. Having this more complete understanding of what shapes HIV risk is critical for develo** more effective HIV prevention efforts for highly burdened populations and for strengthening the global commitment to achieve zero new HIV infections.
Data Availability
Data are available as tables in supplementary files.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance
World Health Organization. 2018 HIV/AIDS surveillance in Europe. Copenhagen: World Health Organization.
Avert. “HIV and AIDS in Eastern Europe & Central Asia,” Avert. 2019. https://www.avert.org/hiv-and-aids-eastern-europe-central-asia-overview. Accessed 29 Jan 2019.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “HIV in the United States and Dependent Areas,” HIV.gov. 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/overview/ataglance.html. Accessed 24 Mar 2022.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “HIV and African American Gay and Bisexual Men,” Atlanta, U.S.A, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/bmsm.html
Pan American Health Organization, “HIV/AIDS,” World Health Organ. https://www.paho.org/en/topics/hivaids. Accessed 09 Mar 2022.
Stannah J, et al. HIV testing and engagement with the HIV treatment cascade among men who have sex with men in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet HIV. 2019;6(11):e769–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30239-5.
World Health Organization. “Are Key Populations Really the ‘Key’ to Ending AIDS in Asia?: Putting Asia’s HIV response back on track,” 2018.
•• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “HIV Risk and Prevention Estimates,” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2015. Importance reference that provides HIV risk estimates for sexual behaviors.
Pinkerton SD, Abramson PR. Effectiveness of condoms in preventing HIV transmission. Soc Sci Med. 1997;44(9):1303–12.
Grant R, et al. Preexposure Chemoprohylaxis for HIV Prevention in Men Who Have Sex with Men. N Engl J Med. 2010;2010:2587–99. Significantly important seminal text that showcased prevention benefits of PrEP.
Volk JE, et al. No New HIV Infections with Increasing Use of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis in a Clinical Practice Setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(10):1601–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ778. Significantly important text that showcased prevention benefits of PrEP in applied setting.
Rodger AJ et al. “Risk of HIV transmission through condomless sex in serodifferent gay couples with the HIV-positive partner taking suppressive antiretroviral therapy (PARTNER): final results of a multicentre, prospective, observational study,” The Lancet 6736, no. 19, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30418-0. Significantly important seminal text that showcased prevention benefits of treatment as prevention Undetectable=Untransmittable).
Stangl AL, et al. The Health Stigma and Discrimination Framework: A global, crosscutting framework to inform research, intervention development, and policy on health-related stigmas. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):18–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1271-3.
Rhodes T, Simic M. Transition and the HIV risk environment. BMJ. 2005;331:220–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7510.220.
Bronfenbrenner U. Developmental Research, Public Policy, and the Ecology of Childhood. Child Dev. 1974;45(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127743.
Thurner S, Hanel R, Klimek P. Introduction to the Theory of Complex Systems. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press; 2018.
Aristotle, Ross WD Metaphysics. Oxford, U.K.: Claredon Press, 1924.
Finegood DT . The complex systems science of obesity, The Oxford handbook of the social science of obesity, pp. 208–236, 2011.
Moher D et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7) 2009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
“Covidence systematic review software.” Veritas Health Innovation, Melborne, Australia. [Online]. Available: https://www.covidence.org
Shea BJ, et al. AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358(j4008):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008.
Kumu, “Kumu [relationship map** software].” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://kumu.io
Huang XJ et al. “Efficacy and Safety of Oral TDF-Based Pre-exposure Prophylaxis for Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Front Pharmacol 9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00799.
Okwundu CI, Uthman OA, Okoromah CAN. Antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for preventing HIV in high-risk individuals. Cochrane database of systematic reviews, no. 7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007189.pub3.
Chou R, et al. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection: Evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA. 2019;321(22):2214–30. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.2591. Significantly important review that showcased prevention benefits of PrEP.
Wang ZY, et al. HIV Nonoccupational Postexposure Prophylaxis Among Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Global Data. AIDS PATIENT CARE AND STDS. 2020;34(5):193–204. https://doi.org/10.1089/apc.2019.0313. Significantly important review that showcased prevention benefits of PEP.
Baggaley RF et al. Does per-act HIV-1 transmission risk through anal sex vary by gender? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Reprod Immunol 2018 80(5), e13039. https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.13039. Significantly important review showcasing per-act HIV 1 transmission risk.
Oldenburg CE, Perez-Brumer AG, Reisner SL, Mimiaga MJ. Transactional Sex and the HIV Epidemic Among Men Who have Sex with Men (MSM): Results From a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(12):2177–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1010-5. Significantly important review that showcased risk of HIV from transactional sex.
Wang H-Y et al. Sexual Risk Behaviors and HIV Infection among Men Who Have Sex with Men and Women in China: Evidence from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. BioMed Res Int 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/850132.
