Abstract
In multilingual areas, geographical (or place) names are often a sensitive issue. In the southern part of the Austrian province of Carinthia, bilingual place names gained visibility and acceptance after decades of conflict. Departing from the notions of “place attachment” and “toponymic attachment”, this chapter investigates whether acceptance has also led to more appreciation, particularly of microtoponyms, and whether this appreciation is used by local and regional authorities to foster regional development, taking advantage of the inclusion of Slovene field and house names in the Austrian National Inventory of UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage in 2010. Results show overwhelming positive attitudes towards Slovene place names among local population, yet differences exist depending on linguistic background. Interviews with local authorities reflect uneven bilingual policies resulting in gaps, notably concerning street names. In some cases, new names with no connection with existing field names are created and incorporated in postal addresses, resulting in impoverishment in the visibility and the use of bilingual names. Bilingualism is recognised as an asset for the region, but bilingual place names are neglected in (rural) development strategies, plans and projects. Social acceptance has not brought about generalised social appreciation. Both positive and negative manifestations of toponymic attachment coexist.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The case study area corresponds to the bilingual school district declared by federal law (in German: Minderheiten-Schulgesetz für Kärnten), according to Art. 7 of the 1955 State Treaty.
References
Abankina, T. (2013). Regional development models using cultural heritage resources. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 7(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506181311301318. Accessed 29 Nov 2021.
Amt der Kärntner Landesregierung. (2020). Unsere Regionen. Dein Projekt. Mein Lebensraum. LEADER als nachhaltiges Instrument der Orts- und Regionalentwicklung in Kärnten. Amt der Kärntner Landesregierung, Abt. 10 (Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Ländlicher Raum).
Amt der Kärntner Landesregierung. (2021a). Regionalstrategie Region Hermagor. Land Kärnten - Abt. 10 Land- und Fortswirtschaft, Ländlicher Raum. https://region-hermagor.at/wp-content/uploads/2DP_Land-Kaernten_Broschuere-Hermagor_Web.x60999.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2021.
Amt der Kärntner Landesregierung. (2021b). Regionalstrategie Region Kärntner Zentralraum. Amt der Kärntner Landesregierung.
Basso, K. H. (1996). Wisdom sits in places: Landscape and language among the Western apache. University of New Mexico Press.
Casey, E. S. (2009). Getting back into place. Indiana University Press.
Cresswell, T. (2004). Place: A short introduction. Blackwell.
Helleland, B. (2012). Place names and identities. Names and Identities, 4(2), 95–116.
Hellwig, V. (2015). Eine konfliktreiche Beziehungsgeschichte. Die Volksgruppenfrage und die Beziehungen zwischen Kärnten und Slowienen. In J. Pirker (Ed.), Kärnten und Slowenien: Getrennte Wege – Gemeinsame Zukunft (Vol. 29, pp. 82–91). Nomos/Eurac Research.
Jordan, P. (2012). Place names as ingredients of space-related identity. Names and Identities, 4(2), 117–131.
Jordan, P., & Mácha, P. (2021). The wider onomastic scope of the research topic. In P. Jordan, P. Mácha, M. Balode, L. Krtička, U. Obrusnik, P. Pilch, & A. Sancho Reinoso (Eds.), Place-name politics in multilingual areas. A comparative study of southern Carinthia (Austria) and the Těšín/Cieszyn region (Czechia) (pp. 13–44). Palgrave Macmillan.
Jordan, P., & Sancho, A. (2021). Questionnaires. In P. Jordan, P. Mácha, M. Balode, L. Krtička, U. Obrusnik, P. Pilch, & A. Sancho Reinoso (Eds.), Place-name politics in multilingual areas. A comparative study of southern Carinthia (Austria) and the Těšín/Cieszyn region (Czechia) (pp. 391–400). Palgrave Macmillan.
Kostanski, L. (2016). Toponymic attachment. In C. Hough (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of names and naming (pp. 1–18) https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199656431.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199656431-e-42. Accessed 29 Nov 2021
Lewicka, M. (2014). In search of roots memory as enable of place attachment. In L. Manzo & P. Devine-Wright (Eds.), Place attachment. Advances in theory, methods, and applications (pp. 49–60). Routledge.
Low, S. M., & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 1–12). Springer.
Narodni svet Koroški Slovencev. (2021). Geschichte der Kärntner Slowenen. http://www.elnet.at/dossier/volkszaehlungen. Accessed 29 Nov 2021.
Petronela, T. (2016). The importance of the intangible cultural heritage in the economy. Procedia Economics and Finance, 39, 731–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30271-4. Accessed 29 Nov 2021.
Piko-Rustia, M. (2020). Evaluation by means of appreciation. Geographical names as (intangible) cultural heritage. Onomàstica, 6, 163–189.
Piko-Rustia, M., Olip, N., Apovnik, P., & Domej, T. (2021). Utilization of communal autonomy for implementing additional bilingual names of populated places and streets in Carinthia (Austria) (GEGN.2/2021/71/CRP.71; p. 7). UN Group of Experts on Geographical Names.
Pirker, J. (2011). Kärntner Ortstafelstreit – eine “(un)endliche” Geschichte? Juristische und historische Einblicke. In G. Hafner & M. Pandel (Eds.), Volksgruppenfragen, Kooperation statt Konfrontation (pp. 127–164). Hermagoras-Mohorjeva.
Plaimer, P., Reiner, V., & Schönherr, I. (2018). Lokale Entwicklungsstrategie der LAG Regionalkooperation Unterkärnten 2014–2020. Regionalkooperation Unterkärnten.
Pohl, H.-D. (2012). Zweisprachige Ortstafeln als Zeugen gemeinsamer Geschichte und Kultur. In N. Beclin (Ed.), Ein Kärnten. Die Lösung (pp. 123–130). Heyn.
Primosch, I. (2020). LAG Regional Villach-Umland Entwicklungsstrategie 2020. Ministerium für ein Lebenswertes Österreich. https://rm-kaernten.at/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/171221-LES_Villach-Umland_14-20_ab-2018.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2021
Relph, E. (1976). Place and placelessness. Pion.
Sacherer, B. (n.d.). Best practice projects Kärntens LEADER-Projekte. LAG Nockregion-Oberkärnten. https://rm-kaernten.at/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/BestProjects_Broschu%CC%88re.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2021
Seamon, D. (2014). Place attachment and phenomenology: The synergistic dynamism of place. In L. Manzo & P. Devine-Wright (Eds.), Place attachment: Advances in theory, methods, and applications (pp. 11–22). Routledge.
Seger, M. (2019). Österreich Raum und Gesellschaft. Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein f. Kärnten.
Slovenska prosvetna zveza/Slowenischer Kulturverein. (2011–2015). Kulturni portal ledinskih in hišnih imen/Kulturportal der Flur- und Hausnamen (FLU-LED), 2011–2015, www.flurnamen.at; www.ledinskaimena.si
Toce, B., & Dourou, E. (2020). Culture without borders: Cultural heritage management for local and regional development (CG/CUR(2020)15-03; p. 30). Congress of Local and Regional Authorities, Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/cg-cur-2020-15-03-en-cultural-heritage/16809f9fbd. Accessed 29 Nov 2021.
Tort, J., & Sancho, A. (2012). Toponyms as ‘landscape indicators’. In J. Tort & M. Montagut (Eds.), Names in daily life. Proceedings of the XXIV ICOS international congress of onomastic sciences (pp. 1987–2016). Generalitat de Catalunya.
Van der Auwera, S., & Schramme, A. (2014). Cultural heritage policies as a tool for development: Discourse or harmony? ENCATC Journal of Cultural Management and Policy, 4(1), 4–8.
Villette, J., & Purves, R. S. (2018). Exploring microtoponyms through linguistic and geographic perspectives. AGILE 2018 (pp. 1–4). https://agile-online.org/conference_paper/cds/agile_2018/shortpapers/67%20AGILE_2018_Villette_Purves.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2021.
Williams, D. R., & Vaske, J. J. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 49(6), 830–840.
Yi-Fu Tuan. (1991). Language and the making of place: A narrative-descriptive approach. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 81(4), 684–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1991.tb01715.x
Acknowledgements
This chapter is based on the results of the research project “The Politics and the Poetics of Toponymy, Identity and Place in Multilingual Areas. A Comparative Study of Carinthia (Austria) and the Těšín Area (Czechia)”, funded by the Austrian Science Fund (project number I 2366-G23) and the Czech Grant Agency (project number 16-34841L).
I would like to express my gratitude to Prof. Peter Jordan and particularly to Martina Piko-Rustia, who oriented me in the conception and the development of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sancho Reinoso, A. (2022). From Place Attachment to Toponymic Attachment: Can Geographical Names Foster Social Cohesion and Regional Development? The Case of South Carinthia (Austria). In: Ilovan, OR., Markuszewska, I. (eds) Preserving and Constructing Place Attachment in Europe. GeoJournal Library, vol 131. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09775-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09775-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-09774-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-09775-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)