SpringerLink
Log in

Sexual and urinary outcomes in robotic rectal surgery: review of the literature and technical considerations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Updates in Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several studies have reported high rates of urogenital dysfunction after open and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Robotic surgery has several features that could facilitate identification and preservation of autonomic nerves. This manuscript aims to summarize the literature regarding urogenital function after robotic rectal cancer surgery and focus on technical aspects of nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision. Comprehensive searches were conducted through online databases. Selection criteria included: original articles assessing urinary and sexual function after robotic surgery of males and/or females with standardized questionnaires. A total of 16 articles were included in the review. Seven of the nine cohort studies evaluating male sexual function showed earlier recovery or better outcomes in patients operated with robotic techniques. Two studies did not find any statistically significant difference. Three out of four case series found no difference in sexual function scores measured preoperatively and after 1 year. Female sexual function was assessed in seven studies: two case series show no deterioration of at 1 year. Three comparative studies showed no difference between robotic and laparoscopic groups. Two randomized control trials showed different results in terms of male and female sexual functions with better preservation at 1 year in the robotic group in one and no difference in another. Urinary functions assessed in males and/or females in the 16 studies showed no statistically significant differences at long-term follow-up. At present, there is no evidence of superiority of robotic surgery for performing nerve-sparing rectal cancer surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA, Eheman C, Zauber AG, Anderson RN, Ries LA (2010) Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer 116(3):544–573

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kapiteijn E, Velde CV (2002) The role of total mesorectal excision in the management of rectal cancer. Surg Clin North Am 82(5):995–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6109(02)00040-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Siegel RL, Jemal A, Ward EM (2009) Increase in incidence of colorectal cancer among young men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 18(6):1695–1698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lindsey I, Guy RJ, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ (2000) Anatomy of Denonvilliers fascia and pelvic nerves, impotence, and implications for the colorectal surgeon. Br J Surg 87(10):1288–1299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lange M, Marijnen C, Maas C, Putter H, Rutten H, Stiggelbout A, Velde CV (2009) Risk factors for sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment. Eur J Cancer 45(9):1578–1588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Banerjee AK (1999) Sexual dysfunction after surgery for rectal cancers. Lancet 353(9168):1900–1902

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hendren SK, O’Connor BI, Liu M, Asano T, Cohen Z, Swallow CJ, Mcleod RS (2005) Prevalence of male and female sexual dysfunction is high following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 242(2):212–223

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Stamopoulos P, Theodoropoulos GE, Papailiou J, Savidis D, Golemati C, Bramis K, Leandros E (2009) Prospective evaluation of sexual function after open and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 23(12):2665–2674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Quah HM et al (2002) Bladder and sexual dysfunction following laparoscopically assisted and conventional open mesorectal resection for cancer. Br J Surg 89(12):1551–1556

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nitori N, Hasegawa H, Ishii Y, Endo T, Kitajima M, Kitagawa Y (2008) Sexual function in men with rectal and rectosigmoid cancer after laparoscopic and open surgery. Hepatogastroenterology 55(85):1304–1307

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Morino M, Parini U, Allaix ME, Monasterolo G, Contul RB, Garrone C (2008) Male sexual and urinary function after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc 23(6):1233–1240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hur H, Bae SU, Kim NK, Min BS, Baik SH, Lee KY, Choi YD (2013) Comparative study of voiding and male sexual function following open and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 108(8):572–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmidt C, Daun A, Malchow B, Küchler T (2010) Sexual impairment and its effects on quality of life in patients with rectal Cancer. Dtsch Arztebl Int 107(8):123–130

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hassan I, Cima RR (2007) Quality of life after rectal resection and multimodality therapy. J Surg Oncol 96(8):684–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim JY, Kim N, Lee KY, Hur H, Min BS, Kim JH (2012) A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 19(8):2485–2493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. D’Annibale A, Pernazza G, Monsellato I, Pende V, Lucandri G, Mazzocchi P, Alfano G (2013) Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 27(6):1887–1895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kenawadekar RD, Dhange RZ, Pandit A, Bandawar MS, Joshi S, Agarwal G, Puntambekar S (2012) Robot-assisted low anterior resection in fifty-three consecutive patients: an Indian experience. J Robot Surg 7(4):311–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Leung AL, Chan W, Cheung HY, Lui GK, Fung JT, Li MK (2013) Initial experience on the urogenital outcomes after robotic rectal cancer surgery. Surg Pract 17(1):13–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Luca F, Valvo M, Ghezzi TL, Zuccaro M, Cenciarelli S, Trovato C, Biffi R (2013) Impact of robotic surgery on sexual and urinary functions after fully robotic nerve-sparing total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 257(4):672–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Park SY, Choi G, Park JS, Kim HJ, Ryuk J (2012) Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 27(1):48–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Park SY, Choi G, Park JS, Kim HJ, Ryuk J, Yun S (2013) Urinary and erectile function in men after total mesorectal excision by laparoscopic or robot-assisted methods for the treatment of rectal cancer: a case-matched comparison. World J Surg 38(7):1834–1842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Stãnciulea O, Eftimie M, David L, Tomulescu V, Popescu I (2013) Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a single center experience of 100 consecutive cases. Chirurgia 108(2):143–151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morelli L, Ceccarelli C, Franco GD, Guadagni S, Palmeri M, Caprili G, Mosca F (2015) Sexual and urinary functions after robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 31(4):913–915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ozeki S, Maeda K, Hanai T, Masumori K, Katsuno H, Takahashi H (2015) Effects of robotic rectal surgery on sexual and urinary functions in male patients. Surg Today 46(4):491–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Panteleimonitis S, Ahmed J, Ramachandra M, Farooq M, Harper M, Parvaiz A (2017) Urogenital function in robotic vs laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study. Int J Colorectal Dis 32(2):241–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schmiegelow AF, Broholm M, Gögenur I, Fode M (2016) Evaluation of sexual and urinary function after implementation of robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26(2):141–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, Brown J (2017) Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer. JAMA 318(16):1569

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang G, Wang Z, Jiang Z, Liu J, Zhao J, Li J (2016) Male urinary and sexual function after robotic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Med Robot Computer Assisted Surg 13(1):e1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim HJ, Choi G, Park JS, Park SY, Yang CS, Lee HJ (2018) The impact of robotic surgery on quality of life, urinary and sexual function following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis with laparoscopic surgery. Colorectal Dis 20(5):O103–O113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim MJ, Park SC, Park JW, Chang HJ, Kim DY, Nam B, Oh JH (2018) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 267(2):243–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kandeel FR (2001) Male sexual function and its disorders: physiology, pathophysiology, clinical investigation, and treatment. Endocr Rev 22(3):342–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Panjari M, Bell RJ, Burney S, Bell S, Mcmurrick PJ, Davis SR (2012) Sexual function, incontinence, and wellbeing in women after rectal cancer—a review of the evidence. J Sex Med 9(11):2749–2758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Calpista A, Lai S, Agostini A, Mancini M, Artibani W (2007) Functional urological complications after colorectal cancer surgery. Pelviperineology 26(1):38–40

    Google Scholar 

  34. Campbell WW (2008) Evaluation and management of peripheral nerve injury. Clin Neurophysiol 119(9):1951–1965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Graziottin A, Giraldi A (2006) Anatomy and physiology of womens sexual function. Int Soc Sex Med 1:289–304

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sterk P, Shekarriz B, Günter S, Nolde J, Keller R, Bruch H, Shekarriz H (2005) Voiding and sexual dysfunction after deep rectal resection and total mesorectal excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 20(5):423–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Luca F, Valvo M (2017) Nerve preservation in robotic rectal surgery. In: Obias V (ed) Robotic colon and rectal surgery. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  38. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69(10):613–616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1(3):144–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ballantyne GH, Merola P, Weber A, Wasielewski A (2001) Robotic solutions to the pitfalls of laparoscopic colectomy. Osp Ital Chir 7(405):405–412

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jayne DG, Brown JM, Thorpe H, Walker J, Quirke P, Guillou PJ (2005) Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg 92(9):1124–1132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Andersson J, Abis G, Gellerstedt M, Angenete E, Angerås U, Cuesta MA, Haglind E (2014) Patient-reported genitourinary dysfunction after laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery in a randomized trial (COLOR II). Br J Surg 101(10):1272–1279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H, Bailey C, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143(8):762–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, Scheidbach H, Konradt J, Bruch HP, Köckerling F (2001) Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results. Surg Endosc 15(2):116–120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University, 11175 Campus Street, 21111, Loma Linda, CA, 92350, USA

    Fabrizio Luca, Danielle K. Craigg, Maheswari Senthil, Matthew J. Selleck, Blake D. Babcock, Mark E. Reeves & Carlos A. Garberoglio

Authors
  1. Fabrizio Luca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Danielle K. Craigg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maheswari Senthil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matthew J. Selleck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Blake D. Babcock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mark E. Reeves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Carlos A. Garberoglio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizio Luca.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Luca, F., Craigg, D.K., Senthil, M. et al. Sexual and urinary outcomes in robotic rectal surgery: review of the literature and technical considerations. Updates Surg 70, 415–421 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0581-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0581-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation