Introduction

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a serious clinical problem, because established treatments for it are currently limited. Although administration of a high dose of methylprednisolone is an established clinical therapy for SCI, it is no longer widely used due to its limited efficacy and significant side effects.1 On the other hand, there are many recent basic research studies and ongoing clinical trials concerning novel therapies for SCI.2 However, it is often difficult to determine the baseline severity of the injury due to the unstable conditions of patients, including the phenomenon of spinal shock in the acute phase. This is an obstacle to the development of new treatments for SCI during the acute phase. To assess the efficacy of novel therapies for SCI, monitoring methods for confirming the therapeutic effects are necessary.3

Based on their potential in modulating signaling not only within cells but also between cells, recent discoveries of extracellular and circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) have focused on their use as novel biomarkers.4 Profiling of circulating miRNAs has been used in a number of studies to identify novel minimally invasive biomarkers associated with cancer development and progression.5 Another important feature is that circulating miRNAs are stabilized by containing them within microvesicles that are small enough to pass through the blood–spinal cord barrier.6 In this study, we evaluated the expression of miRNAs in the serum of mice after SCI and identified candidates for novel biomarkers to evaluate the severity of SCI during the acute phase.

Materials and methods

Animals

All of the experimental research protocols were reviewed and approved by the Hiroshima University ethical committee, and all experiments were performed according to an institutionally approved protocol in accordance with the National Institute of Health Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Female C57BL/6 mice, approximately 10 weeks of age, were used.

Surgical procedure

Mice were anesthetized via sustained inhalation of 2% isoflurane in 1.5 l min−1 air. Laminectomy was carried out at the tenth thoracic spinal vertebrae. A contusive SCI was induced using the Infinite Horizon impactor (Precision Systems and Instrumentation, Lexington, KY, USA). The mice were then divided into four groups: normal (without surgery), sham (laminectomy only), mild (50 kdyn compressing power), and severe (70 kdyn compressing power).

Behavioral testing

The recovery of hindlimb motor function was assessed using the Basso Mouse Scale.7 Mice in all the groups were assessed at 3, 12 and 24 h and at 3, 5, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 days after injury (n=8 in each group).

Sample collection

We collected blood samples and spinal cord tissue samples from all the four groups. Mice were killed, and blood samples (0.6–1.0 ml) were collected from the heart at 3, 12 and 24 h and at 3 and 7 days after injury. To harvest cell-free serum, blood was drawn into a sterile tube without anticoagulant. After standing upright at 37 °C for 60 min, samples were centrifuged at 2500 g for 30 min at 4 °C; the supernatant serum was then removed and centrifuged again at 2900 g for 10 min. The supernatant was then quickly removed and stored immediately at −80 °C until further testing. After harvesting the blood, mice were transcardially perfused with 10 ml sterile RNase-free phosphate-buffered saline. Five-mm-long sections of the injured spinal cord were rapidly isolated, placed on ice and processed immediately for RNA isolation.

RNA isolation

Total RNA was isolated from 200 μl of serum blood using the mirVana PARIS kit (Ambion, Foster City, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions for liquid samples. Caenorhabditis elegans spiked-in oligonucleotides (cel-miR-39) were introduced after denaturation for normalization of variability in RNA isolation across samples.8 Total RNA was extracted from spinal cords using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

TaqMan low-density array for miRNA

In the screening phase, we performed TaqMan low-density array analyses (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) to identify differentially expressed miRNAs in the serum samples of the normal, sham, mild and severe groups (n=1 in each group). A middle-throughput screening of serum miRNAs was performed using TaqMan Array Rodent MicroRNA Cards (Card A v2.0 and Card B v3.0). A spiked-in control (ath-miR159) was used as an internal control for normalization.

Real-time PCR analysis

The expression levels of miRNAs in the serum and spinal cord tissues were assessed by real-time PCR analysis (n=8 in each group). Cel-miR-39 in the serum and snoRNA-202 in the spinal cord tissue were used as internal controls for normalization. The primer and TaqMan probe sequences are shown in Supplementary Table S1. The expression levels of individual miRNAs in each group were calculated relative to their mean expression level in the normal group.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance and Bonferroni post hoc comparisons for behavioral testing. The values of Basso Mouse Scale are presented as mean±s.e. One-way analysis of variance followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison tests were used to compare the expression levels of miRNAs in real-time PCR analyses. These values are presented as mean±s.d. For all analyses, statistical significance was set at <5%.

