Abstract
Port cities and their neighbouring areas, located at the confines between sea and land, are key hubs in the transportation of goods and people. Ports serve global transport needs, while they are embedded in local geographies, topographies, political, economic and historical settlements. People have always been attracted to human settlements at the interface of water and land. These settlements have evolved into large population centres and metropolitan areas. Major cities, economic hubs and trade centres are engines of key importance for expansive territories and the ports in their vicinity, but they are also places at the forefront of many contemporary threats, including sea level rise as a consequence of climate change. Today, according to the United Nations Development Programme, 55% of humans worldwide live in cities and 40% live within 100 kms off the coast, thus in the vicinity of water-related threats. Maritime and logistic flows cross ports and densely built territories, creating additional environmental and other challenges. The war in Ukraine, long periods of drought and excessive water levels due to heavy rainfall in Pakistan are only the latest examples of both the need for and the danger of port activities for cities and landscapes. Nonetheless, a comprehensive understanding of the relationships between ports, cities and their territories is missing. This special issue argues that we need to embrace a holistic, inclusive approach to port city development, based on ecosystems values, embedded in various layers of capital: natural, cultural, social, human, industrial and creative. To achieve a port city symbiosis and avoid parasitism—defined here as a relationship where one partner benefits at the expense of another-, new port governance frameworks will have to answer to what knowledge needs to be shared to make multiple value creation in the port city ecosystem happen. For transitions to happen, port city territories will have to nurture ecosystem values to unlock this capital. New governance constellations will have to be based on shared mindsets, deeper understanding of the interests of local communities, and a set of collaborative principles. What exactly the relationships are between port, city and territory, how maritime flows relate to them, and whether or to what degree these connections are symbiotic or parasitic is subject for further exploration. Exploring the concept of symbiosis in port city ecosystems is fundamental for human activities, including economic ones, to sustain themselves in healthy, clean, green, liveable port cities and coastal communities. In this introduction we reflect on contributions by authors who examine port city symbiosis in various seaports in the Netherlands, Chile, United States, Portugal, as well as inland ports in France, Belgium, Switzerland and Germany.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed for this introduction article.
Notes
A parasitic relationship is one in which one parasite organism lives off a host organism, with detrimental effects for the host that may possibly lead to its death (Preston and Johnson 2010). Such relationships can also be seen between ports and cities when port industrial activities overgrow a city, and its negative externalities affect the livability of communities.
References
Acciaro, M. 2015. Corporate responsibility and value creation in the port sector. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications 18 (3): 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2015.1027150.
AIVP. 2019. AIVP 2030 Agenda. Le Havre: AIVP. https://www.aivpagenda2030.com/. Accessed 27 May 2020.
Aregall, M.G., R. Bergqvist, and J. Monios. 2018. A global review of the hinterland dimension of green port strategies. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment 59: 23–34.
Arkema, K.K., R. Griffin, S. Maldonado, J. Silver, J. Suckale, and D. Guerry. 2017. Linking social, ecological, and physical science to advance natural and nature-based protection for coastal communities’. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13322;1399:5-26.
Avent, Ryan. 2016. The wealth of humans: Work, power, and status in the 21st century. New York: St. Martins’ Press.
Bedoya-Maya, F., and A. Calatayud. 2022. Enhanced port-city interface through infrastructure investment: Evidence from Buenos Aires. Maritime Economics Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-022-00231-z.
Bourdieu, P. 1986. The forms of capital. In Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, ed. J. Richardson, 241–258. New York: Greenwood.
Caragliu, A., C. del Bo, and P. Nijkamp. 2011. Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology 18 (2): 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2011.601117.
Chowdhury, M.M.H., and Z. Haque Munim. 2022. Dry port location selection using a fuzzy AHP-BWM-PROMETHEE approach. Maritime Economics Logistics 5: 22. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-022-00230-0.
Coleman, J.S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94: 95–120.
CPCL 2021a. Special Issues: Port city cultures, values, or maritime mindsets: how to define and assess what makes port cities special. European Journal of Creative Practices in Cities and Landscapes. 4: 1–2.
CPCL 2021b. Special Issues: Studying and sha** cultures in port city territories. European Journal of Creative Practices in Cities and Landscapes 4: 1–2.
Cuevas, H., R. Torres Sainas, G. Grosser, J. Felez-Bernal, and J. Budrovich. 2022. Port-city symbiosis and uneven development: A critical essay on forestry exports and maritime trade from Coronel Chile. Maritime Economics Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-022-00246-6.
Daniel, T.C., A. Muhar, A. Arnberger, O. Aznar, J.W. Boyd, K.M.A. Chan, and A. Von Der Dunk. 2012. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (23): 8812–8819. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1114773109.
