Log in

Distribution of spring barley roots in Danish soils, of different texture and under different climatic conditions

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Spring barley root profiles have been investigated in three years with different climatological conditions during the growing season. In total, 50 root profiles were determined by measuring cm root/ml soil in different 10 cm sections of the profile. The investigations, show that the root density was nearly identical for all soil types within the upper part of the plough layer. The decrease in root density with depth is most pronounced for the sandy soils and less for the loamy soils. The mean max. root depth in the sandy soils was roughly 70 cm, while it was roughly 140 cm for the loamy soils. A comparison between the clay and silt content in the subsoil and the thickness of soil layers with more than given root densities shows that there is no correlation between texture and thickness of soil layers with more than 1.0 cm root/ml soil, while there was a clear, positive correlation between thickness of soil layers with lower root densities and the clay and silt content in the subsoil. The different climatological conditions during the growing season give rise to differences in the root development. Very wet springs seem to impede root development in loamy soils with slowly permeable subsoils, while this is not the case in the sandy soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baligar V C, Whisler F D and Nash V E 1980 Soybean seedling root growth as influenced by soil texture, matric suction and bulk density. Commun. in Soil Sci. and Plant Analysis 11, 903–915.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eaves B W 1972 Soil physical conditions effecting seedling root growth. Plant and Soil 36 613–622.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Foy C D and Brown J C 1964 Toxic factors in acid soils II. Differential aluminium tolerance of plant species. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc., 27–32.

  4. Foy C D, Lafever H N, Schwartz J W and Fleming A L 1974 Aluminium tolerance of wheat cultivars related to region of origin. Agron. J. 66 751–758.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geisler G 1973 Morphogenetische Wirkung der O2-und CO2-Konzentrationen im Boden auf das Wurzelsystem unter Berücksichtigung des Bodenwassergehaltes.In Pseudogley and Gley, Trans. of Comm. V. and VI of Int. Soc. Soil Sci., 557–566.

  6. Head G C 1966. Estimating seasonal changes in the quality of white undisturbed roots on fruit trees. J. Hortic. Sci. 41, 197–206.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hemsath D L and Mazurak A P 1974 Seedling growth of sorghum in clay-sand mixtures at various compaction and water contents. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 38, 387–390.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hignett C T 1976 A method for sampling and measuring cereal roots. J. Austr. Inst. Agric. Sci. 42 127–129.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kar S, Varade S B and Ghildyal B P 1979 Pore size distribution and root growth relations of rice in artificially synthesized soils. Soil Sci. 128, 364–368.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Köhnlein J and Bergt K 1971 Untersuchungen zur Entstehung der biogenen Durchporung im Unterboden eingedeichter Marschen. Z. Acker-und Pflanzenbau 133, 261–298.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Madsen H B 1979 Soil survey and land evaluation. Folia Geographica Danica X 5 (In Danish with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Madsen H B 1983 The soils of himmerland, thesis. Folia Geographica Danica XVI. (In Danish with English summary).

  13. Madsen H B and Platou S W 1983 Land use planning in Denmark. Nordic Hydrology 14, 267–276.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mash B 1971 Measurement of length in random arrangement of lines. J. Appl. Ecol. 8, 267–267.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mathiesen F D and Nørr A H 1976, The Danish soil classification, technical report. The Ministry of Agriculture, Copenhagen (In Danish)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nash V E and Baligar V C 1974 The growth of soybean (Glycine max) roots in relation to soil micromorphology. Plant and Soil 41, 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Olsen M 1958 Investigation of root profiles in relation to deep ploughing in different soils. Hedeselsk. Forskn. Beretn. 3. Viborg. (In Danish).

  18. Schuurman J J 1966 Effects of soil density on root and top growth of oats. Proc. Int. Scient. Symp. Brno. 103–120.

  19. Tabatabei M A and Bremner J M 1970 Use of the Leco Automatic 70-Second Carbon Analyzer for total carbon analysis of soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34, 608–610.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tackett J L and Pearson R W 1964 Oxygen requirements of cotton seedling roots for penetration of compacted soil cores. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 28, 600–605.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wesseling J 1962 Some solutions of the steady state diffusion of CO2 through soils. Neth. J. Agri. Sci. 10, 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Breuning Madsen, H. Distribution of spring barley roots in Danish soils, of different texture and under different climatic conditions. Plant Soil 88, 31–43 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02140664

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02140664

Key words

Navigation