SpringerLink
Log in

Testing and Evaluation for Vehicle Safety

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Intelligent Safety of Automobile

Part of the book series: Key Technologies on New Energy Vehicles ((KTNEV))

  • 260 Accesses

Abstract

Testing and evaluation for vehicle safety (TEVS) is to measure, analyze and judge vehicle safety performance through a series of techniques and methods with reference to certain standards, and then make qualitative or quantitative evaluation conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now
Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 149.79
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 192.59
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. China Center for Information Industry Development. Testing and evaluation technology of ICVs [M]. Bei**g: People’s Posts and Telecom Press, 2019. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cao Qinggui. Safety assessment [M]. Bei**g: China Machine Press, 2017. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhu Dongjie. Research on building fire safety evaluation based on analytic hierarchy process [D]. China University of Science and Technology, 2005. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liao Jun, An Yisheng, Zhang Shaoyang, Zhao **angmo, Ma Tianshan. Comprehensive evaluation model for dynamic traffic safety of road sections [J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2009, 9 (04): 79–84. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wang Hai. Research on safety assessment of dangerous chemical terminal based on FSA [D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2007. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guo Qisheng. Introduction to equipment effectiveness evaluation [M]. Bei**g: National Defense Industry Press, 2005. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liu Gaoliang. Research on effectiveness evaluation of integrated avionics system [D]. **’an: Northwest University of Technology, 2007. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu Shilei, Li Hao. Improved ADC method and its application in effectiveness evaluation of weapon equipment system [J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2017, 39 (03): 130–135. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen Lei, Yao Weizhao, Guo Quankui. Theory, method and application of effectiveness evaluation [M]. Bei**g: Bei**g University of Posts and Telecommunications Press, 2016. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu Bing, Zhang Peixing, Zhao Jian, et al. Research progress in scenario-based virtual testing of automated driving vehicle [J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2019, 32 (06): 1–19. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang Zihui, Li Yanqiang, Wang Jianqiang, et al. Automated driving test method and system based on hybrid reality [P]. Shandong Province: CN109781431A, 2019–05–21. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yu Zhuo**, **%2C%20**ng%20**ngyu%2C%20Chen%20Junyi.%20Progress%20in%20testing%20technology%20and%20application%20of%20automated%20driving%20vehicles%20%5BJ%5D.%20Journal%20of%20Tongji%20University%20%28Natural%20Science%20Edition%29%2C%202019%2C%2047%20%2804%29%3A%20540%E2%80%93547.%20%5Bin%20Chinese%5D"> Google Scholar 

  13. HUANG W L,WANG K F. Autonomous vehicles testing methods review [C]|| International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). 2016 IEEE 19th.

    Google Scholar 

  14. KUHN D R, REILLY M J. An investigation of the applicability of design of experiments to software testing. In: Caulfield M, ed. Proc. of the Annual NASA/IEEE Software Engineering Workshop (SEW). Los Alamitos: IEEE Press, 2009.5.91

    Google Scholar 

  15. GRINDAL M. Handling combinatorial explosion in software testing [D]. Linkö**s: Linkö**s Universitet, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  16. WOTAWA F. Testing Autonomous and Highly Configurable Systems: Challenges and Feasible Solutions [M]|| Automated Driving. Springer International Publishing, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  17. ELROFAI H, WORM D, CAMP O O D. Scenario Identification for Validation of Automated Driving Functions [M]|| Advanced Microsystems for Automotive Applications 2016. Springer International Publishing, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  18. HUANG W L, LV Y, CHEN L, et al. Accelerate the autonomous vehicles reliability testing in parallel paradigm [C]|| IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2017: 922–927.

    Google Scholar 

  19. LI L, HUANG W L, LIU Y, et al. Intelligence Testing for Autonomous Vehicles: A New Approach [J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2017, 1(2):158–166.

    Google Scholar 

  20. MENZEL T, BAGSCHIK G, MAURER M. Scenarios for Development, Test and Validation of Automated Vehicles [J]. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2018: 1821–1827.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yu Rongjie, Tian Ye, Sun Jian. Virtual testing of high-grade automated driving vehicle: research progress and frontier [J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2020, 33 (11): 125–138. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang Genbao, Yang **ngyong. Reliability analysis technology [J]. Manufacturing Technology and Machine Tools, 2015 (1): 7–14. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zeng Shengkui. Course of system reliability design analysis [M]. Bei**g: Bei**g University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Press, 2001. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sun Haiyun. Research on the application of FMEA in automobile axle [D]. Qingdao: Qingdao University of Technology, 2014. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dunjo J, Fthenakis V, Vilchez J A, et al. Hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis. A literature review [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 173(1–3):19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li Na, Sun Wenyong, Ning **ndao. Application analysis of HAZOP, LOPA and SIL [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  27. Standardization Administration of the P.R.C. Application guide for hazard and operability analysis (HAZOP analysis): GB/T 35320-2017 [S]. Bei**g: China Quality and Standards Publishing and Media Co., Ltd., 2018. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Yanhui, Chen **aochun. Improved HAZOP risk assessment [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2011, 07 (007): 174–178. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xu Yingbo, Zhang **huan, Ma Chunsheng, et al. Research on NCAP in foreign countries and some reflections on NCAP in China [J]. Automobile Technology, 2006 (S1): 1–4. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  30. THE RATINGS EXPLAINED[EB/OL]. [2022-02-15]. https://www.euroncap.com/en/vehicle-safety/the-ratings-explained/.

  31. Li Keqiang. Electric vehicle engineering manual Volume 6th: Intelligent network connection [M]. Bei**g: China Machine Press, 2019. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  32. BEST A, NARANG S, BARBER D, et al. AutonoVi: Autonomous Vehicle Planning with Dynamic Maneuvers and Traffic Constraints [C]|| 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2017: 2629–2636.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chen Junyi, Feng Tianyue, Liu Lihao, et al. Automatic generation way of specific scenarios for decision-planning system test [J]. Automobile Technology, 2020 (10): 45–50. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  34. SCHULDT F. Ein Beitrag für den methodischen Test von automatisierten Fahrfunktionen mit Hilfe von virtuellen Umgebungen [D]. Braunschweig: Technische Universitat Braunschweig, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Geng **nli. Research on decision-making of driverless vehicles in uncertain urban environment [D]. Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China, 2017. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  36. Li Wei, Gao Dezhi, Duan Jianmin, et al. Research on free lane-changing model of intelligent vehicles [J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2010, 27 (2): 119–123. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  37. RIGOLLI M, BRADY M. Towards a Behavioural Traffic Monitoring System [C]|| International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems. ACM, 2005: 449–454.

    Google Scholar 

  38. ECKSTEIN L, ZLOCKI A. Safety potential of ADAS-combined methods for an effective evaluation [C]|| 23rd International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) Seoul, South Korea. 2013: 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  39. ROYDEN H L. Real Analysis [M]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Li **aochi, Zhao **angmo, Xu Zhigang, et al. Modular flexible testing field for intelligent connected transport system [J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2019, 32 (06): 137–146. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  41. WISMANS J, JANSSEN E, BEUSENBERG M, et al. Injury Biomechanics (4J610): Third printing,Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  42. FOSTER J K, KORTGE J O, WOLANIN M J. Hybrid III-a biomechanically-based crash test dummy [J]. SAE Transactions, 1977: 3268–3283.