Li P, et al. Association between rectal douching and HIV and other sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect. 2019;95(6):428–36. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-053964. Significantly important review that showcased risk of HIV from rectal douching.
Coelho LE, et al. The Prevalence of HIV Among Men Who Have Sex With Men (MSM) and Young MSM in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Systematic Review. AIDS Behav. 2021;25(10):3223–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-021-03180-5.
Malta M, Magnanini MMF, Mello MB, Pascom ARP, Linhares Y, Bastos FI. HIV prevalence among female sex workers, drug users and men who have sex with men in Brazil: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 10, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-317.
Purcell DW, Higa D, Mizuno Y, Lyles C. Quantifying the Harms and Benefits from Serosorting Among HIV-Negative Gay and Bisexual Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(10):2835–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1800-z. Significantly important review that showcased risk and benefits of serosorting behaviors during sex.
Zhang W, Xu JJ, Zou HC, Zhang J, Wang N, Shang H. HIV incidence and associated risk factors in men who have sex with men in Mainland China: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. SEXUAL HEALTH. 2016;13(4):373–82. https://doi.org/10.1071/SH16001. Significantly important review that showcased numerous associuated risks of HIV among MSM.
Guerra FM, Salway TJ, Beckett R, Friedman L, and Buchan SA. Review of sexualized drug use associated with sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections in gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men. Drug Alcohol Depend. 216, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108237.
M. P. Hibbert, A. Hillis, C. E. Brett, L. A. Porcellato, and V. D. Hope, “A narrative systematic review of sexualised drug use and sexual health outcomes among LGBT people,” Int. J. Drug Policy 93, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103187. Significantly important review that showcased risk of HIV from drug use, particularly during sex.
Vu NTT, Maher L, and Zablotska I. Amphetamine-type stimulants and HIV infection among men who have sex with men: implications on HIV research and prevention from a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Internat AIDS Soc 18, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.18.1.19273.
Kennedy CE et al., “Serosorting and HIV/STI Infection among HIV-Negative MSM and Transgender People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Inform WHO Guidelines.,” J Sex Transm Dis 2013, p. 583627, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/583627.
Woodward EN, Banks RJ, Marks AK, Pantalone DW. Identifying Resilience Resources for HIV Prevention Among Sexual Minority Men: A Systematic Review. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(10):2860–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1608-2.
Meng XJ, et al. Relative Risk for HIV Infection Among Men Who Have Sex with Men Engaging in Different Roles in Anal Sex: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Global Data. AIDS Behav. 2015;19(5):882–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-014-0921-x.
Millett GA, Flores SA, Marks G, Reed JB, Herbst JH. Circumcision status and risk of HIV and sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men - A meta-analysis. JAMA. 2008;300(14):1674–84. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.14.1674.
Sharma SC, Raison N, Khan S, Shabbir M, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Male circumcision for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) acquisition: a meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2018;121(4):515–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14102.
Wiysonge CS et al. Male circumcision for prevention of homosexual acquisition of HIV in men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, no. 6, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-80052039518&partnerID=40&md5=2d99c6cf53e8a1f90c53c9ebddafda5f
Yuan T, et al. Circumcision to prevent HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of global data. Lancet Global Health. 2019;7(4):e436–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30567-9.
Zhang C, Qian HZ, Liu Y, and Vermund SH. Voluntary medical male circumcision and HIV infection among men who have sex with men: Implications from a systematic review. Sage Open Med 7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312119869110.
Malekinejad M, et al. Change in Condom Use in Populations Newly Aware of HIV Diagnosis in the United States and Canada: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AIDS Behav. 2021;25(6):1839–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-020-03113-8. Significantly important review that showcased changes in condom use behaviors among persons living with HIV.
Wirtz AL, Yeh PT, Flath NL, Beyrer C, Dolan K. HIV and Viral Hepatitis Among Imprisoned Key Populations. Epidemiol Rev. 2018;40(1):12–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxy003.
Harawa NT, et al. HIV, Sexually Transmitted Infection, and Substance Use Continuum of Care Interventions Among Criminal Justice-Involved Black Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Systematic Review. Am J Public Health. 2018;108:E1–9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304698.
Buller AM, Devries KM, Howard LM, and Bacchus LJ. Associations between Intimate Partner Violence and Health among Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLOS Med 11, no. 3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001609.
Lloyd S, Operario D. HIV risk among men who have sex with men who have experienced childhood sexual abuse: systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS Educ Prevent. 2012;24(3):228–41. Significantly important review that showcased childhood abuse and trauma as a future risk of HIV.
Berg RC, Ross MW, Tikkanen R. The effectiveness of MI4MSM: how useful is motivational interviewing as an HIV risk prevention program for men who have sex with men? a systematic review. AIDS Educ Prevent. 2011;23(6):533–49.
Baral S, Sifakis F, Cleghorn F, and Beyrer C. Elevated Risk for HIV Infection among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Low- and Middle-Income Countries 2000–2006: A Systematic Review. PLoS Med 4, no. 12, p. e339, Dec. 2007, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040339. Significantly important review that showcased risk of HIV of living in low and middle-income countries.
Blondeel K et al. Evidence and knowledge gaps on the disease burden in sexual and gender minorities: A review of systematic reviews. Int J Equity Health. 15, no. 1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0304-1. Significantly important review that examines burden of disease among sexual and gender minorities, showcasing predominance of HIV research.
Oldenburg CE, et al. Human rights protections and HIV prevalence among MSM who sell sex: Cross-country comparisons from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob Public Health. 2018;13(4):414–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2016.1149598. Significantly important review that showcased how policy level factors influence HIV risk.
Stannah J, Dale E, Elmes J, Staunton R, Boily MC, and Mitchell KM. Sub-optimal Engagement of African MSM in the HIV Treatment Cascade: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, AIDS Res Human Retroviruses 34 MA-P, no. HIV Research for Prevention Meeting (HIVR4P)-AIDS Vaccine, Microbicide and ARV-Based Prevention Science, p. 404, 2018.
Goedel WC, King MRF, Lurie MN, Nunn AS, Chan PA, Marshall BDL. Effect of Racial Inequities in Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use on Racial Disparities in HIV Incidence Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Modeling Study. JAIDS. 2018;79(3):323–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001817.
Millett GA, et al. Comparisons of disparities and risks of HIV infection in black and other men who have sex with men in Canada, UK, and USA: A meta-analysis. The Lancet. 2012;380(9839):341–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60899-X.
Hawe P, Shiell A, Riley T. Theorising interventions as events in systems. Am J Community Psychol. 2009;43(3–4):267–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-009-9229-9.
Stojanovski K, et al. Stigmatizing Policies Interact with Mental Health and Sexual Behaviours to Structurally Induce HIV Diagnoses Among European Men Who Have Sex with Men. AIDS Behav. Apr.2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-022-03683-9.
Marshall BDL et al. A Complex Systems Approach to Evaluate HIV Prevention in Metropolitan Areas : Preliminary Implications for Combination Intervention Strategies. PLoS One 7, no. 9, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044833.
Dreisbach C, Koleck TA, Bourne PE, Bakken S. A systematic review of natural language processing and text mining of symptoms from electronic patient-authored text data. Int J Med Informatics. 2019;125(February):37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.02.008.
Baral S, Logie CH, Grosso A, Wirtz AL, Beyrer C. Modified social ecological model: a tool to guide the assessment of the risks and risk contexts of HIV epidemics. BMC Public Health 13, no. 1, p. 482, Dec. 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-482.
Stromdahl S, Hickson F, Pharris A, Sabido M, Baral S, Thorson A. A systematic review of evidence to inform HIV prevention interventions among men who have sex with men in Europe. Eurosurveillance. 2015;20(15):36–55. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES2015.20.15.21096.
Jiang Y, Su S, Borne Y. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of HAART on HIV transmission and its impact on sexual risk behaviours among men who have sex with men. Sci Rep 10, no. 1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56530-8.
Dong MJ et al., “The prevalence of HIV among MSM in China: A large-scale systematic analysis,” BMC Infect Dis 19, no. 1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4559-1.
Li HM et al., “HIV Incidence among Men Who Have Sex with Men in China: A Meta-Analysis of Published Studies,” PLOS ONE 6, no. 8, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023431.
Freeman EE, Weiss HA, Glynn JR, Cross PL, Whitworth JA, Hayes RJ. Herpes simplex virus 2 infection increases HIV acquisition in men and women: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. AIDS. 2006;20(1):73–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aids.0000198081.09337.a7.
Houlihan CF, et al. Human papillomavirus infection and increased risk of HIV acquisition. A systematic review and meta-analysis. AIDS. 2012;26(17):2211–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0b013e328358d908.
Wu MY, Gong HZ, Hu KR, Zheng HY, Wan X, Li J. Effect of syphilis infection on HIV acquisition: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sexually Transmit Infect. 2021;97(7):525–33. https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2020-054706.
Jeffries WL, et al. Experienced Homophobia and HIV Infection Risk Among US Gay, Bisexual, and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Meta-Analysis. LGBT Health. 2021;8(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2020.0274.
Funding
This work was supported by the Partners for Advancing Health Equity grant (78477) through the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KS, EK, and AG (equal) conceptualized the study. KS led the writing of the original draft. KS, SO, and KG (equal) curated the data and conducted screening and review. KS and KG (equal) conducted the data extraction and analysis. KG supported writing the results. EK, AG, and KT (equal) reviewed drafts, and supported with writing and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Stojanovski, K., King, E.J., O’Connell, S. et al. Spiraling Risk: Visualizing the multilevel factors that socially pattern HIV risk among gay, bisexual & other men who have sex with men using Complex Systems Theory. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 20, 206–217 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-023-00664-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-023-00664-y