Results

Behavioral assessment

Sham and normal groups showed no motor function deficits (Basso Mouse Scale score 9), indicating that these groups were unaffected by the procedure, whereas all mice in the mild and severe groups were completely paralyzed 3 h after SCI. A significant improvement was seen in the mild group compared with the severe group beginning 12 h after SCI (Figure 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Assessment of functional recovery following SCI (n=8). A time course of functional recovery of hindlimbs assessed using the Basso Mouse Scale (BMS). The mild SCI group (50 kdyn) showed significant improvements in their BMS scores compared with the severe group (70 kdyn) beginning at 12 h after SCI. All values are means±s.e. (n=8 per group). *Significantly different from the 70 kdyn, P<0.05.

Changes in miRNA expression levels

To identify miRNAs whose expression levels were specifically correlated with the severity of SCI, we first selected miRNAs that had high expression levels in the following order: severe group, mild group, and sham group (Figure 2). Of these, miR-9*, miR-219 and miR-384-5p were considered to be acceptable candidates for potential diagnostic biomarkers, because there were marked differences in the expression levels of these miRNAs between the mild and severe groups, and their expression levels in the sham group were similar to those in the normal group.

Figure 2
figure 2

Results of the TaqMan low-density array analysis (TLDA) for miRNAs at 12 h after SCI. The miRNAs displayed showed increased expression levels relative to the severity of the SCI. MiR-9*, miR-219 and miR-384-5p were further selected from the displayed genes as candidates for biomarkers, because their expression levels in the sham group were similar to those in the normal group.

The time courses of the expression levels of miR-9*, miR-219, and miR-384-5p in the serum and spinal cord tissues were then assessed by the real-time PCR. In the serum samples (Figure 3), the expression levels of miR-9*, miR-219 and miR-384-5p in the mild and severe SCI groups were increased, whereas those in the normal and sham groups did not change over time. The levels of miR-9* and miR-384-5p expression peaked at 3 h after SCI and that of miR-219 peaked at 12 h after SCI. The expression levels of all three miRNAs were significantly increased relative to the degree of injury at 12 h after SCI, those of miR-9* and miR-384-5p also at 3 h and those of miR-9* and miR-219 also at 24 h. On the other hand, there were no significant differences in the expression levels of miR-9*, miR-219 and miR-384-5p between the normal and sham groups at any time point.

Figure 3
figure 3

Real-time PCR analysis of the expression levels of miR-9*, miR-219 and miR-384-5p in serum samples from mice in the normal, sham, mild (50 kdyn) and severe (70 kdyn) groups over time following the SCI. All values are means±s.d. (n=8 per group). *Significantly greater than the sham groups, significantly greater than the 50 kdyn group, P<0.05.

In the spinal cord tissues (Figure 4), the expression levels of miR-9*, miR-219 and miR-384-5p in the mice with SCI peaked at 12 h following the injury and were significantly higher than those in the sham group at this time. However, there were no significant differences in the expression levels of these miRNAs between the mild and the severe groups at any time point.

Figure 4
figure 4

Real-time PCR analysis of the expression of miR-9*, miR-219 and miR-384-5p in spinal cord tissues. All values are means±s.d. (n=8 per group). *Significantly greater than the sham group, significantly greater than the 70 kdyn group, P<0.05.

The expression levels of miR-146a-5p and miR-155, which were reported to be closely related to inflammation, were also examined to assess the expression pattern of inflammation-related miRNAs in the serum following SCI.9 The expression levels of miR-146a-5p and miR-155 in the sham, mild and severe groups were increased compared with those in the normal group at 3 and 12 h after SCI; however, in contrast to those of miR-9*, miR-219 and miR-384-5p, these increases were not related to the severity of SCI (Figure 5).

Figure 5
figure 5

Real-time PCR analysis of the expression in serum of miR-146a-5p and miR-155, both of which were reported to have a close relation to inflammation. All values are means±s.d. (n=8 per group). *Significantly greater than the sham group, **significantly greater than the normal group, significantly greater than the 50 kdyn group, significantly greater than the 70 kdyn group, P<0.05.

Discussion

In the present study, we identified three serum miRNAs, miR-9*, miR-219 and miR-384-5p, as promising biomarkers for evaluating the severity of SCI in the acute phase. The expression levels of all three miRNAs were increased relative to the severity of SCI within 12 h after injury.

