Abstract
We consider a class (convex set) of quantum states containing all finite rank states and infinite rank states with the sufficient rate of decreasing of eigenvalues (in particular, all Gaussian states). Quantum states from this class are characterized by the property (called the FA-property) that allows to obtain several results concerning finite-dimensional approximation of basic entropic and information characteristics of quantum systems and channels.
We obtain a simple sufficient condition of the FA-property. We show that all the states with the FA-property form a face of the convex set of all quantum states that is contained within the face of all states with finite von Neumann entropy (the non-coincidence of these two faces follows from the recent result of S. Becker, N. Datta and M.G. Jabbour).
We obtain uniform approximation results for characteristics depending on a pair (channel, input state) and for characteristics depending on a pair (channel, input ensemble). We establish the uniform continuity of the above characteristics as functions of a channel w.r.t. the strong convergence provided that the FA-property holds either for the input state or for the average state of input ensemble.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The support \(\textrm{supp}\rho\) of a state \(\rho\) is the closed subspace spanned by the eigenvectors of \(\rho\) corresponding to its positive eigenvalues.
\(\rho_{k}\) is the marginal state of \(\rho_{1..n}\) corresponding to the space \(\mathcal{H}_{k}\).
The validity of Weyl’s inequality for trace class operators follows, f.i., from Theorem 5.10 in [20].
The class \(L(C,T,D)\) can be extended by replacing the binary entropy \(h_{2}\) in (20) by any nonnegative function vanishing as \(p\to 0\). All the below results remain valid for functions from the class \(L(C,T,D)\) extended in this way.
\(\chi(\cdot)\) denotes the Holevo quantity of an ensemble defined in (5).
The weak convergence of a sequence \(\{\mu_{n}\}\subset\mathcal{P}(\mathcal{H})\) to a measure \(\mu_{0}\) in \(\mathcal{P}(\mathcal{H})\) means that \(\lim_{n\to+\infty}\int f(\rho)\mu_{n}(d\rho)=\int f(\rho)\mu_{0}(d\rho)\) for any continuous bounded function on \(\mathfrak{S}(\mathcal{H})\) [26, 34, 35].
The definition of \(\beta_{G}^{E}\) is presented at the end of Section 2.
These functions are introduced at the begin of Section 4.1.
These functions are introduced at the begin of Section 4.2.
It follows from the proof of Proposition 22 in [32] that the condition \(||\omega^{2}_{AB}-\omega^{1}_{AB}||_{1}=\varepsilon<1\) in this proposition can be replaced by the condition \(||\omega^{2}_{AB}-\omega^{1}_{AB}||_{1}\leq\varepsilon<1\).
We assume that \(f_{\Phi}(\rho)=0\) if \(\Phi(\rho)=0\).
REFERENCES
A. Wehrl, ‘‘General properties of entropy,’’ Rev. Mod. Phys. 50, 221–250 (1978).
S. Becker, N. Datta, and M. G. Jabbour, ‘‘From classical to quantum: Uniform continuity bounds on entropies in infinite dimensions,’’ ar**v: 2104.02019 (2021).
M. E. Shirokov, ‘‘Approximation of multipartite quantum states and the relative entropy of entanglement,’’ ar**v: 2103.12111 (2021).
A. S. Holevo, Quantum Systems, Channels, Information. A Mathematical Introduction (De Gruyter, Berlin, 2012).
A. S. Holevo, Statistical Structure of Quantum Theory (Springer, Berlin, 2001).
M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000).
M. M. Wilde, Quantum Information Theory (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2013).
S. Khatri and M. M. Wilde, ‘‘Principles of quantum communication theory: A modern approach,’’ ar**v: 2011.04672.
G. Lindblad, ‘‘Expectation and entropy inequalities for finite quantum systems,’’ Comm. Math. Phys. 39, 111–119 (1974).
A. S. Holevo, ‘‘Bounds for the quantity of information transmitted by a quantum communication channel,’’ Probl. Inf. Transm. (USSR) 9, 177–183 (1973).
M. E. Shirokov, ‘‘Entropy characteristics of subsets of states. I,’’ Izv. Math. 70, 1265–1292 (2006).
M. E. Shirokov, ‘‘Adaptation of the Alicki–Fannes–Winter method for the set of states with bounded energy and its use,’’ Rep. Math. Phys. 81, 81–104 (2018).
A. S. Holevo, ‘‘On complementary channels and the additivity problem,’’ Probab. Theory Appl. 51, 133–143 (2005).
M. E. Shirokov and A. V. Bulinski, ‘‘On quantum channels and operations preserving finiteness of the von Neumann entropy,’’ Lobachevskii J. Math. 41 (12), 2383–2396 (2020).
M. E. Shirokov, ‘‘Uniform continuity bounds for information characteristics of quantum channels depending on input dimension and on input energy,’’ J. Phys. A 52, 014001 (2019).
R. Nair, ‘‘Quantum-limited loss sensing: Multiparameter estimation and Bures distance between loss channels,’’ Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 230801 (2018).
