Rheological Properties of Geopolymer Mortars Incorporating Construction and Demolition Wastes-Based Binders and Aggregates

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2022 (CSCE 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 359))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 202 Accesses

Abstract

The re-utilization of construction and demolition wastes (CDWs) in the emerging geopolymer technology has been recognized as an environmentally friendly solution for tackling the ecological challenges caused by the increased landfilling of CDWs and sustainability issues of Portland Cement (PC) production. Geopolymers are synthesized as a result of intricate chemical interactions between aluminosilicate-based precursors and highly alkaline solutions resulting in the production of amorphous inorganic geopolymers possessing three-dimensional cross-linked networks of Si–O–Al and Si–O–Si bonds. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of incorporating different types of aggregates including recycled concrete aggregates sand (RAS), silica sand (SS) and natural sand (NS) on the rheological properties of geopolymer mortars (GPM) prepared from CDW-materials comprising a combined powder mixture of recycled clay brick (RCB), recycled ceramic tile (RCT) and recycled concrete (RCW) wastes as silico-aluminate binders. Yield stress, viscosity and shear stress were tested at 100% of RAS, SS and NS contents in GPMs prepared with sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide solutions as alkaline reagents and predefined chemical design factors of SiO2/Al2O3, Na2O/SiO2, H2O/Na2O and water-to-binder (W/B) ratios. The correlation between the rheological properties of GPMs and the predefined design parameters was considered. The highest yield stress and viscosity were obtained at medium SiO2/Al2O3 molar ratio of 5.6 for all three GPM systems, while further increase in silicate species caused reduced stresses and viscosities. Comparable shear thinning behavior, higher viscosity and accelerated polycondensation properties were observed with increased RAS amounts compared to SS and NS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 213.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 267.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASTM C188-17 (2020) Standard test method for density of hydraulic cement. pp 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0188-17.2

  2. ASTM C33 (2018) Standard specification for concrete aggregates. ASTM Standards i (C), pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0033

  3. Coelho A, de Brito J (2013) Preparation of concrete aggregates from construction and demolition waste (CDW). https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857096906.2.210

  4. Dadsetan S, Siad H, Lachemi M, Mahmoodi O, Sahmaran M (2019) The effect of chemical factors and glass powder on the rheological properties of metakaolin based geopolymer pastes. In: CSCE annual conference, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dadsetan S, Siad H, Lachemi M, Mahmoodi O, Sahmaran M (2022) Optimization and characterisation of geopolymer binders from ceramic waste, glass waste and sodium glass liquid. J Clean Prod 342(July 2021):130931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130931

  6. Dadsetan S, Siad H, Lachemi M, Sahmaran M (2021) Extensive evaluation on the effect of glass powder on the rheology, strength, and microstructure of metakaolin-based geopolymer binders. Constr Build Mater 268:121168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Davidovits J (1994) Geopolymers: man-made rock geosynthesis and the resulting development of very early high strength cement. Mater Educ 16(2–3):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fang G, Ho WK, Tu W, Zhang M (2018) Workability and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash-slag concrete cured at ambient temperature. Constr Build Mater 172:476–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.008

  9. Favier A, Hot J, Habert G, Roussel N, Lacaillerie JBDD (2014) Flow properties of MK-based geopolymer pastes. a comparative study with standard Portland cement pastes. Soft Matter 10(8):1134–1141. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3sm51889b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Han D, Yoon JY, Kim JH (2019) Control of viscosity of cementitious materials using waste limestone powder. Int J Concr Struct Mater 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-018-0325-9

  11. Lahoti M, Narang P, Tan KH, Yang E-H (2017) Mix design factors and strength prediction of metakaolin-based geopolymer. Ceram Int 43:11433–11441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahmoodi O, Siad H, Lachemi M, Dadsetan S, Sahmaran M (2020) Development of ceramic tile waste geopolymer binders based on pre-targeted chemical ratios and ambient curing. Constr Build Mater 258:120297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahmoodi O, Siad H, Lachemi M, Dadsetan S, Sahmaran M (2020) Optimization of brick waste-based geopolymer binders at ambient temperature and pre-targeted chemical parameters. J Clean Prod 268:122285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mahmoodi O, Siad H, Lachemi M, Dadsetan S, Sahmaran M (2020) Development of normal and very high strength geopolymer binders based on concrete waste at ambient environment. J Clean Prod 279(January):123436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahmoodi O, Siad H, Lachemi M, Dadsetan S, Sahmaran M (2021) Development and characterization of binary recycled ceramic tile and brick wastes-based geopolymers at ambient and high temperatures. Constr Build Mater 301(February):124138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahmoodi O, Siad H, Lachemi M, Dadsetan S, Şahmaran M (2022) Optimized application of ternary brick, ceramic and concrete wastes in sustainable high strength geopolymers. J Clean Prod 338:130650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mesgari S, Akbarnezhad A, **ao JZ (2020) Recycled geopolymer aggregates as coarse aggregates for Portland cement concrete and geopolymer concrete: effects on mechanical properties. Constr Build Mater 236:117571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitschka P (1982) Simple conversion of brookfield R.V.T. readings into viscosity functions. 209:207–209

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ren X, Zhang L (2019) Experimental study of geopolymer concrete produced from waste concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 31(7):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Robalo K, Costa H, Júlio E (2021) Experimental development of low cement content and recycled construction and demolition waste aggregates concrete. Constr Build Mater 273:121680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Robayo-Salazar RA, Mejía-Arcila JM, de Gutiérrez RM (2017) Eco-efficient alkali-activated cement based on red clay brick wastes suitable for the manufacturing of building materials. J Clean Prod 166:242–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.243

  22. Shaikh FUA (2016) Mechanical and durability properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete containing recycled coarse aggregates. Int J Sustain Built Environ 5(2):277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.05.009

  23. Sitarz M, Urban M, Hager I (2020) Rheology and mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer mortars with ground granulated blast furnace slag addition. Energies 13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13102639

  24. Soultana A, Valouma A, Bartzas G, Komnitsas K (2019) Properties of inorganic polymers produced from brick waste and metallurgical slag. Minerals 9(9):1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/min9090551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Turkyilmaz A, Guney M, Karaca F, Bagdatkyzy Z, Sandybayeva A, Sirenova G (2019) A comprehensive construction and demolition waste management model using PESTEL and 3R for construction companies operating in Central Asia. Sustainability (Switz) 11(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061593

  26. Environment UN, Scrivener KL, John VM, Gartner EM (2018) Eco-efficient cements: potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry. Cem Concr Res 114(June):2–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yaseri S, Hajiaghaei G, Mohammadi F, Mahdikhani M, Farokhzad R (2017) The role of synthesis parameters on the workability, setting and strength properties of binary binder based geopolymer paste. Constr Build Mater 157:534–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yeheyis M, Kasun M, Alam S, Eskicioglu C, Sadiq R (2013) An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: a lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15(1):81–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-012-0481-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Obaid Mahmoodi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Canadian Society for Civil Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mahmoodi, O., Siad, H., Lachemi, M., Dadsetan, S., Sahmaran, M. (2024). Rheological Properties of Geopolymer Mortars Incorporating Construction and Demolition Wastes-Based Binders and Aggregates. In: Gupta, R., et al. Proceedings of the Canadian Society of Civil Engineering Annual Conference 2022. CSCE 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 359. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34027-7_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34027-7_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34026-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34027-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation