Introduction

Despite improvements in conventional chemotherapy regimens for the management of aggressive B-cell cancers, including acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), chemotherapy resistance and cancer relapse pose a serious problem, often resulting in poor survival outcomes1,2. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies have revolutionized the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell cancers by inhibiting B-lymphocyte surface antigen B4 (CD19), which is expressed in all B cell lineages3,4. Unlike conventional therapies, CAR-T therapy consists of T cells that are engineered to incorporate a synthetic receptor, which can recognize and eliminate cancer cells expressing a target antigen5,6. Unfortunately, not all patients are eligible for CAR-T therapy, and this treatment strategy can often result in a poor response due to various factors, such as the overexpression of inhibitory checkpoint molecules (e.g., PD-1) in immune cells4,7,8. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that block PD-1 can help prevent CAR-T cell exhaustion and thus improve the effectiveness of CAR-T therapy 9. However, ICIs are cardiotoxic10, whereby even short-term treatment of ICIs could result in a proinflammatory cytokine storm and increased production of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) in myocardial tissues, with increased myocardial expression of MyD88 and NLRP3 promoting fibrosis, hypertrophy, and myocardial inflammation11. Bispecific T-cell engagers are antibodies that can simultaneously bind to both T cells (e.g., via CD3) and tumor antigens (e.g., CD19), thereby directly promoting the T-cell killing of tumor cells that is independent of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) expression12,13,14. While these novel treatments offer promising venues for the treatment of hematological malignancies, they may have adverse cardiovascular events that could potentially hinder their use.

The most common and life-threatening toxicity of CAR-T therapy is cytokine release syndrome (CRS), which is characterized by elevated cytokine and inflammatory markers, including interleukin-6 (IL-6)15. CRS consists of a collection of adverse events that include fever, hypotension, tachycardia, and hypoxemia16,17. The severity of CRS is described by a grading scale, with hypotension being a characteristic symptom for CRS of Grades 2 and higher17,18,19. A 2019 registry study found patients with Grade 2 CRS with troponin elevation developed significantly increased risk for future cardiovascular events, including decompensated heart failure and new arrhythmic events20. While corticosteroids and tocilizumab, which is an IL-6 receptor antagonist, are used regularly to mitigate CRS symptoms, patients with severe CRS symptoms require intensive care treatment and cessation of CAR-T therapy21,22. Unfortunately, there is limited information concerning the onset, severity and overall outcomes of adverse cardiovascular events associated with CAR-T therapy and bispecific T-cell engagers, especially when controlled for the cancers treated. Considering that CAR-T therapy and bispecific T-cell engagers use different drug delivery approaches that redirect T cells to target B-cell surface antigens, a comparative approach using real-world pharmacovigilance databases would offer detailed insights concerning the cardiovascular side-effect profiles of CRS.

In this real-world study, we use a global, retrospective World Health Organization (WHO) database to compare the cardiovascular safety profiles between CAR-T therapy and bispecific T-cell engagers. We find that in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, tisagenlecleucel is associated with severe adverse cardiac events, including cardiac failure, compared to axicabtagene ciloleucel. In pediatric patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia, we find that tisagenlecleucel is associated with highly fatal cardiac failure and cardiac arrest, both adverse events that are not associated with blinatumomab. Recognition of these life-threatening cardiovascular side effects will help physicians to identify patients at increased risk of complications and facilitate prompt clinical management.

Methods

Data source and processing

VigiBase is a global, deduplicated WHO database that contains over 30 million Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) from November 14, 1967 to January 26, 2022 and is maintained by the Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC)23. Over 130 member countries in the WHO Program for International Drug Monitoring (WHO PIDM) collect and share ICSRs electronically with VigiBase. Each ICSR contains information about patient demographics, indications, adverse reactions, seriousness of side effects, fatality, and time to onset23. We uploaded the data from VigiBase into DB Browser for SQLite version 3.12.2 and processed using in-house Structured Query Language (SQL) programming. We then extracted relevant tables as comma-separated values files for further analysis. The Roswell Park Institutional Review Board exempted this study from review given the deidentified nature of VigiBase data. Since the dataset is publicly available with access maintained by the UMC, informed consent was not required.