De Boer, W.P., J.H. Slinger, A.K. Kangeri, H.S.I. Vreugdenhil, P. Taneja, K.A. Addo, and T. Vellinga. 2019. Identifying ecosystem-based alternatives for the design of a seaports marine infrastructure: The case of Tema port expansion in Ghana. Sustainability 11 (23): 6633. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236633.
da Langen, P.W. 2006. Chapter 20 stakeholders, conflicting interests and governance in port clusters. Research in Transportation Economics 17 (06): 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17020-1.
De Langen, P. 2015. Governance in seaport clusters. In Port management, ed. H. Haralambides. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
De Langen, P., and E. Haezendonck. 2012. Ports as clusters of economic activity. In The Blackwell companion to maritime economics, ed. W. Talley, 638–655. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Edvinsson, L. 2006. Aspects on the city as a knowledge tool. Journal of Knowledge Management 10 (5): 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270610691134.
European Commission. 2021. European green deal: Develo** a sustainable blue economy in the European Union, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_2341. Accessed 23 Nov 2022.
Florida, R. 2003. Cities and the creative class. City & Community. 2 (1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6040.00034.
Florida, R. 2011. Cities and the creative class in Asia. City & Community 2: 1–2.
Florida, R., and J. Goodnight. 2005. Managing for creativity. Harvard Business Review 83 (7): 124.
Florida, R., and C. Mellander. 2020. Technology, talent and economic segregation in cities. Applied Geography 116: 102167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102167.
Glaeser, E. 2011. Triumph of the city: How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier and happier. London: Penguin Books.
Guerry, A.D., S. Polasky, J. Lubchenco, R. Chaplin-Kramer, C. Gretchen, D.R. Griffin, M. Ruckelshaus, I.J. Bateman, A. Duraiappah, T. Elmqvist, M.W. Feldman, C. Folke, J. Hoekstra, P.M. Kareiva, B.L. Keeler, S. Li, E. McKenzie, Z. Ouyang, B. Reyers, T.H. Ricketts, J. Rockström, H. Tallis, and B. Vira. 2015. Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (24): 7348–7355. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503751112.
Haezendonck, E., and M. Langenus. 2019. Integrated ports clusters and competitive advantage in an extended resource pool for the Antwerp Seaport. Maritime Policy & Management 46 (1): 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1471535.
Hall, P., and W. Jacobs. 2012. Why are maritime ports (still) urban, and why should policy makers care? Maritime Policy & Management 39 (2): 186–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2011.650721.
Haralambides, H.E. 2017. Globalization, public sector reform, and the role of ports in international supply chains. Maritime Economics & Logistics 19: 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-017-0068-6.
Haralambides, H.E. 2021. Containerization and the port industry. In International encyclopedia of transportation, vol. 5, ed. Roger Vickerman, 545–556. Amsterdam: Elsevier Ltd.
Hayuth, Y. 1982. The port-urban interface: An area in transition. Area 14 (3): 219–224.
Hein, C. 2019. “The Port Cityscape: Spatial and Institutional Approaches to Port City Relationships”. In PORTUSplus 8 (December). https://www.portusplus.org/index.php/pp/article/view/190.
Hein, C., and Van Mil, Y. 2019. Towards a Comparative Spatial Analysis for Port City Regions Based on Historical Geo-Spatial Map**”. In PORTUSplus 8 (November). https://www.portusplus.org/index.php/pp/article/view/189.
Hein, C., and D. Schubert. 2020. Resilience and path dependence: A comparative study of the port cities of London Hamburg, and Philadelphia. Journal of Urban History 47 (2): 389–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144220925098.
Hein, C., Y. Van Mil, and L. Azman-Momirski. 2023. Map** European port city territories: From understanding to design. Rotterdam: Nai010 Publishers.
Horlings, L.G. 2014. “Leadership, governance and knowledge in an enterprising place: The case of Brainport Eindhoven in the Netherlands”, Enterprising places: Leadership and governance networks. Contemporary Issues in Entrepreneurship Research 3: 149–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2040-724620140000003013.
Hoyle, B.S. 2000. Global and local change on the port-city waterfront. Geographical Review 90 (3): 394–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2000.tb00344.x.
Jacobs, J.M. 1969. The economy of cities. New York: Random House.
Jansen, M., A. Brandellero, and R. Van Houwelingen. 2021. Port-city transition: Past and emerging socio-spatial imaginaries and uses in Rotterdam’s makers district. Urban Planning 6 (3): 166–180. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i3.4253.
Jansen, M., R. Van Tulder, and R. Afrianto. 2018. Exploring the conditions for inclusive port development: The case of Indonesia. Maritime Policy & Management 45: 924–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1472824.
Kisida, B., J.P. Greene, and D.H. Bowen. 2014. Creating cultural consumers: The dynamics of cultural capital acquisition. Sociology of Education 87 (4): 281–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040714549076.
