Introduction

Rechargeable Li-ion batteries are representative energy storage systems owing to their high operating voltage and relatively high energy density1,2,3,4,5,6. However, to satisfy the rapidly develo** market for longer-lasting mobile electronic devices and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), much work has been devoted to finding new energy storage systems with higher energy densities than Li-ion batteries7,8,9,10,11,12,13. Among various rechargeable battery systems, rechargeable Li-sulfur (S) batteries have been proposed as an alternative system for Li-ion secondary batteries because of their high theoretical energy density of 1675 mA h g−1 or 3467 mA h cm−3 and appropriate redox potential of ~2.15 V (vs. Li+/Li) by the reaction of S8 + 16Li ↔ 8Li2S14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,Full size image

TeO2→Te (nanocrystalline) + O2 ↑; by HEMM

The mechanical reduction of TeO2 may be related to the high pressure on the order of 6 GPa and temperature above 200°C generated during HEMM. Upon consideration of the simple mechanical reduction of TeO2, we used this mechanical reduction method to produce a Te/C nanocomposite and we subsequently synthesized MR-Te/C nanocomposites. The XRD pattern of the MR-Te/C nanocomposite is shown in Figure 3b. All of the XRD peaks corresponded to Te peaks (JCPDS #36-1452) and no other phases were detected. The TEM bright-field image, the HRTEM images combined with FT patterns and the STEM image with energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) map** of the MR-Te/C nanocomposite show that Te nanocrystallites with sizes of approximately 5–10 nm were well dispersed within the amorphous carbon matrix (Figure 3c). Thus, it can be concluded that the MR-Te/C nanocomposite particles are composed of well-dispersed nanosized (5–10 nm) Te crystallites within the amorphous carbon matrix, as schematically illustrated in Figure 3d.

Electrochemical performances of mechanically reduced Te/C nanocomposite

To evaluate the MR-Te/C nanocomposite as a cathode material for a new Li-Te secondary battery system, the electrochemical properties of the nanocomposite were tested and the results are shown in Figure 4 and S3. The voltage profiles of the Te and MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrodes are shown in Figure 4a (potential vs. volumetric capacity) and S3a (potential vs. gravimetric capacity), respectively. The MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrode showed a discharge potential of 1.7 V (vs. Li+/Li) and the first discharge and charge capacities were 1088 and 740 mA h cm−3 (459 and 312 mA h g−1), respectively, at a current density of 10 mA g−1. The nanocomposite showed an excellent capacity retention of 97.4% of the initial charge capacity after the 10th cycle. However, the voltage profile of the MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrode showed a slight slope compared with those of Te electrode, which was caused by the results of the cooperated electrochemical reactions between nanocrystalline Te and ball-milled amorphous carbon and subreaction between the electrolyte and electrode surface as mentioned above. In Figure S4, the voltage profile of the ball-milled amorphous carbon electrode showed the first discharge and charge capacities of 162 and 87 mA h cm−3 (193 and 103 mA h g−1), respectively, on the condition of the potential range between 1.0 and 3.0 V and current density of 10 mA g−1. The high discharge and charge capacities of the ball-milled carbon were attributed to the degree of disordered structure and morphology and Li diffusion into the inner cores of the fractured carbons37,38,39. The first charge capacity of the ball-milled carbon (34.9 wt%) contributed in the MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrode was approximately 30 mA h cm−3 or 36 mA h g−1. Considering the theoretical capacity of 65.1 wt% Te (273 mA h g−1) and the capacity of 34.9 wt% ball-milled carbon (36 mA h g−1) contributed in the MR-Te/C nanocomposite, Te in the composite electrode was fully reversible with Li, whereas the high initial discharge capacity of MR-Te/C nanocomposite was also correlated with the ball-milled carbon (corresponding to 67 mA h g−1) and the subreaction between the electrolyte and electrode surface.

Figure 4
figure 4

Electrochemical behavior of MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrode.

