SpringerLink
Log in

Nonlinear Dynamic Response of a RC Frame for Different Structural Conditions Including the Effect of FE Model Updating

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After destructive events such as earthquakes, attempts have generally been made to repair and strengthen structures using such methods as filling cracks by injection, wrap** structural elements with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP). These applications can allow the recovery of lost structural performance. In this paper, the aim was to investigate the structural performance of an RC frame under different conditions—undamaged, damaged, repaired, and strengthened—by comparing results of nonlinear dynamic analyses. In addition, finite-element (FE) model updating effects were investigated in the case of the undamaged condition. To this end, an RC frame model was first constructed in the laboratory, and then, the model was damaged by lateral forces, repaired with epoxy injection, and lastly strengthened by wrap** with FRP. To obtain the dynamic characteristics of the RC frame under the different conditions, ambient vibration tests were performed for each condition. The FE model of the RC frame, obtained through global and local model updating using the ambient vibration test results, was modeled to achieve the nonlinear dynamic analyses. The results of the analyses were presented in the form of maximum displacements, principal stresses, and strains with contours diagrams. The maximum displacement increased significantly (133%) with the degree of damage, sharply decreased with the repaired (32%), and strengthened (36%) applications. The maximum and minimum principal stresses decreased by 24% and 35%, respectively, with the damaged condition. In addition, maximum differences between the undamaged and strengthened conditions were calculated as 17% for the maximum principal stress and 38% for the minimum principal stress. Findings indicated that the epoxy injection with FRP wrap** eliminates effect of the damage and recovers the model’s performance to its initial state. In addition, it is demonstrated in this paper that the updating procedure considerably changes the dynamic analysis results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ortlepp R, Ortlepp S (2017) Textile reinforced concrete for strengthening of RC columns: a contribution to resource conservation through the preservation of structures. Constr Build Mater 132:150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Minafò G (2015) A practical approach for the strength evaluation of RC columns reinforced with RC jackets. Eng Struct 85:162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.12.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. del Castillo Rey E, Griffith M, Ingham J (2018) Seismic behavior of RC columns flexurally strengthened with FRP sheets and FRP anchors. Compos Struct 203:382–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Campione G, Fossetti M, Giacchino C, Minafò G (2014) RC columns externally strengthened with RC jackets. Mater Struct 47(10):1715–1728. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-013-0146-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peng YP, Ma M, Chen MX (2010) Study on effect of FRP reinforced manners on seismic performance of concrete frame structure. Adv Mater Res 133:911–916. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.133-134.911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Triantafillou TC, Papanicolaou CG (2006) Shear strengthening of reinforced concrete members with textile reinforced mortar (TRM) jackets. Mater Struct 39(1):93–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11527-005-9034-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cascardi A, Longo F, Micelli F, Aiello MA (2017) Compressive strength of confined column with Fiber Reinforced Mortar (FRM): new design-oriented-models. Constr Build Mater 156:387–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ombres L, Verre S (2018) Shear performance of FRCM strengthened RC beams. Spec Publ ACI 324:7.1–7.22

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cascardi A, Aiello MA, Triantafillou T (2017) Analysis-oriented model for concrete and masonry confined with fiber reinforced mortar. Mater Struct 50(4):202. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-017-1072-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sneed LH, Verre S, Carloni C, Ombres L (2016) Flexural behavior of RC beams strengthened with steel-FRCM composite. Eng Struct 127:686–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dalalbashi A, Ghiassi B, Oliveria DV (2019) Textile-to-mortar bond behaviour in lime-based textile reinforced mortars. Constr Build Mater 227:116682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiangtao Y, Yichao W, Kexu H, Kequan Y, Jianzhuang X (2017) The performance of near-surface mounted CFRP strengthened RC beam in fire. Fire Saf J 90:86–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.04.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen GM, Zhang Z, Li YL, Li XQ, Zhou CY (2016) T-section RC beams shear-strengthened with anchored CFRP U-strips. Compos Struct 144:57–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.02.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gopinath S, Murthy AR, Patrawala H (2016) Near surface mounted strengthening of RC beams using basalt fiber reinforced polymer bars. Constr Build Mater 111:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Irshidat MR, Al-Saleh MH, Al-Shoubaki M (2015) Using carbon nanotubes to improve strengthening efficiency of carbon fiber/epoxy composites confined RC columns. Compos Struct 134:523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tahsiri H, Sedehi O, Khaloo A, Raisi EM (2015) Experimental study of RC jacketed and CFRP strengthened RC beams. Constr Build Mater 95:476–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang SS, Teng JG (2014) Finite element analysis of end cover separation in RC beams strengthened in flexure with FRP. Eng Struct 75:550–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ekenel M, Myers JJ (2007) Durability performance of RC beams strengthened with epoxy injection and CFRP fabrics. Constr Build Mater 21(6):1182–1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.06.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shahverdi M, Czaderski C, Annen P, Motavalli M (2016) Strengthening of RC beams by iron-based shape memory alloy bars embedded in a shotcrete layer. Eng Struct 117:263–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.03.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Diab YG (1998) Strengthening of RC beams by using sprayed concrete: experimental approach. Eng Struct 20(7):631–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00044-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dubey R, Kumar P (2016) Experimental study of the effectiveness of retrofitting RC cylindrical columns using self-compacting concrete jackets. Constr Build Mater 124:104–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Alhadid MMA, Youssef MA (2018) Assessment of the flexural behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with concrete jackets. Eng Struct 167:108–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu Y, Yan JB, Huang FL (2018) Behavior of reinforced concrete beams and columns subjected to blast loading. Def Technol 14(5):550–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2018.07.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Si-Larbi A, Agbossou A, Ferrier E, Michel L (2012) Strengthening RC beams with composite fiber cement plate reinforced by prestressed FRP rods: experimental and numerical analysis. Compos Struct 94(3):830–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Baji H, Eslami A, Ronagh HR (2015) Development of a nonlinear FE modelling approach for FRP-strengthened RC beam-column connections. Structures 3:272–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hawileh RA (2012) Nonlinear finite element modeling of RC beams strengthened with NSM FRP rods. Constr Build Mater 27(1):461–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. De Domenico D (2015) RC members strengthened with externally bonded FRP plates: a FE-based limit analysis approach. Compos B Eng 71:159–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.11.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ventura CE, Lord JF, Simpson RD (2002) Effective use of ambient vibration measurements for modal updating of a 48 storey building in Vancouver, Canada. In: International conference on structural dynamics modelling-test, analysis, correlation and validation, 3–5 June, Madeira, Portugal

  29. Skolnik D, Yu E, Wallace J, Taciroglu E (2007) Modal system identification and finite element model updating of a 15-story building using earthquake and ambient vibration data. Struct Eng Res Front ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/40944(249)74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu JR, Li QS (2004) Finite element model updating for a high-rise structure based on ambient vibration measurements. Eng Struct 26:979–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nozari A, Behmanesh I, Yousefianmoghadam S, Moaveni B, Stavridis A (2017) Effects of variability in ambient vibration data on model updating and damage identification of a 10-story building. Eng Struct 151:540–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.08.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Altunişik AC, Okur FY, Kahya V (2017) Automated model updating of multiple cracked cantilever beams for damage detection. J Constr Steel Res 138:499–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Altunişik AC, Okur FY, Genç AF, Günaydin M, Adanur S (2018) Automated model updating of historical masonry structures based on ambient vibration measurements. J Perform Constr Facil 32(1):04017126. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001108

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Butt F, Omenzetter P (2014) Seismic response trends evaluation and finite element model calibration of an instrumented RC building considering soil–structure interaction and non-structural components. Eng Struct 65:111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sanayei M, Rohela P (2014) Automated finite element model updating of full-scale structures with parameter identification system (PARIS). Adv Eng Softw 67:99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Teughels A, De Roeck G (2003) Damage assessment of the Z24 bridge by FE model updating. Key Eng Mater 245:19–26. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.245-246.19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mosavi AA, Sedarat H, O’Connor SM, Emami-Naeini A, Lynch J (2014) Calibrating a high-fidelity finite element model of a highway bridge using a multi-variable sensitivity-based optimisation approach. Struct Infrastruct Eng 10(5):627–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2012.757793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sanayei M, Khaloo A, Gul M, Catbas FN (2015) Automated finite element model updating of a scale bridge model using measured static and modal test data. Eng Struct 102:66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Okasha NM, Frangopol DM, Orcesi AD (2012) Automated finite element updating using strain data for the lifetime reliability assessment of bridges. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 99:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Altunişik AC, Karahasan OŞ, Genç AF, Okur FY, Günaydin M, Kalkan E, Adanur S (2018) Modal parameter identification of RC frame under undamaged, damaged, repaired and strengthened conditions. Measurement 124(1):260–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.04.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Altunişik AC, Karahasan OŞ, Genç AF, Okur FY, Günaydin M, Kalkan E, Adanur S (2018) Effect of fiber-reinforced polymer strengthening on dynamic characteristics of reinforced concrete frame using model updating. ACI Struct J 115:1589–1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. ANSYS (2015) Swanson analysis system. ANSYS, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  43. MBrace™ (2007) Composite strengthening system. BASF Construction Chemicals UK, version 10, 2007

  44. PEER, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA

  45. Lubliner J, Oliver J, Ollers S, Onate E (1989) A plastic-damage model for concrete. Int J Solid Struct 25(3):299–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(89)90050-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Doran B, Köksal HO, Polat Z, Karakoc C (1998) The use of Drucker–Prager criterion in the analysis of reinforced concrete members by finite elements. Turk Chamb Civ Eng 9:489–493. http://www.imo.org.tr/resimler/ekutuphane/pdf/675.pdf

  47. William KJ, Warnke EP (1974) Constitutive model for the trial-axial behaviour of concrete, IABSE, Report no. 19, Bergamo, Italy, 1–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5169/seals-17526

  48. Gunaydin M, Adanur S, Altunisik AC (2018) Ambient vibration based structural evaluation of reinforced concrete building model. Earthq Struct 15(3):335–350. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.15.3.335

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by TUBITAK and Karadeniz Technical University (KTU) under Research Grant no. 106M038, 2006.112.001.1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080, Trabzon, Turkey

    Murat Günaydin, Olguhan Şevket Karahasan, Ahmet Can Altunişik, Fatih Yesevi Okur & Süleyman Adanur

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080, Trabzon, Turkey

    Ali Fuat Genç

Authors
  1. Murat Günaydin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Fuat Genç
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Olguhan Şevket Karahasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmet Can Altunişik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fatih Yesevi Okur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Süleyman Adanur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Günaydin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Günaydin, M., Genç, A.F., Karahasan, O.Ş. et al. Nonlinear Dynamic Response of a RC Frame for Different Structural Conditions Including the Effect of FE Model Updating. Int J Civ Eng 18, 551–567 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00483-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00483-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation