Abstract
Background
The comprehensive core set for knee dysfunction was developed to classify the functioning of people with any knee dysfunction. To be used as a clinical instrument to measure the functioning of people with knee dysfunction, the construct validity of the core set still needs to be assessed. The purpose of this study was to analyze the construct validity of the comprehensive core set for knee dysfunction as an instrument to measure functioning.
Methods
A cross-sectional study with 200 participants with knee dysfunction with or without clinical diagnosis of knee pathology, with or without complaint of pain, with or without instability, and/or with or without knee movement restriction of any type. Participants were assessed using the comprehensive core set for knee dysfunction with 25 categories, the subjective form from the International Knee Documentation Committee scale, and measures of self-perceived general health and functioning. The construct validity of the core set was assessed by Rasch analysis, and the external construct validity was assessed by correlation between the score of the brief core set for knee dysfunction with the subjective form from the International Knee Documentation Committee scale, and scores of self-perception of health and functioning.
Results
Twelve categories were consistent with a unidimensional construct, with no difference in the response pattern for age, sex, educational level, and time of complaint. These categories were included in the brief core set for knee dysfunction. The mean score of the brief core set was 37 ± 21 points, a value classified as moderate impairment regarding functioning. Correlations with the subjective form from the International Knee Documentation Committee scale and scores of self-perception were adequate (p < 0.01; r > 0.5).
Conclusion
The brief core set for knee dysfunction, a set with 12 categories, can be used as a clinical instrument to measure and score the functioning of people with knee dysfunction, aged between 18 and 89 years, with adequate construct validity.
Background
Knee dysfunction is a complex interaction of multiple factors [1]. Knee dysfunction can be due to a pathological process at the knee joint [1], or changes in body functions, activities, and social participation [2]. Previous injuries or knee structure changes are not always observed [2]. Since knee dysfunction can lead to limitations and disabilities that negatively impact quality of life and functioning during activities of daily living [3], it is important to assess the functioning of patients using an instrument with a comprehensive perspective, as recommended by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).
The ICF was developed to broaden the perspective on people’s functioning, including components such as body functions and structures, activities, participation, environmental, and personal factors [4]. To increase the viability and operational use of the ICF, the core sets project was created [5, 6]. The purpose of a core set is to establish a selection of the ICF categories that describe the functioning of a person in a specific health condition or in a specific care context [6]. This selection and subsequent reduction in the number of categories in the core sets, as opposed to the use of the entire ICF for the assessment of a health condition, encourages clinical use [5, 6].
A preliminary core set for knee dysfunction with 24 categories capable of assessing the functioning and health of people with knee dysfunction was created based on the opinion of patients and then using a statistical model by regression analyses [7]. Afterwards, a panel of experts participated in the content validity assessment of this preliminary core set [8]. After a 4-round Delphi, 25 categories showed adequate content validity to compose the comprehensive core set for knee dysfunction [8]. This comprehensive core set indicates the main ICF categories that should be considered when assessing patients with knee dysfunction [8].
The ICF is based on a conceptual model in which functioning is an umbrella term for body functions and structures as well as for activities and participation [4, 9, 10]. A clinical measure of functioning based on the integration of information obtained from an ICF core set can be considered a unidimensional model [9,10,11]. Rasch analysis allows this unidimensional analysis by checking the data variance, which is the sum of the squares of the values predicted by the analysis around their central values [12]. Rasch analysis can also test whether the order of qualifiers in the comprehensive core set for knee dysfunction is adequate to represent the degree of knee dysfunction [13]. In addition, the consistency between factors such as age, sex, educational level, and time of complaint in the core set [14] allows comparing the functioning in different contexts and populations. Therefore, if the categories of the comprehensive core set for knee dysfunction reflect a unidimensional instrument for assessing body functions and structures, activities and participation, and environmental factors and if the categories are consistent in populations, well-directed, and not redundant, this core set can become a clinical instrument to measure the functioning of people with any knee dysfunction.
Thus, the primary objective of this study was to analyze the construct validity of the comprehensive core set for knee dysfunction as a potential instrument for measuring functioning. The secondary objective was to verify whether there is a difference in the construct validity of the comprehensive core set for knee dysfunction when applied during an interview (conducted by a person trained in the use of the ICF) or self-administered.
Methods
Study design
Cross-sectional study to assess construct validity. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Setting
Face-to-face data collection with an interview was carried out at all levels of care. The interview settings were: Primary Health Care Unit of Bonsucesso (Guarapuava, Paraná), Physical Therapy School of Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (Guarapuava, Paraná), Center for Excellence in Clinical Research in Physical Therapy at Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (São Paulo, São Paulo), and São Vicente de Paulo Charity Hospital (Guarapuava, Paraná). Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, which resulted in social distancing, remote assessments were carried out with a self-administered questionnaire in all levels of care and in several cities in Brazil.
Participants
Participants were aged 18 years or older and had subjective complaints of pain, instability, and/or knee movement restriction of any type. Clinical diagnosis of knee pathology and undergoing treatment were not mandatory for inclusion, as well as having prior surgery was not considered for exclusion. Exclusion criteria were lower limb amputation and congenital and/or acquired malformation distal to the knee. Eligibility was assessed by a standardized set of questions.
Two hundred urban participants were recruited and assessed: 100 were recruited by verbal invitation at the study settings for face-to-face interview assessments, and 100 were identified in social networks of associations of physiotherapists and groups of professionals involved with knee rehabilitation, and in the general community for the remote assessments with a self-administered questionnaire. The assessments were conducted from October 2019 to June 2020.
Variables and measurement
Sample characteristics were assessed with a questionnaire including questions on sociodemographic details and clinical conditions. After that, the comprehensive core set for knee dysfunction was applied using the description of each category as a question and the qualifiers as answer options. The comprehensive core set for knee dysfunction had 25 categories, including 11 categories from the component body functions, three representing body structures, 10 activities and participation, and one environmental factor [8]. The qualifiers for the components body functions, body structures, and activities and participation had five possible answers, ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 being no problem and 4 being a major problem. Additional qualifiers for the body structures and activities and participation components were not used. The qualifiers for the environmental factors component had nine possible answers, ranging from facilitators (+ 1 to + 4, mild facilitator to complete facilitator, respectively) to barriers (1 to 4, mild barrier to complete barrier, respectively) or no barriers/no facilitators (qualifier 0). For all components, qualifier 8 meaning “not specific” and qualifier 9 meaning “not applicable” could also be used [4].
The subjective knee assessment form of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) [15] was also applied. The IKDC had 10 questions that evaluate symptoms, sports activities, and functioning. The total score ranged from 0 to 100, in which 100 indicated that the patient had no limitations with daily living or sports activities, as well as the absence of symptoms [16].
Finally, to assess self-perception of general health and functioning, patient answered two questions: one on general health status and one on functioning, using a numerical scale from 0 to 10 as answers, in which 0 meant poor general health and/or functioning, and 10 meant excellent general health and/or functioning [36]. However, the difficulty in converting the ICF categories into a questionnaire has already been reported in the study investigating the construct validity of the core set for breast cancer [31]. In addition, a cross-cultural adaptation may be necessary to increase the understanding of categories [37]. The results of this study also highlight the importance of a trained professional in using the ICF to conduct the assessment.
As a strength of the present study, a clinical instrument to measure the functioning of people with any knee dysfunction was developed, considering the multiple aspects of functioning recommended by the ICF. As we proposed a measurement tool, a weakness of the study was the failure to evaluate other measurement properties for the instrument to have all the scientifically required parameters. The results of this study demonstrated the potential of the brief core set for knee dysfunction as a scale. Future studies can evaluate other measurement properties of the brief core set for knee dysfunction, such as inter- and intra-rater reliability and responsiveness, in addition to checking for possible ceiling and floor effects.
