CISGENESIS AND CISGENIC CROPS: Need for a Paradigm Shift in Harnessing and Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cisgenic Crops: Safety, Legal and Social Issues

Part of the book series: Concepts and Strategies in Plant Sciences ((CSPS))

Abstract

Cisgenesis is an emerging technology that has much potential in develo** crops and for other innovations. The possibilities of using Cisgenesis are discussed in the literature and there have been experiments to test it and they have proved that it is yet to be commercialized or adopted widely. A major reason is whether to assess it as a Genetically Modified Crop or as a traditionally bred crop or its equivalent. While the opinion on this is divided linking it with the regulation of Genetically Modified Organisms is resulting in controversies although the idea of cisgenesis was advocated by Schouten to overcome this issue. Describing the issue and the entanglements, and, by referring to two concepts ‘bio-object’ and ‘bio-identification’, this Chapter takes the view that the controversy will persist in the near future as regulations on genome edited crops are evolving but in a different direction. This chapter proposes a Global Consortium to pursue research and development in Cisgenesis and Cisgenic crops and suggests how this Consortium can use ideas and practices like Responsible Research and Innovation and Participatory Plant Breeding. Similarly better engagement with stakeholders and dealing with non-technical issues in risk assessment are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beumer K, Stemerding D (2021) A breeding consortium to realize the potential of hybrid diploid potato for food security. Nat.plants 7:1530–1532. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-021-01035-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce A, Bruce D (2019) Genome editing and responsible innovation, can they be reconciled? J Agric Environ Ethics 32:769–788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09789-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi S, Srinivas KR (eds) (2019) Socio-economic impact assessment of genetically modified crops—global implications based on case-studies from India. Springer, p 310. https://springer.longhoe.net/book/10.1007%2F978-981-32-9511-7

  • Chaturvedi S, Srinivas KR, Kumar A (2016) Agriculture technology choices and the responsible research and innovation (RRI) framework: emerging experiences from China and India. Asian Biotechnol Develop Rev 18(1):93–111. https://ris.org.in/sites/default/files/ABDR%20March%202016.pdf

  • Cotter J, Zimmermann D, van Bekkem H (2015) Application of the EU and Cartagena definitions of a GMO to the classification of plants developed by cisgenesis and gene-editing techniques. Greenpeace Research Laboratories Technical Report (Review) 07–2015

    Google Scholar 

  • EFSA GMO Panel (EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms) (2011a) Guidance of the GMO Panel for risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified plants. EFSA J 9(5):2150 37. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011a.2150

    Google Scholar 

  • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), Paraskevopoulos K, Federici S (2021) Overview of EFSA and European national authorities’ scientific opinions on the risk assessment of plants developed through New Genomic Techn. EFSA J 19(4):6314, 43 pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6314

    Google Scholar 

  • EFSA GMO Panel (EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (2012a) Scientific opinion addressing the safety assessment of plants developed through cisgenesis and intragenesis. EFSA J 10(2):2561, 33 pp. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012a.2561

    Google Scholar 

  • Entine J, Felipe MSS, Groenewald JH et al (2021) Regulatory approaches for genome edited agricultural plants in select countries and jurisdictions around the world. Transgenic Res 30:551–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson D, Stymne S, Schjoerring JK (2014) The slippery slope of cisgenesis. Nat Biotechnol 32:727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Food Safety Authority [EFSA] (2012) Scientific opinion addressing the safety assessment of plants developed through cisgenesis and intragenesis. EFSA J 10:2561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou H, Atlihan N, Lu Z-X (2014) New biotechnology enhances the application of cisgenesis in plant breeding. Front Plant Sci 5:389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indian Council of Agricultural Research [ICAR] (2015) Vision 2050, New Delhi: ICAR

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen E, Nataraja KN (2008)—Cisgenics—Facilitating the second green revolution in India by improved traditional plant breeding. Curr Sci 94(11):1365–1366

    Google Scholar 

  • Jochemsen H, Schouten HJ (2000) Ethische beoordeling van genetische modifi catie. In: Jochemsen H (ed) Toetsen en Begrenzen. Een Ethische en Politieke Beoordeling van de Moderne Biotechnologie. Buijten and Schipperheijn, Amsterdam, pp 88–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause SMB, Näther A, Ortiz Cortes V, Mullins E, Kessel GJT, Lotz LAP, Tebbe CC (2020) No tangible effects of field-grown Cisgenic potatoes on soil microbial communities. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 8:603145. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.603145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K, Gambhir G, Dass A et al (2020) (2020) Genetically modified crops: current status and future prospects. Planta 251:91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-020-03372-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macnaghten P, Habets MGJL (2020) Breaking the impasse: towards a forward-looking governance framework for gene editing with plants. Plants, People, Planet 2:353–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavone V, Martinelli L (2015) Cisgenics as emerging bio-objects: bio-objectification and bio-identification in agrobiotech innovation. New Genet Soc 34(1):52–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2014.998816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts P et al (2020) Responsible innovation in biotechnology: stakeholder attitudes and implications for research policy. Elem Sci Anth 8:47. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sara Nawaz (2021) Beyond naturalness? Social dimensions of gene editing in agriculture (PhD Dissertation) Vancouver: University of British Columbia. https://open.library.ubc.ca/soa/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0401729?o=8

  • Sarmah BK, Gohain M, Borah BK, Acharjee S (2021) Cisgenesis: engineering plant genome by Harnessing compatible gene pools. In: Sarmah BK, Borah BK (eds) Genome engineering for crop improvement. concepts and strategies in plant sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63372-1_8

  • Schouten HJ, Krens FA, Jacobsen E (2006) Cisgenic plants are similar to traditionally bred plants: international regulations for genetically modified organisms should be altered to exempt cisgenesis. EMBO Rep 7:750–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Schouten H (2014) Reply to the slippery slope of cisgenesis. Nat Biotechnol 32:728. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srividhya Venkataraman, Uzma Badar, Kathleen Hefferon (2019) Agricultural innovation and the global politics of food trade, Editor(s): Pasquale Ferranti, Elliot M. Berry, Jock R. Anderson, Encyclopedia of Food Security and Sustainability, Elsevier, 2019, pp 114-121

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hove L, Gillund F (2017) Is it only the regulation? Broadening the debate on cisgenic plants. Environ Sci Eur 29(1):22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincenzo Pavone and Lucia Martinelli (2015) Cisgenics as emerging bio-objects: bio-objectification and bio-identification in agrobiotech innovation. New Genet Soc 34(1):52–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2014.998816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan AI, Lema MA (2017) A research program for the socioeconomic impacts of gene editing regulation. GM Crops Food 8(1):74–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2016.1271856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan AI, Lema MA (2019) Regulation of genome editing in plant biotechnology: Argentina. In: Dederer H-G, Hamburger D (eds) Regulation of genome editing in plant biotechnology. Springer International Publishing, pp 19–62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Woolley J, Johnson VB, Ospina B, Lemaga B, Jordan T, Harrison G, Thiele G (2011) Incorporating stakeholder perspectives in international agricultural research: the case of the CGIAR Research Program for Roots, Tubers, and Bananas for Food Security and Income. International Potato Center (CIP), Lima, Peru. Social Sciences Working Paper 2011–3, p 92

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the editors for the suggestion to contribute and the opportunity. Their comments have been useful in writing and revising the text for the chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krishna Ravi Srinivas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Srinivas, K.R. (2023). CISGENESIS AND CISGENIC CROPS: Need for a Paradigm Shift in Harnessing and Governance. In: Chaurasia, A., Kole, C. (eds) Cisgenic Crops: Safety, Legal and Social Issues. Concepts and Strategies in Plant Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10721-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10721-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10720-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10721-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation