Skip to main content

Page of 4
and
  1. No Access

    Chapter

    The Motor Examination

    Because of the nature of development, with its dependence on sensorimotor interaction, an assessment of motor functioning is critical to a meaningful evaluation of the cognitive control system. In this regard,...

    Leonard F. Koziol in The Myth of Executive Functioning (2014)

  2. No Access

    Chapter

    Problem Solving: Practical Examples and Additional Properties

    Under a variety of circumstances, breaking down a problem or reducing it to its stimulus-based properties might seem easy, and as a result, a solution can be found very quickly. For example, once it is underst...

    Leonard F. Koziol in The Myth of Executive Functioning (2014)

  3. No Access

    Chapter

    Neuropsychological Constructs, Assumptions, and Executive Functioning: Revisiting Principles of Brain Organization

    In the 1800s, Dr. Paul Broca observed that patients with expressive aphasia, which is sometimes termed motor aphasia, had lesions in the anterior frontal lobe. Dr. Wernicke later reported that certain patients...

    Leonard F. Koziol in The Myth of Executive Functioning (2014)

  4. Chapter

    Large Scale Brain Systems

    The concept of large scale brain systems was reviewed in detail in Volume I of this series [2], which described a model of brain-behavior relationships using ADHD as proxy. Seven patterns of connectivity have ...

    Leonard F. Koziol in The Myth of Executive Functioning (2014)

  5. No Access

    Chapter

    The Novelty-Routinization Principle of Brain Organization

    The verbal–non-verbal dichotomy of left versus right hemispheric specialization of brain function is problematic for several reasons. To start with, it is not biologically consistent across different species o...

    Leonard F. Koziol in The Myth of Executive Functioning (2014)

  6. No Access

    Chapter

    Movement, Thinking, Anticipation, and Banishing Executive Functioning

    As stated in Volume I, the functional architecture of the vertebrate brain evolved to meet the needs of interactive behavior; it did not evolve for the specific purpose of thinking [104]. This evolutionary phe...

    Leonard F. Koziol in The Myth of Executive Functioning (2014)

  7. No Access

    Chapter

    Abolishing the Executive and the Mind-Body Problem

    Cognition is not separate from sensorimotor control; there is no duality between motor and “cognitive” functions. This was clearly implied in the examples of the automobile mechanic, the brain dissection works...

    Leonard F. Koziol in The Myth of Executive Functioning (2014)

  8. No Access

    Chapter

    The Cerebro-Cerebellar Underpinning of Cognitive Control

    During the course of evolution, the neocortex demonstrated a significant expansion. This increase in size actually reflects increased specialization. It is not really “size” that matters. Instead, within this ...

    Leonard F. Koziol in The Myth of Executive Functioning (2014)

  9. No Access

    Chapter

    The Basal Ganglia Underpinning of Cognitive Control: The Fronto-Striatal System

    The organization of the cortex includes widespread connections with the basal ganglia. The basal ganglia are a group of subcortical nuclei that are bilaterally represented within the brain. These nuclei consis...

    Leonard F. Koziol in The Myth of Executive Functioning (2014)

  10. No Access

    Chapter

    Basal Ganglia Dynamics, Cognition, and Social Behavior

    The basal ganglia gate cognition the same way they select behavior, on the basis of activity within the direct and indirect pathways. For example, within the FPN, and the general cognitive control system, the ...

    Leonard F. Koziol in The Myth of Executive Functioning (2014)

  11. No Access

    Chapter

    Neuropsychological Testing and Neuropsychological Evaluation: Is There a Difference Between These Approaches?

    The ideal way to assess cognitive control is to evaluate the procedural learning that generates automaticity and to assess novel problem solving abilities. Procedural learning is simply not assessed in neurops...

    Leonard F. Koziol in The Myth of Executive Functioning (2014)

  12. No Access

    Chapter

    The Traditional Neuropsychological Assessment Paradigm

    Most neuropsychological tests are based upon a paradigm that is referred to as serial-order processing. There is a static view of cognition inherent in this model. Three processes are foundational to this para...

    Leonard F. Koziol in The Myth of Executive Functioning (2014)

  13. No Access

    Chapter

    The Evaluation of Reward Preferences

    Another reason that neuropsychological tests have limited applicability in the evaluation of EF concerns the emphasis on “thinking” mechanisms, without considering the implicit reward system. As things stand r...

    Leonard F. Koziol in The Myth of Executive Functioning (2014)

  14. No Access

    Chapter

    Introduction

    These first three quotations were used to open chapters 2, 7 and 8 of Subcortical Structures and Cognition: Implications for Neuropsychological Assessment [1]. They are reused here because they have special re...

    Leonard F. Koziol in The Myth of Executive Functioning (2014)

  15. No Access

    Chapter

    The Problem Solving Metaphor, Neuropsychology, and Executive Functioning

    So, how do these examples and principles apply to EF as it is currently conceptualized in neuropsychology? The understanding of EF is a critical problem. Clinical practitioners and the educators who train them...

    Leonard F. Koziol in The Myth of Executive Functioning (2014)

  16. No Access

    Chapter

    Functional Domains, Unitary Constructs, and the Integrated Brain

    The specific functional domains tested in neuropsychology include language, visuospatial functioning, attention, memory, executive functioning, and sometimes sensorimotor functioning. Sometimes domains are con...

    Leonard F. Koziol in The Myth of Executive Functioning (2014)

  17. No Access

    Chapter

    Addendum

    Knudson [306] proposed a comprehensive model of attention that recognized the role of certain subcortical structures and implicit processes in decision-making behavior. Within that model, the guidance of worki...

    Leonard F. Koziol in The Myth of Executive Functioning (2014)

  18. No Access

    Chapter

    The Application of Large Scale Brain Systems to Practical “EF” Behavior: Revisiting the Introductory Examples

    The introduction of this paper described numerous examples of decision making, or problem-solving. These examples warrant a close examination of the concept of cognitive control, how it differs in some of thes...

    Leonard F. Koziol in The Myth of Executive Functioning (2014)

  19. Chapter

    ADHD and Neuropsychological Nomenclature

    While the DSM defines a diagnosis by a set of behaviors that are assigned to a category, neuropsychology, the study of brain–behavior relationships [28], seeks to identify the brain regions, systems, and/or ne...

    Leonard F. Koziol, Deborah Ely Budding in ADHD as a Model of Brain-Behavior Relation… (2013)

  20. No Access

    Chapter

    Preliminary Answers to the Question

    While specific neuropsychological tests can identify key features of ADHD, their scope is limited to measuring symptoms of ADHD; they do not identify groups of heterogeneous symptoms necessary to make a catego...

    Leonard F. Koziol, Deborah Ely Budding in ADHD as a Model of Brain-Behavior Relation… (2013)

Page of 4