Abstract
This work explores the differences between walking locomotion on rigid pavement and a particular type of flexible pavements made of EVA75 foam having thickness of either 10 or 20 mm. The aim is to analyse how human movements, in terms of trajectories of different body parts, are influenced by rigidity of such pavements. This research line is ultimately directed towards evaluation of the influence of flexible pavement on the vibration perception by human test subjects walking over vibrating decks of lively footbridges and floors.
The experiments were carried out in the Structures Laboratory at the University of Warwick, UK. A part of a 20 m long walkway was monitored using six infrared cameras. Three test subjects, instrumented with reflective body markers were asked to walk over the walkway made of concrete. Nominally the same experiments were then conducted on the walkway covered with one 10 mm thick layer of foam (ethyl vinyl acetate EVA75) first, and then with two layers of foam having thickness of 20 mm. Mechanical properties of the foam and its influence on the vertical ground reaction forces (GRFz) depending on the number of layers are studied. The trajectories of the reflective markers attached to the human anatomical landmarks are traced using the Vicon motion capture system. Averaged amplitudes of movement for chosen markers are compared for walking over the three supporting surfaces. While the first peak in the GRFz decreases when increasing thickness of the foam the magnitudes of displacements and accelerations of all analysed markers increase. The findings reveal that human walking on surfaces of different flexibility can be characterised by acceleration of body segments as well as by the way the forces propagate through the body via skeletal system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Istrate MV, Lorenzana Ibán A, Ibán Lorenzana N, Vasallo Belver A (2012) Cuantificación de la percepción de la vibración en pasarelas peatonales. DYNA Ingeniería e Industria 69(3):467–473. doi:10.6036/4510
Gu Y, Li J, Ren X, Lake M, Li Z (2012) A pilot study in different unstable designs on the biomechanical effect of gait characteristics. J Mech Med Biol 12(5):1250031 (7 pp). doi:10.1142/S0219519412500315
Menz HB, Lord SR, Fitzpatrick RC (2003) Acceleration patterns of the head and pelvis when walking on level and irregular surfaces. Gait Posture 18(1):35–46
MacLellan MJ, Patla AE (2006) Adaptations of walking pattern on a compliant surface to regulate dynamic stability. Exp Brain Res 173(3):521–530. doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0399-5
Patel M, Fransson PA, Lush D, Gomez S (2008) The effect of foam surface properties on postural stability assessment while standing. Gait Posture 28(4):649–656
Zivanovic S, Pavic A, Reynolds P (2005) Vibration serviceability of footbridges under human-induced excitation: a literature review. J Sound Vib 279(1–2):1–74
Whitham EM, Griffin MJ (1978) The effects of vibration frequency and direction on the location of areas of discomfort caused by whole-body vibration. Appl Ergon 9:231–239
Verdejo R, Mills NJ (2004) Heel–shoe interactions and the durability of EVA foam running-shoe midsoles. J Biomech 37(9):1379–1386
Lieberman DE, Venkadesan M, Werbel WA, Daoud AI, D’Andrea S, Davis IS, Ojiambo Mang’Eni R, Pitsiladis Y (2010) Foot strike patterns and collision forces in habitually barefoot versus shod runners. Nature 463:531–535
Vicon Motion Systems (2008) Vicon plug-in gait product guide—foundation notes revision 1.0
de Leva P (1996) Adjustments to Zatsiorsky—Seluyanov’s segment inertia parameters. J Biomech 29(9):1223–1230
Howarth HVC (1987) A study of the growth of human discomfort with increasing magnitude of mechanical shocks. United Kingdom Informal Group Meeting on Human Response to Vibration, Royal Military College of Science, Shrivenham, 21–22 Sept 1987
Winter DA (1990) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge that the work described in this paper was supported by MINECO, Spanish Government (research project, BIA2011-28493-C02-02), the Warwick-Santander Partnership Grant (project Pedestrian Locomotion and Perception of Vibration on Lively Surfaces of Different Hardness) and the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (project Pedestrian Interaction with Lively Low-Frequency Structures, reference number EP/I03839X/1). We are also grateful to the Birmingham Science City and Advantage West Midlands for the access to the Gait Laboratory.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Istrate, M.V., Zivanovic, S., Lorenzana, A., Ibán, N., Dang, H.V. (2013). Quantifying Differences Between Walking Locomotion on Rigid and Flexible Pavements. In: Catbas, F., Pakzad, S., Racic, V., Pavic, A., Reynolds, P. (eds) Topics in Dynamics of Civil Structures, Volume 4. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6555-3_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6555-3_38
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6554-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6555-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)