(a) Voltage profiles of Te (current density: 10 mA g−1) and MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrodes (current density: 10 and 100 mA g−1). (b) Cycling performance of Te, Te/C nanocomposite and MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrodes at a cycling rate of 10 or 100 mA g−1. (c) Voltage profiles at various C rates for Li4Ti5O12 and MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrodes. (d) Plot of the discharge and charge capacity vs. cycle number for the Li4Ti5O12 and MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrodes at various C rates (Li4Ti5O12 - 1C: 190 mA h cm−3, MR-Te/C nanocomposite - 1C: 700 mA h cm−3).

The MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrode showed much better electrochemical performance than the Te and Te/C nanocomposite electrodes. Comparisons of the cycling performance were made for the Te, Te/C and MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrodes in the potential range between 1.0 and 3.0 V. The gravimetric and volumetric capacities of the Te and Te/C nanocomposite electrodes, as shown in Figure 4b and S3b, decreased gradually after a few cycles. The reversible capacity and capacity retention of the MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrode was significantly enhanced as compared to the Te and Te/C nanocomposite electrodes. The MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrode showed a very stable capacities of more than 704 mA h cm−3 or 297 mA h g−1 (current density: 10 mA g−1) and 597 mA h cm−3 or 252 mA h g−1 (current density: 100 mA g−1) over 100 cycles, corresponding to ca. 95% and 96% of the initial charge capacities, respectively. Additionally, the average Coulombic efficiency per cycle of the MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrode is above 99.5%. The size of the Te crystallites of the MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrode after various cycling was also analyzed using HRTEM. The HRTEM results of the samples obtained after the 10th and 50th cycles are shown in Figure S5a and b, respectively. The HRTEM images combined with FT patterns reveal the presence of the Te phase, whose crystallite size is approximately 5–10 nm after the 10th cycle and the Te crystallites still remained 5–10 nm in size upon further cycling, even after 50 cycles. These results show that the Te nanocrystallites within the MR-Te/C nanocomposite do not agglomerate during cycling. The excellent cycling behaviour of the MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrode was attributed to the uniform distribution of 5–10-nm-sized Te crystallites within the amorphous carbon buffering matrix, which alleviated the effect of the volume expansion on the active materials, as illustrated in Figure 3d. On the basis of the results, the MR-Te/C nanocomposite can provide a new cathode material for Li-Te secondary batteries owing to its reduction potential of 1.7 V (vs. Li+/Li) and excellent cycling behavior.

The rate capability test of the MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrode was also conducted in the potential range between 1.0 and 3.0 V. The results are shown in Figure 4c (potential vs. volumetric capacity) and 4d (volumetric capacity vs. cycle number) and in Figure S3c (potential vs. gravimetric capacity) and S3d (gravimetric capacity vs. cycle number). The figures show the cyclability of the MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrode as a function of the C rate, where C is defined as the full use of the restricted charge capacity of 700 mA h cm−3 in 1 h. At rates of 2C and 5C, the MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrode showed very high charge capacities of 590 and 550 mA h cm−3, respectively, corresponding to ca. 79% and 75% of the charge capacity for the rate at 0.1C with stable cycling behavior. The rate capability of the MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrode was excellent, with a higher capacity than that of commercially available Li4Ti5O12 anodes for Li-ion batteries. The fast rate capability of the MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrode is ascribed to the presence of the ca. 5–10-nm-sized mechanically reduced nanocrystalline Te within the amorphous carbon matrix, which contributed to short Li diffusion paths. Additionally, the better electrical conductivity of Te than S and Se contributed to the fast rate capability. Considering the excellent rate capability and high volumetric capacity with a reduction potential of ca. 1.7 V (vs. Li+/Li) of the MR-Te/C nanocomposite electrode, it can be utilized as either the cathode in Li-Te secondary batteries or a high-potential anode in rechargeable Li-ion batteries.