Log in

Understanding linear measurement: A comparison of filipino and new zealand children

  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An understanding of linear measurement depends on principles that include standard unit size, iteration of units, numbering of a unit at its end, and partial units for measuring continuous length. Children may learn these principles at school, for example through experience with informal measurement, or they may learn them through use of measurement in society. This study compared the application of these principles by children aged 8 and 9 from the Philippines and New Zealand. These countries were selected because they have quite different curricula, societal influences and economies. Ninety-one children were interviewed individually on a common set of unusual tasks that were designed to tap underlying principles. Results showed many similarities and some differences between countries. Most tasks requiring visualisation and informal units were done more accurately by New Zealand children. Some tasks involving the use of a conventional ruler were done more accurately by Filipino children. These differences appear to be related to differences in curricula and possibly to differences in societal use of measurement. We suggest that these results, like those of other writers cited, demonstrate the need for extensive work on the underlying concepts in measurement through work on informal measurement and a careful transition between informal and formal measurement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bladen, E., Wildish, K., & Cox, J. A. (2000). The development of linear measurement in elementary school children: An empirical study.The Genetic Epistemologist, 28(3). Retrieved May 20, 2004, from http://www.piaget.org/GE/2000/GE-28-3.html.

  • Bragg, P., & Outhred, L. (2000). Students’ knowledge of length units: Do they know more about rules than rulers? In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.),Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 97–104). Hiroshima, Japan: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, M., & Walker, M. (2001).Trends in Year 9 students’ mathematics and science achievement: Results from New Zealand’s participation in the repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Wellington: Research Division, Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, D. H., Battista, M. T., Sarama, J., Swaminathan, S., & McMillan, S. (1997). Students’ development of length concepts in a Logo-based unit on geometric paths.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 70–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davydov, V. V. (1982). The psychological characteristics of the formation of elementary mathematical operations in children. In T. P. Carpenter, J. M. Moser, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.),Addition and subtraction: A cognitive perspective (pp. 226–238). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gay, H., & Cole, M. (1967).The new mathematics and an old culture: A study of learning among the Kpelle of Liberia. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K. M. (1981). Measurement. In K. M. Hart, (Ed.),Children’s understanding of mathematics: 11–16 (pp. 9–22). Newcastle upon Tyne: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K., Johnson, D. J., Brown, M., Dickson, L., & Clarkson, R. (1989).Children’s mathematical frameworks 8–13: A study of classroom teaching. Windsor, Berks: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, K. C., & Ell, F. (2002). Visualising and the move from informal to formal linear measurement. In B. Barton, K. C. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch, & M. O. J. Thomas (Eds.),Mathematics education in the South Pacific.Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 358–365). Sydney: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamii, C., & Clark, F. B. (1997). Measurement of length: The need for a better approach to teaching.School Science and Mathematics, 97(3), 116–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manila Bulletin. (2004, August 23). Retrieved August 30, 2004, from http://www.mb.com.ph/issues/2004/08/23/MTNN2004082316911.html

  • Millroy, W. L. (1992).An ethnographic study of the mathematical ideas of a group of carpenters. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, R. G. (1998). Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: Comparison of eleven methods.Statistics in Medicine, 17, 873–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Council for Educational Research [NZCER]. (2000).Assessment resource bank, mathematics [MS2087]. Retrieved May 11, 2001, from http://arb.nzcer.org.nz/nzcer3/maths/msrmnt/2000-099/ms2087.htm.

  • New Zealand Ministry of Education. (1992).Mathematics in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Zealand Ministry of Education Numeracy Projects. (2003). Retrieved October 23, 2003, from http://www.nzmaths.co.nz/Numeracy/Index.htm.

  • New Zealand Official Yearbook on the Web. (n.d). Retrieved November 7, 2003, from http://www.stats.govt.nz/domino/external/PASfull/PASfull.nsf/0/4c2567ef0 0247c6acc25697a000442b0/Open Document.

  • Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (1996).Children doing mathematics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz Munsayac, C. (1994).Book I measurements in metric: The SI units. Metro Manila: Tri-Copy Publishing House Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippine Department of Education. (2002).Handbook in elementary level (mathematics). The 2002 basic education curriculum. Pasig: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B., (1967).The child’s conception of space. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schliemann, A. D., & Carraher, D. W. (1992). Proportional reasoning in and out of school, In P. Light & G. Butterworth (Eds.),Context and cognition (pp. 47–73). London: Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Third International Mathematics and Science Study - Repeat (1999). Retrieved October 23, 2003, from http://timss.bc.edu/timss1999i/items.html.

  • Vistro-Yu, C. P. (2002). Filipino students’ achievement in mathematics: Results from TIMSS — Repeat.Matimyas Matematika, 25, 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vistro-Yu, C. P. (2003).Children’s visualization skills and their understanding of concepts, necessary for linear measurement — Iterated units and fractional units. Unpublished report. Manila: Ateneo de Manila University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuyk, R. (1981).Overview and critique of Piaget’s genetic epistemology 1965 – 1980. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Irwin, K.C., Ell, F.R. & Vistro-Yu, C.P. Understanding linear measurement: A comparison of filipino and new zealand children. Math Ed Res J 16, 3–24 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217393

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217393

Keywords

Navigation