Abstract
Although the concept of modularity is pervasive across fields and disciplines, philosophers and scientists use the term in a variety of different ways. This paper identifies two distinct ways of thinking about modularity, and considers what makes them similar and different. For philosophers of mind and cognitive science, cognitive modularity helps explain the capacities of brains to process sundry and distinct kinds of informational input. For philosophy of biology and evolutionary science, biological modularity helps explain the capacity of random evolutionary processes to give rise to highly complex and sophisticated biological systems. Although these different ways of thinking about modularity are largely distinct, this paper proposes a unifying feature common to both: isolability, or the capacity of subsystems to undergo changes without resulting in substantial changes to neighboring or interconnected subsystems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Credit goes to an anonymous reviewer for highlighting that the example of the Rube Goldberg machine described here is analogous to Simon’s (1962) elegant watchmaker example. Although there are important differences between these examples, the conclusion of the argument is quite similar: systems that comprise modules (‘subassemblies’, on Simon’s account) are likely to exhibit a higher probability of evolving toward greater degrees of complexity.
Note that Brosnan (2009) offers a definition of quasi-independence that captures potential fitness trade-offs: “For any trait Ti that is correlated with other traits Tn, and whose trait values are T1 and T2, Ti is quasi-independent of Tn if and only if Ti’s advantageous trait value is fitter than its disadvantageous trait value” (p. 232).
Thanks to an anonymous reviewer for introducing the notion of near decomposability to this analysis.
References
Altenberg L (2005) Modularity in evolution: some low-level questions. In: Callebaut W, Rasskin-Gutman D (eds) Modularity: understanding the development and evolution of complex natural systems. MIT Press, Cambridge
Barret HC, Kurzban R (2006) Modularity in cognition: framing the debate. Psychol Rev 113(3):628–647
Barrett HC (2005) Enzymatic computation and cognitive modularity. Mind Lang 20(3):259–287
Barrett HC (2015) Modularity. In: Virgil Zeigler-Hill LLMW, Shackelford TK (eds) Evolutionary perspectives on social psychology. Evolutionary psychology. Springer, Berlin, pp 39–49
Bolker JA (2000) Modularity in development and why it matters to Evo-Devo. Am Zool 40(5):770–776
Brookfield JFY (2001) Evolution: the evolvability enigma. Curr Biol 11(3):R106–R108
Brookfield John F Y (2009) Evolution and evolvability: celebrating Darwin 200. Biol Lett 5(1):44–46
Brosnan K (2009) Quasi-independence, fitness, and advantageousness. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part C 40(3):228–234
Brown RL (2014) What evolvability really is. Br J Philos Sci 65:549–572
Carruthers P (2006) The architecture of the mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Cheverud JM (2001) The genetic architecture of pleiotropic relations and differential epistasis. In: Wagner GP (ed) The character concept in evolutionary biology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 411–433
Colosimo PF, Hosemann KE, Balabhadra S, Villarreal G, Dickson M, Grimwood J, Schmutz J, Myers RM, Schluter D, Kingsley DM (2005) Widespread parallel evolution in sticklebacks by repeated fixation of ectodysplasin alleles. Science 307(5717):1928–1933
Cosmides L (1989) The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the wason selection task. Cognition 31(3):187–276
Cosmides L, Tooby J (1992) Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In: Barkow L, Cosmides L, Tooby J (eds) The adapted mind. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 163–228
Craver C, Tabery JG (2016) Mechanisms in science. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/science-mechanisms/. Accessed 1 Feb 2019
Driscoll C (2004) Can behaviors be adaptations? Philos Sci 71(1):16–35
Eble G (2005) Morphological modularity and macroevolution: conceptual and empirical aspects. In: Callebaut W, Rasskin-Gutman D (eds) Modularity: understanding the development and evolution of complex natural systems. MIT Press, Cambridge
Fodor J (1983) The modularity of mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
García CL (2007) Cognitive modularity biological modularity and evolvability. Biol Theory Integr Dev Evol Cognit (KLI) 2(1):62–73
Garson J (2013) The functional sense of mechanism. Philos Sci 80(3):317–333
Gerhart J, Kirschner M (1997) Cells, embryos, and evolution. Blackwell Science Inc, Malden
Gould SJ (1977) Ontogeny and phylogeny. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Hansen TF (2003) Is modularity necessary for evolvability? Remarks on the relationship between pleiotropy and evolvability. Biosystems 69(2–3):83–94
Hughes CL, Kaufman TC (2002) Hox genes and the evolution of the arthropod body plan. Evol Dev 4(6):459–499
Kirschner M, Gerhart J (1998) Evolvability. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95(15):8420–8427
Lewontin RC (1978) Adaptation. Sci Am 239(3):212–218
Longino HE (2013) Studying human behavior: how scientists investigate aggression & sexuality. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Love AC (2003) Evolvability, dispositions, and intrinsicality. Philos Sci 70(5):1015–1027