Immunotherapies investigated and adverse drug reactions

The medication categories investigated in this study are six CAR-T therapies (tisagenlecleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel, brexucabtagene autoleucel, lisocabtagene maraleucel, idecabtagene vicleucel, ciltacabtagene autoleucel), and one bispecific T-cell engager (blinatumomab) (Supplementary Table 1). The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terminology is the international medical terminology developed under the auspices of the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). MedDRA offers a standardized approach to classify adverse reactions associated with the use of medications using a multiaxial hierarchy model24. Therefore, we performed SQL programming to search for ICSRs containing adverse reactions listed under the MedDRA version 24.1 system organ classes of cardiac disorders, vascular disorders, and investigations.

Information component analyses

Researchers at the UMC utilized a Bayesian confidence propagation neural network in conjunction with principles from information theory to derive the information component (IC), which is a statistic used to detect significant adverse reactions for a given category of medications25. The UMC researchers provided an approximation formula that can accurately calculate the information component, as illustrated below (Eq. 1)26:

$${IC}={\log }_{2}\left(\frac{{N}_{{AD}}+0.5}{{N}_{E}+0.5}\right),{{{{{\rm{where}}}}}}\, {N}_{E}=\frac{{N}_{A}{N}_{D}}{{N}_{{total}}}$$
(1)

Where NAD is the observed number of reports in VigiBase for a given drug-adverse reaction pair, NE is the expected number of reports for a given drug-reaction pair, NA is the number of reports for a given adverse reaction, ND is the number of reports for a given drug, and Ntotal is the total number of reports in VigiBase. The IC025 represents that lower bound of the 95% credibility interval for IC, where an IC025 greater than 0 suggests a statistically significant adverse reaction signal for a given drug26. Information components were calculated to evaluate the strengths of adverse reaction signals for CAR-T therapies. However, ICs can only be used to compare a drug-adverse reaction pair against the entire database.

Statistical analyses

To compare the strengths of reports between two drug categories for a given adverse reaction, reporting odds ratios (RORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by constructing 2 × 2 contingency tables (Supplementary Table 2), while Pearson’s chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test were used to examine statistical significance as appropriate. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant for all statistical analyses. Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel (16.47.1, 21032301) and SAS v9.4 (Cary, NC).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Results

Characterization of CAR-T therapy safety reports

Based on the records obtained up to January 26, 2022, a total of 30,039,123 Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) were reported in VigiBase. These ICSRs were filtered into 5,576 reports containing CAR-T therapy for all adverse reactions, and these reports were then subdivided by CAR-T cell product used, which included tisagenlecleucel (ND = 2,233), axicabtagene ciloleucel (ND = 3,035), brexucabtagene autoleucel (ND = 170), lisocabtagene maraleucel (ND = 82), idecabtagene vicleucel (ND = 54), and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (ND = 2), for all adverse reactions. After filtering for cardiac, investigational, and vascular adverse reactions, the number of reports obtained from clinical studies was reduced to n = 667 for tisagenlecleucel, n = 101 for axicabtagene ciloleucel, and n = 7 for brexucabtagene autoleucel, n = 2 for lisocabtagene maraleucel, n = 3 for idecabtagene vicleucel, and n = 1 for ciltacabtagene autoleucel. A flowchart describing this process is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1: Flowchart illustrating the filtering of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs).
figure 1

After obtaining all CAR-T therapy ICSRs from VigiBase, the reports were filtered for tisagenlecleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel, and brexucabtagene autoleucel for all cardiac, vascular, and investigational adverse reactions. These ICSRs were subsequently filtered by cancer indications consisting of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

Full size image

Given the heterogeneity of ICSRs reported to VigiBase, the ICSRs were categorized based on whether reporting was spontaneous (i.e., voluntary) or derived from clinical studies (Fig. 2). Of the 382 CAR-T ICSRs for all cardiac reactions, 130 ICSRs (34.0%) were reports from clinical study, while 252 reports (66.0%) were spontaneous. In contrast, 672 (67.0%) of the 1,003 CAR-T ICSRs for all investigational reactions were reports from clinical study, while 330 ICSRs (32.9%) were spontaneous with 1 report (0.1%) marked as other. For the 564 CAR-T ICSRs for all vascular reactions, 265 (47.0%) were reports from clinical study and 299 ICSRs (53.0%) were spontaneous.

Fig. 2: Distribution of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) by report type.
figure 2

ICSRs for CAR-T therapy were categorized by report type documented in VigiBase for (a) cardiac, (b) investigational, and (c) vascular adverse reactions from 2018 to 2022.

Full size image

CAR-T therapy is associated with arrhythmic and systemic inflammatory adverse reactions

Information components (ICs) were calculated for CAR-T therapy for a series of adverse cardiovascular and inflammatory reactions, with IC025 > 0 suggesting a statistically significant reaction signal. Apart from QT prolongation, CAR-T therapy was associated with most arrhythmic events, including atrial fibrillation and cardiac arrest (Table 1). CAR-T therapy was also associated with cardiomyopathy-related events, including stress cardiomyopathy, decreased ejection fraction, and cardiogenic shock. While no reports of cardiac tamponade were observed in VigiBase, pericardial effusion, increased C-reactive protein, capillary leak syndrome, hypotension, and sinus tachycardia were significant signals for CAR-T therapy. Of the six CAR-T therapies studied, only tisagenlecleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel, and brexucabtagene autoleucel had significant signals for the investigated cardiovascular adverse reactions (Supplementary Tables 3–8).

Table 1 Information components (IC) calculated for CAR-T therapy (ND = 5,576) for the given adverse reactions
Full size table

The ICSRs for each of the 13 significant reactions for CAR-T therapy were filtered by the cancer indication that necessitated CAR-T treatment. The three most reported indications were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; N = 391), acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL; N = 289), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL; N = 21). DLBCL was the most reported indication for ICSRs containing CAR-T therapy and adverse reactions related to arrhythmias and cardiomyopathies, while ALL was the most reported indication for pericardial effusion and capillary leak syndrome (Table 2).

Table 2 Distribution of CAR-T therapy-treated individual case safety reports (ICSRs) by cancer indication for each statistically significant adverse reaction signal
Full size table

Higher fatality rates of hypotension observed in tisagenlecleucel compared to axicabtagene ciloleucel in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel are indicated for the treatment of relapsed/refractory DLBCL27,28,29. In VigiBase, there were 17,479 reports containing the DLBCL indication, which were filtered to 237 clinical study reports for tisagenlecleucel and 42 clinical study reports for axicabtagene ciloleucel for all cardiovascular and investigational adverse reactions. Reports from clinical study were used to mitigate the bias involved from voluntary reporting of severe adverse events. Tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel shared eight significant reactions in common, which included increased C-reactive protein, pericardial effusion, tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, cardiac arrest, hypotension, sinus tachycardia, and decreased ejection fraction (Supplementary Tables 3, 4). Tisagenlecleucel was uniquely associated with capillary leak syndrome and cardiac failure, while axicabtagene ciloleucel was uniquely associated with atrial flutter, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, and stress cardiomyopathy.

Although axicabtagene ciloleucel had significantly greater reporting odds ratios (RORs) for hypotension than tisagenlecleucel in DLBCL patients (ROR: 2.54; 95% CI: 1.28–5.03; p = 0.012; NAD (axicabtagene ciloleucel) = 18, NAD (tisagenlecleucel) = 54), tisagenlecleucel had a significantly higher fatality rate for hypotension (50.0%) than axicabtagene ciloleucel (5.6%, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3 and Table 3). Additionally, tisagenlecleucel was associated with cardiac failure (IC025 = 0.366), with an 85.7% fatality rate. Axicabtagene ciloleucel and tisagenlecleucel had similar reporting for atrial fibrillation in DLBCL patients (ROR: 2.20; 95% CI: 0.56–8.66; p = 0.22; NAD (axicabtagene ciloleucel) = 3, NAD (tisagenlecleucel) = 8), with no significant difference in fatality rates [50.0% (tisagenlecleucel) vs 33.3% (axicabtagene ciloleucel); p = 1.00]. Of the 11 DLBCL CAR-T patients reporting atrial fibrillation, 7 patients (63.6%) were treated with cyclophosphamide/fludarabine combination (Supplementary Table 9).

Fig. 3: Comparison of CAR-T Cardiotoxicities for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL).
figure 3

Reporting odds ratios were compared for significant adverse reactions between tisagenlecleucel (N = 237 reports) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (N = 42 reports) for DLBCL patients. Significant adverse reactions include atrial fibrillation (n = 8 reports [tisagenlecleucel] and n = 3 reports [axicabtagene ciloleucel]), tachycardia (n = 12 reports [tisagenlecleucel] and n = 3 reports [axicabtagene ciloleucel]), cardiac arrest (n = 1 reports [tisagenlecleucel] and n = 1 reports [axicabtagene ciloleucel]), and hypotension (n = 54 reports [tisagenlecleucel] and n = 18 reports [axicabtagene ciloleucel]). Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals.

Full size image
Table 3 Case-seriousness rates calculated for cardiovascular and inflammatory adverse events associated with the CAR-T therapies of tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients
Full size table

Tisagenlecleucel is associated with fatal cardiac arrest and cardiac failure in pediatric acute lymphocytic leukemia

Tisagenlecleucel, brexucabtagene autoleucel, and blinatumomab are indicated for the treatment of relapsed/refractory ALL30,31,32. There were 28,803 reports in VigiBase containing the ALL indication, which were filtered to 354 clinical study reports for tisagenlecleucel, 230 clinical study reports for blinatumomab, and 2 clinical study reports for brexucabtagene autoleucel ICSRs for all cardiovascular and investigational adverse reactions. Blinatumomab shared six significant reactions in common with tisagenlecleucel, which included increased C-reactive protein, capillary leak syndrome, pericardial effusion, tachycardia, hypotension, and sinus tachycardia (Table 4 and Supplementary Table 3). Brexucabtagene autoleucel was associated with tachycardia and hypotension (Supplementary Table 5).

Table 4 Information components (IC) calculated for blinatumomab (ND = 4808) for the given adverse reactions
Full size table

Tisagenlecleucel is indicated for the treatment of relapsed/refractory ALL in pediatric patients30. Blinatumomab, while commonly used for treating relapsed/refractory ALL in adult patients, is also indicated for treatment of pediatric relapsed/refractory ALL33,34. Consequently, safety reports from clinical studies were compared between tisagenlecleucel and blinatumomab for patients aged 17 or younger, resulting in 219 safety reports for tisagenlecleucel and 28 safety reports for blinatumomab for all cardiovascular and investigational adverse reactions.

While blinatumomab had significantly higher reporting for pericardial effusion compared to tisagenlecleucel (ROR: 8.64; 95% CI: 1.65–45.12; p = 0.021; NAD (tisagenlecleucel) = 3, NAD (blinatumomab) = 3), the fatality rates were not significantly different [100% (tisagenlecleucel) vs 66.7% (blinatumomab); p = 1.00] (Fig. 4 and Table 5). Additionally, tisagenlecleucel-associated cardiac arrest and cardiac failure had high fatality rates of 100% and 80.0% respectively. Blinatumomab and tisagenlecleucel had similar reporting for hypotension (ROR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.16–1.22; p = 0.13; NAD (tisagenlecleucel) = 72, NAD (blinatumomab) = 5) as well as similar fatality rates [34.7% (tisagenlecleucel) vs 20.0% (blinatumomab); p = 0.66] in pediatric ALL patients. Similarly, tisagenlecleucel and blinatumomab had comparable fatality rates for tachycardia [47.1% (tisagenlecleucel) vs 50.0% (blinatumomab); p = 1.00]. Of the 72 pediatric ALL patients treated with tisagenlecleucel who reported having hypotension, about 83.3% were treated with cyclophosphamide/fludarabine combination (Supplementary Data 1).

Fig. 4: Cardiovascular toxicity comparisons for immunotherapies targeting Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL).
figure 4

Reporting odds ratios were compared for significant adverse reactions between tisagenlecleucel (N = 219 reports) and blinatumomab (N = 28 reports) for pediatric ALL patients (aged 17 or younger). Significant adverse reactions include tachycardia (n = 17 reports [tisagenlecleucel] and n = 2 reports [blinatumomab]), sinus tachycardia (n = 5 reports [tisagenlecleucel] and n = 2 reports [blinatumomab]), pericardial effusion (n = 3 reports [tisagenlecleucel] and n = 3 reports [blinatumomab]), and hypotension (n = 72 reports [tisagenlecleucel] and n = 5 reports [blinatumomab]). Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals.

Full size image
Table 5 Case-seriousness rates calculated for cardiovascular and inflammatory adverse events associated with tisagenlecleucel and blinatumomab for acute lymphocytic leukemia patients (aged 17 years or younger in both drug categories)
Full size table

Discussion

CAR-T therapy has found applications in the treatment of numerous cancers, including ALL, DLBCL, MCL, and multiple myeloma35,36,37. Indeed, our study highlighted that DLBCL, ALL, and MCL were the three most reported indications for CAR-T therapy in VigiBase, and the two multiple myeloma CAR-T reports for cardiogenic shock and hypotension corresponded to the medications of ciltacabtagene autoleucel and idecabtagene vicleucel, respectively. Unfortunately, the immense benefits of CAR-T therapy might be dampened by the serious drawbacks resulting from cytokine release syndrome, which can present a complex cardiovascular toxicity profile17. Information component analyses in our study showed that CAR-T therapy was associated with serious arrhythmias, including atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, and cardiac arrest, as well as cardiomyopathy-related events, including decreased ejection fraction and stress cardiomyopathy. As such, our study, which was based on safety data from six CAR-T cell products, provides further support to recent studies that investigated the cardiovascular toxicity profiles of CAR-T therapy38,39,40,41.

A key highlight of our study is the cancer-specific comparison of cardiovascular toxicity profiles between CAR-T cell products, as well as between CAR-T therapy and bispecific T-cell engagers. Salem et al. and Goldman et al. performed pharmacovigilance analyses using VigiBase and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to illustrate that tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel were associated with pericardial disorders and tachyarrhythmias, with Goldman et al. further showing that axicabtagene ciloleucel was associated with venous thromboembolic events38,39. Tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel are both CD19-targeted CAR-T cell products approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory DLBCL27,28,29, and hence comparisons between the two CAR-T cell products in our study were restricted specifically to the DLBCL patient population. Unlike the other CAR-T cell products and the overall CAR-T category, tisagenlecleucel was uniquely associated with cardiac failure, with an 85.7% fatality rate in DLBCL patients. Additionally, tisagenlecleucel had a significantly higher fatality rate of 50.0% for hypotension compared to 5.6% for axicabtagene ciloleucel, even though axicabtagene ciloleucel had significantly greater reporting for hypotension. As hypotension is a characteristic symptom for Grade 2 and higher CRS according to the ASTCT Consensus Grading18, tisagenlecleucel seemed to be associated with a more severe and fatal form of CRS compared to axicabtagene ciloleucel in DLBCL patients, thereby potentially highlighting differences in CRS manifestations between CAR-T cell products.

CRS is characterized by increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-6 and IFN-γ15,18,42. Based on the current understanding of CRS mechanisms, CAR-T cells first recognize tumor antigens and then release large amounts of cytokines, perforin and granzymes, leading to a significant release of gasdermin and resulting in tumor pyroptosis, which is a proinflammatory form of programmed cell death mediated by gasdermin42,43,44,45. Pyroptotic tumor cells can release large amounts of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which include double-stranded DNA, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), resulting in the activation of macrophages42,43,46. ATP can lead to the formation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and maturation of caspase 1 in macrophages, with caspase 1 converting gasdermin D into its active form and leading to pyroptosis in macrophages42,46. Pyroptotic macrophages in turn produce large amounts of DAMPs, resulting in the activation of even more macrophages42,46. Meanwhile, HMGB1 binds to TLR2 and TLR4 found on surface of macrophages, which leads to adaptor proteins MyD88 and TRIF activating mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and IκB kinase (IKK) that in turn regulate the release of cytokines, including IL-642,43,46. The release of cytokines from macrophages and CAR-T cells can injure endothelial cells and contribute to edema, coagulopathy, and increased vascular permeability and leakage42,47.

DAMPs play a similar role in the cardiotoxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), whereby short-term ICI therapy is associated with a proinflammatory cytokine storm and increased myocardial expression of MyD88 and NLRP3, resulting in increased myocardial and vascular inflammation11. Mechanistically, a deficiency in PD-1/PD-L1 is linked to higher levels of pro-atherosclerotic cytokines, IFN-γ and TNF-α, with increased numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells present in atherosclerotic lesions48,49,50. Similarly, blocking the CD28-CD80/86 co-stimulatory T-cell activation with abatacept, which is a CTLA-4Ig fusion protein, prevented CD4+ T cell activation and reduced the accelerated development of atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic ApoE3*Leiden mice48,51. However, these mechanistic studies are still in progress, and future studies are needed to investigate the interplay between the PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 axis and the CRS associated with CAR-T therapy and pyroptosis.

Blinatumomab is a bispecific T-cell engager that binds to both CD3 found on T cells and CD19 found on B cells, thereby bringing T cells to malignant B cells and initiating a cytotoxic T-cell response52. Blinatumomab is approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory ALL, along with tisagenlecleucel and brexucabtagene autoleucel, where both CAR-T cell products target CD1930,31,32. While information component analyses showed that brexucabtagene autoleucel was associated with hypotension and tachycardia, the small sample size of only two ALL reports limited direct comparisons with blinatumomab and tisagenlecleucel.

In pediatric ALL patients, blinatumomab had significantly higher reporting odds ratios for pericardial effusion compared to tisagenlecleucel, but the fatality rates for pericardial effusion were similar between the two groups. Tisagenlecleucel and blinatumomab also had similar fatality rates for tachycardia, sinus tachycardia, and hypotension. Unlike blinatumomab, tisagenlecleucel was associated with cardiac arrest and cardiac failure, with high fatality rates of 100% and 80.0% respectively. Recently, two new CD20/CD3 bispecific T-cell engagers, glofitamab and mosunetuzumab, were approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma respectively53,54. Our study comparing cardiovascular toxicity profiles between CD19-targeted CAR-T therapy and the CD19/CD3 bispecific T-cell engager, blinatumomab, can serve as a foundation for future studies that compare toxicity profiles between CAR-T therapy and bispecific T-cell engagers, where both therapies target the same tumor antigen, and uncover mechanisms that would explain differences in CRS presentation.

In both DLBCL CAR-T patients reporting atrial fibrillation and pediatric ALL CAR-T patients reporting hypotension, most of the patient populations (63.6% for DLBCL and 83.3% of ALL) were treated with the chemotherapy regimen of cyclophosphamide/fludarabine. The cyclophosphamide/fludarabine combination is an effective conditioning regimen that can create a favorable environment for CAR-T cell expansion and function through mechanisms involving lymphodepletion and elimination of immunosuppressive cells55,56. However, cyclophosphamide is cardiotoxic, and so additional studies are needed to explore the roles that the conditioning regimen might contribute to the cardiotoxicities associated with CAR-T therapy57.

An important limitation of this study is that the data reported to VigiBase comes from various sources, so the probability that a suspected adverse reaction is related to a particular drug is not the same in all cases23. VigiBase safety reports are affected by biases and data heterogeneity, and there is no prevalence information concerning the total number of patients treated with the drug23. Considering the diversity in data sources, including both spontaneous reporting and trial data, it is essential to acknowledge that any observed variations in toxicity among different cell therapies could potentially be attributed to this factor. The problem of selection bias involved from the voluntary reporting of adverse events was mitigated by restricting the comparisons to reports from clinical studies. However, this approach led to a decrease in the sample size of reports available for comparisons, and information on time to onset of adverse reactions associated with a drug was limited. Furthermore, comparisons between blinatumomab and tisagenlecleucel were made for patients aged 17 or younger, as VigiBase included demographic reports for the 18-44 age group. Given the retrospective nature of VigiBase, the calculated information components and reporting odds ratios could only be used to show an association, not a causation, between a reaction and a drug category. Nonetheless, the analyses from VigiBase can be used to develop hypotheses for future studies that further investigate the cardiovascular profile of CRS seen in CAR-T therapy.

Conclusion

In this comprehensive pharmacovigilance analysis, tisagenlecleucel was associated with significantly higher fatality rates for hypotension compared to axicabtagene ciloleucel in DLBCL patients but had similar fatality rates compared to blinatumomab in pediatric ALL patients. Tisagenlecleucel was also associated with cardiac failure with high fatality rates in both DLBCL and pediatric ALL patients. Identification of such risk factors may help with efforts to mitigate future risk, and future studies are needed to further examine the mechanisms surrounding the cardiovascular safety profiles of CAR-T therapy and bispecific T-cell engagers. We conclude that these therapies, despite their potential life-saving benefits, are associated with a significant risk of cardiac toxicity. To ensure proper management, it is crucial to engage experienced physicians with expertise in interdisciplinary approaches, including skilled cardiologists or cardio-oncologists, particularly in managing these toxicities.