Kramer, M.R., and M.W. Pfitzer. 2016. The ecosystem of shared value. Harvard Business Review 94 (10): 80–89.
Kratke, S. 2011. The creative capital of cities: Interactive knowledge creation and the urbanization economies of innovation. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lam, J.S., and E. van de Voorde. 2012. Green port strategy for sustainable growth and development. In Proceedings of the transport logistics for sustainable growth at a new level, ed. T. Yip, X. Fu, and A. Ngasew, 417–427. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
Lareau, A., and B. Elliot. 2003. Cultural capital in educational research: A critical assessment. Theory and Society 32 (5/6): 567–606. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RYSO.0000004951.04408.b0.
Lee, J.T. 2015. Education hubs and talent development : Policymaking and implementation challenges (December 2014). Higher Education 68: 807–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9745-x.
Liu, J., H. Mooney, V. Hull, S.J. Davis, J. Gaskell, T. Hertel, J. Lubchenco, K.C. Seto, P. Gleick, C. Kremen, and S. Li. 2015. Sustainability. Systems integration for global sustainability. Science 347 (6225): 1258832. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258832.
McWilliam, Erica, and Shane Dawson. 2008. Teaching for creativity: Towards sustainable and replicable pedagogical practice. Higher Education. 56 (6): 633–643.
Moeremans, B., M. Dooms, and E. Haezendonck. 2022. Long-term analysis of traffic flows in European inland ports: Implications for the port–city interface. Maritime Economics Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-022-00233-x.
Porter, M.E. 1990. The competitive advantage of nations. London: Macmillan Press.
Porter, M.E., and M.R. Kramer. 2011. Creating shared value. Boston: Harvard Business Review.
Preston, D., and P. Johnson. 2010. Ecological consequences of parasitism. Nature Education Knowledge 3 (10): 47.
Punt, E., J. Monstadt, S. Frank, et al. 2022. Beyond the dikes: An institutional perspective on governing flood resilience at the Port of Rotterdam. Maritime Economics Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-022-00234-w.
Ramos, S. J., Yilmaz, U. 2022. Energy transition and city–port symbiosis in biomass import–export regions. Marit Econ Logist. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-022-00238-6
Rees, W., and M. Wackernagel. 2008. Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable—and why they are a key to sustainability In Urban ecology. Boston: Springer.
Savini, F. 2019. The economy that runs on waste: Accumulation in the circular city. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21 (6): 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1670048.
Song, A.K. 2019. The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem: A critique and reconfiguration. Small Business Economics 53 (3): 569–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00232-y.
Sorensen, A. 2015. Taking path dependence seriously: An historic institutionalist research agenda in planning history. Planning Perspectives 30 (1): 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2013.874299.
Stockholm Resilience Centre. 2019. Reconnect to the biosphere. https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/research-news/2015-02-19-reconnect-to-the-biosphere.html. Accessed 12 Apr 2020.
The International Integrated Reporting Council. 2013. Integrated Reporting. https://www.integratedreporting.org/. Accessed 12 Apr 2020.
Throsby, D. 1999. Cultural capital. Journal of Cultural Economics 23: 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579910283440.
Trist, E. 1977. A concept of organizational ecology. Australian Journal of Management 2 (2): 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/031289627700200205.
United Nations Environment Programme. Ecosystems and biodiversity. https://www.unenvironment.org/explore-topics/ecosystems/about-ecosystems. Accessed 12 Apr 2020.
Van den Berghe, K., E. Louw, F. Pliakis, et al. 2022. When “port-out – city-in” becomes a strategy: is the port–city interface conflict in Amsterdam an observation or a self-fulfilling prophecy? Maritime Economics Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-022-00236-8.
Van Zanten, J., and R. Van Tulder. 2021. Improving companies’ impacts: A nexus approach to companies’ enggement with the SDGs. Organisation and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2835.
Von Glasow, R., T.D. Jickells, A. Baklanov, G.R. Carmichael, T.M. Church, L. Gallardo, and T. Zhu. 2013. Megacities and large urban agglomerations in the coastal zone: Interactions between atmosphere, land, and marine ecosystems. Ambio 42 (1): 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0343-9.
Waterman, R. 2010. Integrated coastal policy via building with nature. Delft: TU Delft.
Witte, P., B. Slack, M. Keesman, J.-H. Jugie, and B. Wiegmans. 2018. Facilitating start-ups in port-city innovation ecosystems: A case study of Montreal and Rotterdam. Journal of Transport Geography 71: 224–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.03.006.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The development of the special issue was led by Carola Hein, while the writing of this introduction builds on a concept developed by Maurice Jansen.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Jansen, M., Hein, C. Port city symbiosis: introduction to the special issue. Marit Econ Logist 25, 211–229 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-023-00257-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-023-00257-x