I. Bengtsson and K. Zyczkowski, Geometry of Quantum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2017).
A. Wehrl, ‘‘How chaotic is a state of a quantum system,’’ Rep. Math. Phys. 6, 15–28 (1974).
P. Harremoes, ‘‘Information topologies with applications,’’ in Entropy, Search, Complexity, Ed. by I. Csiszár et al., Vol. 16 of Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies (Springer, Berlin, 2007).
A. S. Markus, ‘‘The eigen- and singular values of the sum and product of linear operators,’’ Russ. Math. Surv. 19 (4), 91–120 (1964).
R. T. Rockafellar, Convex Analysis (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1996).
M. E. Shirokov, ‘‘Advanced Alicki–Fannes–Winter method for energy-constrained quantum systems and its use,’’ Quantum Inf. Process. 19, 164 (2020).
E. R. Loubenets, ‘‘Quantum stochastic approach to the description of quantum measurements,’’ J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34, 7639–7675 (2001).
E. R. Loubenets, ‘‘Quantum stochastics. New approach to the description of quantum measurements,’’ Found. Prob. Phys. 13, 246–256 (2001).
F. Buscemi, M. Hayashi, and M. Horodecki, ‘‘Global information balance in quantum measurements,’’ Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 210504 (2008).
A. S. Holevo and M. E. Shirokov, ‘‘Continuous ensembles and the capacity of infinite-dimensional quantum channels,’’ Theory Probab. Appl. 50, 86–98 (2005).
G. G. Amosov, ‘‘Remark on the additivity conjecture for a quantum depolarizing channel,’’ Probl. Inform. Transmis. 42 (2), 69–76 (2006).
A. S. Holevo and M. E. Shirokov, ‘‘Mutual and coherent information for infinite-dimensional quantum channels,’’ Probl. Inform. Transmis. 46, 201–218 (2010).
M. Takeoka, S. Guha, and M. M. Wilde, ‘‘The squashed entanglement of a quantum channel,’’ IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 60, 4987–4998 (2014).
M. Christandl and A. Winter, ‘‘Squashed entanglement - an additive entanglement measure,’’ J. Math. Phys. 45, 829–840 (2003).
R. Tucci, ‘‘Entanglement of distillation and conditional mutual information,’’ ar**v: quant-ph/0202144.
M. E. Shirokov, ‘‘Squashed entanglement in infinite dimensions,’’ J. Math. Phys. 57, 3220 (2016).
M. J. Donald, ‘‘Further results on the relative entropy,’’ Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 101, 363–373 (1987).
P. Billingsley, Convergence of Probability Measures (Wiley, New York, 1968).
V. I. Bogachev, Measure Theory (Springer, Berlin, 2007).
O. Oreshkov and J. Calsamiglia, ‘‘Distinguishability measures between ensembles of quantum states,’’ Phys. Rev. A 79, 032336 (2009).
A. Winter, ‘‘Energy-constrained diamond norm with applications to the uniform continuity of continuous variable channel capacities,’’ ar**v: 1712.10267.
M. M. Wilde, ‘‘Strong and uniform convergence in the teleportation simulation of bosonic Gaussian channels,’’ Phys. Rev. A 97, 062305 (2018).
M. E. Shirokov, ‘‘Strong convergence of quantum channels: Continuity of the Stinespring dilation and discontinuity of the unitary dilation,’’ J. Math. Phys. 61, 082204 (2020).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I am grateful to A.S. Holevo and to the participants of his seminar ‘‘Quantum probability, statistic, information’’ (the Steklov Mathematical Institute) for useful discussion. I am also grateful to S. Becker, N. Datta and M.G. Jabbour for resolving the open question stated in the preliminary version of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
(Submitted by A. S. Holevo)
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
Lemma 1. Let \(f\) be a function on \(\mathfrak{S}(\mathcal{H})\) satisfying inequality (20) with some parameters \(a_{f}\) and \(b_{f}\) then for any positive trace-non-increasing linear map \(\Phi:\mathfrak{T}(\mathcal{H})\rightarrow\mathfrak{T}(\mathcal{H})\) the functionFootnote 11
on \(\mathfrak{S}(\mathcal{H})\) satisfies inequality (20) with the same parameters \(a_{f}\) and \(b_{f}\).
Proof. Let \(\rho\) and \(\sigma\) be arbitrary states and \(\lambda\) any number in \((0,1)\). Let \(p=||\Phi(\rho)||_{1}\) and \(q=||\Phi(\sigma)||_{1}\). If \(pq=0\) then inequality (20) trivially holds for the function \(f_{\Phi}\). If \(pq\neq 0\) then the validity of the l.h.s. of inequality (20) for the function \(f\) implies
So, to prove the l.h.s. of inequality (20) for the function \(f_{\Phi}\) it suffices to show that
for all positive numbers \(x\) and \(y\) such that \(x+y\leq 1\). This inequality follows from the concavity of the binary entropy, since the probability distribution \(\{x,1-x\}\) is the convex mixture of the probability distributions \(\{x/(x+y),y/(x+y)\}\) and \(\{0,1\}\) with the coefficients \(x+y\) and \(1-x-y\).
The r.h.s. of inequality (20) for the function \(f_{\Phi}\) is proved similarly. \(\Box\)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shirokov, M.E. On Quantum States with a Finite-Dimensional Approximation Property. Lobachevskii J Math 42, 2437–2454 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080221100206
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080221100206