In previous studies, neurostructural proteins, including neurofilaments, neuron-specific enolase and S100β, were reported to be serum biomarkers for SCI.10, 11, 12 Neuron-specific enolase and S100β might be suitable for early diagnosis, because their expression peaked 6 h after SCI. However, the sensitivity of these proteins to predict the severity of SCI varied by reports, and one of them did not show a significant difference relative to the severity of SCI.11 On the other hand, the phosphorylated form of the high-molecular-weight neurofilament subunit (pNF-H) in serum was recently reported to be a promising biomarker for evaluating the severity of SCI. Serum pNF-H was reported to increase in patients with SCI. The serum pNF-H values of patients with complete SCI, classified as American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale (AIS) A, were markedly higher than those of patients with incomplete SCI (AIS C, D and E). However, there was no significant difference in serum pNF-H levels between AIS C and D patients. Therefore, pNF-H can be applied only to distinguish complete SCI from incomplete SCI. Additionally, it takes >18 h to determine the severity of SCI using serum pNF-H,10 and acute-phase treatments for SCI might require them to be started earlier. For example, methylprednisolone needs to be administrated within 8 h of SCI.13 It is therefore desirable to identify novel sensitive biomarkers that enable earlier diagnosis of the severity of SCI. MiRNAs are thought to have high value as biomarkers due to the highly sensitive PCR detection methods and their low complexity compared with protein biomarkers.14 In the current study, the expression levels of miR-9*, miR-219 and miR-384-5p all detected a difference in the severity of SCI at 12 h after SCI. Additionally, the expression of miR-9* was also increased relative to SCI severity at 3 and 24 h after SCI. Therefore, these miRNAs might enable us to predict the severity of SCI earlier than pNF-H. However, it is unclear whether the kinetics of these miRNAs are similar in mice and humans. The expression levels of these miRNAs in clinical serum samples should be examined in the next step.

Previously, Redell et al.15 reported that plasma levels of miR-92a and miR-16 in severe traumatic brain injury were significantly increased within the first 24 h compared with healthy volunteers. However, the result of TaqMan low-density array in our present study showed negative association between the expression level of miR-92a and miR-16 and the severity of SCI. On the other hand, Liu et al.16 performed miRNA microarray assay using spinal cord tissues of SD rats and described several miRNAs as targets for therapeutic interventions. Our previous study also reported a marked change of expression levels of mir-124a and mir-223 in spinal cord tissue of mice following SCI.17 However, the expression levels of serum miRNAs were not reported in these previous reports. Additionally, the expression levels of these miRNAs in the serum were not specifically associated with the severity of SCI in miRNA microarray assay in the present study. Therefore, the present study is the first report of the serum miRNAs as biomarkers for the severity of SCI.

We cannot say whether serum miR-9*, miR-219 and miR-384-5p were derived from the injured spinal cord. At least, the increases in these miRNAs in the serum did not reflect their upregulation in spinal cord tissue. Because the levels of total RNA in the spinal cord tissues were higher than that in the serum, the absolute amount of miRNA, including miR-9*, miR-219 and miR-384-5p, in the spinal cord tissues must be much larger than that in the serum. This large difference in the absolute amount of miRNA between spinal cord tissues and serum might be related to the discrepancy in the expression levels of miR-9*, miR-219 and miR-384-5p between spinal cord tissues and serum (for example, minimal changes in the expression levels of these miRNAs in spinal cord tissues might have large effects on their expression levels in serum). However, previous studies showed that miR-9 and miR-219 were detected in oligodendrocyte lineage cells and had an important role in oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelin maintenance.18, 19, 20 Therefore, increases in serum miR-9* and miR-219 might be associated with the release of these miRNAs into the circulation resulting from the destruction of myelin in the spinal cord. On the other hand, it is difficult to discuss the origin of miR-384-5p, because little is known about its tissue-specific expression or function. In the present study, the expression levels of these serum miRNAs were unaffected by the skeletal muscle and bone injuries associated with laminectomy. Furthermore, the expression patterns of these serum miRNAs were quite different from those of inflammation-related miRNAs in the serum. These findings suggest that increases in these miRNAs were at least specifically linked to the severity of SCI. These miRNAs may also be useful as a diagnostic tool in the patient with acute SCI who is unconscious or who cannot be immediately examined neurologically. Although further studies in clinical trials are needed to provide credible evidence, miR-9*, miR-219 and miR-384-5p are promising candidates for biomarkers of SCI.

Data archiving

There were no data to deposit.