Soziale Kognition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sozialpsychologie
  • 17k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Wie ist es uns möglich, uns selbst im Bruchteil einer Sekunde und auf der Grundlage minimaler Informationen einen ersten Eindruck von anderen Menschen zu bilden? Wie können wir überhaupt mit der Komplexität sozialer Informationen im Alltag umgehen? Warum nehmen wir andere Menschen in Abhängigkeit von der Situation und unseren eigenen Zielen und Bedürfnissen unterschiedlich wahr? Und wie bilden wir ein moralisches Urteil oder entwickeln Empathie für andere? In der Sozialpsychologie verwenden wir verschiedene Ansätze, um eine Vielzahl sozialpsychologischer Phänomene zu erklären, von denen wir hier nur einige genannt haben. Das vorliegende Kapitel konzentriert sich auf einen spezifischen Ansatz zur Erklärung sozialpsychologischer Phänomene, nämlich den Ansatz der sozialen Kognition. Dieser Ansatz hat zum Ziel, soziale Phänomene zu verstehen, indem er sich auf unterschiedliche allgemeine kognitive Prozesse stützt – darunter Lernen, Kategorisierung, die Aktivierung von Gedächtnisinhalten, Aufmerksamkeit und Denken. Das Kapitel folgt in der Struktur fünf übergeordneten Prinzipien der sozialen Kognition. Die ersten drei Prinzipien beziehen sich auf die Anpassung allgemeiner kognitiver Prozesse an soziale Phänomene und die Abhängigkeit dieser Phänomene von der gegebenen Situation sowie der Motivation der wahrnehmenden Person. Das vierte Prinzip besagt, dass soziale Kognition eine besondere Anpassung der Lebewesen an ihre sozialen Umwelten darstellen kann. Den Abschluss des Kapitels bildet das fünfte Prinzip, nach dem weder allgemeine noch spezifische soziale Prozesse genügen, um einige soziale Phänomene ausreichend zu erklären: Eine Kombination beider Ansätze ist vonnöten. Das Ziel dieses Kapitels ist es, einen Überblick über einen faszinierenden Ansatz zum Verständnis der breiten Vielfalt sozialpsychologischer Phänomene zu geben, die in den anderen Kapiteln dieses Buches genauer beschrieben werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (1999). How often did I do it? Experienced ease of retrieval and frequency estimates of past behavior. Acta Psychologica, 103, 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adolphs, R. (2010). Conceptual challenges and directions for social neuroscience. Neuron, 65, 752–767.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1965). Influence of models’ reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 589–595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963b). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 3–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer Jr. & T. K. Srull (Hrsg.), Handbook of social cognition (2. Aufl., Bd. 1, S. 1–40). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batres, C., Re, D. E., & Perrett, D. I. (2015). Influence of perceived height, masculinity, and age on each other and on perceptions of dominance in male faces. Perception, 44, 1293–1309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batres, C., Russell, R., Simpson, J. A., Campbell, L., Hansen, A. M., & Cronk, L. (2018). Evidence that makeup is a false signal of sociosexuality. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 148–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 290–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrmann, M., Richler, J. J., Avidan, G., & Kimchi, R. (2015). Holistic face perception. In J. Wagemans (Hrsg.), Oxford handbook of perceptual organization (S. 758–774). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Meredith, M., & Wheeler, S. C. (2008). Contextual priming: Where people vote affects how they vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(26), 8846–8849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biland, C., Py, J., Allione, J., Demarchi, S., & Abric, J.-C. (2008). The effect of lying on intentional versus unintentional facial expressions. European Review of Applied Psychology/Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 58, 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F., & Harnishfeger, K. K. (1995). The evolution of inhibition mechanisms and their role in human cognition and behavior. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Hrsg.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (S. 141–173). Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhausen, G. V., Macrae, C. N., & Sherman, J. W. (1999). On the dialectics of discrimination. Dual processes in social stereoty**. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Hrsg.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (S. 271–290). Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhausen, G. V., Kang, S. K., & Peery, D. (2012). Social categorization and the perception of social groups. In S. T. Fiske & C. N. Macrae (Hrsg.), The Sage handbook of social cognition (S. 311–329). Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (2010). Prejudice: It’s social psychology (2. Aufl.). Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswick, E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology (International encyclopedia of unified science, Bd. 1(10)). University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busigny, T., Van Belle, G., Jemel, B., Hosein, A., Joubert, S., & Rossion, B. (2014). Face-specific impairment in holistic perception following focal lesion of the right anterior temporal lobe. Neuropsychologia, 56, 312–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casper, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2010). Automatic stereotype activation is context dependent. Social Psychology, 41, 131–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassia, V. M., Picozzi, M., Kuefner, D., Bricolo, E., & Turati, C. (2009). Holistic processing for faces and cars in preschool-aged children and adults: Evidence from the composite effect. Developmental Science, 12, 236–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ciaramelli, E., Muccioli, M., Làdavas, E., & di Pellegrino, G. (2007). Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 84–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cordaro, D. T., Sun, R., Keltner, D., Kamble, S., Huddar, N., & McNeil, G. (2018). Universals and cultural variations in 22 emotional expressions across five cultures. Emotion, 18, 75–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Correll, J., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Wittenbrink, B. (2002). The police officer’s dilemma: Using ethnicity to disambiguate potentially threatening individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1314–1329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cuff, B. M. P., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. J. (2016). Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8, 144–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Entremont, B., Hains, S. M. J., & Muir, D. W. (1997). A demonstration of gaze following in 3- to 6-month-olds. Infant Behavior and Development, 20, 569–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawtry, R. J., Sutton, R. M., & Sibley, C. G. (2015). Why wealthier people think people are wealthier, and why it matters: From social sampling to attitudes to redistribution. Psychological Science, 26, 1389–1400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Decety, J., & Yoder, K. J. (2016). Empathy and motivation for justice: Cognitive empathy and concern, but not emotional empathy, predict sensitivity to injustice for others. Social Neuroscience, 11, 1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, R., & Strack, F. (2008). Variants of judgment and decision making: The perspective of the reflective-impulsive model. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Hrsg.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (S. 39–53). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M., & Grunedal, S. (2002). Facial reactions to emotional stimuli: Automatically controlled emotional responses. Cognition & Emotion, 16, 449–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyen, S., Klein, O., Pichon, C.-L., & Cleeremans, A. (2012). Behavioral priming: It’s all in the mind, but whose mind? PLoS One, 7, e29081.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. (1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology, 6, 178–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D. (2015). Motivated cognition in self and social thought. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, E. Borgida, & J. A. Bargh (Hrsg.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, volume 1: Attitudes and social cognition (S. 777–803). American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edele, A., Dziobek, I., & Keller, M. (2013). Explaining altruistic sharing in the dictator game: The role of affective empathy, cognitive empathy, and justice sensitivity. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisen, S. V., & McArthur, L. Z. (1979). Evaluating and sentencing a defendant as a function of his salience and the perceiver’s set. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 48–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 169–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & O’Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46, 913–920.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elaad, E. (2003). Effects of feedback on the overestimated capacity to detect lies and the underestimated ability to tell lies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 349–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 203–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 581–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Hrsg.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (S. 231–254). Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freiwald, W., Duchaine, B., & Yovel, G. (2016). Face processing systems: From neurons to real-world social perception. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 39, 325–346.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 490–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 694–724.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U., & Frith, C. (2010). The social brain: Allowing humans to boldly go where no other species has been. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 365, 165–176.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Galesic, M., Olsson, H., & Rieskamp, J. (2012). Social sampling explains apparent biases in judgments of social environments. Psychological Science, 23, 1515–1523.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galfano, G., Dalmaso, M., Marzoli, D., Pavan, G., Coricelli, C., & Castelli, L. (2012). Eye gaze cannot be ignored (but neither can arrows). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1895–1910.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garrigan, B., Adlam, A. L. R., & Langdon, P. E. (2016). The neural correlates of moral decision-making: A systematic review and meta-analysis of moral evaluations and response decision judgements. Brain and Cognition, 108, 88–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2011). The associative-propositional evaluation model: Theory, evidence, and open questions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 59–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawronski, B., & Sritharan, R. (2010). Formation, change, and contextualization of mental associations: Determinants and principles of variations in implicit measures. In B. Gawronski & B. K. Payne (Hrsg.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (S. 216–240). Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, S. A., Gubin, A., Fiske, S., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2000). Power can bias impression processes: Stereoty** subordinates by default and by design. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 227–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Map** the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 366–385.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D. (2015). The rise of moral cognition. Cognition, 135, 39–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greitemeyer, T., & Mügge, D. O. (2014). Video games do affect social outcomes: A meta-analytic review of the effects of violent and prosocial video game play. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 578–589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happé, F., Cook, J. L., & Bird, G. (2017). The structure of social cognition: In(ter)dependence of sociocognitive processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 243–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 555–588.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, O. P., & Norton, M. I. (2017). (mis)perceptions of inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 21–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, W. G., Crookes, K., Chu, M. H., Favelle, S. K., & Rhodes, G. (2016). Holistic processing of face configurations and components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1482–1489.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hennes, E. P., Ruisch, B. C., Feygina, I., Monteiro, C. A., & Jost, J. T. (2016). Motivated recall in the service of the economic system: The case of anthropogenic climate change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(6), 755–771.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernández-Lloreda, M. V., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: The cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science, 317, 1360–1366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, U., & Fischer, A. (2013). Emotional mimicry as social regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 142–157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heyes, C. (2012). What’s social about social learning? Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126, 193–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Hrsg.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principle (S. 133–168). Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, M. L., & Craig, K. D. (2004). Detecting deception in facial expressions of pain: Accuracy and training. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 20, 415–422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. E., & Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 787–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J. W., & Rothbart, M. (1980). Social categorization and memory for in-group and out-group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Social Cognition Network. (2020). What is social cognition? https://social-cognition.info/. Zugegriffen am 20.03.2023.

