Log in

Intra- and interspecific ultrastructural character variation: The chaetation of the Microphthalmus listensis species group (Polychaeta, Hesionidae)

  • Published:
Zoomorphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The different chaetal types of three eidonomically very similar, closely related polychaete species (Microphthalmus carolinensis, M. nahantensis and M. listensis) were ultrastructurally investigated and compared with one another. Characteristic substructures are regularly arranged channels, the course and number of which were analysed in cross-sections. The intraspecific variability of the number of these channels is low in the individual chaetal type. Between the species, however, distinct differences exist, facilitating separation and identification of the species at the level of ultrastructure in certain chaetae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Eckelbarger KJ, Grassle JP (1983) Ultrastructural differences in the eggs and ovarian follicle cells of Capitella (Polychaeta) sibling species. Biol Bull 165:379–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckelbarger KJ, Grassle JP (1987a) Interspecific variation in genital spine, sperm, and larval morphology in six sibling species of Capitella. Bull Biol Soc Wash 7:62–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckelbarger KJ, Grassle JP (1987b) Spermatogenesis, sperm storage and comparative sperm morphology in nine species of Capitella, Capitomastus and Capitellides (Polychaeta: Capitellidae). Mar Biol 95:415–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers U (1985) Das Phylogenetische System der Plathelminthes. Fischer, Stuttgart New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustus RM, Cloney RA (1972) Ultrastructural similarities between setae of brachiopods and polychaetes. Acta Zool 53:229–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgeson AN, Bernard RTF (1986) Observations on the ultrastructure of the spermatozoon of two mytilids from the southwest coast of England. J Mar Biol Ass UK 66:385–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippert W, Gentil K (1963) Über den Feinbau der Schillerhaare des Polychaeten Aphrodite aculeata L. Z Morphol Ökol Tiere 53:22–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Orrhage L (1971) Light and electron microscope studies of some annelid setae. Acta Zool 52:157–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus HF (1979) Eye structure and the monophyly of the Arthropoda. In: Gupta AP (ed) Arthropod phylogeny. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 299–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietsch A, Westheide W (1985) Ultrastructural investigations of presumed photoreceptors as a means of discrimination and identification of closely related species. Zoomorphology 105:265–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Purschke G (1985) Anatomy and ultrastructure of ventral pharyngeal organs and their phylogenetic importance in Polychaeta (Annelida). Zoomorphology 105:223–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice SA (1981) Spermatogenesis and sperm ultrastructure in three species of Polydora and in Streblospio benedicti (Polychaeta, Spionidae). Zoomorphology 97:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger RM (1986) Über den Ursprung der Bilateria: Die Bedeutung der Ultrastrukturforschung für ein neues Verstehen der Metazoenevolution. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 79:31–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger RM, Ruppert E (1978) Resin embedment of quantitative meiofauna samples for structural and ecological studies. Description and application. Mar Biol 46:223–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger RM, Tyler S (1985) Das Homologietheorem in der Ultrastrukturforschung. In: Ott JA, Wagner GP, Wuketits FM (eds) Evolution, Ordnung und Erkenntnis. Parey Verlag, Hamburg Berlin, pp 21–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharnofske P (1986) Ultrastructure of sperm morphology of Trilobodrilus axi and T. heideri (Dinophilidae, Polychaeta). Helgol Wiss Meeresunters 40:419–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch V (1979) Contributions of comparative ultrastructural research to problems of invertebrate evolution. Amer Zool 19:637–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide W (1967) Monographie der Gattungen Hesionides Friedrich und Microphthalmus Mecznikow (Polychaeta, Hesionidae). Ein Beitrag zur Organisation und Biologie psammobionter Polychaeten. Z Morphol Tiere 61:1–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide W (1978) Ultrastructure of the genital organs in interstitial polychaetes. I. Structure, development and function of the copulatory stylets in Microphthalmus listensis. Zoomorphologie 91:101–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide W (1984) The concept of reproduction in polychaetes with small body size: Adaptations in interstitial species. In: Fischer A, Pfannenstiel H-D (eds) Fortschritte der Zoologie, Bd. 29. Polychaete reproduction, Fischer, Stuttgart New York, pp 265–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide W, Rieger RM (1987) Systematics of the amphiatlantic Microphthalmus listensis species group (Polychaeta, Hesionidae): Facts and concepts for reconstruction of phylogeny and speciation. Z Zool Syst Evolutionsforsch 25:12–39

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Specht, A., Westheide, W. Intra- and interspecific ultrastructural character variation: The chaetation of the Microphthalmus listensis species group (Polychaeta, Hesionidae). Zoomorphology 107, 371–376 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312220

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312220

Keywords

Navigation