Log in

Solving non-linear portfolio optimization problems with interval analysis

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

Estimation errors or uncertainities in expected return and risk measures create difficulties for portfolio optimization. The literature deals with the uncertainty using stochastic, fuzzy or probability programming. This paper proposes a new approach to treating uncertainty. By assuming that the expected return and risk vary within a bounded interval, this paper uses interval analysis to extend the classical mean-variance portfolio optimization problem to the cases with bounded uncertainty. To solve the interval quadratic programming problem, the paper adopts order relations to transform the uncertain programme into a deterministic programme, and includes the investors’ risk preference into the model. Numerical analysis illustrates the advantage of this new approach against conventional methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alolyan I (2011). A new method for comparing closed intervals. The Australian Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Application 8 (1): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammar EE (2008). On solutions of fuzzy random multiobjective quadratic programming with applications in portfolio problem. Information Science 178 (2): 468–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aouni B and Torre DL (2010). A generalized stochastic goal programming model. Applied Mathematics and Computation 215 (12): 4347–4357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya R, Kar S and Majumder DD (2011). Fuzzy mean-variance-skewness portfolio selection models by interval analysis. Computers & Mathematics with Application 61 (1): 126–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A and Cooper WW (1959). Chance-constrained programming. Management Science 6 (1): 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinneck JW and Ramadan K (2000). Linear programming with interval coefficients. Journal of Operational Research Society 51 (2): 209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado M, Verdegay JL and Vila MA (1989). A general model for fuzzy linear programming. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 29 (1): 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang Y, Lai KK and Wang SY (2006). Portfolio rebalancing model with transaction costs based on fuzzy decision theory. European Journal of Operational Research 175 (2): 879–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giove S, Funari S and Nardelli C (2006). An interval portfolio problem based on regret function. European Journal of Operational Research 170 (1): 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hladík M (2008). Tolerances in portfolio selection via interval linear programming. In: Rehorova P, Marsikova K and Hubinka Z (eds). CD-ROM Proceedings 26-th Int. Conf. Mathematical Methods in Economics MME08; Liberec, Czech Republic, pp 185–191.

  • Hladík M (2011). Optimal value bounds in nonlinear programming with interval data. TOP 19 (1): 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hladík M (2012). Interval linear programming: A survey. In: Mann ZA (ed). Linear Programming-New Frontiers in Theory and Applications. Nova Science Publishers: New York, pp 85–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang GH and Cao MF (2011). Analysis of solution methods for interval linear programming. Journal of Environmental Informatics 17 (2): 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ida M (2003). Portfolio selection problem with interval coefficients. Applied Mathematics Letters 16 (3): 709–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ida M (2004). Solutions for the portfolio selection problem with interval and fuzzy coefficients. Reliable Computing 10 (5): 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inuiguchi M and Sakawa M (1995). Minimax regret solution to linear programming problems with an interval objective function. European Journal of Operational Research 86 (3): 526–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishibuchi H and Tanaka H (1990). Multiobjective programming in optimization of the interval objective function. European Journal of Operational Research 48 (2): 219–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kall P (1982). Stochastic programming. European Journal of Operational Research 10 (2): 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmakar S and Bhunia AK (2012). A comparative study of different order relations of intervals. Reliable Computing 16: 38–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmakar S and Bhunia AK (2014). Uncertain constrained optimization by interval-oriented algorithm. Journal of the Operational Research Society 65 (1): 73–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karmakar S, Mahato SK and Bhunia AK (2009). Interval oriented multi-section techniques for global optimization. Journal of Computation and Applied Mathematics 224 (2): 476–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai KK, Wang SY, Xu JP, Zhu SS and Fang Y (2002). A class of linear interval programming problems and its application to portfolio selection. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 10 (6): 698–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J and Xu JP (2009). A novel portfolio selection model in a hybrid uncertain environment. Omega 37 (2): 439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W and Tian XL (2008). Numerical solution method for general interval quadratic programming. Applied Mathematics and Computation 202 (2): 589–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ST (2011). The mean-absolute deviation portfolio selection problem with interval-valued returns. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 235 (14): 4149–4157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S-T and Wang R-T (2007). A numerical solution method to interval quadratic programming. Applied Mathematics and Computation 189 (2): 1274–1281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu XW and Da QL (1999). A satisfactory solution for interval number linear programming. Journal of Systems Engineering 14 (2): 123–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu YJ, Zhang WG and Zhang P (2013). A multi-period portfolio optimization model by using interval analysis. Economic Modelling 33: 113–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore RE (1979). Method and Application of Interval Analysis. SIAM: Philadelphia.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ratschek H and Rokne J (1988). New Computer Methods for Global Optimization. Ellis Horwood Ltd.: Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohn J (2006). Interval linear programming. In: Fiedler M, Rohn J, Nedoma J, Ramík J and Zimmermann K (eds). Linear Optimization Problems with Inexact Data. Springer: New York, pp 79–100.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rommelfanger H (1989). Interactive decision making in fuzzy linear optimization problems. European Journal of Operational Research 41 (2): 210–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo L, Bhunia AK and Kapur PK (2012). Genetic algorithm based multi-objective reliability optimization in interval environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering 62 (1): 152–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta A and Pal TK (2000). On comparing interval numbers. European Journal of Operational Research 127 (1): 28–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta A and Pal TK (2009). Fuzzy Preference Ordering of Interval Numbers in Decision Problems. Springer: India.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta A, Pal TK and Chakraborty D (2001). Interpretation of inequality constraints involving interval coefficients and a solution to interval linear programming. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 119 (1): 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Y, Wu F, Chu LK, Sculli D and Xu YH (2010). A portfolio approach to managing procurement risk using multi-stage stochastic programming. Journal of the Operational Research Society 62 (11): 1958–1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong SC (1994). Interval number and fuzzy number linear programmings. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 66 (3): 301–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vajda S (1972). Probabilistic Programming. Academic Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful for support from the No.71272160 and No.71172011 project of National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. NCET-12-0772 Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of Ministry of Education of China and No. FRF-TP-09-022. A project of the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, this paper is finished as expected. We are also grateful to the anonymous referees for their professional comments and suggestions, which have greatly improved upon the earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, X., He, F., Chen, R. et al. Solving non-linear portfolio optimization problems with interval analysis. J Oper Res Soc 66, 885–893 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.31

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.31

Keywords

Navigation