Abstract
Objectives
To compare diagnosis performance and effective dose of ultra-low-dose CT (ULD CT) versus radiographs in suspected spinal or pelvic ring or hip fracture for minor trauma.
Methods
ULD CT, in addition to radiography, was prospectively performed in consecutive patients admitted to the emergency department for minor traumas, during working hours over 2 months. Presence of a recent fracture was assessed by two blind radiologists independently. Sensitivities and specificities were estimated using the best valuable comparator (BVC) as a reference and using a latent class model in Bayesian inference (BLCM). Dosimetric indicators were recorded and effective doses (E) were calculated using conversion coefficient.
Results
Eighty areas were analyzed in 69 patients, including 22 dorsal spine, 28 lumbar spine, and 30 pelvic ring/hip. Thirty-six fractures (45%) were observed. Applying the BVC method, depending on location, ULD CT sensitivity was 80 to 100% for reader 1 and 85 to 100% for reader 2, whereas radiographic sensitivity was 60 to 85% for reader 1 and 50 to 92% for reader 2. With BLCM approach for reader 2, ULD CT sensitivity for all locations/dorsal spine/lumbar spine and pelvic ring-hip was 87.1/75.9/84.2/76.9% respectively. Corresponding radiograph sensitivity was 73.8, 54.8, 80.4, and 68.7%. Effective doses of ULD CT were similar to radiographs for dorsal and hip locations whereas for lumbar spine, ULD CT effective dose was 1.83 ± 0.59 mSv compared with 0.96 ± 0.59 mSv (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Sensitivity for fracture detection was higher for ULD CT compared with radiographs with an effective dose comparable to radiographs.
Key Points
• Ultra-low-dose spine and pelvis CT demonstrates better fracture detection when compared with radiographs.
• The effective dose of ultra-low-dose spine and pelvis CT scan and radiographs is comparable.
• Replacement of radiographs by ULD CT in daily practice for trauma patients is an option to consider and should be evaluated by a randomized trial.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BVC:
-
Best valuable comparator
- CTDIvol :
-
Volume CT dose index
- DAP:
-
Dose area product
- DLP:
-
Dose length product
- E:
-
Effective dose
- eDAP :
-
Region-specific conversion coefficient to calculate ERX
- eDLP :
-
Region-specific conversion coefficient to calculate EULD
- ERX :
-
Effective dose for each radiograph examination
- EULD :
-
Effective dose calculated for each ULD CT examination
- IR:
-
Iterative reconstruction
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- PACS:
-
Picture archiving and communication system
- ULD CT:
-
Ultra-low-dose computed tomography
References
HAS, SOFCOT, SFGG (2017) Haute Autorité de Santé - Orthogériatrie et fracture de la hanche.
Looby S, Flanders A (2011) Spine Trauma. Radiol Clin North Am 49:129–163
Hu R, Mustard CA, Burns C (1996) Epidemiology of incident spinal fracture in a complete population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:492–499
Cooper C, Atkinson EJ, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ (1992) Incidence of clinically diagnosed vertebral fractures: a population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota, 1985-1989. J Bone Miner Res 7:221–227
Heinemann U, Freund M (2006) Diagnostic strategies in spinal trauma. Eur J Radiol 58:76–88
Schicho A, Schmidt SA, Seeber K, Olivier A, Richter PH, Gebhard F (2016) Pelvic X-ray misses out on detecting sacral fractures in the elderly - importance of CT imaging in blunt pelvic trauma. Injury 47:707–710
Roberts TT, Tartaglione JP, Dooley TP, Papaliodis DN, Mulligan MT, Bagchi K (2015) Preliminary trauma radiographs misrepresent pubic diastasis injuries. Orthopedics 38:e229–e233
Kirby MW, Spritzer C (2010) Radiographic detection of hip and pelvic fractures in the emergency department. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1054–1060
Daffner RH, Sciulli RL, Rodriguez A, Protetch J (2006) Imaging for evaluation of suspected cervical spine trauma: a 2-year analysis. Injury 37:652–658
Saltzherr TP, Beenen LFM, Reitsma JB, Luitse JSK, Vandertop WP, Goslings JC (2010) Frequent computed tomography scanning due to incomplete three-view X-ray imaging of the cervical spine. J Trauma 68:1213
Thomas RW, Williams HLM, Carpenter EC, Lyons K (2016) The validity of investigating occult hip fractures using multidetector CT. Br J Radiol 89:20150250
Heikal S, Riou P, Jones L (2014) The use of computed tomography in identifying radiologically occult hip fractures in the elderly. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 96:234–237
Rehman H, Clement RGE, Perks F, White TO (2016) Imaging of occult hip fractures: CT or MRI? Injury 47:1297–1301
Dunker D, Collin D, Göthlin JH, Geijer M (2012) High clinical utility of computed tomography compared to radiography in elderly patients with occult hip fracture after low-energy trauma. Emerg Radiol 19:135–139
Gabbe BJ, Esser M, Bucknill A et al (2013) The imaging and classification of severe pelvic ring fractures: experiences from two level 1 trauma centres. Bone Joint J 95-B:1396–1401
Konda SR, Goch AM, Leucht P et al (2016) The use of ultra-low-dose CT scans for the evaluation of limb fractures: is the reduced effective dose using CT in orthopaedic injury (REDUCTION) protocol effective? Bone Joint J 98-B:1668–1673
Moritz JD, Hoffmann B, Sehr DH et al (2012) Pediatric fracture diagnosis--ultra-low-dose CT with an effective dose equal to that of radiographs. Rofo 184:1026–1033
Tozakidou M, Reisinger C, Harder D et al (2018) Systematic radiation dose reduction in cervical spine CT of human cadaveric specimens: how low can we go? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:385–391
Macri F, Greffier J, Pereira F et al (2016) Value of ultra-low-dose chest CT with iterative reconstruction for selected emergency room patients with acute dyspnea. Eur J Radiol 85:1637–1644
Macri F, Greffier J, Khasanova E et al (2019) Minor blunt thoracic trauma in the emergency department: sensitivity and specificity of chest ultralow-dose computed tomography compared with conventional radiography. Ann Emerg Med 73:665–670
Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628
Gies M, Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C (1999) Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. I. Simulation studies. Med Phys 26:2235–2247
Kalender WA, Buchenau S, Deak P et al (2008) Technical approaches to the optimisation of CT. Phys Medica 24:71–79
Greffier J, Macri F, Larbi A et al (2015) Dose reduction with iterative reconstruction: optimization of CT protocols in clinical practice. Diagn Interv Imaging 96:477–486
Greffier J, Fernandez A, Macri F, Freitag C, Metge L, Beregi JP (2013) Which dose for what image? Iterative reconstruction for CT scan. Diagn Interv Imaging 94:1117–1121
Greffier J, Frandon J, Pereira F et al (2020) Optimization of radiation dose for CT detection of lytic and sclerotic bone lesions: a phantom study. Eur Radiol 30:1075–1078
Hui SL, Walter SD (1980) Estimating the error rates of diagnostic tests. Biometrics 36:167
van Smeden M, Naaktgeboren CA, Reitsma JB, Moons KGM, de Groot JAH (2014) Latent class models in diagnostic studies when there is no reference standard--a systematic review. Am J Epidemiol 179:423–431
Joseph L, Gyorkos TW, Coupal L (1995) Bayesian estimation of disease prevalence and the parameters of diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard. Am J Epidemiol 141:263–272
Spiegelhalter DJ, Myles JP, Jones DR, Abrams KR (2000) Bayesian methods in health technology assessment: a review. Health Technol Assess 4:1–130
Shrimpton PC, Wall BF (2009) Effective dose and dose-length product in CT. Radiology 250:604–605
Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA (2010) Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 257:158–166
Publications Office of the EU (2000) European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d229c9e1-a967-49de-b169-59ee68605f1a/language-en
Carpenter B, Gelman A, Hoffman MD et al (2017) Stan: a probabilistic programming language. J Stat Softw 76:1–32
Hauser CJ, Visvikis G, Hinrichs C et al (2003) Prospective validation of computed tomographic screening of the thoracolumbar spine in trauma. J Trauma 55:228–234 discussion 234-235
Wintermark M, Mouhsine E, Theumann N et al (2003) Thoracolumbar spine fractures in patients who have sustained severe trauma: depiction with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 227:681–689
Brandt M-M, Wahl WL, Yeom K, Kazerooni E, Wang SC (2004) Computed tomographic scanning reduces cost and time of complete spine evaluation. J Trauma 56:1022
Brown CVR, Antevil JL, Sise MJ, Sack DI (2005) Spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine fractures: its time has come. J Trauma 58:890–895 discussion 895-896
Antevil JL, Sise MJ, Sack DI, Kidder B, Hopper A, Brown CVR (2006) Spiral computed tomography for the initial evaluation of spine trauma: a new standard of care? J Trauma 61:382–387
Their MEA, Bensch FV, Koskinen SK, Handolin L, Kiuru MJ (2005) Diagnostic value of pelvic radiography in the initial trauma series in blunt trauma. Eur Radiol 15:1533–1537
Kessel B, Sevi R, Jeroukhimov I et al (2007) Is routine portable pelvic X-ray in stable multiple trauma patients always justified in a high technology era? Injury 38:559–563
Henes FO, Nüchtern JV, Groth M et al (2012) Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomography in the detection of pelvic fractures. Eur J Radiol 81:2337–2342
Mei K, Kopp FK, Bippus R et al (2017) Is multidetector CT-based bone mineral density and quantitative bone microstructure assessment at the spine still feasible using ultra-low tube current and sparse sampling? Eur Radiol 27:5261–5271
Lee SH, Yun SJ, Jo HH, Kim DH, Song JG, Park YS (2018) Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose versus ultra-low-dose CT for lumbar disc disease and facet joint osteoarthritis in patients with low back pain with MRI correlation. Skeletal Radiol 47:491–504
Suntharalingam S, Mikat C, Wetter A et al (2018) Whole-body ultra-low dose CT using spectral sha** for detection of osteolytic lesion in multiple myeloma. Eur Radiol 28:2273–2280
Konda SR, Goch AM, Haglin J, Egol KA (2018) Ultra low dose CT scan (REDUCTION protocol) for extremity fracture evaluation is as safe and effective as conventional CT: an evaluation of quality outcomes. J Orthop Trauma 32:216–222
Funding
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Jean Paul Beregi, MD, PhD.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors has significant statistical expertise: Sophie Bastide, MD
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
Methodology
• prospective
• diagnostic or prognostic study
• performed at one institution
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 969 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hamard, A., Greffier, J., Bastide, S. et al. Ultra-low-dose CT versus radiographs for minor spine and pelvis trauma: a Bayesian analysis of accuracy. Eur Radiol 31, 2621–2633 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07304-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07304-8