Log in

Shocks and Currents: Monetary Policy and Israel’s Foreign Exchange Market

  • Published:
Comparative Economic Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the interplay between domestic and global monetary policies, capital flows, and exchange rate dynamics in Israel. Using a novel dataset of daily sectoral FX transactions, we examine the transmission of monetary shocks identified from yield curve shifts around central bank announcements. Local projections reveal that foreign financial investors respond strongly and symmetrically to domestic and foreign shocks, which suggests that they react to the interest rate differential. Domestic institutional investors counteract this by rebalancing their portfolios. In particular, the impact of US monetary shocks on Israeli institutional investors and on the exchange rate depends on the shocks’ correlation with the S&P 500 stock index. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the mechanisms through which domestic and global monetary policies influence small open economies like Israel, and highlight the limited monetary autonomy of small open economies even under flexible exchange rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See also Swanson (2023).

  2. In the period following the October 7th 2023 events and the war in Gaza (which is outside our sample), the Bank of Israel sold foreign exchange for the first time to counteract short-term disruptions in the FX market.

  3. See also Matheson and Stavrev (2014).

  4. This section draws heavily from the analysis and survey presented in Barkai and Liviatan (2007).

  5. See Fischer (1987) and Patinkin (1993).

  6. For dependent variables expressed as flows, the cumulative change \({\Delta }_{h}{y}_{t+h}\) represents the accumulated flow over the period from time \(t-1\) to time \(t+h\).

  7. In Appendix, we present the results for the 3-month yield, which are qualitatively similar to those obtained for the 1-year yields.

  8. Kutai (2023) analyzed the effect of BOI forward guidance using intraday data but his sample is partial.

  9. In the USA, we use the benchmarks provided by Bloomberg for the corresponding bills and T-bonds. In Israel, we use interbank rates up to maturity of 1-year (TELBOR) and the Benchmarks for Government Bonds for longer maturities. As the TELBOR day is fixed daily by the BOI at noon and the policy announcements of the BOI are released at 16:00, we use the change between the day following the announcement (\(t+1\)) and the day of announcement (\(t\)) in order to measure the shifts in maturities of up to one year. As government bonds in Israel are traded in the stock exchange, which closes at 17:30, we use the shift between day of announcement (\(t\)) and the previous day (\(t-1\)) in order to measure the shifts of yields longer than one year. This differential treatment is applied because the money market in Israel is not deep and liquid, and therefore the yields are noisy and unreliable.

  10. If we consider \(k\) to be 0, then the \(\mathbf{Z}\) can be comprehensively represented by \(n\) separate white noise processes. In a case where \(k\) equals 1, \(\mathbf{Z}\) would be described as a linear response to a single factor and an uncorrelated white noise. If we consider \(k\) to be 2, \(\mathbf{X}\) would be seen as a response to two intrinsic dimensions of BOI announcements, again complemented by uncorrelated white noise, etc.

  11. This interpretation is related to the level and slope interpretation common in finance models such as the Nelson-Siegel model.

  12. All FX transactions—onshore and offshore—are reported to the BOI’s statistics department on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) basis. This creates some discrepancy in the local “day” definition between US (UTC—5, EST) and Israel (UTC + 2), but this takes place after main business hours in both countries. We match the flow data with Bloomberg COB USDILS rate sampled at 23:00 local time. The data are confidential, as they include FX transactions by the BOI on a daily basis while the BOI reports to the public only on a monthly basis.

  13. The statistics for the BOI intervention refer to all trading days, including a large share of days with no intervention.

  14. We do not include lagged shocks on the RHS of the estimation as they are always zero on the days prior to the interest rate announcement.

  15. With a positive value indicating a depreciation of the ILS.

  16. The results for the 3-month yields are presented in Appendix and are qualitatively similar.

  17. Institutional investors regularly use future contracts on the S&P 500 index in order to rebalance their portfolios.

References

  • Barkai, H., and N. Liviatan (eds.). 2007. The Bank of Israel: Volume 1: A monetary history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspi, I., A. Friedman, and S. Ribon. 2022. The immediate impact of FX intervention on the exchange rate and its persistence over time. International Journal of Central Banking 18(5): 165–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieslak, A., and A. Schrimpf. 2019. Non-monetary news in central bank communication. Journal of International Economics 118: 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch, R. 1976. Exchange rate expectations and monetary policy. Journal of International Economics 6(3): 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatum, R., and B. Scholnick. 2008. Monetary policy news and exchange rate responses: Do only surprises matter? Journal of Banking & Finance 32(6): 1076–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, M., J. Kearns, and A. Schrimpf. 2021. Monetary policy’s rising FX impact in the era of ultra-low rates. Journal of Banking & Finance 129: 106142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S. 1987. The Israeli stabilization program, 1985–86. The American Economic Review 77(2): 275–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A., and Z. Hercowitz. 2022. The impact of sectoral flows and the Bank of Israel foreign currency purchases on the exchange rate. In Monetary policy during in a period of price stability, ed. A. Yaron and M. Strawczynski. Jerusalem: Bank of Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gürkaynak, R.S., B. Sack, and E.T. Swanson. 2005. Do actions speak louder than words? The response of asset prices to monetary policy actions and statements. International Journal of Central Banking. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.633281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue, A., and B. Rossi. 2019. The effects of conventional and unconventional monetary policy on exchange rates. Journal of International Economics 118: 419–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarociński, M., and P. Karadi. 2020. Deconstructing monetary policy surprises—The role of information shocks. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 12(2): 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorda, O. 2005. Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections. American Economic Review 95(1): 161–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiendrebeogo, Y. 2016. Unconventional monetary policy and capital flows. Economic Modelling 54: 412–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutai, A. 2023. Measuring the effect of forward guidance in small open economies: The case of Israel. Israel Economic Review 21(1): 75–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheson, Troy, and Emil Stavrev. 2014. News and monetary shocks at a high frequency: A simple approach. Economics Letters 125(2): 282–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda-Agrippino, S., and T. Nenova. 2022. A tale of two global monetary policies. Journal of International Economics 136: 103606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patinkin, D. 1993. Israel’s stabilization program of 1985, or some simple truths of monetary theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives 7(2): 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piger, J., and T. Stockwell. 2023. Differences from differencing: Should local projections with observed shocks be estimated in levels or differences?. Available at SSRN 4530799.

  • Ribon, S. 2017. Why the Bank of Israel intervenes in the foreign exchange market, and what happens to the exchange rate. Bank of Israel Discussion Paper 2017.04.

  • Solis, P. 2023. Does the exchange rate respond to monetary policy in Mexico? Solving an exchange rate puzzle in emerging markets. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.13032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, E.T. 2021. Measuring the effects of federal reserve forward guidance and asset purchases on financial markets. Journal of Monetary Economics 118: 32–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, E.T. 2023. The macroeconmic effects of the Federal Reserve’s conventional and unconventional monetary policies. NBER Working Paper 31603, August 2023.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to participants in the Bank of Israel Research Department Seminar and in the “50 Years after the End of Bretton Woods—The Experiences of Small Open Economies” workshop in ETH Zurich. The views presented in this paper are exclusively those of the authors. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Bank of Israel or any of its staff.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Friedman.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table

Table 4 Yields statistics 2010–August 2023, decision dates

4, Figs.

Fig. 10
figure 10

a The reaction of capital flows and the exchange rate to a 100b.p. Shock to the 3-month US Yield. b The reaction of capital flows and the exchange rate to a 100b.p. Shock to the 3-month local yield. The gray lines depict a 90% confidence interval corrected for possible autocorrelation using Newey–West procedure. Flows are in $billions; positive figures represent outflows. ddol is the percentage change in the ILS/USD rate, and a positive figure represents depreciation of local currency. (Color figure online)

10 and

Fig. 11
figure 11

a The reaction of capital flows and the exchange rate to a 100b.p. Shock to the 1-year US Yield, 2010–2019. b The reaction of capital flows and the exchange rate to a 100b.p. Shock to the 1-year local yield, 2010–2019. The gray lines depict a 90% confidence interval corrected for possible autocorrelation using Newey–West procedure. Flows are in $billions; positive figures represent outflows. ddol is the percentage change in the ILS/USD rate, and a positive figure represents depreciation of local currency. (Color figure online)

11.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caspi, I., Friedman, A. & Ribon, S. Shocks and Currents: Monetary Policy and Israel’s Foreign Exchange Market. Comp Econ Stud (2024). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-024-00236-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-024-00236-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation