Log in

Comment to “Skeletonization-based beam finite element models for stochastic bicontinuous materials: Application to simulations of nanoporous gold” by C. Soyarslan et al. [J. Mater. Res. 33(20), 3371 (2018)]

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soyarslan et al. [J. Mater. Res. 33(20), 3371 (2018)] proposed a beam-finite element model for the computation of effective elastic properties of nanoporous materials, where the ligament diameter along the skeleton is determined with the biggest sphere algorithm. Although this algorithm is often used in the literature, it is known that it systematically overestimates the diameter in network structures. Thus, the need for further stiffening of the junction zones as proposed by the authors is in contradiction to the literature. Furthermore, the factor 40 appears to be one order of magnitude too high. We show that the 3D microstructures generated from random Gaussian fields contain features that are violating the assumption of circular cross-sections and, therefore, cannot be captured by the biggest sphere algorithm. Consequently, the authors required an unphysically high value of 40 to compensate this hidden effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1:
Figure 2:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Huber, R. Viswanath, N. Mameka, J. Markmann, and J. Weißmüller: Scaling laws of nanoporous metals under uniaxial compression. Acta Mater. 67, 252–265 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Jiao and N. Huber: Effect of nodal mass on macroscopic mechanical properties of nanoporous metals. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 134, 234–243 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. B.-N. Ngô, A. Stukowski, N. Mameka, J. Markmann, K. Albe, and J. Weissmüller: Anomalous compliance and early yielding of nanoporous gold. Acta Mat er. 93, 144–155 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Mangipudi, E. Epler, and C. Volkert: Topology-dependent scaling laws for the stiffness and strength of nanoporous gold. Acta Mater. 119, 115–122 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Hu, M. Ziehmer, K. Wang, and E. Lilleodden: Nanoporous gold: 3D structural analyses of representative volumes and their implications on scaling relations of mechanical behaviour. Philos. Magaz. 96, 3322–3335 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Hu: Micromechanical and three-dimensional microstructural characterization of nanoporous gold–epoxy composites. Ph.D. thesis, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), 2017

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. Richert and N. Huber: Skeletonization, geometrical analysis and finite element modeling of nanoporous gold based on 3D tomography data. Metals 8, 282 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Soyarslan, S. Bargmann, M. Pradas, and J. Weissmüller: 3D stochastic bicontinuous microstructures: Generation, topology and elasticity. Acta Mater. 149, 326–340 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Hildebrand and P. Rüegsegger: A new method for the model-independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images. J. Microsc. 185, 67–75 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Richert, A. Odermatt, and N. Huber: Computation of thickness and mechanical properties of interconnected structures: Accuracy, deviations and approaches for correction. Front. Mat er. 6, 352 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Odermatt, C. Richert, and N. Huber: Prediction of elastic-plastic deformation of nanoporous metals by FEM beam modeling: A bottom-up approach from ligaments to real microstructures. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 791, 139700 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Soyarslan, H. Argeso, and S. Bargmann: Skeletonization-based beam finite element models for stochastic bicontinuous materials: Application to simulations of nanoporous gold. J. Mater. Res. 33, 3371–3382 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Bargmann, B. Klusemann, J. Markmann, J. Schnabel, K.S.C. Schneider, and J. Wilmers: Generation of 3D representative volume elements for heterogeneous materials: A review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 96, 322–384 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A. Stukowski: Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO–the Open Visualization Tool. Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18, 015012 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)–Projektnummer 192346071–SFB 986 Tailor-Made Multi-Scale Materials Systems: M3 project B4. J. Weissmüller is acknowledged for making the Mathematica script available published in [3] that allowed for reproducing the 3D microstructures. E.T. Lilleodden is acknowledged for discussions and editing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norbert Huber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huber, N., Richert, C. Comment to “Skeletonization-based beam finite element models for stochastic bicontinuous materials: Application to simulations of nanoporous gold” by C. Soyarslan et al. [J. Mater. Res. 33(20), 3371 (2018)]. Journal of Materials Research 35, 2831–2834 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2020.257

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2020.257

Navigation