  • Ito, T. A. (2011). Perceiving social category information from faces: Using ERPs to study person perception. In A. Todorov, S. T. Fiske, & D. A. Prentice (Hrsg.), Social neuroscience: Toward understanding the underpinnings of the social mind (S. 85–100). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, A. (1966). Lemur social behavior and primate intelligence. Science, 153, 501–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawakami, K., Amodio, D. M., & Hugenberg, K. (2017). Intergroup perception and cognition: An integrative framework for understanding the causes and consequences of social categorization. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 1–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, A. C., Whitson, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Compensatory control: Achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 264–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendal, R. L., Boogert, N. J., Rendell, L., Laland, K. N., Webster, M., & Jones, P. L. (2018). Social learning strategies: Bridge-building between fields. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 651–665.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, C. K., White, K. R., Hinojos, M. R., Sandoval, M., & Crites, S. L. (2018). Sequential stereotype priming: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22, 199–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. R., Kang, J.-S., & Yun, S. (2012). Moral intuitions and political orientation: Similarities and differences between South Korea and the United States. Psychological Reports, 111, 173–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klopfer, P. H. (1959). Social interactions in discrimination learning with special reference to feeding behavior in birds. Behaviour, 14, 282–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krieglmeyer, R., & Sherman, J. W. (2012). Disentangling stereotype activation and stereotype application in the stereotype misperception task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 205–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Principles of the interface. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Hrsg.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (S. 493–520). Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lassiter, G. D. (2002). Illusory causation in the courtroom. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 204–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likowski, K. U., Mühlberger, A., Seibt, B., Pauli, P., & Weyers, P. (2008). Modulation of facial mimicry by attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1065–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loersch, C., & Payne, B. K. (2011). The situated inference model: An integrative account of the effects of primes on perception, behavior, and motivation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 234–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marques, J. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1988). The black sheep effect: Judgmental extremity towards ingroup members in inter- and intra-group situations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 287–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazziotta, A., Mummendey, A., & Wright, S. C. (2011). Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14, 255–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarty, C. (2006). Hierarchies and minority groups: The roles of salience, overlap, and background knowledge in selecting meaningful social categorizations from multiple alternatives. In R. J. Crisp & M. Hewstone (Hrsg.), Multiple social categorization: Processes, models and applications (S. 25–49). Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, P. H., & Josephs, R. A. (2010). Testosterone and cortisol jointly regulate dominance: Evidence for a dual-hormone hypothesis. Hormones and Behavior, 58, 898–906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meinhardt-Injac, B., Boutet, I., Persike, M., Meinhardt, G., & Imhof, M. (2017). From development to aging: Holistic face perception in children, younger and older adults. Cognition, 158, 134–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mekawi, Y., & Bresin, K. (2015). Is the evidence from racial bias shooting task studies a smoking gun? Results from a meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 61, 120–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miklikowska, M. (2018). Empathy trumps prejudice: The longitudinal relation between empathy and anti-immigrant attitudes in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 54, 703–717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. (2018). Social learning and associative processes: A synthesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 44, 105–113.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molden, D. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). Motivated thinking. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (S. 295–317). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondloch, C. J., Lewis, T. L., Budreau, D. R., Maurer, D., Dannemiller, J. L., Stephens, B. R., & Kleiner-Gathercoal, K. A. (1999). Face perception during early infancy. Psychological Science, 10, 419–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297–326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, G. B., & Li, P. (2011). Egalitarian goals trigger stereotype inhibition: A proactive form of stereotype control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 103–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, D. C., & Goldman, S. K. (2010). Mass media. In J. F. Dovidio, M. Hewstone, P. Glick, & V. M. Esses (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereoty** and discrimination (S. 241–258). Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, R., & Strack, F. (2000). ‚Mood contagion‘: The automatic transfer of mood between persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 211–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, A., & Erlandsson, A. (2015). The moral foundations taxonomy: Structural validity and relation to political ideology in Sweden. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 28–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noorden, T. H. J., Haselager, G. J. T., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Bukowski, W. M. (2015). Empathy and involvement in bullying in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44, 637–657.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Over, H., & Cook, R. (2018). Where do spontaneous first impressions of faces come from? Cognition, 170, 190–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pacer, M., & Lombrozo, T. (2017). Ockham’s razor cuts to the root: Simplicity in causal explanation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 1761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Papies, E. K., Stroebe, W., & Aarts, H. (2008). The allure of forbidden food: On the role of attention in self-regulation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1283–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, C., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Koralus, P. E., Mendelovici, A., McGeer, V., & Wheatley, T. (2011). Is morality unified? Evidence that distinct neural systems underlie moral judgments of harm, dishonesty, and disgust. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3162–3180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, B. K., Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., & Loersch, C. (2016). Replicable effects of primes on human behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 1269–1279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pendry, L. F., & Macrae, C. N. (1994). Stereotypes and mental life: The case of the motivated but thwarted tactician. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 303–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, C. R., Heim, D., Levy, A. R., & Larkin, D. T. (2016). Twenty years of stereotype threat research: A review of psychological mediators. PLoS One, 11, e0146487.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Plutchik, R. (1980). Emotion – A psychoevolutionary synthesis. Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prkachin, K. M., & Solomon, P. E. (2008). The structure, reliability and validity of pain expression: Evidence from patients with shoulder pain. Pain, 139, 267–274.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richler, J. J., & Gauthier, I. (2014). A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1281–1302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, K., Dziobek, I., Preißler, S., Rüter, A., Vater, A., et al. (2011). Lack of empathy in patients with narcissistic personality disorder. Psychiatry Research, 187, 241–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, K., Dziobek, I., Hassenstab, J., Wolf, O. T., & Convit, A. (2007). Who cares? Revisiting empathy in Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 709–715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, J., Deutsch, R., & Sherman, J. W. (2018). Automatic antecedents of discrimination. European Psychologist, 24, 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Hrsg.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (S. 33–58). Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440–452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Hrsg.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Bd. 25, S. 1–65). Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women’s performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2015). Social cognition. Animal Behaviour, 103, 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J. W., Kruschke, J. K., Sherman, S. J., Percy, E. J., Petrocelli, J. V., & Conrey, F. R. (2009). Attentional processes in stereotype formation: A common model for category accentuation and illusory correlation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 305–323.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic information processing: Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simion, F., & Giorgio, E. D. (2015). Face perception and processing in early infancy: Inborn predis-positions and developmental changes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 969.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, T., & Lamm, C. (2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 81–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stel, M., Van Baaren, R. B., & Vonk, R. (2008). Effects of mimicking: Acting prosocially by being emotionally moved. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 965–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. E. (2014). The direction of evolution: The rise of cooperative organization. Biosystems, 123, 27–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stillman, T. F., & Maner, J. K. (2009). A sharp eye for her SOI: Perception and misperception of female sociosexuality at zero acquaintance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 124–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strack, F. (1988). Social Cognition: Sozialpsychologie innerhalb des Paradigmas der Informationsverarbeitung. Psychologische Rundschau, 39, 72–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2015). The duality of everyday life: Dual-process and dual system models in social psychology. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, E. Borgida, & J. A. Bargh (Hrsg.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Attitudes and social cognition (S. 891–927). American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhler, C. L., & Churchland, P. (2011). Can innate, modular ‚foundations‘ explain morality? Challenges for Haidt’s moral foundations theory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2103–2116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1975). Point of view and perceptions of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 439–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, J. J., Kamil, A. C., & Balda, R. P. (1999). Sociality and social learning in two species of corvids: The pinyon jay (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus) and the Clark’s nutcracker (Nucifraga columbiana). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 113, 450–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todorov, A., Pakrashi, M., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2009). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Social Cognition, 27, 813–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos, K., & Maas, M. (2009). On the psychology of the belief in a just world: Exploring experiential and rationalistic paths to victim blaming. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1567–1578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Overwalle, F. (2009). Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Map**, 30, 829–858.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vezzali, L., Hewstone, M., Capozza, D., Giovannini, D., & Wölfer, R. (2014). Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious forms of indirect contact. European Review of Social Psychology, 25, 314–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vittrup, B., & Holden, G. W. (2011). Exploring the impact of educational television and parent– child discussions on children’s racial attitudes. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 11, 82–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingarten, E., & Hutchinson, J. W. (2018). Does ease mediate the ease-of-retrieval effect? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 227–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weingarten, E., Chen, Q., McAdams, M., Yi, J., Hepler, J., & Albarracín, D. (2016). From primed concepts to action: A meta-analysis of the behavioral effects of incidentally presented words. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 472–497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (2001). Spontaneous prejudice in context: Variability in automatically activated attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 815–827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747–759.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zych, I., Baldry, A. C., Farrington, D. P., & Llorent, V. J. (2019). Are children involved in cyberbullying low on empathy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of research on empathy versus different cyberbullying roles. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland Deutsch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Deutsch, R., Roth, J. (2023). Soziale Kognition. In: Ullrich, J., Stroebe, W., Hewstone, M. (eds) Sozialpsychologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65297-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65297-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-65296-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-65297-8

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation