Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] contained several errors. The numbers in Table 3 should have been divided by two and the title of the table should have been “Ranking of nodes based on the fraction of the total weight” instead of “Ranking of nodes based on the total weight”. Accordingly, the sentence “The Eiffel Tower alone accounted for a 50% of the total weighted degree” in Section 3.3 “Network of touristic sites” should have read “The Eiffel Tower alone accounted for a 25% of the total weighted degree”.
The correct Table 3 is included in full in this erratum.
References
Bassolas A, Lenormand M, Tugores A, Gonçalves B, Ramasco JJ (2016) Touristic site attractiveness seen through Twitter. EPJ Data Sci 5:12. doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0073-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0073-5.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Bassolas, A., Lenormand, M., Tugores, A. et al. Erratum to: Touristic site attractiveness seen through Twitter. EPJ Data Sci. 5, 16 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0077-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0077-1