Regarding the limitations of this study, first, the sample was limited to only two cities in Brazil. Therefore, different results could be found in other countries or regions. Although patients were asked about other comorbidities, we did not assess whether these comorbidities impacted functioning. Furthermore, lifestyle habits and the use of orthoses were not recorded. Regarding educational level, other studies [14, 25] conducted the analysis considering the average schooling time in the country. However, in our study, educational level was assessed as a categorical variable, not allowing analysis by the average schooling time of the Brazilian population, which is 9.4 years [38]. Finally, the face-to-face sample may not represent all people with knee dysfunction, because they are relatively less educated, older, and retired. Although the study identifies which categories can be used as a measurement tool, scores from qualifiers can be considered provisional until repeated evidence in larger samples supports the current interpretation.
Conclusion
From the comprehensive core set for knee dysfunction, 12 categories showed adequate construct validity to compose the brief core set for knee dysfunction to be applied face-to-face via interview by a professional. These 12 categories cover body functions and structures and activities and participation and can be used to measure the functioning of people with any knee dysfunction, aged between 18 and 89 years.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- ICF:
-
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
- IKDC:
-
International Knee Documentation Committee
- Infit:
-
Information-weighted (or inlier-sensitive) fit statistic
- Outfit:
-
Outlier sensitive fit statistic
- MnSq:
-
Mean-square
- DIF:
-
Differential item functioning
References
Reiman MP, Bolgla LA, Lorenz D. Hip functions influence on knee dysfunction: a proximal link to a distal problem. J Sport Rehabil. 2009;18(1):33–46.
Urquhart DM, Phyomaung PP, Dubowitz J, Fernando S, Wluka AE, Raajmaakers P, Wang Y, Cicuttini FM. Are cognitive and behavioural factors associated with knee pain? A systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015;44(4):445–55.
Alkan BM, Fidan F, Tosun A, Ardicoglu O. Quality of life and self-reported disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2014;24(1):166–71.
World Health Organization. ICF - international classification of Functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
Stucki G. G Grimby 2004 Applying the ICF in medicine. J Rehabil Med 44 Suppl 5–6.
Selb M, Escorpizo R, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G, Ustun B, Cieza A. A guide on how to develop an international classification of Functioning, disability and Health Core Set. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;51(1):105–17.
Fréz AR, Alouche SR, Binda AC, Vieira GW, Bueno BAM, Cabral CMN. Development of a core set for knee dysfunction based on the International Classification of Functioning, disability and health: a cross-sectional study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(4):571–81.
Fréz AR, Alouche SR, Binda AC, Nunes Cabral CM. Content validity of the International Classification of Functioning, disability and health core set for knee dysfunction: a Delphi study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2024;40(1):110–7.
Cieza A, Hilfiker R, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustün BT, Stucki G. The International classification of Functioning, disability, and Health could be used to measure functioning. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(9):899–911.
Algurén B, Bostan C, Christensson L, Fridlund B, Cieza A. A multidisciplinary cross-cultural measurement of functioning after stroke: Rasch analysis of the brief ICF core set for stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(Suppl 1):573–86.
Cieza A, Hilfiker R, Boonen A, van der Heijde D, Braun J, Stucki G. Towards an ICF-based clinical measure of functioning in people with ankylosing spondylitis: a methodological exploration. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(7):528–37.
A user’s guide to Winsteps. Minisep Rasch-model computer programs [https://www.winsteps.com/a/Winsteps-Manual.pdf].
Svensson E. Guidelines to statistical evaluation of data from rating scales and questionnaires. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33(1):47–8.
Kurtaiş Y, Oztuna D, Küçükdeveci AA, Kutlay S, Hafiz M, Tennant A. Reliability, construct validity and measurement potential of the ICF comprehensive core set for osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:255.
Rodriguez-Merchan EC. Knee instruments and rating scales designed to measure outcomes. J Orthop Traumatol. 2012;13(1):1–6.
Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD. Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(5):600–13.
**e F, Lo NN, Lee HP, Cieza A, Li SC. Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, disability, and Health (ICF) brief core set for osteoarthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2008;37(6):450–61.
Andrich D, Luo G. Conditional pairwise estimation in the Rasch model for ordered response categories using principal components. J Appl Meas. 2003;4(3):205–21.
Prodinger B, Salzberger T, Stucki G, Stamm T, Cieza A. Measuring functioning in people with fibromyalgia (FM) based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)--a psychometric analysis. Pain Pract. 2012;12(4):255–65.
Masters GN. A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika. 1982;47(2):149–74.
Linacre J, Wright B. Winsteps: multiple-choice, rating scale, na partial credit Rasch analysis. Chicago: MESA; 2000.
Chien CW, Bond TG. Measurement properties of fine motor scale of Peabody developmental motor scales-second edition: a Rasch analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88(5):376–86.
Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2007.
Wright BD, Linacre JM. Observations are always ordinal; measurements, however, must be interval. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70(12):857–60.
Røe C, Sveen U, Geyh S, Cieza A, Bautz-Holter E. Construct dimensionality and properties of the categories in the ICF Core Set for low back pain. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(6):429–37.
Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item response theory for psychologists. Mahway: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.
Fidalgo AM, Scalon JD. Using mantel-haenszel methods for detecting differential item functioning. Psicologia Reflexão E Crítica. 2012;25(1):60.
Hauck Filho N, Teixeira MAP. Análise de rasch de uma medida de problemas decorrentes do beber em estudantes universitários. Psico. 2013;44(2):3.
Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–57.
Stucki G, Kostanjsek N, Ustün B, Cieza A. ICF-based classification and measurement of functioning. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44(3):315–28.
Yang EJ, Shin EK, Shin HI, Lim JY. Psychometric properties of scale constructed from the International Classification of Functioning, disability and health (ICF) core set for breast cancer based on Rasch analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22(10):2839–49.
Cheng KK, Lee J, Leung SF, Liang RH, Tai JW, Yeung RM, Thompson DR. Use of Rasch analysis in the evaluation of the oropharyngeal mucositis quality of life scale. Nurs Res. 2011;60(4):256–63.
Alvarelhao J, Silva A, Martins A, Queiros A, Amaro A, Rocha N, Lains J. Comparing the content of instruments assessing environmental factors using the International classification of Functioning, disability and health. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(1):1–6.
Guo C, Liu Y, Hao S, **e L, **ang G, Wu Y, Li S. The reliability and validity of the activity and participation component in the brief ICF core set for chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases based on Rasch analysis. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020;15:1191–8.
Bagraith KS, Strong J, Meredith PJ, McPhail SM. Rasch analysis supported the construct validity of self-report measures of activity and participation derived from patient ratings of the ICF low back pain core set. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;84:161–72.
Rogers SN, Forgie S, Lowe D, Precious L, Haran S, Tschiesner U. Development of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a brief head and neck cancer patient questionnaire. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39(10):975–82.
Tschiesner U, Sabariego C, Linseisen E, Becker S, Stier-Jarmer M, Cieza A, Harreus U. Priorities of head and neck cancer patients: a patient survey based on the brief ICF core set for HNC. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270(12):3133–42.
Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua - Educação. 2019 [https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes&id=2101736].
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
ARF, BBP, and ACB performed patient recruitment and data collection. ARF, GRC, and CMNC performed data analysis and interpretation. ARF and ACB performed the literature review and primary manuscript preparation. ARF, ACB, and CMNC assisted with initial drafting of the manuscript, as well as editing and final draft preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (process number 2.008.701 and 4.845.845). All eligible participants received clear information and those who agreed to participate in the study signed an informed consent form.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Fréz, A.R., Coelho, G.R., de Barros Pereira, B. et al. Development of a brief core set for knee dysfunction based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: assessing construct validity and measurement potential. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 25, 512 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07635-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07635-3