SpringerLink
Log in

Personal fraud victims and their official responses to victimization

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The bulk of the research on predatory crime focuses on characteristics, profiles, and patterns of offenders. This information is important, but from the perspective of police agencies, information about the victims of predatory crimes, including victims of white-collar predatory crimes, and how they officially respond to victimization is also important. Using survey data from a random sample of 400 residents of Knox County, Tennessee, we investigated the characteristics of victims of thirteen different types of fraud. After dividing individuals into categories of non-victims, one-time victims, and repeat victims, we develop profiles of personal fraud victims by examining differences in key demographic and offense characteristics. Next, we investigate the official reporting behavior of victims. The results are instructive for police agencies as they highlight common characteristics of fraud victims and suggest methods for encouraging fraud victims to report their victimization to police.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association of Retired People. (1996).Telemarketing fraud and older Americans: An AARP study. Conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates.

  • American Association of Retired People. (1997).Comparative findings from the 1996 and 1997 Omnibus surveys on telemarketing fraud. Evaluation Research Services, Research Division.

  • Bass, Ron & Hoeffler, Lois (1992).Telephonebased fraud: A survey of the American public. New York: Louis Harris & Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Donald. (1976).The behavior of law Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, Richard. (1972).Deceivers and deceived. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, John (1992).Fraud victimization survey, 1990 Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brintnall, Michael L. (1978). Police and whitecollar crime.Policy Studies Journal, 7, 431–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Lawrence E. & Felson, Marcus. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach.American Sociological Review, 44, 588–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copes, Heith, Kerley, Kent R., Mason, Karen & Van Wyk, Judy (2001). Reporting behavior of fraud victims and Black's theory of law: An empirical assessment.Justice Quarterly, 18, 343–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, Phillip. (1967).Criminal victimization in the United States: A report of a national survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enter, Jack E. (1989). Psychological profiling and the predator criminal: A new form of criminological inquiry?Quarterly Journal of Ideology, 13, 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fyfe, Nicholas R. (1995). Policing the city.Urban Studies, 32, 4–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganzini, L., McFarland, B., & Bloom, J. (1990). Victims of fraud: Comparing victims of white collar and violent crime.Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 18, 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, Gilbert. (1973). Victimization patterns in white collar crime. In I. Drapkin & E. Viano (Eds.),Victimology: A new focus on exploiters and exploited vol. 5. (pp. 86–106). Lexington, MA: DC Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Alan. (1979). Obstacles in maximizing police productivity.Police Studies, 2, 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, C. Ronald. (1990).Gangs in America. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesilow, Paul, Klemper, Ester & Chiao, Victoria. (1992). Reporting consumer and major fraud: A survey of complainants. In Kip Schlegel & David Weisburd (Eds.),White Collar Crime Reconsidered (pp. 149–168). Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Ann. (1980).Women who kill. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Malcolm. (1995).The American street gang New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Malcolm & Maxson, Cheryl (1989). Street gang violence. In Neil A. Weiner & Marvin E. Wolfgang (Eds.),Violent crime, violent criminals. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Michael. (1987a) Crisis? What crisis? Reactions to commercial fraud in the United Kingdom.Contemporary Crises, 11, 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Michael. (1987b)Regulating Fraud: White-collar crime and the criminal process. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Michael (1992). White-collar crime victimization. In Kip Schlegel & David Weisburd (Eds.),White Collar Crime Reconsidered (pp. 169–192). Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveland, Ian (1989). Policing welfare: Local authority responses to claimant fraud in the housing benefit scheme.Journal of Law and Society, 16, 187–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunde, Donald T. (1976).Murder and madness. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Karen & Benson, Michael L. (1996). The effect of social support on fraud victims' reporting behavior.Justice Quarterly, 13, 511–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miethe, Terance D. & Meier, Robert F. (1994).Crime and its social context: Toward an integrated theory of offenders, victims, and situations. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbold, Greg & Ivory, Robert. (1993). Policing serious fraud in New Zealand.Crime, Law, and Social Change, 20, 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, Robert. (2000). Crime facts: Victim and offender data In Joseph Sheley (Ed.),Criminology (pp. 59–84). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polk, Kenneth. (1994).When men kill: Scenarios of masculine violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontell, Henry, Rosoff, Steve & Goode, Eric. (1990). White collar crime. In Eric Goode (Ed.)Deviant Behavior (pp. 289–313). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebovich, Donald & Layne, Jenny (2000).The national public survey on while collar crime. Morgantown, WV: National White Collar Crime Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiman, Jeffrey. (1998).The rich get richer and the poor get prison. 5th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sechrest, Dale K. et al. 1998. A research note: Women's response to a telemarketing scam. InWomen and Criminal Justice vol. 10 (pp. 75–89) Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shichor, David, Sechrest, Dale K., & Doocy, Jeffrey. (2001). Victims of investment fraud. In Henry Pontell & David Shichor (Eds.),Contemporary issues in crime and criminal justice: Essays in honor of Gilbert Geis (pp. 81–96), Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shover, Neal, Fox, Greer Litton & Mills, Michael. (1994). Long-term consequences ofvictimization by white-collar crime.Justice Quarterly, 11, 75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, Judith. (2000). Elder and dependent adult fraud: A sampler of actual cases to profile theoffenders and the crimes they perpetrate.Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect, 12, 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, Eric. (1975). Fraud, dispute and the consumer: Responding to consumer complaints.University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 123, 1107–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, Dennis J. (1997). Violence and serial rape.Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 12, 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, Richard. (2001). Personal fraud and its victims. In Neal Shover & John Wright (Eds.)Crimes of Privilege (pp. 57–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, Richard & Gover, Angela R. (2001). Personal fraud: The victims and the scams.Crime Prevention Studies, 41, 54–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titus, Richard Heinzelman, Fred & Boyle, John. (1995). Victimization of persons by fraud.Crime and Delinquency, 41, 54–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uniform Crime Reports. 1991–1999. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation.

  • Van Wyk, Judy & Benson, Michael L. (1997). Fraud victimization: Risky business or just bad luck?American Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 163–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, Diane & Carlo, Giovanna. (1975). The appliance repairman: A study of victim-responsiveness and fraud.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 12, 153–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, Diane & Carlo, Giovanna. (1976). Victims of fraud: Victim-responsiveness, incidence and reporting. In E. Viano (Ed.)Victims and Society. Washington, DC: Visage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walklate, Sandra (1989).Victimology: The victim and the criminal justice process. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, Marvin E. (1967).Studies in homicide. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Richard & Decker, Scott E. (1994).Burglars on the job: Streetlife and residential break-ins. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Richard & Decker, Scott E. (1997).Armed robbers in action: Stickups and street culture. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mississippi State University, Mississippi

    Kent R. Kerley

  2. University of Alabama, Birmingham

    Heith Copes

Authors
  1. Kent R. Kerley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heith Copes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kerley, K.R., Copes, H. Personal fraud victims and their official responses to victimization. J Police Crim Psych 17, 19–35 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02802859

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02802859

Keywords

Search

Navigation