Machery E (2007) Massive modularity and brain evolution. Philos Sci 74(5):825–838
Matthews LJ (2016) On closing the gap between philosophical concepts and their usage in scientific practice: a lesson from the debate about natural selection as mechanism. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part C Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 55(February):21–28
Matthews LJ (2017) On mechanistic reasoning in unexpected places: the case of population genetics. Biol Philos 32(6):999–1018
Mezey JG, Cheverud JM, Wagner GP (2000) Is the genotype-phenotype map modular? A statistical approach using mouse quantitative trait loci data. Genetics 156(1):305–311
Mitchell SD (2003) Biological complexity and integrative pluralism. Cambridge University Press, New York
Musacchia G, Sams M, Skoe E, Kraus N (2007) Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(40):15894–15898
Needham J (1933) On the dissociability of the fundamental processes in ontogenesis. Biol Rev 8(2):180–223
Nicholson DJ (2012) The concept of mechanism in biology. Stud Hist Philos Sci Part C Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci 43(1):152–163
Pardo-Diaz C, Salazar C, Jiggins CD (2015) Towards the identification of the loci of adaptive evolution. Methods Ecol Evol 6(4):445–464
Pigliucci M (2008) Is evolvability evolvable? Nat Rev Genet 9(1):75–82
Pinker S (1997) How the mind works. W. W. Norton & Company, New York
Raff RA (1996) The shape of life: genes, development and the evolution of animal form. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Raff EC, Raff RA (2000) Dissociability, modularity, evolvability. Evol Dev 2(5):235–237
Robbins P (2007) Minimalism and modularity. In: Preyer G, Peter G (eds) Context-sensitivity and semantic minimalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 303–319
Robbins P (2015) Modularity of Mind. In: Zalta EN (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/modularity-mind/. Accessed 1 Feb 2019
Samuels R (2000) Massively modular minds: evolutionary psychology and cognitive architecture. In: Carruthers P, Chamberlain A (eds) Evolution and the human mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 13–46
Schank JC, Wimsatt WC (2001) Evolvability, adaptation and modularity. In: Singh RS, Krimbas CB, Paul DB, Beatty J (eds) Thinking about evolution, vol 2. Historical, philosophical, and political perspectives. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 322–335
Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. Proc Am Philos Soc 106(6):467–482
Simon HA (2002) Near decomposability and the speed of evolution. Ind Corp Change 11(3):587–599
Sperber D (1994) The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In: Hirschfeld LA, Gelman SA (eds) Map** the mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 39–67
Sperber D (2002) In defense of modularity. In: Dupoux I (ed) Language, brain, and cognitive development. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 47–57
Stadler Bärbel M R, Stadler PF, Wagner GP, Fontana W (2001) The topology of the possible: formal spaces underlying patterns of evolutionary change. J Theor Biol 213(2):241–274
Sterelny K (1992) Evolutionary explanations of human behaviour. Australas J Philos 70(2):156–173
Sterelny K (2007) What is evolvability? In: Matthen M, Stephens C (eds) Philosophy of biology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 177–192
Sterelny K (2011) Evolvability reconsidered. In: Calcott B, Sterelny K (eds) The major transitions in evolution revisited. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 83–100
Sterelny K, Griffiths P (1999) Sex and death. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
von Dassow G, Munro E (1999) Modularity in animal development and evolution: elements of a conceptual framework for EvoDevo. J Exp Zool 285(4):307–325
Wagner GP (1995) Adaptation and the modular design of organisms. In: Morán F, Moreno A, Merelo JJ, Chacón P (eds) Advances in artificial life, vol 929. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, pp 315–328
Wagner GP (1996) Homologues, natural kinds and the evolution of modularity. Integr Comp Biol 36(1):36–43
Wagner GP, Altenberg L (1996) Perspective: complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50(3):967–976
Wagner GP, Stadler PF (2003) Quasi-independence, homology and the unity of type: a topological theory of characters. J Theor Biol 220(4):505–527
Welch JJ, Waxman D, Houle D (2003) Modularity and the cost of complexity. Evolution 57(8):1723–1734
Winther RG (2001) Varieties of modules: kinds, levels, origins, and behaviors. J Exp Zool 291:116–129
Acknowledgements
Above all else, Kenneth Blake Vernon played a pivotal role in the earliest stages of this project. He both helped formulate the idea for a paper that compared cognitive and biological concepts of modularity, and helped write sections of a first draft that did not make it to the final manuscript. Special thanks to Anya Plutynski for advising early stages of the project, reading multiple drafts and providing great feedback. Thanks as well for helpful comments from Juliana Gottschling, Lisa Hanh, Sarah Carol, Evan Giangrande, and Eric Turkheimer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matthews, L.J. Isolability as the unifying feature of modularity. Biol Philos 34, 20 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-019-9672-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-019-9672-4