Abstract
Magnetic frustration is a route for novel ground states, including spin liquids and spin ices. Such frustration can be introduced through either lattice geometry or incompatible exchange interactions. Here, we find that epitaxial strain is an effective tool for tuning antiferromagnetic exchange interactions in a square-lattice system. By studying the magnon excitations in La2NiO4 films using resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, we show that the magnon displays substantial dispersion along the antiferromagnetic zone boundary, at energies that depend on the lattice of the film’s substrate. Using first principles simulations and an effective spin model, we demonstrate that the antiferromagnetic next-nearest neighbour coupling is a consequence of the two-orbital nature of La2NiO4. Altogether, we illustrate that compressive epitaxial strain enhances this coupling and, as a result, increases the level of incompatibility between exchange interactions within a model square-lattice system.
Introduction
The square-lattice Heisenberg model is the subject of intense numerical and experimental investigations. In spin-1/2 systems—such as cuprates1 and copper deuteroformate tetradeurate (CFTD)2—higher-order exchange interactions are inferred from observations of magnon dispersions along the magnetic zone boundary3,4. While a detailed magnon characterization is useful to understand quantum-fluctuation effects5, exchange incompatibility is typically avoided in these systems. Indeed, the antiferromagnetic (AF) nearest-neighbor (NN) exchange interaction (J1 > 0) and the ferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor (NNN) interaction (J2 < 0) in these systems stabilize the classical AF Néel order. Instead, magnetic exchange incompatibility requires both J1 > 0 and J2 > 0. This regime of the J1–J2 model is the subject of extensive computational investigations for both spin S = 1/26,7,8,9,10 and S = 111,12 systems. In a narrow range near \({J}_{2}/{J}_{1}\) ~ 1/2, magnetic frustration is found to dominate, and exotic quantum phases such as the spin-liquid state13 are predicted. Several calculations show that the Néel order is destroyed there and the ground state has a valence-bond character13,14,15, although its exact nature is still the subject of debate8,16. However, only very few square-lattice systems exhibit substantial magnetic frustration17,18, and even fewer display tunable magnetic interactions19. As a result, approaching the interesting parameter regime in real materials remains an ongoing issue.
In this article, we provide a high-resolution resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) study of magnetic excitations in epitaxial thin films of the canonical S = 1 system La2NiO4, grown on different substrates. We discover a marked, upward dispersion along the AF zone boundary \(({\!\,}^{1}{/}_{2},0)\to ({\!\,}^{1}{/}_{4}{,}{\!\,}^{1}{/}_{4})\), which reveals the presence of AF NNN interactions that partly frustrate the NN ones. By employing ab initio calculations, we demonstrate that these results can only be explained by including the multi-orbital nature of 3d8-Ni systems. Furthermore, we observe a correlation between the relative strength of the magnetic interactions and the strain applied to the films. Our results demonstrate that 214-type nickelates are a promising class of materials for the study of the AF square-lattice Heisenberg model. Moreover, the use of thin films provides a clear route to tune the magnetic frustration and explore so far inaccessible regions of the magnetic-phase diagram.
Results
Our thin films of La2NiO4 (LNO) on SrTiO3 (STO), LaAlO3 (LAO), (LaAlO3)0.3(Sr2TaAlO6)0.7 (LSAT), and NdGaO3 (NGO) substrates are characterized by atomic force microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and X-ray absorption spectroscopy (see Fig. 1). The atomic force microscopy images display a step-like morphology indicating an excellent layer-by-layer growth. Diffraction patterns probing the (0, 0, ℓ) reciprocal direction demonstrate good single crystallinity and allow us to extract the c-axis lattice parameters of the films. The epitaxial strain applied by the substrates is supported by the film c-axis and in-plane lattice-parameter dependence (Fig. 1b). X-ray absorption spectra recorded on the LNO/STO and LNO/NGO, shown in Fig. 1c, are consistent with observations on related nickelates20,21,22,23. The Ni L-edge features on the tail of the La M-edge.
a X-ray diffraction (at 300 K) probing the (0, 0, ℓ) direction of 12-nm thin films of La2NiO4 on substrates as indicated. The inset represents the atomic force microscopy image showing the step-like morphology of the films (here for the NGO substrate). The color scale corresponds to film thickness. b c-axis lattice parameter versus in-plane epitaxial strain (at 300 K) calculated for La2NiO4 (purple dots) and La2CuO432 (gray dots) films grown on different substrates as a relative change of in-plane parameters in reference to bulk (diamonds) with a = 3.868 Å and c = 12.679 Å for an isomorphic La2NiO4 structure59 and a = 3.803 Å and c = 13.156 Å for La2CuO460. The errorbar correspond to the spread of in-plane parameters measured by X-ray diffraction. c X-ray absorption spectra around the Ni L-edge. The dominant peak corresponds to the La M-edge. b, c Dashed lines are guides to the eye.
The RIXS spectra of La2NiO4 films were measured at the Ni L3 edge (853 eV). These spectra exhibit key RIXS excitations, including high-energy dd-excitations (at ~0.5–3 eV), an elastic scattering contribution at 0 eV, as well as phonon and magnon excitations in between. The dd-excitations have a multi-peak structure, qualitatively similar to other 3d8 systems, such as NiO20,21,22,24. As shown in Fig. 2a, the relative intensities of the peaks are different in the three samples, due to the different crystal-fields acting on the Ni atoms (see Fig. S1, Supplementary Note 1). However, all our La2NiO4 films display the most intense dd-excitation around 1.1 eV and a second less intense excitation just below 1.6 eV. This is consistent with what is reported in bulk La2NiO425 (see Fig. S2, Supplementary Note 1). The subtraction of the elastic peak clearly highlights the presence of multiple low-energy features (see Fig. 2b, c).
a Raw spectra recorded in La2NiO4 films with substrates as indicated. a (inset) Schematics of the photon-in-photon-out resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS) geometry with horizontally polarized light (π) and azimuthal sample rotation angle ϕ. b, c Low-energy part of the RIXS spectra with momentum transfer and film substrates indicated. The solid red line indicates a three-component fit with phonon, magnon (shaded), and multi-magnon (continuum) contributions. The elastic scattering channel is subtracted in (b, c).
To extract the dispersion of magnetic excitations, we assumed a two-mode model with the addition of a high-energy continuum “background" (Fig. 2b, c). Each of these components is represented by a Gaussian profile. This provides an effective fitting model of excitations for all measured film systems and momenta. Our interpretation of the proposed model is based on the hypothesis that the lower-energy mode (~40 meV) stems from an optical phonon, while the higher-energy mode (strongly dispersing between 60 and 120 meV) is a magnon. This assignment is supported by previous neutron scattering measurements that identified the phonon part via an out-of-plane oxygen buckling mode26,27. The interpretation of the higher-energy mode as a magnon is consistent with earlier RIXS25 and neutron studies28 of bulk La2NiO4. The resulting magnon dispersions are shown in Fig. 3.
a–c Magnon excitation energies (open dots) along high-symmetry directions for La2NiO4 on substrates as indicated. Solid lines represent the same spin-wave model evaluated for different exchange parameters within the confidence intervals of the fitted parameters. The curves corresponding to the best-fit values (marked in bold in the legend) are reported as thicker lines. The middle segment, X → Σ, is part of the antiferromagnetic zone boundary. The error bars are determined from the fitting uncertainty.
Due to lower-energy resolution, the previous RIXS study25 did not resolve any phonon excitations. The unresolved phonon excitation implied that the phonon and magnon spectral weights were merged. This, in turn influences the extraction of the magnon dispersion. Having access, in this work, to a higher-energy resolution, we can distinguish between the nearly momentum-independent phonon mode and the dispersive magnon branch along the three measured high-symmetry directions. In all the film systems explored, the magnon energy reaches its maximum at the AF zone boundary, at the Σ point \(({\!\,}^{1}{/}_{4},{\!\,}^{1}{/}_{4})\), referred to as EΣ, while it displays a local minimum at the X point \(({\!\,}^{1}{/}_{2},0)\), referred to as EX. This evidently anisotropic shape of magnon dispersion was not reported in earlier studies25,28, except for a recent inelastic neutron scattering experiment29. Furthermore, the energy EΣ is different for all three substrates. In particular, it increases as a function of compressive strain, with an enhancement of 18 ± 4 meV (~20%) from LNO/STO to LNO/LAO.
Discussion
By resolving both the phonon and magnon modes, we find that all samples exhibit a substantial dispersion of magnetic excitations along the AF zone boundary. This directly implies the presence of higher-order effective magnetic exchange interactions. In La2CuO4 and related Mott insulating cuprates, the zone-boundary dispersion has been interpreted in terms of a positive ring-exchange interaction that emerges naturally from a single-orbital Hubbard model30,31,32. There is, however, an important difference between the zone-boundary dispersion of La2CuO4 and La2NiO4: in contrast to La2CuO4, the zone- boundary dispersion of La2NiO4 has its maximum at the AF zone boundary Σ point rather than at the X point. As such, the magnon dispersion of La2NiO4 is (as could be expected) inconsistent with a single-band Hubbard model in the strong coupling limit (where the projection onto a Heisenberg spin Hamiltonian is viable).
As a first step, we parameterize the magnon dispersion of La2NiO4 using a phenomenological spin-wave model that includes effective NN and NNN exchange interactions, respectively, J1 and J2 (Fig. 3), plus an easy-plane anisotropy K, already reported by previous measurements28,29. As a starting point, we employ the AF structure of the bulk La2NiO4 determined by neutron diffraction33,34,35, with the spin direction parallel to the crystallographic a-axis. The model is solved in a linear spin-wave (large-S) limit, and the calculated dispersion is fitted to the measured one (see “Methods”). Fitting the experimental (exp) data yields an effective NN exchange interaction \({J}_{1}^{\exp } \sim 30\) meV consistent with previous neutron and RIXS results25,36. Due to the demonstrated finite zone-boundary dispersion, our spin-wave model fitting also yields a moderate NNN exchange interaction \({J}_{2}^{\exp }\). Importantly, \({J}_{2}^{\exp }\) is positive and enhanced by compressive strain3,4. In what follows, we wish to extract the frustration parameter \({{{{{{{\mathcal{G}}}}}}}}={J}_{2}^{\exp }/{J}_{1}^{\exp }\) with the highest precision. Within our spin-wave model, EX = 4SZc(J1 − 2J2) and EΣ = 4SZc(J1 − J2), where Zc is the quantum renormalization factor for spin-wave energies, which is taken as Zc = 1.0937. This gives \({{{{{{{{\mathcal{G}}}}}}}}}^{-1}=1{+}^{{E}_{\Sigma }}{/}_{({E}_{\Sigma }-{E}_{X})}\). The frustration parameter \({{{{{{{\mathcal{G}}}}}}}}\) is thus derived directly from the experimental data, with high precision (EΣ and EX are extracted with error lower than 5 meV) and plotted as a function of the c lattice parameter in Fig. 4 (see also Table S1, Supplementary Note 2). Due to the Poisson effect, the c lattice parameter undergoes a proportional shrinkage when the in-plane parameters expand. Our X-ray diffraction measurements confirm this relationship (Fig. 1b), indicating that the c-axis lattice parameter can serve as an indirect probe of the in-plane strain. Therefore, our findings demonstrate a nearly linear correlation between magnetic frustrations and epitaxial strain.
The frustration parameter \({{{{{{{\mathcal{G}}}}}}}}={J}_{2}^{\exp }/{J}_{1}^{\exp }\) derived from the experimental data (squares; left axis) is presented as a function of the c-axis lattice parameter. The error bars for the experimental data are calculated as a propagation of standard deviations extracted from the fits. The results for films are combined with data for bulk La2NiO4 from ref. 29. The experimental frustration \({{{{{{{\mathcal{G}}}}}}}}\) is compared to the ratio \({J}_{2}^{{{{{{{{\rm{cal}}}}}}}}}/{J}_{1}^{{{{{{{{\rm{cal,corr}}}}}}}}}\) derived from the DFT and cRPA calculations (diamonds; right axis). Note that the calculated \({J}_{2}^{{{{{{{{\rm{cal}}}}}}}}}\) only contains a contribution to the full next-nearest-neighbor coupling J2. Therefore, the comparison merely highlights a similar trend of the frustration under in-plane compression. The dashed line is a guide-to-the-eye.
We stress that, for interaction strengths and hop**s that are realistic for cuprates and nickelates, J2 > 0 is hard to reconcile with a single-band Hubbard model. A positive J2 implies an effective AF NNN exchange interaction, at odds with what is observed in cuprates4,30 and d9 infinite-layer nickelates38,39. Both systems have indeed been successfully described using a single d-orbital framework3,4,40,41. Therefore, we argue that the magnon zone-boundary dispersion in LNO signals physics beyond the single-orbital Hubbard model. We propose that the multi-orbital (\({d}_{{x}^{2}-{y}^{2}}\), \({d}_{{z}^{2}}\)) nature of nickelates42,43,44 must be explicitly considered. Already in La2CuO4, due to the short apical oxygen distance, a small but significant orbital hybridization between \({d}_{{z}^{2}}\) and \({d}_{{x}^{2}-{y}^{2}}\) has been reported45. In La2NiO4 the apical oxygen distance is even shorter, as exemplified by the reduced c lattice parameter (see Fig. 1b), and hence an even more pronounced hybridization is expected.
To rationalize the trend in the exchange interactions obtained from our spin-wave fits, we derive a two-orbital low-energy model for La2NiO4 on different substrates from first principles (see the Method section). For the Ni \({d}_{{z}^{2}}\) and \({d}_{{x}^{2}-{y}^{2}}\) orbitals (labeled α and β), we compute the (next) nearest-neighbor hop** parameters \({t}^{({\prime} )}\), the crystal-field splitting Δeg, local Coulomb (Hubbard) interaction U and Hund’s exchange JH using experimental lattice constants from Table 1. Noteworthy46, the hop** parameters and Coulomb interactions, listed in Table 1, hardly change under varying in-plane compression. This is different from calculations for the cuprate family, see ref. 32, and agrees with our experiments, which show substantially smaller changes in the magnon spectrum than for the cuprates. What is most affected by strain in Table 1 is the crystal-field splitting Δeg by which the Ni \({d}_{{x}^{2}-{y}^{2}}\) orbital is higher in energy than the \({d}_{{z}^{2}}\) orbital. When going from the STO to the LAO substrate, in-plane strain pushes the \({d}_{{x}^{2}-{y}^{2}}\) orbital further up in energy, as it is pointing towards the now closer in-plane oxygen sites that are charged negatively.
This crystal-field splitting Δeg enters the calculated (cal) two-orbital superexchange as follows:
where we extend the formula of ref. 47 to finite Δeg (see Supplementary Note 3). As Δeg appears once with a plus and once with a minus sign in the denominator, the crystal-field splitting enters \({J}_{1}^{{{{{{{{\rm{cal}}}}}}}}}\) in a higher-than-linear order.
The magnetic exchange couplings \({J}_{1}^{{{{{{{{\rm{cal}}}}}}}}}\) determined by Eq. (1) are displayed in Table 1. They show the same qualitative tendency as in our experiment, i.e., an increase of both \({J}_{1}^{\exp }\) (see Fig. 3) and \({J}_{1}^{{{{{{{{\rm{cal}}}}}}}}}\) with compressive strain. Quantitatively, the ab initio calculated \({J}_{1}^{{{{{{{{\rm{cal}}}}}}}}}\) is however too large. This has two major origins: (i) The cRPA interactions are, here, taken at zero frequency U = U(ω = 0). Additional renormalizations from the frequency dependence U(ω)48 are often mimicked through an empirical enhancement of U. Increasing U, we could easily obtain quantitative agreement with the experimental J1, but at the cost of a free fit parameter and most likely only an accidental agreement. (ii) Eq. (1) only includes terms to second-order perturbation theory in t. For the one-band Hubbard model, higher-order processes have been calculated and yield a correction from J1 = 4t2/U to a reduced J1 = 4(t2/U − 16t4/U3)40,49. Higher-order terms are expected to reduce J1 also in the two-orbital setting. Here, we estimate these corrections by the one-orbital prescription t2/U ⟶ t2/U − 16t4/U3. Then, e.g., for the NGO substrate, the leading contribution to \({J}_{1}^{{{{{{{{\rm{cal}}}}}}}}}\), i.e., \({t}_{\beta \beta }^{2}/({U}_{{{{{{{{\rm{eff}}}}}}}}})\) with Ueff = U + JH, reduces from 47 to 37 meV. Applying this substitution to Eq. (1) yields the corrected exchange couplings \({J}_{1}^{{{{{{{{\rm{cal,corr}}}}}}}}}\) listed in Table 1, which are in better agreement with the measured values (see Fig. 3).
Table 1 also lists the next-nearest-neighbor exchange \({J}_{2}^{{{{{{{{\rm{cal}}}}}}}}}\) that can be obtained with the same second-order formula Eq. (1), except now using the hop**s \({t}^{{\prime} }\) instead of t (see Supplementary Note 3 for details). Crucially, our calculations predict a positive J2, in agreement with the experiment. Moreover, \({J}_{2}^{{{{{{{{\rm{cal}}}}}}}}}\) shows the same qualitative tendency as in the experiment as a function of epitaxial strain. On a quantitative level, the calculated values are, however, a factor ~3–5 lower than the experimental results. The reason is that contributions to J2 from higher-order exchange processes, of order t4/U3 and \({t}^{{\prime} }{t}^{2}/{U}^{2}\), become (relatively) more important for \({J}_{2}^{{{{{{{{\rm{cal}}}}}}}}}\), as the second-order terms are now based on the much smaller \({t}^{{\prime} }\).
The key difference between the multi-orbital case of LNO and the one-orbital cuprates is the larger U (UcRPA ≈ 3.1 eV for two-orbitals while UcRPA ≈ 1.9 eV for a one Ni \({d}_{{x}^{2}-{y}^{2}}\) orbital setup) and the additional Hund’s JH ≈ 0.5 eV in the denominator of Eq. (1). As a consequence, the balance for the NNN exchange coupling shifts from a ferromagnetic ring exchange \({J}_{2} \sim -\!\!{t}^{4}/{U}_{eff}^{3} \, < \, 0\), that overpowers the AF second-order exchange \({J}_{2} \sim {{t}^{{\prime} }}^{2}/{U}_{eff} \, > \, 0\) in the one-orbital cuprates, toward dominance of the latter in the multi-orbital LNO. This change in hierarchy explains the main qualitative differences in magnon dispersion between LNO and cuprates: the opposite sign of the effective J2. For LNO, with a positive J2, the zone-boundary dispersion shows a notable minimum at \(({\!\,}^{1}{/}_{2},0)\), see Fig. 3, whereas a maximum occurs for the negative J2 in cuprates.
Conclusions
The ab initio calculations indicate that the magnetic frustration in La2NiO4 is caused by the multi-orbital nature of 3d8 nickelates. More importantly, our results demonstrate that the degree of frustration is amplified by compressive strain (see Fig. 4), with a pivotal role played by the crystal-field splitting. Indeed, with the substrates used, the magnetic frustration increases four-fold with respect to the bulk, bridging half the way toward the exotic realm anticipated for J2/J1 ~ 1/2. Thus, our study suggests an effective tool for tuning antiferromagnetic interactions within square-lattice systems. We speculate that the approach is applicable beyond La2NiO4 and may offer an experimental route to reach so far unexplored regions of the magnetic-phase diagram, potentially allowing to investigate exotic states induced by magnetic frustration.
Methods
Film growth and characterization
Thin films of La2NiO4 were grown by RHEED-equipped Radio-frequency off-axis magnetron sputtering50 on (001) STO, (001) LAO, (001) LSAT and (110) NGO substrates. These films were grown in an argon atmosphere at 700 °C. Their qualities were confirmed by atomic force microscopy and x-ray diffraction. Their insulating character was confirmed by resistivity measurements of the LNO/STO film (see Fig. S3, Supplementary Note 4).
RIXS experiments
Ni L-edge RIXS experiments for STO, LAO and NGO substrates were carried out at the I21 beamline51 at the DIAMOND Light Source. All spectra were collected in the grazing exit geometry using linear horizontal polarized incident light with the scattering angle fixed to 2θ = 154°. The energy resolution was estimated from the elastic scattering on amorphous carbon tape and was between 37 and 41 meV (full-width-at-half-maximum, FWHM). All films were measured at base temperature T = 16 K. We define the reciprocal space (qx, qy, qz) in reciprocal lattice units (h, k, ℓ) = (qxa/2π, qyb/2π, qzc/2π) where a, b, and c are the pseudo-tetragonal lattice parameters. RIXS spectra were acquired along three in-plane paths: (0, 0) → (0, 1/2), \((0,0)\to ({\!\,}^{1}{/}_{4},{\!\,}^{1}{/}_{4})\) and \((0,{\!\,}^{1}{/}_{2})\to ({\!\,}^{1}{/}_{4},{\!\,}^{1}{/}_{4})\). Extraction of low-energy excitations around (0, 0) is limited by energy resolution. Due to kinematic constraints Γ points at higher zones cannot be reached, as well. RIXS intensities are normalized to the weight of the dd-excitations52. The data for the LSAT substrate were collected at the ID32 beamline at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) (see description in Supplementary Note 5, Fig. S4).
Phenomenological spin-wave model
The effective superexchange parameters were extracted from the measured dispersion using a linear spin-wave model. We included effective couplings between the first and second nearest neighbors, plus an easy-plane anisotropy K, with the resulting Hamiltonian:
where 〈i, j〉 and 〈〈i, j〉〉 denote pairs of first and second nearest neighbors Ni atoms, respectively. The fitting procedure has been carried out using the SpinW package53. As an input we have used the AF structure of the bulk La2NiO4 determined by neutron diffraction33,34,35, with the spin direction parallel to the crystallographic a-axis. The dispersion in the approximation of the linear spin-wave theory is represented by4,29:
where \({\nu }_{x}=\cos (2\pi x)\). The quantum renormalization factor for spin-wave velocity is fixed to Zc = 1.09, as usual for S = 1 systems37. The value of the easy-plane anisotropy K mostly controls the size of the magnon gap at the Γ point. Since this value is very hard to obtain from RIXS spectra, we have fixed K = 0.5 meV in agreement with previous inelastic neutron scattering data28. We have also neglected other interactions <10−1 meV, such as easy-axis anisotropy, inter-layer coupling, and Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interactions29,34.
Ab initio calculations
Electronic structure calculations were performed with density functional theory in the local density approximation using a full-potential linearized muffin-tin orbital (FPLMTO) code54, after the structures were optimized with WIEN2k55 using the PBE functional. We mimicked the influence of the substrates by simulating bulk La2NiO4 using the experimental lattice constants of the thin films. The reference calculation for the bulk uses lattice constants from ref. 29. All calculations assume the space group I4/mmm and are paramagnetic. The resulting band structures are displayed in Fig. S5, Supplementary Note 6. The FPLMTO calculations were converged using 123 reducible k-points and include local orbitals for the Ni-3p and La-5p states. The internal atomic positions were relaxed with WIEN2k using 63 reducible k-points, a cutoff parameter RMTKMAX = 7 and partial waves inside the atomic spheres up to l = 5, until the forces were below 1 mRy per Bohr radius (for details of the relaxed structures, see Supplementary Note 7, Table S2). The tight-binding hop** and crystal-field parameters have been extracted from a projection onto maximally localized Wannier orbitals56,57 of Ni \(3{d}_{{x}^{2}-{y}^{2}}\) and \(3{d}_{{z}^{2}}\) character. Matrix elements of the static (ω = 0) and local screened Coulomb interaction (Hubbard U and Hund’s JH) have been estimated from calculations in the constrained random phase approximation (cRPA)48 for entangled band structures58 in the Wannier basis57 using 6 × 6 × 6 reducible momentum-points in the Brillouin zone. For the two-particle product basis, states are kept up to an angular cutoff of l = 4 and down to an overlap eigenvalue of 10−4.
Data availability
Data supporting the findings of this study are available from corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Code availability
Code supporting the data processing of this study is available from corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
Lee, P. A., Nagaosa, N. & Wen, X.-G. Do** a Mott insulator: physics of high-temperature superconductivity. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 17–85 (2006).
Christensen, N. B. et al. Quantum dynamics and entanglement of spins on a square lattice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15264–15269 (2007).
Headings, N. S., Hayden, S. M., Coldea, R. & Perring, T. G. Anomalous high-energy spin excitations in the high-Tc superconductor-parent antiferromagnet La2CuO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 247001 (2010).
Coldea, R. et al. Spin waves and electronic interactions in La2CuO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5377–5380 (2001).
Wang, Q. et al. Magnon interactions in a moderately correlated Mott insulator. Nat. Commun. 15, 5348 (2024).
Choo, K., Neupert, T. & Carleo, G. Two-dimensional frustrated J1 − J2 model studied with neural network quantum states. Phys. Rev. B 100, 125124 (2019).
Capriotti, L. & Sorella, S. Spontaneous plaquette dimerization in the J1 − J2 Heisenberg model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3173–3176 (2000).
Capriotti, L., Becca, F., Parola, A. & Sorella, S. Resonating valence bond wave functions for strongly frustrated spin systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 097201 (2001).
Zhang, G.-M., Hu, H. & Yu, L. Valence-bond spin-liquid state in two-dimensional frustrated spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 067201 (2003).
Gong, S.-S., Zhu, W., Sheng, D. N., Motrunich, O. I. & Fisher, M. P. A. Plaquette ordered phase and quantum phase diagram in the spin-\(\frac{1}{2}\)J1 − J2 square Heisenberg model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 027201 (2014).
Sushkov, O. P., Oitmaa, J. & Weihong, Z. Quantum phase transitions in the two-dimensional J1 − J2 model. Phys. Rev. B 63, 104420 (2001).
Jiang, H. C. et al. Phase diagram of the frustrated spatially-anisotropic S = 1 antiferromagnet on a square lattice. Phys. Rev. B 79, 174409 (2009).
Anderson, P. W. The resonating valence bond state in La2CuO4 and superconductivity. Science 235, 1196–1198 (1987).
Dagotto, E. & Moreo, A. Phase diagram of the frustrated spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet in 2 dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2148–2151 (1989).
Schulz, H. J., Ziman, T. A. & Poilblanc, D. Magnetic order and disorder in the frustrated quantum Heisenberg antiferromagnet in two dimensions. J. de Physique I 6, 675–703 (1996).
Beach, K. S. D. Master equation approach to computing RVB bond amplitudes. Phys. Rev. B 79, 224431 (2009).
Wang, Q. et al. Magnetic ground state of FeSe. Nat. Commun. 7, 12182 (2016).
Gu, Y. et al. Frustrated magnetic interactions in FeSe. Phys. Rev. B 106, L060504 (2022).
Mustonen, O. et al. Spin-liquid-like state in a spin-1/2 square-lattice antiferromagnet perovskite induced by d10 − d0 cation mixing. Nat. Commun. 9, 1085 (2018).
Nag, A. et al. Many-body physics of single and double spin-flip excitations in NiO. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 067202 (2020).
Ghiringhelli, G. et al. NiO as a test case for high resolution resonant inelastic soft x-ray scattering. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, 5397–5412 (2005).
Lin, J. Q. et al. Strong superexchange in a d9−δ nickelate revealed by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 087001 (2021).
Kuiper, P. et al. Polarization-dependent nickel 2p x-ray-absorption spectra of La2NiO4+δ. Phys. Rev. B 57, 1552–1557 (1998).
Ghiringhelli, G. et al. Observation of two nondispersive magnetic excitations in NiO by resonant inelastic soft-X-ray scattering. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 027401 (2009).
Fabbris, G. et al. Do** dependence of collective spin and orbital excitations in the spin-1 quantum antiferromagnet La2−xSrxNiO4 observed by X rays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 156402 (2017).
Pintschovius, L. et al. Lattice dynamics of La2NiO4. Phys. Rev. B 40, 2229–2238 (1989).
Pintschovius, L. et al. Phonon anomalies in La2NiO4. Europhys. Lett. 5, 247 (1988).
Nakajima, K., Yamada, K., Hosoya, S., Omata, T. & Endoh, Y. Spin-wave excitations in two dimensional antiferromagnet of stoichiometric La2NiO4. J. Phys. Soc. Japn. 62, 4438–4448 (1993).
Petsch, A. N. et al. High-energy spin waves in the spin-1 square-lattice antiferromagnet La2NiO4. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 033113 (2023).
Peng, Y. Y. et al. Influence of apical oxygen on the extent of in-plane exchange interaction in cuprate superconductors. Nature Phys. 13, 1201–1206 (2017).
Ivashko, O. et al. Damped spin excitations in a doped cuprate superconductor with orbital hybridization. Phys. Rev. B 95, 214508 (2017).
Ivashko, O. et al. Strain-engineering Mott-insulating La2CuO4. Nat. Commun. 10, 786 (2019).
Aeppli, G. & Buttrey, D. J. Magnetic correlations in La2NiO4+δ. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 203–206 (1988).
Yamada, K. et al. Magnetic structure and weak ferromagnetism of La2NiO4+δ. Physica C: Superconductivity 191, 15–22 (1992).
Rodriguez-Carvajal, J., Fernandez-Diaz, M. T. & Martinez, J. L. Neutron diffraction study on structural and magnetic properties of La2NiO4. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 3, 3215 (1991).
Yamada, K. et al. Complete two-dimensional antiferromagnetic spin-wave dispersion relation of La2NiO4 determined by chopper spectrometer installed at the pulsed neutron source. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 60, 1197–1200 (1991).
Igarashi, J. 1/S expansion for thermodynamic quantities in a two-dimensional Heisenberg antiferromagnet at zero temperature. Phys. Rev. B 46, 10763–10771 (1992).
Lu, H. et al. Magnetic excitations in infinite-layer nickelates. Science 373, 213–216 (2021).
Gao, Q. et al. Magnetic excitations in strained infinite-layer nickelate PrNiO2 films. Nat. Commun. 15, 5576 (2024).
Delannoy, J.-Y. P., Gingras, M. J. P., Holdsworth, P. C. W. & Tremblay, A.-M. S. Low-energy theory of the \(t-{t}^{{\prime} }-{t}^{\prime\prime }-U\) Hubbard model at half-filling: Interaction strengths in cuprate superconductors and an effective spin-only description of La2CuO4. Phys. Rev. B 79, 235130 (2009).
Dalla Piazza, B. et al. Unified one-band Hubbard model for magnetic and electronic spectra of the parent compounds of cuprate superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 85, 100508 (2012).
Horio, M. et al. Two-dimensional type-II Dirac fermions in layered oxides. Nat. Commun. 9, 3252 (2018).
Uchida, M. et al. Orbital characters of three-dimensional Fermi surfaces in Eu2−xSrxNiO4 as probed by soft-X-ray angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 84, 241109 (2011).
Uchida, M. et al. Pseudogap of metallic layered nickelate R2−xSrxNiO4 (R = Nd, Eu) crystals measured using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 027001 (2011).
Matt, C. E. et al. Direct observation of orbital hybridisation in a cuprate superconductor. Nat. Commun. 9, 972 (2018).
Tomczak, J. M., Miyake, T., Sakuma, R. & Aryasetiawan, F. Effective Coulomb interactions in solids under pressure. Phys. Rev. B 79, 235133 (2009).
Lemanski, R. & Matysiak, J. Two-orbital Hubbard model vs spin S = 1 Heisenberg model: Studies on clusters. Condens. Matter Phys. 21, 33301 (2018).
Aryasetiawan, F. et al. Frequency-dependent local interactions and low-energy effective models from electronic structure calculations. Phys. Rev. B 70, 195104 (2004).
MacDonald, A. H., Girvin, S. M. & Yoshioka, D. Reply to “Comment on ‘t/U expansion for the Hubbard model”’. Phys. Rev. B 41, 2565–2568 (1990).
Podkaminer, J. P., Patzner, J. J., Davidson, B. A. & Eom, C. B. Real-time and in situ monitoring of sputter deposition with RHEED for atomic layer controlled growth. APL Mater. 4, 086111 (2016).
Zhou, K.-J. et al. I21: an advanced high-resolution resonant inelastic X-ray scattering beamline at Diamond Light Source. J. Synchrotron Rad. 29, 563–580 (2022).
Wang, Q. et al. High-temperature charge-stripe correlations in La1.675Eu0.2Sr0.125CuO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 187002 (2020).
Toth, S. & Lake, B. Linear spin wave theory for single-Q incommensurate magnetic structures. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 27, 166002 (2015).
Methfessel, M., van Schilfgaarde, M. & Casali, R. A full-potential lmto method based on smooth Hankel functions. In Electronic Structure and Physical Properties of Solids: The Uses of the LMTO Method, Lecture Notes in Physics. (ed. Dreysse, H.) 535 (Springer, 2000).
Blaha, P. et al. WIEN2k: An APW+lo program for calculating the properties of solids. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 074101 (2020).
Marzari, N., Mostofi, A. A., Yates, J. R., Souza, I. & Vanderbilt, D. Maximally localized Wannier functions: theory and applications. Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1419–1475 (2012).
Miyake, T. & Aryasetiawan, F. Screened Coulomb interaction in the maximally localized Wannier basis. Phys. Rev. B 77, 085122 (2008).
Miyake, T., Aryasetiawan, F. & Imada, M. Ab initio procedure for constructing effective models of correlated materials with entangled band structure. Phys. Rev. B 80, 155134 (2009).
Goodenough, J. & Ramasesha, S. Further evidence for the coexistence of localized and itinerant 3d electrons in La2NiO4. Mater. Res. Bull. 17, 383–390 (1982).
Radaelli, P. G. et al. Structural and superconducting properties of La2−xSrxCuO4 as a function of Sr content. Phys. Rev. B 49, 4163–4175 (1994).
Acknowledgements
I.B. and L.M. acknowledge support from the Swiss Government Excellence Scholarship under project numbers ESKAS-Nr: 2022.0001 and ESKAS-Nr: 2023.0052. G.D.L., S.J., M.G., I.B., and J.C. thank the Swiss National Science Foundation under Projects No. 200021_188564 and PP00P2_170564. Q.W. is supported by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (ECS No. 24306223), and the CUHK Direct Grant (No. 4053613). G.D.L. acknowledges support from the UZH GRC Travel Grant. We acknowledge Diamond Light Source for providing beam time on beamline I21 under Proposal MM30189 and the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) for providing beam time on beamline ID32 under Proposal HC 5241. C.B.E. acknowledges support for this research through a Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellowship (ONR N00014-20-1-2844), the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s EPiQS Initiative, Grant GBMF9065 and NSF through the University of Wisconsin Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (DMR-2309000). The synthesis of thin films at the University of Wisconsin-Madison was supported by the US Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES), under award number DE-FG02-06ER46327.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
I.B. and L.M. have contributed equally to this work. G.D.L., C.B.E., A.D., L.G., A.E., S.J., and M.G. grew and characterized the La2NiO4 films. I.B., J.Choi, M.G.-F., S.A., K.-J.Z., K.K., N.B.B., and Q.W. carried out the RIXS experiments. I.B., L.M., and Q.W. analyzed the RIXS data. P.W., J.M.T, and K.H. conceived, executed, and analyzed the ab initio calculations. I.B., Q.W., and J.C. conceived the project. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Physics thanks Shrawan Mishra, Evgeny Kravtsov and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Biało, I., Martinelli, L., De Luca, G. et al. Strain-tuned incompatible magnetic exchange-interaction in La2NiO4. Commun Phys 7, 230 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01701-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01701-x
- Springer Nature Limited