    Google Scholar 

  43. NEILSON L, LOWNE R, TARRIERE C, et al. The EUROSID side impact dummy [R]. SAE Technical Paper, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  44. EEVC. Improved test methods to evaluate pedestrian protection afforded by passenger cars (December 1998 with September 2002 updates) [R]. EEVC Working Group 17, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 4activesystems [EB/OL]. [2022-02-15]. https://www.4activesystems.at/downloads. [in Chinese]

  46. Sun Yang, Chen Huiyan. Research on the evaluation system of unmanned ground vehicles [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36 (06): 978–986. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  47. **ong Guangming, Gao Li, Wu Shaobin, et al. Intelligent behavior of driverless vehicles and its testing and evaluation [M]. Bei**g: Bei**g University of Technology Press, 2015. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sha Jie, Zhao Hui**g, Cui **shi, Zha Hongbin. Intersection traffic data collection and analysis based on distributed laser scanner [J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2009, 26 (S1): 30–34. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  49. KIROVSKII O. Determination of Validation Testing Scenarios for an ADAS Functionality: Case Study [J]. SAE Paper 2019-01-0137.

    Google Scholar 

  50. DA VISION A J, REID I D, MOLTON N D, et al. MonoSLAM: Real-time Single Camera SLAM[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2007, 29 (6): 1052–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  51. **a Houkaishun, Chen Shanxing, Wu Yilin. Modeling and simulation of target tracking system based on binocular PTZ camera [J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2015, 27 (2): 362–368. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  52. ETINGER A, LITVAK B, PINHASI Y. Multi Ray Model for Near-ground Millimeter Wave Radar [J]. Sensors, 2017, 17 (9):1983.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wang Huili, Yang Haizhong. Vehicle dynamics modeling based on system identification [J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2015, 36 (6): 1275–1282. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  54. Nie Yinyu. Research on data-driven vehicle dynamics modeling and simulation [D]. **’an: **’an Jiaotong University, 2016. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  55. Xu Xue**. Research on vehicle dynamics modeling based on driving simulator [D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2007. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  56. Yan Zhi. Virtual simulation technology of automated driving (IV): simulation testing process and requirements [EB/OL]. [2021-12-27] https://auto.vogel.com.cn/c/2021-05-24/1110694.shtml. [in Chinese]

  57. OTTEN S, BACH J, WOHLFAHRT C, et al. Automated Assessment and Evaluation of Digital Test Drives[M] || Springer. Advanced Microsystems for Automotive Applications 2017. Berlin: Springer, 2017:189–199.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Chen Zhicheng, Wu Jian, Zhao Jian, et al. Control strategy for precise adjustment of braking force of hybrid-line control dynamic system [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2018, 40 (4): 86–93. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  59. Gao Y, Xu Z, Zhao X, et al. Hardware-in-loop Simulation Platform for Autonomous Vehicle AEB Prototy** and Validation [C]// 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). IEEE, 2020: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Li **aoqing, Liu Qi, Li Binglin, et al. Research on route selection and classification of open roads for testing ICVs [J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19 (05): 74–78. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  61. Tang Li, Qing Sandong, Xu Zhigang, Zhou Houqing. Summary of research on public acceptance of automated driving [J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2020, 20 (02): 131–146. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  62. Li Jun. Challenges and solutions to China’s SOTIF [J]. ICV, 2021 (05): 12–13. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  63. Li Yang. Research on multi-attribute evaluation method and application of driving behavior safety [D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2016. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  64. BRODSKY W, SLOR Z. Background music as a risk factor for distraction among young-novice drivers [J]. Accid Anal Prev, 2013, 59(oct.):382–393.

    Google Scholar 

  65. SMITH M E, GEVINS A, BROWN H, et al. Monitoring task loading with multivariate EEG measures during complex forms of human-computer interaction [J]. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2001, 43(3): 366–380.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Guo Zhangyong. Research on evaluation of driver acceptance of adaptive cruise control system [D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2014. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  67. Lin Qingfeng, Wang Zhaojie, Lu Guangquan. Takeover safety evaluation model of L3 automated driving vehicle [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2019, 41 (11): 1258–1264. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  68. FANCHER, P. Intelligent cruise control field operational test.No.UMTRI-98-17[R]. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  69. DONG F, ZHAO Y N, GAO L. Application of gray correlation and improved AHP to evaluation on intelligent U-Turn behavior of unmanned vehicles [C]|| 2015 8th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design (ISCID). IEEE, 2015, 1: 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  70. XIONG G, HAO L, DING Z, et al. Subjective evaluation of vehicle active safety using PreScan and Simulink: Lane departure warning system as an example [C]|| 2017 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES). IEEE, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Sun Yong, Guo Kuiyuan, Gao Mingqiu. Status and development of autonomous emergency baking system in the new vehicle evaluation procedure [J]. Automobile Technology, 2016 (02): 1–6. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  72. European new car assessment programme assessment protocol: Safety Assist Version 9.0.4. [S/OL]. Euro NCAP, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  73. European new car assessment programme test protocol: AEB Car-to-Car systems Version 3.0.3. [S/OL]. Euro NCAP, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wang Runmin, Deng **aofeng, Xu Zhigang, Zhao **angmo. Overview of research on simulation testing and evaluation technology for Internet of vehicles [J]. Application Research of Computers, 2019, 36 (07): 1921–1926+1939. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  75. GOOGLE. On the road to fully self-driving-waymo safety report [DB/OL]. https://storage.googleapis.com/sdc-prod/v1/safetyreport/waymo-safety-report-2017-10.pdf.

  76. Zhu Bing, Zhang Peixing, Zhao Jian. Cluster evaluation of automated driving safety for multi-dimensional logical scenarios [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2020, 42 (11): 1458–1463+1505. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  77. GIETELINK O J. Design and validation of advanced driver assistance systems [D]. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  78. GRUYER D, PERCHBERTI S, GLASER S. Development of full speed range ACC with SIVIC, a virtual platform for ADAS prototy**, test and evaluation [C]|| Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. Gold Coast: IEEE, 2013:100–105.

    Google Scholar 

  79. ROSSETTI R J F. An integrated architecture for autonomous vehicles simulation [C]|| ACM Symposium on Applied Computing. Riva del Garda: ACM, 2012:286–292.

    Google Scholar 

  80. HAGER B, ALLEN J. Raw Data Injection and Failure Testing of Camera, Radar, and Lidar for Highly Automated Systems [J]. SAE Paper 2019-01-1378.

    Google Scholar 

  81. DROLIA, WANG Z, VEMURI, et al. Demo Abstract: AutoPlug -An Automotive Test-bed for ECU Testing,Validation and Verification [C]|| IEEE.International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. New York: IEEE, 2011: 131–132.

    Google Scholar 

  82. WE K S, LEE C G, LEE J, et al. ECU-in-loop Real-time Simulation Technique for Develo** Integrated Vehicle Safety System [C]|| IEEE. International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems. New York: IEEE, 2014: 1432–1437.

    Google Scholar 

  83. BRIEFS U. M-city grand opening [J]. The UMTRI Research Review, 2015, 46(3):1.

    Google Scholar 

  84. JACOBSON J, JANEVIK P, WALLIN P. Challenges in creating AstaZero, the active safety test area [C]|| Transport Research Arena (TRA) 5th Conference. Paris: Transport Research Arena (TRA), 2014: 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Chen Guihua, Yu Shengbo, Li Qiao, et al. Investigation and research on the development of China ICV testing demonstration zone [J]. Chinese Journal of Automotive Engineering, 2020, 10 (02): 79–87. [in Chinese]

    Google Scholar 

  86. American Honda; GoMentum Station And Honda Offer Demo Of Autonomous Vehicle TechnologyJ [J]. Journal of Transportation, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Science and Technology Department of the Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. Management specification for road testing of ICVs (Trial) [EB/OL]. [2021-07-15]. https://xxgk.mot.gov.cn/2020/jigou/kjs/2006/t20200623_3317132.html. [in Chinese]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Bei**g, China

    Jianqiang Wang, Bingbing Nie & Hong Wang

Authors
  1. Jianqiang Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bingbing Nie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianqiang Wang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 China Communications Press Co., Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wang, J., Nie, B., Wang, H. (2024). Testing and Evaluation for Vehicle Safety. In: The Intelligent Safety of Automobile. Key Technologies on New Energy Vehicles. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6399-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-6399-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-6398-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-6399-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation