Abstract
The modularity of the mind has been a contentious topic in psychology, stemming from the classical definition of modules as innate, automatic, unconscious cognitive reflexes. A biological view of modularity, on the other hand, treats modules as biological traits that can vary in many ways, including along dimensions of separability, plasticity, and interactivity. Here, I compare and contrast these views to show how a biologically based view of modularity is indispensable for thinking about the architecture of the brain, an assembly of many interacting mechanisms and processes with distinct functions and evolutionary histories. I describe how a hierarchical view of brain modules as evolved via descent with modification from common ancestral structures leads to a rethinking of the classical view of modules as entirely autonomous and independently shaped traits, and discuss implications of the biological modularity perspective for social psychology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allman, J. M. (2000). Evolving brains. New York: Scientific American Library.
Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules: Vol. 1. The power of modularity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Barrett, H. C. (2005). Enzymatic computation and cognitive modularity. Mind & Language, 20, 259–287.
Barrett, H. C. (2006). Modularity and design reincarnation. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind: Vol. 2. Culture and cognition (pp. 199–217). New York: Oxford University Press.
Barrett, H. C. (2012). A hierarchical model of the evolution of human brain specializations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(Suppl. 1), 10733–10740.
Barrett, H. C. (2015). The shape of thought: How mental adaptations evolve. New York: Oxford University Press.
Barrett, H. C., & Kurzban, R. (2006). Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review, 113, 628–647.
Barrett, H. C., Frederick, D. A., Haselton, M. G., & Kurzban, R. (2006). Can manipulations of cognitive load be used to test evolutionary hypotheses? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 513–518.
Buller, D. J., & Hardcastle, V. G. (2000). Evolutionary psychology, meet developmental neurobiology: Against promiscuous modularity. Brain and Mind, 1, 307–325.
Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009). Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 186–198.
Callebaut, W., & Rasskin-Gutman, D. (Eds.). (2005). Modularity: Understanding the development and evolution of natural complex systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Carroll, S. B. (2008). Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: A genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell, 134, 25–36.
Carruthers, P. (2006). The architecture of the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
DeSteno, D., Bartlett, M. Y., Braverman, J., & Salovey, P. (2002). Sex differences in jealousy: Evolutionary mechanism or artifact of measurement? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1103–1116.
Evans, J. S. B. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255–278.
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. A. (1987). Modules, frames, fridgeons, slee** dogs, and the music of the spheres. In J. L. Garfield (Ed.), Modularity in knowledge representation and natural-language understanding (pp. 26–36). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fodor, J. (1998). The trouble with psychological Darwinism. London Review of Books, 20, 11–13.
Fodor, J. (2000). The mind doesn’t work that way: The scope and limits of computational psychology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Frankenhuis, W. E., & Ploeger, A. (2007). Evolutionary psychology versus Fodor: Arguments for and against the massive modularity hypothesis. Philosophical Psychology, 20, 687–710.
Friederici, A. D. (2009). Pathways to language: Fiber tracts in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 175–181.
Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2007). Social cognition in humans. Current Biology, 17(16), R724–R732.
Hall, B. K. (2003). Descent with modification: The unity underlying homology and homoplasy as seen through an analysis of development and evolution. Biological Reviews, 78, 409–433.
Holland, N. D. (2003). Early central nervous system evolution: An era of skin brains? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 617–627.
Kaas, J. H. (1984). Duplication of brain parts in evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 342–343.
Khaitovich, P., Muetzel, B., She, X., Lachmann, M., Hellmann, I., Dietzsch, J., Steigele, S., Do, H. H., Weiss, G., Enard, W., Heissig, F., Arendt, T., Nieselt-Struwe, K., Eichler, E. E., & Pääbo, S. (2004). Regional patterns of gene expression in human and chimpanzee brains. Genome Research, 14, 1462–1473.
Krubitzer, L., & Huffman, K. J. (2000). Arealization of the neocortex in mammals: Genetic and epigenetic contributions to the phenotype. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 55, 322–335.
Kurzban, R. (2010). Why everyone (else) is a hypocrite: Evolution and the modular mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Laland, K. N., Odling-Smee, J., & Feldman, M. W. (2000). Niche construction, biological evolution, and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 131–146.
Machery, E. (2008). Massive modularity and the flexibility of human cognition. Mind & Language, 23, 263–272.
Nelson, C. (2004). Selector genes and the genetic control of developmental modules. In G. Schlosser & G. P. Wagner (Eds.), Modularity in development and evolution (pp. 17–33). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Panksepp, J., & Panksepp, J. B. (2000). The seven sins of evolutionary psychology. Evolution and Cognition, 6, 108–131.
Raff, R. A. (1996). The shape of life: Genes, development, and the evolution of animal form. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ravasz, E., Somera, A. L., Mongru, D. A., Oltvai, Z. N., & Barabási, A. L. (2002). Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science, 297(5586), 1551–1555.
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rilling, J. K., Glasser, M. F., Preuss, T. M., Ma, X., Zhao, T., Hu, X., & Behrens, T. E. J. (2008). The evolution of the arcuate fasciculus revealed with comparative DTI. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 426–428.
Samuels, R. (1998). Evolutionary psychology and the massive modularity hypothesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49, 575–602.
Schlosser, G., & Wagner, G. P. (Eds.). (2004). Modularity in development and evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schoenemann, P. T., Sheehan, M. J., & Glotzer, L. D. (2005). Prefrontal white matter volume is disproportionately larger in humans than in other primates. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 242–252.
Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, D. (1994). The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Map** the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 39–67). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, D. (2001). In defense of massive modularity. In E. Dupoux (Ed.), Language, brain, and cognitive development: Essays in honor of Jacques Mehler (pp. 47–57). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Stanovich, K. E. (2004). The robot’s rebellion: Finding meaning in the age of Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Thomas, R. D. K. (2005). Hierarchical integration of modular structures in the evolution of animal skeletons. In W. Callebaut & D. Rasskin-Gutman (Eds.), Modularity: Understanding the development and evolution of natural complex systems (pp. 239–258). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Uttal, W. R. (2001). The new phrenology: The limits of localizing cognitive processes in the brain. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Wagner, G. P., & Altenberg, L. (1996). Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution, 50, 967–976.
Wagner, G. P., Mezey, J., & Calabretta, R. (2005). Natural selection and the origin of modules. In W. Callebaut & D. Rasskin-Gutman (Eds.), Modularity: Understanding the development and evolution of natural complex systems (pp. 33–50). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barrett, H. (2015). Modularity. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Welling, L., Shackelford, T. (eds) Evolutionary Perspectives on Social Psychology. Evolutionary Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12697-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12697-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12696-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12697-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)