Abstract
Nano-materials are materials with at least one nano-phase. A nano-phase is a phase with at least one of its dimensions below 100 nm. It is shown here that nano-phases have at least 1% of their atoms along their surface layer. The ratio of surface atoms is proportional to the specific surface area of the phase, defined as the ratio of its surface area to its volume. Each specific/molar property has its bulk value and its surface value for the given phase, being always different, as the energetic states of the atoms in the bulk and in the surface layer of a phase are different. The average specific/molar property of a nano-phase is modeled here as a linear combination of the bulk and surface values of the same property, scaled with the ratio of the surface atoms. That makes the performance of all nano-phases proportional to their specific surface area. As the characteristic size of the nano-phase is inversely proportional to its specific surface area, all specific/molar properties of nano-phases are inversely proportional to the characteristic size of the phase. This is applied to the size dependence of the molar Gibbs energy of the nano-phase, which appears to be in agreement with the thermodynamics of Gibbs. This agreement proves the general validity of the present model on the size dependence of the specific/molar properties of independent nano-phases. It is shown that the properties of nano-phases are different for independent nano-phases (surrounded only by their equilibrium vapor phase) and for nano-phases in multi-phase situations, such as a liquid nano-droplet in the sessile drop configuration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M.H. Ehsani, M.E. Ghazi, P.J. Kameli, and J. Moradi, Size Dependence of Electrical Properties of La0.8Sr0.2MnO3 Nanoparticels, J. Supercond. Nov. Magn., 2016, 29, p 2969–2977
D.A. Kiselev, M.S. Afanasiev, S.A. Levashov, A.A. Sivov, and G.V. Chucheva, Thickness Dependence of Electrical and Piezoelectric Properties of Ferroelectric Ba0.8Sr0.2TiO3 Thin Films, Thin Solid Films, 2016, 619, p 214–219
A. Beukel, On the Size Dependence of the Diffusion Coefficient in Metalic Glasses, Acta Metall. Mater., 1994, 42, p 1273–1278
X. Yu, A. Beharaj, M.W. Grinstaff, and O.K.C. Tsui, Modulation of the Effective Viscosity of Polymer Films by Ultraviolet Ozone Treatment, Polymer, 2017, 116, p 498–505
G. Radnoczi, E. Bokanyi, Z. Erdelyi, and F. Misjak, Size Dependent Spinodal Decomposition in Cu-Ag Nanoparticles, Acta Mater., 2017, 123, p 82–89
A. Portavoce, K. Hoummada, and L. Chow, Atomic Transport in Nano-crystalline Thin Films, Defect Diffus. Forum, 2016, 367, p 140–148
G.Y. Molnár, S. Shenouda, G.L. Katona, A. Langer, and D.L. Beke, Determination of the Compositions of the DIGM Zone in Nanocrystalline Ag/Au and Ag/Pd Thin Films by Secondary Neutral Mass Spectrometry, Beilstein J Nanotechnol., 2016, 7, p 474–483
D.A. Bonnell, Y. Liang, M. Wagner, D. Carroll, and M. Rühle, Effect of Size Dependent Interface Properties on Stability of Metal Clusters on Ceramic Substrates, Acta Mater., 1997, 46, p 2263–2270
V.M. Samsonov, N.Y. Sdobnyakov, and A.N. Bazulev, Size Dependence of the Surface Tension and the Problem of Gibbs Thermodynamics Extension to Nanosystems, Coll. Surf. A, 2004, 239, p 113–117
H.M. Lu and Q. Jiang, Size-Dependent Surface Tension and Tolmans Length of Droplets, Langmuir, 2005, 21, p 779–781
G. Ouyang, X. Tan, and G. Yang, Thermodynamic Model of the Surface Energy of Nanocrystals, Phys. Rev. B, 2006, 74, p 195408
Q. Jiang and H.M. Lu, Size Dependent Interface Energy and Its Applications, Surf. Sci. Rep., 2008, 63, p 427–464
H. Zhang, B. Chen, and J.F. Banfield, The Size Dependence of the Surface Free Energy of Titania Nanocrystals, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2009, 11, p 2553–2558
M.C. Weinberg, E.D. Zanotto, and S. Manrich, Classical Nucleation Theory with a Size Dependent Interfacial Tension: Li2O 2SiO2 Crystal Nucleation, Phys. Chem. Glasses, 1992, 33, p 99–102
M.G. Gee, A. Gant, and B. Roebuck, Wear Mechanisms in Abrasion and Erosion of WC/Co and Related Hardmetals, Wear, 2007, 263, p 137–148
P. Valat-Villain, J. Durinck, and P.O. Renault, Grain Size Dependence of Elastic Moduli in Nanocrystalline Tungsten, J. Nanomater., 2017, 2017, p 3620910
S. Dong, P. Hu, X. Zhang, Y. Cheng, D. Zhang, L. Yan, and G. Chen, Size Dependence of Optical and Mechanical Properties of Si3N4 Nanobelts Controlled by Flow Rates, J. Mater. Chem. C, 2016, 4, p 11212–11218
K.R. Mangipudi, E. Epler, and C.A. Volkert, Topology-Dependent Scaling Laws for the Stiffness and Strength of Nanoporous Gold, Acta Mater., 2016, 119, p 115–122
P. Wen, H. Mei, P. Zhai, and B. Duan, Effects of Nano-α-Al2O3 Dispersion on the Thermoelectric and Mechanical Properties of CoSb3 Composites, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2013, 22, p 3561–3565
T.C. Joshi, U. Prakash, and V.V. Dabhade, Effect of Nano-Scale and Micro-Scale Yttria Reinforcement on Powder Forged AA-7075 Composites, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2016, 25, p 1889–1902
F.G. Shi, Size Dependent Thermal Vibrations in Nanocrystals, J. Mater. Res., 1994, 9, p 1307–1313
P.R. Couchman and W.A. Jesser, Thermodynamic Theory of Size Dependence of Melting Temperature in Metals, Nature, 1977, 269, p 481–483
Y. Cheng, H. Su, T. Koop, E. Mikhailov, and U. Pöschl, Size Dependence of Phase Transitions in Aerosol Nanoparticles, Nat. Commun., 2015, 6, p 5923–5930
M. Perez, Gibbs-Thomson Effects in Phase Transformations, Scr. Mater., 2005, 52, p 709–712
G. Kaptay, J. Janczak-Rusch, G. Pigozzi, and L.P.H. Jeurgens, Theoretical Analysis of Melting Point Depression of Pure Metals in Different Initial Configurations, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2014, 23, p 1600–1607
G. Kaptay, J. Janczak-Rusch, and L.P.H. Jeurgens, Melting Point Depression and Fast Diffusion in Nanostructured Brazing Fillers Confined Between Barrier Nanolayers, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2016, 25, p 3275–3284
Z. Cui, H. Duan, Q. Fu, Y. Xue, and S. Wang, Universal Size Dependence of Integral Enthalpy and Entropy for Solid-Solid Phase Transitions of Nanocrystals, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2017, 121, p 24831–24836
S.S. Laletina, M. Mamatkulov, E.A. Shor, V.V. Kaichev, A. Genest, I.V. Yudanov, and N. Rösch, Size-Dependence of the Adsorption Energy of CO on Pt Nanoparticles: Tracing Two Intersecting Trends by DFT Calculations, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2017, 121, p 17371–17377
J. Tuoriniemi, M.D. Jürgens, M. Hassellöv, and G. Cornelis, Size Dependence of Silver Nanoparticle Removal in a Wastewater Treatment Plant Mesocosm Measured by FAST Single Particle ICP-MS, Environ. Sci. Nano, 2017, 4, p 1189–1197
A. Fattah-Alhosseini, O. Imantalab, and E.R. Attarzadeh, Electrochemical Behavior of Nano-grained Pure Copper in Dilute Alkaline Solution with Chloride Ion Trace, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2016, 25, p 4478–4483
N. Yabuuchi, K. Kubota, Y. Aoki, and S. Komaba, Understanding Particle-Size-Dependent Electrochemical Properties of Li2MnO3-Based Positive Electrode Materials for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2016, 120, p 875–885
C.Q. Sun, Size Dependence of Nanostructures: Impact of Bond Order Deficiency, Prog. Solid State Chem., 2007, 35, p 1–159
S.C. Vanithakumari and K.K. Nanda, A Universal Relation for the Cohesive Energy of Nanoparticles, Phys. Lett. A, 2008, 372, p 6930–6934
G. Guisbiers and L. Buchaillot, Universal Size/Shape Dependent Law for Characteristic Temperatures, Phys. Lett. A, 2009, 374, p 305–308
G. Guisbiers, Size-Dependent Materials Properties Toward a Universal Equation, Nanoscale Res. Lett., 2010, 5, p 1132–1136
S. **ong, W. Qi, Y. Cheng, B. Huang, M. Wang, and Y. Li, Universal Relation for Size Dependent Thermodynamic Properties of Metallic Nanoparticles, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13, p 10652–10660
C.C. Yang and Y.W. Mai, Thermodynamics at Nanoscale: A New Approach to the Investigation of Unique Physicochemical Properties of Nanomaterials, Mater. Sci. Eng. R, 2014, 79, p 1–40
J. Chandra and K. Kholiya, Diameter-Dependent Thermodynamic and Elastic Properties of Metallic Nanoparticles, Mod. Phys. Lett. B, 2015, 29(1550025), p 16
M. Manu, M. Singh, and V. Dubey, Size-Dependent Cohesive Energy of FCC Nanomaterials, Integr. Ferroelectr., 2017, 184, p 108–113
X. Zhang, W. Li, Y. Deng, J. Shao, H. Kou, J. Ma, X. Zhang, and Y. Li. Theoretical Analytical Model of Vacancy Formation Energy with Simultaneous Dependence of Surface Orientation, Temperature, Material Size. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa9fa7
V.V. Levdansky, O. Solcová, and P. Izák, Size Effects in Physicochemical Processes in Nanoparticles and Nanopores, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2018, 211, p 117–122
G. Kaptay, A Unified Model for the Cohesive Enthalpy, Critical Temperature, Surface Tension and Volume Thermal Expansion Coefficient of Liquid Metals of BCC, FCC and HCP Crystals, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, 495, p 19–26
G. Kaptay, On the Interfacial Energy of Coherent Interfaces, Acta Mater., 2012, 60, p 6804–6813
G. Kaptay, On the Solid/Liquid Interfacial Energy of Metals and Alloys, J. Mater. Sci., 2018, 53, p 3767–3784
G. Kaptay, Nano-Calphad: Extension of the Calphad Method to Systems with Nano-phases and Complexions, J. Mater. Sci., 2012, 47, p 8320–8335
G. Kaptay, The Gibbs Equation Versus the Kelvin and the Gibbs-Thomson Equations to Describe Nucleation and Equilibrium of Nano-Materials, J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 2012, 12, p 2625–2633
G. Kaptay, A new Paradigm on the Chemical Potentials of Components in Multi-component Nano-phases within Multi-phase Systems, RSC Adv., 2017, 7, p 41241–41253
G. Kaptay, The Chemical (Not Mechanical) Paradigm of Thermodynamics of Colloid and Interface Science. Adv. Colloid. Interface Sci. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2018.04.007
Acknowledgments
This paper was written as part of the GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00027 project “Sustainable operation of the workshop of excellence for the research and development of crystalline and amorphous nanostructured materials,” implemented in the framework of the Szechenyi 2020 program. The realization of this project is supported by the European Union.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is an invited submission to JMEP selected from presentations at the Symposium “Interface Design and Modelling, Wetting and High-Temperature Capillarity,” belonging to the topic “Processing” at the European Congress and Exhibition on Advanced Materials and Processes (EUROMAT 2017), held September 17-22, 2017, in Thessaloniki, Greece, and has been expanded from the original presentation.
Appendix: On the Specific Surface Area of Phases with Different Shapes
Appendix: On the Specific Surface Area of Phases with Different Shapes
The specific surface area of a phase depends on its size and on its shape. First, let us consider the simplest 3D object, a sphere with radius r (m). The equations for its surface area and for its volume are: \( A_{\text{sphere}} = 4 \times \pi \times r^{2} \), \( V_{\text{sphere}} = 4 \times \pi \times r^{3} /3 \). Substituting these two equations into Eq 1, the equation for the specific surface area for a sphere is obtained as:
Now, let us consider a cube with side length a (m) with the known equations for its surface area and volume: \( A_{\text{cube}} = 6 \times a^{2} \), Vcube = a3. Substituting these two equations into Eq 1, the equation for the specific surface area for a cube is obtained as:
As follows from Eq Aa-Ab, the specific surface area of any object is inversely proportional to its characteristic size. Thus, nano-phases have high specific surface areas, compared to micro-phases or macro-phases. This is the major special property of nano-phases that makes them so special compared to micro-phases and macro-phases.
Now, let us find that special value of the radius of a sphere (rsphere–cube, m), which provides the same volume as a cube of side length a. To obtain this, the volumes of these two bodies should be identical: \( 4 \times \pi \times r_{{{\text{sphere}} - {\text{cube}}}}^{3} /3 = a^{3} \). Let us express from here rsphere–cube and substitute it into Eq Aa:
Comparing Eq Ab-Ac, one can see that a sphere has a smaller specific surface area than a cube of the same volume by 19.3%. Let us declare that among all 3D bodies the sphere has the smallest specific surface area. This is because spheres have no corners.
Let us consider also a cylinder of radius rcap. In the first approximation, let us consider only its wall and neglect its ends. Then: \( A_{{{\text{cyl}} - {\text{wall}}}} = 2 \times r_{\text{cap}} \times \pi \times L \), \( V_{\text{cyl}} = r_{\text{cap}}^{2} \times \pi \times L \), where L (m) is the length of the cylinder. Substituting these two equations into Eq 1, the equation for the specific surface area for a cylindrical wall is obtained as:
Equation Ad is approximately valid for long cylinders (L ≫ rcap), even if their ends are taken into account. For short cylinders, the ends of the cylinder should also be taken into account: \( A_{\text{cyl}} = 2 \times r_{\text{cap}} \times \pi \times L + 2 \times r_{\text{cap}}^{2} \times \pi \). Substituting this equation and \( V_{\text{cyl}} = r_{\text{cap}}^{2} \times \pi \times L \) into Eq 1, the equation for the specific surface area for a cylinder is obtained as:
Finally, let us consider the specific surface area of a thin film of a small thickness d (m) surrounded by two large parallel surface areas A (m2). Neglecting the negligible side surface areas compared to two large surface areas A, the surface area and the volume of the thin film are written as: \( A_{\text{film}} = 2 \times A \), \( V_{\text{film}} = A \times d \). Substituting these two equations into the definition of the specific surface area Eq 1, the specific surface area of a thin film is obtained as:
Note that the two large surface areas A usually correspond to different types of interfaces, such as film/substrate and film/gas.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaptay, G. On the Size Dependence of Molar and Specific Properties of Independent Nano-phases and Those in Contact with Other Phases. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 27, 5023–5029 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3411-x
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-018-3411-x