Background

Pulpal and periapical diseases are common endodontic conditions, and root canal therapy (RCT) is currently the most effective treatment for such conditions [1]. However, previous studies have revealed treatment-failure rates of 4–15%, even after refined RCT treatment, with such failures evolving into refractory apical periodontitis characterized by persistent inflammatory response and progressive destruction of periapical bone, eventually resulting in tooth loss [2, 3]. Accordingly, increasing numbers of studies are being focused on develo** new clinical strategies for the repair and/or regeneration of damaged endodontic tissue.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are often used to repair inflammatory tissue damage owing to their multi-differentiation ability and anti-inflammatory properties [4,

Table 1 Primer sequences used in qRT-PCR

Western blot

Cells cultured under the same osteogenic-induction conditions were lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime) after 3 and 7 days. Protein concentrations were measured with BCA protein assay reagent. Equal amounts of protein for each sample were separated using 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then transferred onto poly(vinylidene fluoride) membranes. The membranes were then blocked with 5% nonfat milk and incubated with primary antibodies for OCN, OSX Runx2 (Affinity Biosciences, Cincinnati, OH, USA), and DSPP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 4 °C overnight and then incubated with horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Proteintech, Wuhan, Hubei, China) for 1 h at room temperature. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Thermo Scientific) and the grayscale values were determined with ImageJ software.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 21.0 software. All experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Group comparisons were performed via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by least significant difference testing. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.